Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
2010-01-27, 09:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
[3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Easy question (or not so easy, considering I have to ask);
What happens when Disjunction is cast, and there is a person/item/etc. protected or enchanted with Spell Turning?
Does Spell Turning 'deflect' the Disjunction effect since Disjunction is a spell? Or does Disjunction cancel Spell Turning enchantments?
-
2010-01-27, 09:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Spell turning affects spells targetting you.
Disjunction is a burst.
So, no.
-
2010-01-27, 10:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Is an interesting question.
Let us pretend dysjunction was a ray. I'm guessing it turns.Originally Posted by Alabenson
-
2010-01-27, 10:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- By a Park
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Why? Mage’s disjunction is a burst, not a ray.
That said, Tyndmyr is correct. Spell turning is explicit that it only affects targeted spells.
You would be incorrect. Ray spells are a effect spells, not targeted spells. See the entry of the individual spells. They have “Effect: Ray,” not “Target: x.” So they are unaffected by spell turning as well.
Originally Posted by [url=http://www.systemreferencedocuments.org/resources/systems/pennpaper/dnd35/soveliorsage/spellsS.html#spell-turning]SRD: Spells: [i]Spell Turning[/i][/url]Last edited by Shhalahr Windrider; 2010-01-27 at 10:39 AM.
The Future just ain’t what it used to be.
-
2010-01-27, 10:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
-
2010-01-27, 11:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Technically, rays aren't "targeted" either - so Spell Turning is ineffective there as well.
-
2010-01-27, 11:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Mountain View, CA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Spell Turning does nothing against area spells, so Disjunction works like normal and dispels everything, including the Spell Turning.
A better question would be targeted Greater Dispel Magic vs Spell Turning. If GDM is cast targeting a creature who is protected by Spell Turning, it is reflected and attempts to dispel the caster instead. If GDM is cast targeting the Spell Turning spell (or any other single spell) specifically, it is not reflected and gets to make its dispel check normally.Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.
Avatar by Ceika.
Archives:
SpoilerSaberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)
-
2010-01-27, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
Right. I see my mistake.
I blame the influence. Silly OotS making me believe that Disjunction is a targeted spell.
-
2010-01-27, 12:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Israel
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Spell Turning vs. Disjunction?
A wise monk trains both mind and body, but a smart monk is actually a swordsage.