Results 1 to 11 of 11
-
2011-03-03, 12:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Lemuria
- Gender
High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
So as the title says... Do you prefer quick ascension? Where you have less power but get it faster. Or High ceiling? Which is whereyou have great potential for power but it takes a while.
-
2011-03-03, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
I will almost invariably choose the latter.
-
2011-03-03, 12:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Germany
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
I like to have constant improvement, but always staying on a relatively low level.
We are not standing on the shoulders of giants, but on very tall tower of other dwarves.
Spriggan's Den Heroic Fantasy Roleplaying
-
2011-03-03, 12:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Scandinavia
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
Boats are like nuts, the outside is hard but the inside is usually good to eat.
And remember, things can always get worse.
-
2011-03-03, 01:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
-
2011-03-03, 01:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Maryland
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
I do enjoy E6, but even there, I make builds that stress more power later over more power now.
-
2011-03-03, 01:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
I like to play with a medium degree of power -- in 3.5 terms, tier 3 in the level six to twelve range. Stretching out that sweet spot is great, so if it takes three campaigns to go from 6th to 14th, that's fine. Less power makes me feel like I can't accomplish much deliberately without GM fiat, and more power tends to make me feel less immersed, because I'm questioning how it could exist without trending toward a Tippyverse.
-
2011-03-03, 01:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- Germany
We are not standing on the shoulders of giants, but on very tall tower of other dwarves.
Spriggan's Den Heroic Fantasy Roleplaying
-
2011-03-03, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Lemuria
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
Personally I hate E6, It's just so limiting.
I much prefer the bleach d20 way of limiting. You can choose to try for enormous world changing power... Or you can just take being strong.
With option one you usually go through a soft shell stage where anyone can kill you. With option two your relatively solid the whole way through.
-
2011-03-03, 02:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
But the limiting is all the fun of it. Trying to be world-crushingly powerful with 20 levels at your disposal is easy. Trying to accomplish the same results with far more limited resources makes for much more interesting characters IMO.
The more severe the limits, the more creative I have to be.
-
2011-03-03, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Lemuria
- Gender
Re: High ceiling of power or quick ascension?
Now try to beat someone who is level 20, while level 16. Most of the broken spells stripped out, and a few magic sword moves, and since I play hollows, monster abilities.
Certain paths in Bleach simply cannot make it to level twenty.
Heck the normal people stop at level 10. That's as far as most are able to go.
The exception being Paragon hollows. And Vizards.
Pretty much everything hollow related. And even normal Paragons are a horrible choice after a certain point if you have people trying to kill you.
If you want mind numbing ultimate power it's very difficult.