New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Pixie in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2010

    Default 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    I am starting a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game.

    I was thinking of playing a Conjurer (opposed school Divination (homemade alt. rules)) or an Invoker (opp.school ench.).

    We are gonna use PHB only...

    It is gonna be my first wizard. Any advice ?

    thanks

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Colossus in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    Sounds like you'd be using AD&D era specialization rules. I'd consider Illusion specialization as Necromancy is largely redundant in terms of combat...though if you'd be interested in creating a platoon or two of undead, that's a bad idea. The thing is, Evocation forbids Enchantment and Enchantment forbids Evocation and neither is an extraordinary specialization. But I wouldn't want to give up Enchantment just for the "dominate leaders on opposing side"-factor and Evocation...meh. Lots of rather large spreads in the school. Ultimately, conjuration would be the best specialization but Divination is a bit hefty to give up (Please Try Dying isn't nearly as scary as Scry'n'Die).

    Enchanter may be the easiest way ultimately; you could bring stuff in to Dominate your targets but it's really inconvenient to have them in unreliable hands instead of your own, so having access to Dominates is really big while...well, there's tons of ways to blow things up so Evocation isn't strictly necessary. Sure, Fireball wreaks nice havoc but a Cloudkill is far more brutal (of course, it's also higher level).


    Anyways, Being Batman is a good place to start in. Just, for war purposes, re-evaluate spells based on their grand scale impact; Planar Binding is pretty insane since such a creature can destroy a purely martial army alone, for example, and something like Cloudkill or in general, anything that affects a large area (Control Weather much?) simply has vastly increased usefulness.
    Campaign Journal: Uncovering the Lost World - A Player's Diary in Low-Magic D&D (Latest Update: 8.3.2014)
    Being Bane: A Guide to Barbarians Cracking Small Men - Ever Been Angry?! Then this is for you!
    SRD Averages - An aggregation of all the key stats of all the monster entries on SRD arranged by CR.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Lizardfolk

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    Quote Originally Posted by wallofterror View Post
    I am starting a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game.

    I was thinking of playing a Conjurer (opposed school Divination (homemade alt. rules)) or an Invoker (opp.school ench.).

    We are gonna use PHB only...

    It is gonna be my first wizard. Any advice ?

    thanks
    1. How out numbered are your forces likely to be? And how much power disparity? If your out numbered ten to 1 by somewhat weaker enemies area control spells, if your out numbered 100 to 1 by weak-as-kittens archers then buffing your allies.

    2. What special rules are at play in the game? If its a normal game based around fighting lots of humanoids then banning Div is not a good plan. Scry and Dieing tactics are even better in a military based game then an adventuring game. "cleric buffs group to maximum, wizard scry/teles them in, kill the enemy leader, tele out." Or even better, tele to their horses at night and kill them all so they have no mounts.

    3. Don't be afraid to run. A wizard is really, really squishy.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Tyndmyr's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    If I could normally ban divination in 3.5, I would almost every time. It's my least used school, with the exception of detect magic and identify, which are easily available from items. See invis is also nice, technically, but since it's subject to permanency, you only need it cast on you once.

    The only thing I'd actually miss is the easy access to True Seeing. Oh well, that's what summons and calling are for.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Troll in the Playground
     
    UserClone's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Connecticut
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    I'd be a conjurer or transmuter building off of strong buffs, and make your way into the War Weaver PrC from Heroes of Battle. Your party will LOVE you. Also, take a look at the various orb spells and some nice debuffs like slow and touch of idiocy, enervation and the like.

    Beguiler, you just got served.
    ALL hail DirtyTabs, creator of this wonderful UserClone TRONpony!
    *sigh*
    X Stat to Y Bonus
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by BRC
    Railroading isn't saying "There is a wall there", Railroading is when you say "There is a wall everywhere BUT there"


  6. - Top - End - #6
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Valameer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2010

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    Don't give up divination. Intelligence in a military campaign is huge. Knowing who and what is where is the first step to stopping any enemy plans.

    Being able to plan ahead and know when your enemy is weak and strong is the equivalent of min-maxing a war.

    Imagine the enemy has a contingent of hippogriff riding elven archers. If they attacked your camp at night and dropped alchemist's fire on your supplies, it could be devastating. With their mobility, they could strike and be long long gone before you realized what had happened. But if you had divined that the enemy had such a force, and had advance warning that they were attacking, then those hippogriffs would just be flying into an ambush.

    Also, don't underestimate necromancy. Skeletons on skeletal horses can gallop all night and all day with no supply train.

    Honestly, your least useful abilities will probably end up being evocation. And hey, enchantment could potentially win the war sun tzu style.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Troll in the Playground
     
    herrhauptmann's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Default Re: 3.5 playing a Wizard in a battle/war-oriented game advice

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    If I could normally ban divination in 3.5, I would almost every time. It's my least used school, with the exception of detect magic and identify, which are easily available from items. See invis is also nice, technically, but since it's subject to permanency, you only need it cast on you once.
    Pretty sure that if you ban Divination, you can't use anything that provides a divination spell. Definitely not wands, and probably not crystal balls, or anything else with a Divination spell in the crafting prereqs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •