Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
-
2010-01-17, 11:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Gender
(4e) No point in basic attacks?
So it looks like your basic attack has been replaced by at will powers. Other than opportunity attacks, is there ever a reason to use your basic melee or ranged?
-
2010-01-17, 11:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Though I could be missing some purposes for them, there are three main uses for basic attacks as I see it:
1. Opportunity Attacks
2. Attacks on a Charge
3. For attacks granted by a warlord (as a Warlord as a metric ton of powers that grant basic attacks)Thanks to Elrond for the Vash avatar.
-
2010-01-17, 11:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Arizona, USA
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Basic attacks trigger on:
1. Opportunity attacks
2. Attacks granted by certain powers (Commander's Strike, Strikeback gauntlets, and others)
3. For fighters, enemies that provoke their Combat Challenge
4. Charging attacks
5.
For most characters, when it's their turn, basic attacks aren't on the menu; they'll be sticking with at-will powers at minimum. When it's not your turn, you'll most likely be interrupting enemies with basic attacks, if the opportunity arises. You'll see basic attacks used in situations like:
-Fighters hucking javelins at a flying creature,
-Ranged characters locked into melee and needing to do _some_thing, but not wanting to provoke opportunity attacks
-Someone who has a pretty good reason to use a basic attack, because it's being boosted by a power or item (i.e. my fighter for a little while, who had a Farslayer weapon and Bracers of Mighty Striking: i.e. your basic attack on your turn has reach 5 and deals +4 damage).
So, long story short: 95% of the time, basic attacks are opportunity attacks and desperation attacks, and on your turn, you'll be sticking with at-will powers.VisitSunnyBalmyExotic Sigil, City of Doors
"Parallel" avatar by idksocrates
Lady of Pain avatar by ElfLad
-
2010-01-17, 11:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Reverent's pretty much got the list.
ex: My dwarf fighter in LFR has a variety of different basic attacks.
-Ones he gets via combat challenge class feature.
-Ones he gets via regular AOOs. (different bonuses and damage from the combat challenge attacks cuz of feat selection).
-Warlords commanding strike (with damage boost due to his Int)
-Basics made during my turn:
---Charges
---Ranged basic attacks (if I can't reach the enemy to use a melee power)
-
2010-01-17, 11:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Gender
-
2010-01-17, 11:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Meridianville AL
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Agreed on most points. My players include an Avenger who thinks her Bracers of Mighty Striking make her basic attack better than any of her At-Wills (arguably correct, and she also gets at least two more boosts on a charge and her Oath of Emnity works fine in a charge or basic attack. I'd guess a barbarian might be even more charge-happy).
And amost all of my PCs have a longbow even if they're not proficient because they are well aware that I'm willing to throw fliers or fast movers with long range attacks at them (I've done it before, I'll do it again). Since only the Ranger actually HAS any longbow based powers everyone else is using ranged basic attacks.
-
2010-01-17, 11:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Dosent anybody miss running out of spells and relying on your pathetic (or sometimes strong) melee attacks?
-
2010-01-17, 11:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
-
2010-01-17, 11:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Copenhagen, DK
- Gender
-
2010-01-18, 12:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
The Assault Swordmage also has a use for basic attacks.
-
2010-01-18, 12:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Poland
- Gender
-
2010-01-18, 01:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
-
2010-01-18, 01:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Nope. Basic Attacks are for OAs and charges and the like. And even then, I think some at-wills can be used in place of basic attacks.
The only time I ever used a basic attack was my first game, and I didn't know how anything worked.
-
2010-01-18, 01:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Texas...for now
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
[/sarcasm]
FAQ is not RAW!Avatar by the incredible CrimsonAngel.
Saph:It's surprising how many problems can be solved by one druid spell combined with enough aggression.
I play primarily 3.5 D&D. Most of my advice will be based off of this. If my advice doesn't apply, specify a version in your post.
-
2010-01-18, 08:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Rarely, and for many classes basic attacks can be ignored entirely.
Opportunity attacks are a rarity because they're usually pretty easy to avoid. Warlords tend to grant basic attacks, but are usually happy if they have one party member to grant them to, so the rest of the party can still ignore them. Charging is relevant for characters that lack ranged capability.Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-01-18, 08:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
My reaction exactly. They're at-will specifically because they're not powerful. It represents a rogue who favors a left feint in a knife fight, and will make the move unless a better opportunity (encounter attack) presents itself. It represents the fighter fond of powerful stabs. It represents the wizard expending minor bits of magical energy to create a minor effect.
If I want to run on basic attacks when I run out of spells, I'd play 2e. (This isn't rhetorical.) 3.5 wizards have far too many spells to make basic attacks a feasible option, and 4e has at-wills.Last edited by Foryn Gilnith; 2010-01-18 at 08:32 AM.
-
2010-01-18, 11:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Baltimore
- Gender
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
For what it's worth, there's also a few At-Will powers out there that can be used as basic attacks. Though they're often not worth much on their own, they are big power boosters for classes that can't do much with a basic attack.
Halbert's Cubicle - Wherein I write about gaming and . . . you know . . . stuff.
-
2010-01-18, 11:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: (4e) No point in basic attacks?
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!