New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Hello playground. Before we begin, yes this is another character advice thread.

    Also, I'm not looking to optimize, I'm just looking to be effective.

    And into it we go: I'm playing in a pathfinder game (ECL 7 currently) as a Rogue. Recently, due to fluff reasons, the DM is allowing me to respec my straight rogue into something more arcane. So I did some research, and this is what I found that I might be interested in:

    Beguiler, Spellthief, Unseen Seer, Arcane Trickster, Wizard. I kind of want to go into either Unseen Seer or Arcane Trickster using any combination of the base classes. Rogue is fittable as well.

    I want my character to be effective as a rogue, but I also want my secondary or even primary purpose to be a batman or toolbox type character. Also, I've been doing a lot of the spying and reconnaissance so that could work in there as well.

    Also, I'm using the pathfinder version of Arcane Trickster and Rogue and the regular version of everything else. Do you guys have any suggestions?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2010

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    How attached are you to a rogue? The sandman bard can basically do everything the rogue can with regards to traps.
    Hail to the Lord of Death and Destruction!
    CATNIP FOR THE CAT GOD! YARN FOR THE YARN THRONE! MILK FOR THE MILK BOWL!

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by WarKitty View Post
    How attached are you to a rogue? The sandman bard can basically do everything the rogue can with regards to traps.
    Not too attached at all. I don't really want to be a singy-music playing bard type either though. O.o. I'll admit I haven't looked at the variant though.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Rogue 1/ Beguiler 5/ Unseen Seer 4/ Arcane Trickster 10

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2010

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    Not too attached at all. I don't really want to be a singy-music playing bard type either though. O.o. I'll admit I haven't looked at the variant though.
    Take Oratory as your primary perform skill? Or if that doesn't suit your taste, we refluffed dance for one of my characters as performing fancy or showy moves with a weapon.
    Hail to the Lord of Death and Destruction!
    CATNIP FOR THE CAT GOD! YARN FOR THE YARN THRONE! MILK FOR THE MILK BOWL!

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by gorfnab View Post
    Rogue 1/ Beguiler 5/ Unseen Seer 4/ Arcane Trickster 10
    What's the rogue for? Wouldn't it be just as good to put that level into Beguiler?

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Euphonistan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    What's the rogue for? Wouldn't it be just as good to put that level into Beguiler?
    Without rogue or something similar you do not get sneak attack damage from unseen seer.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Ohhh, right. I forgot it only gives you a bonus.

    Edit: Wouldn't it be better to take an extra level of Unseen Seer rather than that fifth Beguiler level? It doesn't really give you anything.
    Last edited by Otherworld Odd; 2011-02-05 at 01:54 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Minot, ND
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    Edit: Wouldn't it be better to take an extra level of Unseen Seer rather than that fifth Beguiler level? It doesn't really give you anything.
    Beguiler 5 would net you Silent Spell as a bonus feat where as another level of Unseen Seer nets you another Advanced Learning and Nondetection. So yeah Unseen Seer seems like the better way to go.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by gorfnab View Post
    Beguiler 5 would net you Silent Spell as a bonus feat where as another level of Unseen Seer nets you another Advanced Learning and Nondetection. So yeah Unseen Seer seems like the better way to go.
    I think either Unseen Seer or Arcane Trickster (pathfinder) gives a silent spell-type ability anyways.

    Another problem I ran into is that the Arcane Trickers requires the ability to cast mage hand as a pre-req and sadly, beguilers don't get mage hand. S I might have to sub the beguiler levels for wizard.

    So what I'm thinking is one of these:

    Rogue1/Wizard4(or5)/Unseen Seer(4 or 5)/Arcane Trickster 10

    or

    Rogue1/Wizard(4or5)/Arcane Trickster(4or5)/Unseen Seer 10.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2010

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    I think either Unseen Seer or Arcane Trickster (pathfinder) gives a silent spell-type ability anyways.

    Another problem I ran into is that the Arcane Trickers requires the ability to cast mage hand as a pre-req and sadly, beguilers don't get mage hand. S I might have to sub the beguiler levels for wizard.

    So what I'm thinking is one of these:

    Rogue1/Wizard4(or5)/Unseen Seer(4 or 5)/Arcane Trickster 10

    or

    Rogue1/Wizard(4or5)/Arcane Trickster(4or5)/Unseen Seer 10.
    If you add 1 more level of rogue, you can get mage hand 3/day as a rogue talent. Sadly you don't get a lot else from that level.
    Hail to the Lord of Death and Destruction!
    CATNIP FOR THE CAT GOD! YARN FOR THE YARN THRONE! MILK FOR THE MILK BOWL!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by WarKitty View Post
    If you add 1 more level of rogue, you can get mage hand 3/day as a rogue talent. Sadly you don't get a lot else from that level.
    This is very true. Do you think it would be better to do that or just take wizard levels for it?

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2005

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by WarKitty View Post
    If you add 1 more level of rogue, you can get mage hand 3/day as a rogue talent. Sadly you don't get a lot else from that level.
    Rogue 2 gets Evasion. Which never sucks.
    Shecky

    True Neutral: "... does what seems to be a good idea at the time..."

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Greenish's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Finland

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    Also, I'm not looking to optimize, I'm just looking to be effective.

    Quote Originally Posted by Otherworld Odd View Post
    And into it we go: I'm playing in a pathfinder game (ECL 7 currently) as a Rogue. Recently, due to fluff reasons, the DM is allowing me to respec my straight rogue into something more arcane. So I did some research, and this is what I found that I might be interested in:

    Beguiler, Spellthief, Unseen Seer, Arcane Trickster, Wizard. I kind of want to go into either Unseen Seer or Arcane Trickster using any combination of the base classes. Rogue is fittable as well.
    Well, you're in luck, since PF skill change means you don't need the Able Learner (and thus human as the race) that the 3.5 rogue/wizards usually want to nab. Batman-ish toolbox & effective rogue seem to ask for more versatility than beguiler provides (even though it's an awesome class), so a normal rogue/wizard/Unseen Seer is probably the order of the day.
    Quotes:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by Claudius Maximus View Post
    Also fixed the money issue by sacrificing a goat.
    Quote Originally Posted by subject42 View Post
    This board needs a "you're technically right but I still want to crawl into the fetal position and cry" emoticon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitsu View Post
    I define [optimization] as "the process by which one attains a build meeting all mechanical and characterization goals set out by the creator prior to its creation."
    Praise for avatar may be directed to Derjuin.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2005

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by Greenish View Post

    Well, you're in luck, since PF skill change means you don't need the Able Learner (and thus human as the race) that the 3.5 rogue/wizards usually want to nab. Batman-ish toolbox & effective rogue seem to ask for more versatility than beguiler provides (even though it's an awesome class), so a normal rogue/wizard/Unseen Seer is probably the order of the day.
    That's the way I'm going with mine. Mine's a dwarf (story reasons) with two levels of rogue already (also story reasons), and the DM is leaning towards enforcing multiclassing penalties, so I'll probably tack on 3 wizard levels before going US. Batman/toolbox primarily, also shouldering as much of the party's main-caster role as possible. Pondering going with more crowd control to make the melee-centric party a bit more effective, but definitely hanging on to the occasional roguely contribution to combat (i.e., sneak attack damage) as well. Also the only party trapfinder/fixer, which is integral to the character's story. US seems a nice mix of all those roles.
    Shecky

    True Neutral: "... does what seems to be a good idea at the time..."

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    HalflingPirate

    Join Date
    Dec 2010

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Traits from Pathfinder APG can nab you Mage Hand without taking levels in Wizard or giving up the precious rogue talent. See Two-World Magic or Magical Talent.
    Last edited by MightyPirate; 2011-02-08 at 01:29 PM.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Orc in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Quote Originally Posted by MightyPirate View Post
    Traits from Pathfinder APG can nab you Mage Hand without taking levels in Wizard or giving up the precious rogue talent. See Two-World Magic or Magical Talent.
    Interesting. O.o. I will definitely look this up...



    Now, another question for you guys. Do you prefer the Unseen Seer or the Arcane Trickster (From the pathfinder book)? From what I see online, Unseen Seer seems to be almost unanimous decision as the better class but for some reason my DM keeps pushing Arcane Trickster as the better class so I'm quite conflicted as to which one is actually better. Both fit my character concept quite perfectly and I have no leanings towards either class because they both seem good to me.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Dusk Eclipse's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Runite
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    I prefer Unseen seer, better BAB, more utility (truly Advanced learning is AWESOME, there are some exelent divinations normally impossible to adquire for a wizard like Hunter's Eye), better skill points, and easier requirements
    Just call me Dusk
    Avatar by Ceika

    Dming: Eyes of the Lich Queen IC OOC


  19. - Top - End - #19
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Akal Saris's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2007

    Default Re: Roguey Spellcaster-Thing. [Pathfinder]

    Unseen Seer helps you get to 2d6 SA to qualify for Arcane Trickster anyhow.

    Personally, I prefer Unseen Seer, since it has better skill points per level and there are always 2-3 divinations that I want from other spell lists - usually the ranger's Hunter's Eye spell, and then the cleric's Divine Insight, Commune, Divination, and True Seeing (at 5th rather than 6th level).

    With that said, I do like the new class features in the PF arcane trickster. I might suggest a build along the lines of Rogue 1/Wiz 4/Unseen Seer 2/Arcane Trickster 10/Unseen Seer +3.

    Another interesting build would be Sandman Bard 6/Unseen Seer 2/Arcane Trickster 10/Unseen Seer +2. Sandman Bard gets sneak attack at 5th and bardic music is always nice to have around, so you'd trade raw spellcasting power for more early-game flexibility.
    Handbooks: (Hosted on the new MixMax forums)
    [3.5] The Poison Handbook
    [3.5] (New) Master of Shrouds Handbook
    [3.5 Base Class] Healer's Handbook

    Trophies!
    Spoiler
    Show

    Thanks to Strategos and Jumilk for the awesome Iron Chef trophies!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •