Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: [3.5] Hidden Casting
-
2010-06-10, 11:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Tulsa, OK
- Gender
[3.5] Hidden Casting
My Ravenloft group should avoid this discussion.
SpoilerMy gestalt Strahd is a full necromancer on one side and an assortment of classes on the other. His goal is to remain hidden while casting.
Relevant Feats and Class Abilities
Hide in Plain Sight (Shadowdancer)
Skill Mastery (Exemplar)
Mobile Spellcasting
Still Spell
Silent Spell
It is my understanding if you cast a spell while hidden, you take a -20 on the Hide check. If you take a move action after the casting, you only have the hide penalty associated with how far you have moved. Strahd can move as part of the casting, and then take another move action afterwards.
Question #1
How do Mobile Spellcasting and Hide work together?
For example, he has an enhanced speed of 60, and he casts then moves 55 feet (greater than half and less than full), so he has a -5 penalty due to movement. If he cast at the beginning, does the -20 penalty apply during the movement portion of the standard action?
Here is how I believe it works, so please correct me as needed. Any time you move, it necessitates an opposed hide/spot. Any time you attack, it also necessitates an opposed hide/spot. If you move, cast and then move again (mobile spellcasting), you treat the moving and casting as separate checks. So mobile spellcasting allows you to ignore the -20 penalty, since you are moving after the casting. The only penalty comes from how fast you are moving.
Question #2
How does a lack of spell components interact with the Hide skill?
For example, if you are casting a Silent Still spell (no material/focus) and the spell does not require an attack roll, do you take the -20 hide penalty? It seems like there would be no penalty, since there is nothing to be seen or heard.
Thanks for the feedback.Last edited by Scipio; 2010-06-10 at 12:47 PM.
Tekeli Li! Tekeli Li!
-
2010-06-10, 11:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- USA
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Hidden Casting
Looking at the Hide skill, that's a reasonable assumption, but I believe the -20 would (or should) apply to any Hide checks you make in a round after you attack or cast a spell.
Question #2
How does a lack of spell components interact with the Hide skill?
For example, if you are casting a Silent Still spell (no material/focus) and the spell does not require an attack roll, do you take the -20 hide penalty? It seems like there would be no penalty, since there is nothing to be seen or heard.ze/zir | she/her
Omnia Vincit Amor
-
2010-06-10, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Hidden Casting
Don't forget the Conceal Spellcasting skill trick from Complete Scoundrel p.85, I think that may help here.
It doesn't specifically talk about being hidden, but it should apply and if it doesn't you could just work out a version that requires hide instead of sleight of hand that would do so.Last edited by JasonP; 2010-06-10 at 12:22 PM.
-
2010-06-10, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Tulsa, OK
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Hidden Casting
Yeah, I am not sure mobile spellcasting affects the hide check during the move/cast standard action. It seems to me that if you use your actual move action after casting, then you should not get the -20 penalty. I need to read up (again) on the expanded hide rules in CAdv and the Rules Compendium.
The -20 hide penalty either technically still applies because you cast a spell or technically doesn't because you didn't make an attack. It'd be a reasonable houserule to state that there's no hide penalty because of the lack of components.
The nice part is that even if Strahd takes the -20 penalty, he can take 10 on his hide check for a 28. That is before invisibility comes into play.Tekeli Li! Tekeli Li!
-
2010-06-10, 12:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: [3.5] Hidden Casting
That's plainly inconsistent with the rules. Hide normally takes no action itself, so the penalty is purely for the action on which you piggy-back your Hide check. There's no "in the same round" penalty anywhere in the rules for the skill.
Mobile Spellcasting combines spellcasting and moving, and there's no Hide penalty for moving -- only for the speed at which you move. These aren't separate actions under the rules; it's all one. You don't "cast then move" or "move then cast": you do them together, and that's why you provoke AoOs everywhere along your movement path.
As far as casting and using Hide together without Mobile Spellcasting: you can't. It's just not one of the actions on which you can piggy-back a Hide check. So there's no situation where a -20 penalty would apply with Mobile Spellcasting; the check is always piggy-backed on your movement.
-
2010-06-10, 12:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Gender
-
2010-06-10, 01:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Tulsa, OK
- Gender
-
2010-06-10, 01:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: [3.5] Hidden Casting
You're moving in the standard action when you cast with Mobile Spellcasting.
Normally, you make a Hide check as part of movement, so it doesn’t take a separate action.