Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
-
2010-10-14, 08:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Boston
- Gender
[3.5] Adjudicating a chase
I am thinking of starting off my next session with a chase. A large-ish scouting party breaks off from a main army and goes after the party who have a good head start. However, the scouting party has tracking and wolves. Ultimately, I'd like it to break into tense mini combats, as the scouting party splits into smaller teams and the party gets separated as they try to run.
The DMG suggests adjudicating a chase with a dex or con check, but I'd rather handles this in a sort of round-to-round style where each round the pursuers get a chance to close in on the party, or the party gets a chance to break away. Tactics, survival skills, and physical conditioning would be a factor.
Has anyone done anything like this? How did you do it? If not, what would you suggest?Click the spoiler to see all the great games I design:
Spoiler
Who Beats Who? the hilariously geeky game of hypothetical battles.
Who has two thumbs (up) and a board game coming out from Rio Grande? This guy. Gladiators (Rio Grande)
PIZZA IN SPAAAAACE! Cambridge Games Facotry and Spoiled Flush Games Cosmic Pizza coming soon.
Matrix Solitaire, likely the best Solitaire game you will ever play.
Spoiled Flush Games
Twitter... where I talk about game design and beer.
-
2010-10-14, 09:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
There's always the option of using the DMG's advice; Have it be a set of dex checks, but make it so they need to reach a set number of wins - say, five. Each side gets a roll every round to bypass some obstacle - a group of people, a trash can the individual running away overturned, whatever - and whoever reaches 5 successes first wins.
Pokemon friend code : 3067-5701-8746
Trade list can be found on my Giant League wiki page, all pokemon are kept in stock with 5 IVs, most with egg moves, some bred for Hidden Powers. Currently at 55 in stock and counting.
Padherders for my phone and my tablet!
-
2010-10-14, 09:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Boston
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
Hm, true, I could just run it like a 4e skill challenge...
Click the spoiler to see all the great games I design:
Spoiler
Who Beats Who? the hilariously geeky game of hypothetical battles.
Who has two thumbs (up) and a board game coming out from Rio Grande? This guy. Gladiators (Rio Grande)
PIZZA IN SPAAAAACE! Cambridge Games Facotry and Spoiled Flush Games Cosmic Pizza coming soon.
Matrix Solitaire, likely the best Solitaire game you will ever play.
Spoiled Flush Games
Twitter... where I talk about game design and beer.
-
2010-10-14, 09:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
Skill challenges are only fun if the players feel like rolling dice to win. Handle it like One Piece and get each member of the party to handle it in their own way, thats the real point of being a player anyway.
-
2010-10-14, 09:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Boston
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
I'm intrigued... go on...
Click the spoiler to see all the great games I design:
Spoiler
Who Beats Who? the hilariously geeky game of hypothetical battles.
Who has two thumbs (up) and a board game coming out from Rio Grande? This guy. Gladiators (Rio Grande)
PIZZA IN SPAAAAACE! Cambridge Games Facotry and Spoiled Flush Games Cosmic Pizza coming soon.
Matrix Solitaire, likely the best Solitaire game you will ever play.
Spoiled Flush Games
Twitter... where I talk about game design and beer.
-
2010-10-14, 09:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
-
2010-10-14, 09:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
I recommend giving the players chances to throw the pursuers off the trail. Choose 5 or 6 different scenes as they run off and pause to describe them in detail. If the players choose to interact with the scene in such a way that you believe it would make the pursuers harder to follow, give them a victory point. If they have enough victory points after all the scenes, they get away. If they don't, they think they have, but the scouts catch them later.
You could spice each scene up with skill checks to combine character build capability with player ingenuity.
-
2010-10-15, 06:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Gender
Re: [3.5] Adjudicating a chase
Give the fighters time to fight, the rogues time to sneak, the mages time to cast.
Battles like these should not be decided by rolls, they should be decided by ingenuity and challenging the mental resourcefulness of your players-- if a player does not choose a high int high wis build that means they want others to come up with the plans-- do not leave these man-child characters unattended.
It's pretty simple, have each split designed to be countered for each of the characters, they'll see pretty fast that splitting is a good idea.
Also, have the characters turn the tables somehow, if they keep running have a random good luck happen like a man with a pot walks by and stumbles to get out of the way of the escaping character, and have the pot and him fall comically to the ground emulating a Grease spell.
If a character does something too effective have the chasing party split off and rejoin another group, ect.
Leave the locations vague, so you can rejoin 2 of the players immediately if one starts to get cornered, this makes for some interesting moments and a "got your back" kind of trust forming that strengthens the characters emotional ties-- which is a GREAT thing to build and should be focused on.