New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Hello all:

    I'm embarking on a new character, and he's going to be a sneaky warlock. However, I'm unsure to play him as a Rogue 1/Warlock 2 or a Scout 1/Warlock 2. Usually, I would just use rogue, but I am thinking of taking Martial Study and Martial Stance to get Child of Shadow. Because of this, I will need to be moving as much as possible. Does this make scout a better choice?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Titan in the Playground
     
    PairO'Dice Lost's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Malsheem, Nessus
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Scout is a better choice than rogue for a ranged warlock because for skirmish you just need to move whereas for sneak attack your opponent has to lose Dex to AC or be flanked, and you can't flank at range and it can be hard to make your opponents lose Dex to AC.
    Better to DM in Baator than play in Celestia
    You can just call me Dice; that's how I roll.


    Spoiler: Sig of Holding
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by abadguy View Post
    Darn you PoDL for making me care about a bunch of NPC Commoners!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chambers View Post
    I'm pretty sure turning Waterdeep into a sheet of glass wasn't the best win condition for that fight. We lived though!
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxiDuRaritry View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PairO'DiceLost View Post
    <Snip>
    Where are my Like, Love, and Want to Have Your Manchildren (Totally Homo) buttons for this post?
    Won a cookie for this, won everything for this

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Troll in the Playground
     
    SamuraiGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Boston
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Since you're already dipping into tome of battle for feats, why don't you just take Swordsage? They get hide as a class skill.
    Click the spoiler to see all the great games I design:
    Spoiler
    Show


    Who Beats Who? the hilariously geeky game of hypothetical battles.

    Who has two thumbs (up) and a board game coming out from Rio Grande? This guy. Gladiators (Rio Grande)

    PIZZA IN SPAAAAACE! Cambridge Games Facotry and Spoiled Flush Games Cosmic Pizza coming soon.

    Matrix Solitaire, likely the best Solitaire game you will ever play.
    Spoiled Flush Games

    Twitter... where I talk about game design and beer.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    SolithKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Elsewhen
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Scout is as good as a Rogue.


    Don't forget about the Factotum, Swordsage and Beguiler as very effective sneaky classes.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Dusk Eclipse's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Runite
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    I say anyone of those classes but be sure to that feat from drow of the underdark that lets you hide in your own darkness (invocation) as a swift action, free hide in plain sight at level 1 (or 3)
    Just call me Dusk
    Avatar by Ceika

    Dming: Eyes of the Lich Queen IC OOC


  6. - Top - End - #6
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Thanks for the feedback, I'm now contemplating running him as a Scout 1/Warlock 1/Swordsage 1 for precisely the reasons mentioned. I was looking at the DotU feat (Blend with Shadows, I think), but I might be better off without it. If I take Child of Shadow as my stance, it gives me concealment whenever I move, right? That allows me to make Hide checks, right?

    I know it's not as good as HiPS, but I don't like having darkness as my only invocation. With that being said, what SHOULD I use? Eldritch Spear seems best for combat, but are there any better for sneaking? I like the ability to spiderclimb, but can't I get Slippers of Spiderclimbing for that?
    Last edited by OMG PONIES; 2010-06-17 at 12:09 PM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by OMG PONIES View Post
    If I take Child of Shadow as my stance, it gives me concealment whenever I move, right?
    Whenever you move for 10' or more, yes.
    Quote Originally Posted by OMG PONIES View Post
    That allows me to make Hide checks, right?
    No, the stance specifically says you can't use it's concealment for hiding.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Oh.

    Well then, should I really consider darkness as my sole invocation? It would probably work well, since I'm playing a whisper gnome w/ darkvision. Also, am I going to need to waste feats on Point Blank Shot/Precise Shot for use on my Eldritch Blast?

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    gallagher's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Some corn field
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by PairO'Dice Lost View Post
    Scout is a better choice than rogue for a ranged warlock because for skirmish you just need to move whereas for sneak attack your opponent has to lose Dex to AC or be flanked, and you can't flank at range and it can be hard to make your opponents lose Dex to AC.
    Eldritch blast is a touch attack... doesnt sneak attack go off for touch attacks? i dont know if it was a feat or just misinformed teammates, but i had a teammate who played a rogue 1 sorceror X and used mostly touch attacks to gain the extra sneak attack die
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by 3SecondCultist View Post
    ...

    You're just going to start randomly setting things on fire, aren't you?
    Quote Originally Posted by TechnoScrabble View Post
    ...

    This entire campaign's going to become nothing but partying in a long forgotten world, isn't it?
    In the past, I played Sir Theo Roost.
    I am soon to begin playing his heir, Dora the Destroya

    Avatar by Szilard

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by OMG PONIES View Post
    It would probably work well, since I'm playing a whisper gnome w/ darkvision.
    Darkvision doesn't help against magical darkness (such as that from the invocation).
    Quote Originally Posted by OMG PONIES View Post
    Also, am I going to need to waste feats on Point Blank Shot/Precise Shot for use on my Eldritch Blast?
    If you're having hard time on hitting things, but you're using touch attacks with mostly medium BAB classes so that shouldn't be so hard.
    Quote Originally Posted by gallagher View Post
    Eldritch blast is a touch attack... doesnt sneak attack go off for touch attacks?
    Yes, if it has an attack roll you can Sneak Attack with it.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Titan in the Playground
     
    PairO'Dice Lost's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Malsheem, Nessus
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by gallagher View Post
    Eldritch blast is a touch attack... doesnt sneak attack go off for touch attacks? i dont know if it was a feat or just misinformed teammates, but i had a teammate who played a rogue 1 sorceror X and used mostly touch attacks to gain the extra sneak attack die
    You can sneak attack with touch attacks, but you still must fulfill the requirement of a flanked opponent or one who has lost Dex to AC. You don't get to add SA dice just because you're making a touch attack.
    Better to DM in Baator than play in Celestia
    You can just call me Dice; that's how I roll.


    Spoiler: Sig of Holding
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by abadguy View Post
    Darn you PoDL for making me care about a bunch of NPC Commoners!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chambers View Post
    I'm pretty sure turning Waterdeep into a sheet of glass wasn't the best win condition for that fight. We lived though!
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxiDuRaritry View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PairO'DiceLost View Post
    <Snip>
    Where are my Like, Love, and Want to Have Your Manchildren (Totally Homo) buttons for this post?
    Won a cookie for this, won everything for this

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenish View Post
    Darkvision doesn't help against magical darkness (such as that from the invocation).
    Grr, you and your actually remembering the rules for such things. I'll have to check out DotU to see if it's worthwhile. Any other least invocations besides Spider Climb worth checking out?

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Titan in the Playground
     
    PairO'Dice Lost's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Malsheem, Nessus
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by OMG PONIES View Post
    Grr, you and your actually remembering the rules for such things. I'll have to check out DotU to see if it's worthwhile. Any other least invocations besides Spider Climb worth checking out?
    Well, devil's sight lets you see through magical darkness, which seems to be exactly what you're looking for.
    Better to DM in Baator than play in Celestia
    You can just call me Dice; that's how I roll.


    Spoiler: Sig of Holding
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by abadguy View Post
    Darn you PoDL for making me care about a bunch of NPC Commoners!
    Quote Originally Posted by Chambers View Post
    I'm pretty sure turning Waterdeep into a sheet of glass wasn't the best win condition for that fight. We lived though!
    Quote Originally Posted by MaxiDuRaritry View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PairO'DiceLost View Post
    <Snip>
    Where are my Like, Love, and Want to Have Your Manchildren (Totally Homo) buttons for this post?
    Won a cookie for this, won everything for this

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Il_Vec's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Are you using fractional BAB or will you really have + 0 BAB?
    Inner fear is your only enemy.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fairfield, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Quote Originally Posted by PairO'Dice Lost View Post
    Well, devil's sight lets you see through magical darkness, which seems to be exactly what you're looking for.
    So does ebon eyes from SC.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Banned
     
    Lycanthromancer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    I'm currently using a swordsage 1/factotum 3/swordsage 1, and it's great. I get Int to damn near everything, and plenty of other bonuses out the wazoo. I just need to see if I can squeeze out 160 gp or so for an additional +5 to initiative (go go warning shuriken!).

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    DruidGirl

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    IIRC, Scouts don't get UMD as a class skill. Rogues do, however, and it meshes well with warlock abililties.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Thanks for the suggestions. We're using fractional BAB, and I think I'm sticking w/ rogue for UMD and other such goodies. I'm trying to see if I can sneak in a level of swordsage at some point later on.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    RandomAction's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Virginia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    Here is my 2cp:

    If your are focusing on just using Eldritch Blast, then I would go Scout. True it does lack UMD as a class skill, but doesn't warlock get it as class skill? I saw a mention earlier about the Child of Shadow stance. Scout works wonders with this, since both require movement to gain each's abilities. With the warlock's blast, I would consider going for shot-on-the-run feat. This will help keep you mobile while dishing out damage.
    Finally the Random has come back to the playground!

    Reason for being gone:
    Spoiler
    Show

    You ever had a really bad day in court?




    Avatar by Strategos.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Person_Man's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Better Sneaky Class [3.5]

    You might want to consider Binder 1/Warlock 2.

    Binder 1 is all you need to Bind Naberius, which grants you at will supernatural Disguise Self, Command at will once every 5 rounds, large buffs to Diplomacy and Bluff, and the ability to heal ability damage every round (which is a must have for drug abuse or Hellfire Warlock).

    So instead of using Hide and Move Silently, you walk around in disguise continuously, and just walk up to your enemies and bluff them. Also, if your Int is decent you can invest in Hide and Move Silently cross class without a big penalty to your checks. Or you can take more Binder to get access to continuous Invisibility, buffs to Hide and Move Silently, Death Attack, etc.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •