Results 1 to 30 of 31
Thread: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
-
2010-04-19, 11:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
[4E] Doing away with Dragon
It started with just me, but now there's more than one person in my gaming group that is willing to DM, and we've had a few issues regarding character creation.
To start with, I played it safe and asked everyone to stick to the Core Books and the various splat like Martial and Divine Power...but for some reason people have ignored that and gone to Dragon Magazine.
Now I am a subscriber, but not everyone in our group is (including some of the DMs, on) which is why I asked people not to use Dragon. I've also had the sneaking suspicion that some of what comes out through Dragon (like feats, for instance) is not very balanced and can get get rather Munchkiny. Particularly when our group's resident munchkin has gotten almost everything from it.
It is also rather hard to look stuff up if someone has used Dragon without the character builder, which can be a problem if the first time you see a character sheet is five minutes before you play.
Is there anyway I can justify my argument in having Dragon banned from our games?Last edited by Katana_Geldar; 2010-04-19 at 11:22 PM.
-
2010-04-19, 11:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
You're the DM, you shouldn't have to justify your decision to ban Dragon Magazine. But what you've already said (mainly the fact that not everyone has access to it) should already be justification enough.
Originally Posted by SkyBoundFencer
-
2010-04-19, 11:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
First of all, I agree with the sentiment that, as the DM, you need not justify this.
Second,
Now I am a subscriber, but not everyone in our group is (including some of the DMs, on) which is why I asked people not to use Dragon. I've also had the sneaking suspicion that some of what comes out through Dragon (like feats, for instance) is not very balanced and can get get rather Munchkiny.It always amazes me how often people on forums would rather accuse you of misreading their posts with malice than re-explain their ideas with clarity.
-
2010-04-19, 11:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
I'm going to chime in just to say that just because someone is the DM doesn't mean they are free from justifying their actions.
That said, yeah, you have all the reasons you need, IMO.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2010-04-19, 11:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
I'm not The DM, just happen to be one of them.
But I will bring it up when we meet next.
-
2010-04-19, 11:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Still, when it's your turn, ask them not to use said material. Unless you rotate DMs without changing games, which would be... odd.
If that IS the case, meet with your fellow DMs, and make the case to just them, and then once you convince them, use that consensus to convince everyone.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2010-04-19, 11:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Now, see, Dragon's actually pretty balanced this time around, though it does include some odd elements that occasionally have significantly more power. However, if they're trying to cheese their characters out by jumping straight to Dragon, it's well within your rights to slap them on the wrists for being so silly. A lot of the early material they should be looking at is in a published book anyway: Weapon Expertise/Focus, feats from X Power and the PHBs, and the books' powers are more than enough to fill up an entire 30 level build, and for most classes will end up about as strong as a 30 level build with as much of the cheesiest stuff from Dragon crammed in.
-
2010-04-20, 12:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
As long as a majority of the DMs agree, I see no problem with doing away with it.
-
2010-04-20, 02:06 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Austin TX
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
If I was a player in your group, I'd argue with you, explain how Dragon stuff isn't overpowered, and how others not subscribing shouldn't have to effect me, especially since I AM paying for something extra... Ultimately though, I am not in your group, so I don't really care, and as DM, you can decide whatever you wish to.
Avatar by me. It's Incendius Darkscale, a Good Dragonborn Dragon Sorcerer, Demonskin Adept, Prince of Hell, worshiper of the Platinum Dragon (Bahamut), specializing in Fire and Lightning, wielding a staff in each hand.
-
2010-04-20, 02:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
If everyone in the group is ok with you having access to something, some MIGHT consider broken or overpowered, then of course you could argue it that way.
But if I were in your game group as a fellow gamer, I´d argue since I don´t enjoy a disparity between the choices WE as a group have in building our characters, you should stick to the sources WE all have available.
But at least I´m neither in your or the OP gaming group, so it really isn´t up to me. I´d consider "Please stick to the sources we all have access to" as kind and fair enough, since we as a group want to have fun. Pulling ominous feat out of some dusty tome of knowledge isn´t going to help with that, so put it away.Last edited by Angelmaker; 2010-04-20 at 02:47 AM.
-
2010-04-20, 02:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Just been talking to the others, we have decided to let some races and classes from Dragon, but not feats. Which satisifies all parties.
And we have agreed to be careful with what we'll allow.
New players won't be allowed to use Dragon at first, similar sort of rule that I have in Star Wars anyway.
-
2010-04-20, 03:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
I know that Dragon has a poor reputation, but at least since 4E came out, this is largely undeserved. Most of the material printed in Dragon is of weak to average power, and most of the "OMG uber" options come straight from Core material. The occasional slip-up tends to be fixed in the end-of-the-month compilation of Dragon; so disallowing everything until it's compiled sounds fair to me.
There are, yes, a handful of exceptions (dice of auspicuous cheese come to mind); but the ratio of "broken stuff" to "OK stuff" seems, if anything, to be lower in Dragon than in the books.Last edited by Kurald Galain; 2010-04-20 at 03:56 AM.
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-20, 04:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- North Carolina, USA
- Gender
-
2010-04-20, 08:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Honestly, he may just be grabbing stuff from the character builder too. It may have less to do with reading dragon than it is seeing neat options in the character builder.
-
2010-04-20, 08:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
-
2010-04-20, 08:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Somerville, MA
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
This attitude is why I quit playing CCGs and switched to RPGs. It was too easy for the rich kids to do well because they could spend more money on good cards. Buying a DDI subscription does not entitle you to use DDI content in someone else's game.
Anyway, I've found Dragon to be harmless in 4e. I started a game a few months ago and told the players they could use Dragon content on a case by case basis, but they had to run it by me first. So far I've approved everything they've shown me, except for one feat. Because 4e is still a new system and classes are published with specific build paths, I really like that 4e is giving my players more options beyond the standard good builds. But it's your game and you should do what you want with it. I'll also point out that DDI subscriptions have been passed around in my game and everyone has equal access in their character builders.If you like what I have to say, please check out my GMing Blog where I discuss writing and roleplaying in greater depth.
-
2010-04-20, 09:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-20, 09:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
As a compromise suggestion; perhaps stick to compiled versions of Dragon only? Generally, any slightly wonky stuff is tidied up by that point, whereas once or twice an error or so has snuck through at the individual article stage.
Really, it's pretty balanced on the whole, though. I'm not suprised your Resident Munchkin has a fair bit of stuff from it though. Because Dragon is where the less obvious stuff, or the more quirky stuff, or so on tends to turn up. It's often the place to look for 'something a bit different'. Between this, and the sheer volume of dragon matirial, many people who enjoy tinkering around with builds themselves will end up with a bit of Dragon here and there.
If you're worried, it's worth vetting character sheets to make sure everything is kosher.
And if the other DM's agree, there's no huge problem in banning dragon. All you'll really be losing is more options.
-
2010-04-20, 09:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Somerville, MA
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
If you like what I have to say, please check out my GMing Blog where I discuss writing and roleplaying in greater depth.
-
2010-04-20, 10:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- UTC -6
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Then you should also allow the feats made for the Dragon-only races and classes, since otherwise they end up without the support they need to compete with the printed material, since Dragon is the only source for feats similar to the class/race specific feats in the PHBs and X Power books.
-
2010-04-20, 10:11 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Utah
- Gender
You can call me Draz.
Trophies:
Spoiler
Also of note:
- Winning Entry of Gestalt Build Challenge IV
- 3rd Place in Iron Chef XI (Blade Bravo)
- Judge of Iron Chef XXIII (Divine Champion)
I have a number of ongoing projects that I manically jump between to spend my free time ... so don't be surprised when I post a lot about something for a few days, then burn out and abandon it.
... yes, I need to be tested for ADHD.
-
2010-04-20, 10:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-20, 10:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- MONSTER. VAULT.
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
I notice this is 4e - do you guys use the character builder? I know I rarely if ever even look at where my stuff came from anymore. It never even enters into the mental calculation anymore - it's just picking from the tasty items on the "menu". I'm not saying you should change your stance - just defending your players who may not even realize they're taking Dragon stuff, until they get done and think "Oh yeah, we have that weird source restriction this campaign. Well, let's go back through and see if I messed up anywhere..."
There may be no malice in taking Dragon stuff from your players - with the character builder, it's really easy to do accidentally!
-
2010-04-20, 11:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Somerville, MA
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
The campaign settings tab lets you restrict which sources are available. By default, they're all enabled. I kinda wish Dragon Magazine was grouped together so you could remove all of it instead of clicking through each article, but software design was never WotC's strong suit.
If you like what I have to say, please check out my GMing Blog where I discuss writing and roleplaying in greater depth.
-
2010-04-21, 05:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Sydney
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
The only way we can get Dragon is through character builder. And I think that is how many people get it anyway.
BTW, the guy is playing a Revenant Assassin. And he's a Munchkin Powergamer, a self-confessed one. Need to be very careful with what he wants. In my SW game, where I'm the only Gm and have more authority, I outruled his taking Skill Focus twice and said he could take it again at level 10 and not before.
-
2010-04-21, 06:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
All right... revenant assassin is at its core just a useful combination because its stats line up, and the revenant racial is a striker power. I don't believe there's anything particularly wonky about assassins.
However, revenants do have certain issues, particularly if he follows up on either the "half elf soul" line of feats, or the "extra actions when you're dying" line of feats. None of this is problematic at heroic tier, but may be an issue at paragon and epic.Guide to the Magus, the Pathfinder Gish class.
"I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums. I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that." -- ChubbyRain
Crystal Shard Studios - Freeware games designed by Kurald and others!
-
2010-04-21, 07:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
- Sometimes, the knights are the monsters
- The main problem with the world? So many grownups, not enough adults.
- Talk less; say more.
- George R.R. Martin, Kirkman, and Joss Whedon walked into a bar. There were no survivors.
- Current Project: Fallout 4 "nerd" build (3/7/2/2/9/3/2, PER 9 after boosts)
-
2010-04-21, 08:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Indianapolis, Indiana
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
If your players are using the Character Builder from DDI, the solution is very simple. You can set up a Campaign Options file where you select which sources you want to be available for your campaign. You then disseminate this file to your players and they load it prior to working on their characters in the Character Builder. IIRC options from books you didn't check won't even show up. They can force the issue, but then it will label their character as illegal for your campaign.
Of course, if you're approaching 4E from an old-school character-building perspective and people are actually creating their characters on paper, then this won't work.JediSoth
Fantasy/Sci-Fi Author, Gamer, Foodie
Doctor StrangeRoll or How I learned to stop worrying and love all D&D
"The quality of our legacy is measured in the lives we touch."
-
2010-04-21, 04:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Austin TX
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
I played a Revenant Assassin once. A lot of fun. Very mobile class... Revenants are VERY risky to play though. When knocked to 0, they stay up. This makes it far more likely that they'll hit -bloodied and die instantly, but also might give them a chance to Second Wind when below 0.
I had a few combinations of things... One of which required the DM to make a judgment call on how this should work.
As my previous race, I was a Tiefling, so I could take Tiefling feats. I took the feat to give myself Infernal Wrath, allowing me to select each encounter between my Tiefling or Revenant racial power. Then I took a Tiefling feat that replaces Infernal Wrath with a daily transformation power. The way the DM ruled it is, if I use my Tiefling daily in an encounter, then I can't use my Revenant encounter and vice versa, and the daily can still only be used once per day. A less generous DM would've ruled that whichever power I use first in a day, I lose the ability to use the other that day at all. (I told the DM both interpretations and let him decide.)
The other combination was poison damage. A Mordant Weapon can make everything poison damage, and Assassins can take feats to ignore poison resistance and add additional damage when dealing poison damage.
The Dragonmark feat that adds 1 to any shift or teleport is very useful for an Assassin, as they can teleport from adjacent to one creature to adjacent to another as a move at-will (3, 4 or 5 spaces, depending on tier).
Assassins don't, however, deal as much damage as other strikers. Instead, they're very controllery with high mobility, so none of what I did was particularly broken. The Warforged Barbarian in the group was dealing far more damage... I did a lot towards setting up flanks and such.
The party wiped at the end of the first session. My character survived because he ran away 2 rounds before the wipe, thinking his party wasn't stupid enough to stay in an obvious wipe. That ended that campaign...Last edited by Thajocoth; 2010-04-21 at 04:06 PM.
Avatar by me. It's Incendius Darkscale, a Good Dragonborn Dragon Sorcerer, Demonskin Adept, Prince of Hell, worshiper of the Platinum Dragon (Bahamut), specializing in Fire and Lightning, wielding a staff in each hand.
-
2010-04-21, 07:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
- Gender
Re: [4E] Doing away with Dragon
{Scrubbed}
Last edited by Roland St. Jude; 2010-04-21 at 08:26 PM.
Really really really awesome avatar thanks to neoseph7