New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    balistafreak's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Gender
    Male

    Default [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    The title says it all.

    A Cloistered Cleric wants to know Explosive Runes.

    The problem is that almost every single way carries a ton of unneeded baggage with it. The only ways I can find are taking a domain with Explosive Runes on it (yes, these domains exist) or using the alternate class feature to sacrifice a domain to know a limited selection of arcane spells... which is basically like taking a domain. Anyspell can't do it because it's a 3rd level arcane spell, and Great Anyspell is a bloody waste.

    Is there any way to simply throw Explosive Runes onto the list without the domain? Something like "Feat: Know this spell"?
    Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put tomato in fruit salad. Charisma is convincing someone it's a good idea anyways.

    I am a 12/13/13/17/15/17 True Neutral Sorcerer2.

    Tainted Bonds, a newly-created Touhou x D&D 3.5 CYOA. Just read these before posting anywhere. Talk about it here.

    Awesome remastered ballista avatar by Savannah!

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Claudius Maximus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    You could always pick up an extra domain with a class like Contemplative, though this doesn't work at lower levels.

    Some people believe that the feat Extra Spell can grant out-of-list spells. See if your DM is one of these people. IIRC there was a FAQ response that said no to this, but it's not clear by RAW.
    Last edited by Claudius Maximus; 2010-04-11 at 01:36 PM.
    Editor and playtester for Legend.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Eurus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Spending a feat to get Explosive Runes isn't exactly unbalanced anyway, unless you're trying to build yourself a book-nuke.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    balistafreak's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Blacksburg, VA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    It seems I've found a more creative solution - take a class that gives you an Extra Domain that you had, namely the Travel domain from Seeker of the Misty Isle from Complete Divine (pg 61).

    Proceed to use the now-free Domain slot for the ACF of extra arcane spells. It's a bit of a waste, but it's the only solution I can find for now.

    If someone can find a more elegant solution, I'm all for it.

    As for the book-nuke... well, sort-of-kind-of-not-quite-but-possibly.

    The idea is more of paranoia. Someone who writes EVERYTHING important in nothing but Explosive Runes. Journal? Explosive Runes. Directions to not die to some other trap? Explosive Runes. Random sign somewhere important? Explosive Runes.

    While we're on the topic of Explosive Runes, is there any way to trigger them offensively? I'm aware of the whole "fail your dispel" trick, but I'm thinking more of a "time bomb" concept.
    Last edited by balistafreak; 2010-04-11 at 02:07 PM.
    Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put tomato in fruit salad. Charisma is convincing someone it's a good idea anyways.

    I am a 12/13/13/17/15/17 True Neutral Sorcerer2.

    Tainted Bonds, a newly-created Touhou x D&D 3.5 CYOA. Just read these before posting anywhere. Talk about it here.

    Awesome remastered ballista avatar by Savannah!

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Goblin

    Join Date
    May 2008

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Isn't there a feat that lets spellcasters add spells to their spells known, or is that only for spontaneous/arcane casters?

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Troll in the Playground
     
    WhiteWizardGirl

    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    You can always do spell research per the guidelines in DMG. Of course that requires time, money and DM approval.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Israel
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Quote Originally Posted by Kylarra View Post
    You can always do spell research per the guidelines in DMG. Of course that requires time, money and DM approval.
    You will probably want to research for a weaker but same level version of the spell, or same power but higher level of it... The DMG says that wizards are those with the flashy blasty powers so showing that it's weaker on your cleric's list might get higher chances of being approved. If he cares, anyway.
    A wise monk trains both mind and body, but a smart monk is actually a swordsage.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Ranos's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Get some cross-class UMD ranks and an eternal wand. You'll have to retry a few times before you can get it to work and sometimes it'll just shut down for the day, but it should be perfectly fine for a spell like that.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Librarian in the Playground Moderator
     
    LibraryOgre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Well, what domains do you have? If you have Magic, just get a wand of Explosive Runes (for bonus points, have it look like a pen)... you can use spell trigger items without a problem. Otherwise, UMD is probably your best bet, or you might ask your DM if "when read" is an acceptable condition for a Glyph of Warding. Same 3rd level, just a touch less blasty.
    The Cranky Gamer
    *It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
    *Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
    *Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
    *The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
    Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
    There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Banned
     
    Lycanthromancer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    The magic domain does grant the ability to use spell-completion items for arcane spells, meaning you can use that eternal wand with no problems.

    There are a lot of nice spells in that domain as well.

    [edit] Golly-gosh gee wilikers, I got ninja'd.
    Last edited by Lycanthromancer; 2010-04-11 at 02:26 PM.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    What about a Drake Helm? Or are they only for Arcane casters?
    ,,,,^..^,,,,


    Quote Originally Posted by Haldir View Post
    Edit- I understand it now, Fighters are like a status symbol. If you're well off enough to own a living Fighter, you must be pretty well off!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Starbuck_II's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [3.5] Cloistered Cleric Seeks Explosive Runes Without Domain Loss

    Quote Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
    You will probably want to research for a weaker but same level version of the spell, or same power but higher level of it... The DMG says that wizards are those with the flashy blasty powers so showing that it's weaker on your cleric's list might get higher chances of being approved. If he cares, anyway.
    Explosive runes is force so making it fire based version of same level would be weaker.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •