Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
2010-07-29, 09:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
While I assume that the expanded spellbook class feature of the master specialist lets you only chose from the wizard/sorc list it dose not specificity state that the spell has to be from the wizard/sorc list in complete mage, it just says it has to be from your chosen school. Dose that mean a master specialist could learn spells not from the wiz/sorc list with with expanded spellbook provided they where of their specialized school?
Last edited by Maho-Tsukai; 2010-07-29 at 09:49 PM.
Awesome evil Necro-Cleric Avatar created by Ceika
In D&D I am a..
SpoilerLevel 3 Lawful Evil Half-Elf Cleric with the following ability scores...
Strength- 11
Dexterity- 13
Constitution- 12
Intelligence- 15
Wisdom- 17
Charisma- 16
To find out your D&D self take this quiz today!
-
2010-07-29, 09:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
I'd never noticed that before, but yes rules as written say you can take any spell that's from your school so I would guess you'd be able to take a spell not on your normal spell list.
-
2010-07-29, 10:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
This is covered in the errata, which added a sentence preventing you from grabbing spells from your school not on the wizard list.
-
2010-07-29, 10:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Gender
-
2010-07-30, 12:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
-
2010-07-30, 01:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
Yeah, no need to make Master Specialist even better, really. You can always see if your DM will allow you to use it to research a custom spell of your specialty school for free, though. It'd technically be on your spell list.
-
2010-07-30, 01:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- Netherlands
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
Actually, it's still pretty good. Not every backwards village or kobold's lair has spell scrolls just lying around. Especially not the one's your DM doesn't really want you to find/hasn't thought of himself.
This is basically a way to guarantee yourself that must-have spell.
Recently resurrected. Sorry for bailing on you guys.
"Never play leapfrog with a unicorn"
Awesome OOTSatar by Crimmy, masterfully done.
-
2010-07-30, 01:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
-
2010-07-30, 01:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
-
2010-07-30, 01:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
-
2010-07-30, 01:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
Level 4 normally, I believe. 3 with basic early entry shenanigans, 2 with dusk giant cheese.
It's not bad, mind you, but you do have to consider if losing the bonus MM feat(or an ACF for it) at level 5 is worthwhile. You get a minor arcana, Skill Focus: Spellcraft, and another spell known in exchange. Plus, you gotta sink a feat into Spell Focus.
It's not horrible, but its not amazing either.
-
2010-07-30, 01:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
Re: Master Specalist expanded spellbook question..
I think MS is a really solid prestige class, especially depending on where you go with it. It gives some nice bennies early on. At level 5, I would rather be casting fly or haste rather than a metamagic'd low level spell, and spell focus/skill focus sets you up for AM and/or Iot7V. And you can always shuffle the feat out for something at a higher level. Once you get access to shuffling, it doesn't really matter what your bonus feat does.