New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. - Top - End - #1

    Default Looking for a feat [3.5]

    I am looking for a feat that makes Ninja and Rogue levels stack for Sudden Strike and Sneak Attack. Does that exist?
    Last edited by Lord of Syntax; 2010-02-26 at 07:11 PM.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    Jun 2005

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Um... Sneak Attack and Sudden Strike already stack with each other when both apply. They even stack for the purpose of meeting a prerequisite of some number of Sneak Attack dice. This is explicitly stated on page 8 of Complete Adventurer.
    Quote Originally Posted by icefractal View Post
    Abstract positioning, either fully "position doesn't matter" or "zones" or whatever, is fine. If the rules reflect that. Exact positioning, with a visual representation, is fine. But "exact positioning theoretically exists, and the rules interact with it, but it only exists in the GM's head and is communicated to the players a bit at a time" sucks for anything even a little complex. And I say this from a GM POV.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Banned
     
    DragoonWraith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    No, he means something like Swift Hunter for a Ranger/Scout that causes Ranger and Scout levels to both stack for Favored Enemy and Skirmish. So a Rogue 3/Ninja 3 would have +5d6 Sneak Attack damage and (I assume) +5d6 Sudden Strike damage, since you would effectively have 6 levels of each.

    In other words, the ultimate ability to throw silly amounts of d6's.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    I think there's one for rogue/monk and possibly one for monk/ninja, but not rogue/ninja.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Raiki's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    I think that every rogue/ninja ever would take that feat. Rogue 1/Ninja 19 would then become an awesome build. All the nice deliciousness of the ninja, with +10d6 Sneak Attack on top of +10d6 sudden strike. I'd play that. Given it's still not anywhere near the limits of actual RAW optimization, but someone worried about that wouldn't really be playing a rogue or ninja anyway.

    ~R~
    Last edited by Raiki; 2010-02-26 at 09:33 PM.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    Jun 2005

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Oh. Well, if that's what he meant, I highly doubt that that feat exists. Official cheese tends to be a lot less blatant than that. Sudden Strike is a restricted version of Sneak Attack in the first place, so being able to double up on them is obviously even better than a die of Sudden Strike every level.
    Quote Originally Posted by icefractal View Post
    Abstract positioning, either fully "position doesn't matter" or "zones" or whatever, is fine. If the rules reflect that. Exact positioning, with a visual representation, is fine. But "exact positioning theoretically exists, and the rules interact with it, but it only exists in the GM's head and is communicated to the players a bit at a time" sucks for anything even a little complex. And I say this from a GM POV.

  7. - Top - End - #7

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Devils_Advocate View Post
    Oh. Well, if that's what he meant, I highly doubt that that feat exists. Official cheese tends to be a lot less blatant than that. Sudden Strike is a restricted version of Sneak Attack in the first place, so being able to double up on them is obviously even better than a die of Sudden Strike every level.
    Wait, what? How is a stacking feat more blatant than something like Initiate of Mystara? I'm not following your logic here.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Banned
     
    DragoonWraith's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Raiki View Post
    I think that every rogue/ninja ever would take that feat. Rogue 1/Ninja 19 would then become an awesome build. All the nice deliciousness of the ninja, with +10d6 Sneak Attack on top of +10d6 sudden strike. I'd play that. Given it's still not anywhere near the limits of actual RAW optimization, but someone worried about that wouldn't really be playing a rogue or ninja anyway.

    ~R~
    Every multiclass feat would be taken by every person who decides to take that multiclass combination. There is no reason whatsoever to not take Swift Hunter on a Ranger/Scout build, no reason not to take Daring Outlaw on a Rogue/Swashbuckler, etc etc. Of course every appropriate multiclass character would take it.

    But it's not so good that everyone who is a Rogue is going to say "Oh man, I need to dip Ninja so I can take that feat!". It's just not.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Dr Bwaa's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoonWraith View Post
    But it's not so good that everyone who is a Rogue is going to say "Oh man, I need to dip Ninja so I can take that feat!". It's just not.
    The feat described is, however, so good that every ninja would need to dip rogue at first level. The feat asked for seems to say "make my ninja levels not only add Sudden Strike, but also Sneak Attack at the same rate" or put another way "for one feat, I double my primary class feature forever!" There is other broken stuff out there, yes. Some of that is worse, yes. But this is still off the chain (basically, because it invalidates Rogue as a damaging class, since ninja would be literally twice as good).
    Last edited by Dr Bwaa; 2010-02-26 at 11:51 PM.
    For people who enjoy reading or writing.

    Spoiler
    Show

    Awesome banner/avatar by El_Frenchie!

    Play chess? Look me up! (bwaa)


    Formerly known as lordhenry4000

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    ElfMonkGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Jolly Old England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinfire Titan View Post
    Wait, what? How is a stacking feat more blatant than something like Initiate of Mystara? I'm not following your logic here.
    Because that feat would not require any real D&D optimization knowledge at all to abuse. It's completely blatant, not to mention it would not be a very logical feat to make (Stacking abilities from classes that are practically variants of each other? Not going to happen).
    Give me any character, and I will give you a freeform conversion.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Titan in the Playground
     
    AssassinGuy

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sunnydale

    Default Re: Looking for a feat [3.5]

    Sneak attack is the most significant Rogue class feature, and is a pure superset of cunning strike: i.e., sneak attack works in all situations where cunning strike works, plus more. So a feat that let a Ninja get Rogue abilities (without taking Rogue levels for them) and still have all their Ninja abilities including Ghost Step, would be excessive.

    Swift Ambusher doesn't give the Scout sneak attack progression. Ascetic Rogue doesn't give the Monk sneak attack progression. These are the existing Rogue multiclassing feats that should serve as a guideline for what's reasonable to include in a similar feat for another class.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •