Results 1 to 30 of 70
-
2009-12-20, 07:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Hey everyone. I seem to remember someone mention that spells that don't allow spell resistance, such as the orb of spells being able to ignore antimagic fields. Is this true, and if so, can I get some info on where to find the ruling about it?
Thanks in advance.You are my God.
-
2009-12-20, 07:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
The argument has nothing to do with spell resistance. It's about orbs being Conjuration (Creation) spells - the actual orb is non-magical, so shouldn't be supressed.
An AMF has no effect on a wall of iron, after all.
-
2009-12-20, 07:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
"The effects of instantaneous conjurations are not affected by an antimagic field because the conjuration itself is no longer in effect, only its result."
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/spells/antimagicField.htm
The orb spells are instantaneous conjurations.
-
2009-12-20, 07:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
-
2009-12-20, 07:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
-
2009-12-20, 07:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
-
2009-12-20, 07:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
-
2009-12-20, 07:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
-
2009-12-20, 07:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Thanks guys. I was checking under Antimagic in the SRD under special abilities and couldn't find anything. You guys answered so fast I got my answer before even turning to the antimagic field spell. Thanks a ton.
You are my God.
-
2009-12-20, 07:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Gender
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
-
2009-12-20, 07:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Shenanigans. Being on the Plane of Fire only does 3d10 points of fire damage per round. The only mundane heat-related effect that does more damage than an Orb of Fire I can find is total immersion in lava, for 20d6 per round. Which is total immersion, not a little ball of fire.
-
2009-12-20, 07:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Last edited by Myrmex; 2009-12-20 at 07:34 PM.
-
2009-12-20, 07:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Well, being on fire does 1d6 per round, but even when you're on fire it only covers so much of your body, and you can often still breathe. If there was some way to replicate the "Everything around you is made out of fire, including the air" aspects of the Plane of Fire on the Material, I believe it would have exactly the same effects as being on the Plane of Fire. In fact, one could argue that the Planar Breach line of spells does just this, though arguably it's overlaying one plane on top of another rather than transporting a surrounding layer of fire to the Prime Material.
EDIT:
But spell school doesn't matter nearly as much to them, so they're immune to the "Conjuration win! Evocation lose!" rule.
-
2009-12-20, 07:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
-
2009-12-20, 07:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
Compressed matter from the Elemental Plane of Sound? Even if it was, that doesn't explain how you can hold onto and throw a ball of sound without it dispersing without the use of magic. Then again, D&D kills enough catgirls, so perhaps I should just leave it alone.
-
2009-12-20, 07:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
That makes my head hurt.
-
2009-12-20, 07:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
-
2009-12-20, 07:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
That makes... no sense.
[edit]
@ YukiLast edited by Myrmex; 2009-12-20 at 07:40 PM.
-
2009-12-20, 07:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Department of Smiting
- Gender
-
2009-12-20, 07:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
-
2009-12-20, 07:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
-
2009-12-20, 07:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Antimatic Field vs No Spell Resistance?
It actualy makes some sense, since waves travel a lot easier trough a solid hard enviroment than trough an empty enviroment. Earthquakes anyone?