Results 1 to 17 of 17
-
2010-05-24, 08:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Blacksburg, VA
- Gender
[3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
So Incarnate Construct (from Savage Species) sent me into the tank about how I could use 2 free levels of templates to boost a character.
Then I hit a problem. What do you start an Incarnate Construct with? I can't really think of any good 1HD constructs off the top of my head - and I don't believe Warforged works, as they're living constructs, as opposed to merely constructs.
You don't keep your base land speed, special attacks, or special qualities, but you do keep your natural AC bonus and fly speed if available.
Secondly, there's a lot of templates out there. What templates can be applied to a plain ol' humanoid (because that's what you are now ) for the most mileage? I know there's a lot of bad templates out there, but surely there are some gems. They need to be able to make it worth being an Incarnate Construct as opposed to being, say, a Human with a lot of goodies already.Last edited by balistafreak; 2010-05-24 at 08:36 PM.
Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put tomato in fruit salad. Charisma is convincing someone it's a good idea anyways.
I am a 12/13/13/17/15/17 True Neutral Sorcerer2.
Tainted Bonds, a newly-created Touhou x D&D 3.5 CYOA. Just read these before posting anywhere. Talk about it here.
Awesome remastered ballista avatar by Savannah!
-
2010-05-24, 08:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Saint and Phrenic are great templates.
As for 1HD Constructs... I have no idea. Have you checked Crystalkeep?
-
2010-05-24, 08:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
The maug (fiend folio) is generally considered the best base construct. 2 racial HD, +3LA (which is reduced to LA+1 after applying incarnate). Very good physical stats and overall a good deal for ECL3.
-
2010-05-24, 08:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Phrenic Warforged.
-
2010-05-24, 09:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Blacksburg, VA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Reading OPs.
More seriously, Maug are kind of cool. I'd end up with what's basically LA +2, but able to be bought off by 6th level (right?) because it's actually LA +1 and a racial HD. Base land speed of 40 feet, and a jaw-dropping +7 natural armor. Don't get any of the special abilities, though. I'm not keen on the whole Two Weapon fighting thing, either, and I have to miss two class levels.
Come on, 1 HD constructs... there have to be some somewhere.Intelligence is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is knowing not to put tomato in fruit salad. Charisma is convincing someone it's a good idea anyways.
I am a 12/13/13/17/15/17 True Neutral Sorcerer2.
Tainted Bonds, a newly-created Touhou x D&D 3.5 CYOA. Just read these before posting anywhere. Talk about it here.
Awesome remastered ballista avatar by Savannah!
-
2010-05-24, 09:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
-
2010-05-24, 09:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Last edited by arguskos; 2010-05-24 at 09:39 PM.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2010-05-24, 10:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Questionable legality, but Effigy 1/2 Ogre Incarnate Construct is decent for a melee type (size L at LA +0).
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2010-05-24, 10:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Last edited by arguskos; 2010-05-24 at 10:46 PM.
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2010-05-25, 01:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Ah yes, but I believe it could be interpreted that if all templates are added prior to character creation, the Incarnate Construct template negates the "LA -" of the Effigy template. It really relies on DM approval/DM fiat.
Essentially, the "LA -" has ceased to be before it is applied to your character, depending on the order of templates...cheesy, to be sure.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2010-05-25, 01:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Broken Damaged Worthless
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Not really that cheesy, since it's actually worse than what I suggested (Feral Half-Minotaur Incarnate Warforged), but, given that LA - is an ill-defined term in player interactions, I'm chalking that one up to "whatever the DM says".
Of course, applying the Incarnate Construct template to a Warforged is highly abusable to begin with (take Feral and Mineral Warrior, for instance, or Dark and Mineral Warrior, or Saint if you're starting at a high enough level and then buy off a Feral or something; the list is endless). Oh Savage Species, you were so broken (see: Tauric).
All that I say applies only to myself. You author your own actions and choices. I cannot and will not be responsible for you, nor are you for me, regardless of situation or circumstance.
-
2010-05-25, 03:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
-
2010-05-25, 04:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Well, because titans are greater than LA +2 and have RHD. 1/2 Ogres (RoD) are LA +2 and have no racial hit dice. If an Incarnate Construct Effigy creature is allowed, the LA -2 negates the LA +2. Even if not allowable as a PC due to "LA -", it is allowable as an NPC.
I maintain that order of operations, template stacking and so forth does not mean that this is a clear cut "LA - equals non-playable" RAW situation...the waters are very muddy, and would require a DM ruling. Most sane DMs would rule no, IMHO...but then, they would probably say no to a Phrenic Warforged Incarnate Construct as well.Last edited by Thurbane; 2010-05-25 at 04:15 AM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2010-05-25, 05:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
Not to derail, but I don't follow this logic at all.
Your seem to imply that incarnate construct is not applicable to creatures with racial HD or an LA greater than two. That is not the case.
And of course are "LA -" creatures allowable as NPCs/monsters. For those, CR matters and LA doesn't.
I'm not sure where you get this from, but "LA -" has always indicated that the race / template / templated creature is not suitable for a PC.
Order of operations is not an issue either (it's perfectly clear in this case).
Once you apply that template, the creature ceases to be playable (it's LA becomes "-", as spelled out clearly in the template entry). And what is "-" minus two anyway?
-
2010-05-25, 05:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
No, not implying that at all, sorry if I was unclear. What I was saying was that a base creature with LA +2 and no RHD is preferable in the case of creating a character playable at 1st level.
Agreed. Agreed 100%.
But I'm saying that it can be read that the LA+2 from 1/2 Ogre, and the LA -2 from IC, = LA +0 and "cancel out" the "LA -" of Effigy Creature, particularly if applied prior to the point of character creation. In a previous thread on this very topic, several people agreed with my interpretation.
I'm not claiming that it is RAW, I'm saying that it's a possible reading of the situation after all templates are applied. Hence, it would required a DMs ruling.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2010-05-25, 11:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
For those without LA, simply use baselines for mosters of that CR. ON average, you have 2x as many HD as LA (although exceptions exist)
-
2010-05-25, 05:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: [3.5] Starting an Incarnate Construct
I'm afraid I'm still not following why it would.
First, you take a half-ogre; his LA is +2. Next, you apply the effigy template (you have to do that before incarnate construct). His LA is now "-", and he's no longer a suitable PC choice. Incarnate construct doesn't change that: "-" minus two is not zero, it's meaningless.