Results 361 to 390 of 1472
Thread: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
-
2011-05-10, 02:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In a box of dice
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
If you knew anyting about Douglas Adams and how he wrote, I don't think you'd describe his script as taking the easy way out. Actually, it challenged the BBC literally to their limits and beyond at the time. But in those days, when asked "Can we show an infinitely long tunnel that accelerates people to near light speed, then deposits them safely at the other end" nobody said "Actually, no."
But the script was heavily trimmed down simply because there was too much plot for two hours of TV to handle.
Face it, the episode was boring, the actors looked like they weren't trying, the plot holes were glaring and the resolution was both something we've already seen and not that interesting anyway.
And on top of that, next week sees the middle episode of the season arriving. Which means we've had a confusing two parter and a bland, forgettable waste of air time that has more in common with the Colin Baker years than modern TV.
She was a good looking girl, but the concept of "space nurse doesn't really get how humans work" has already been done, and done better.
-
2011-05-10, 03:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Carlisle, Englund
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
In your opinion, yes it was. I found it an ok episode, mostly everything up to the alien ship was good, and then it was just really passable (ignore the drawn out death, they milked that way too much).
I wouldn't trust my opinion though, as I got amusement out of watching Paradise Towers and Twin Dilemma."Three blokes walk into a pub. One of them is a little bit stupid, and the whole scene unfolds with a tedious inevitability." - Bill Bailey
Androgeus' 3 step guide to Doctor Who speculation:
Spoiler- Pick a random character
- State that person is The Rani
- goto 1
-
2011-05-10, 04:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I'm not talking about animation or special effects or anything. But really, if the captain in PP was supposed to be threatening then I really must have missed something there. 'taking the easy way out' might have been a bad choice of words. I'm familiar enough with Adam's writing, the thing is, I don't think he can make good drama. He can make great comedy but no real emotional drama, at least nothing I ever read from him made me feel something else than amused. And CotBS just wasn't meant as a complete joke.
But the script was heavily trimmed down simply because there was too much plot for two hours of TV to handle.
Face it, the episode was boring, the actors looked like they weren't trying, the plot holes were glaring and the resolution was both something we've already seen and not that interesting anyway.
Okay, after the last discussions we had I guess we have the problem that I'm pretty easy to please and you... well, have higher and different standards. So there's little point in arguing over anything subjective and we could just agree to disagree on most things (except for PP having no plot holes. I'll keep insisting on that one. Not many more than your average Who episode but still) (just to prevent a prolonged argument)
-
2011-05-10, 04:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In a box of dice
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I can respect that. I liked Trial of a Time Lord and Ghost Light.
Mostly, I just wish the directors they've used on Who for the past couple of seasons were up to the task. The writing is (mostly) good, the actors are very talented. But the directors, the people who are supposed to filter the written word and turn it into visual entertainment while adding their own spin on things, aren't really trying to bring anything to the table. I mean, the guy who directed the last episode has also done Grange Hill ( a soap in a high school) and Casualty (a soap in a hospital) as well as Merlin (a dreadful things that takes the names of mythological figures, then ignores everything else about them).
That's not exactly inspiring and confidence-filling.
Edits:
The captain was hiding a complex and sophisticated science fiction revenge plan under the bluster and shouting. And his polyphase avitron scared the heck out of me when I was 7, so don't go dissing that
The Pirate PLanet also has the only Doctor Who cliffhanger that has ever left me in doubt that the Doctor was going to be okay. The end of episode 3 is something that will stick with me for the rest of my life as a high point of what TV can offer.
I'm obsessive about reading the production subtitles on the DVDs. And as I said, the captain and his robot parrot were surprisingly clever, just let down by 70s costume and effects technology.
There's a reason that The Pirate Planet and City of Death are held up as two of the best examples of 70s Doctor Who. It's because in both cases, the scripts are nearly perfect. I'll be impressed if you can point out a genuine plot hole, as in something that happens for no apparent reason or that is left unexplained, in either episode.
Characters might act in ways that only make sense taken in the context of the show they are on. But that's not the same thing as a plot hole, really. That happens in just about every genre show you can think of.Last edited by The Big Dice; 2011-05-10 at 04:39 PM.
-
2011-05-10, 04:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Location
- Lost in the Hinterlands
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I thought it was a decent episode.
I like Merlin.Last edited by Giggling Ghast; 2011-05-10 at 04:32 PM.
-
2011-05-10, 04:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I'll agree this episode wasn't up to par, but it was no worse than most of what passes for television, at least over here in the states (there's a reason I don't watch much TV). It was disappointing. That said, while the two parter might have been a little confusing, I thought it was excellent, and most reviews I've seen agreed. Also, next week looks awesome. Between the previews and Neil ****ing Gaiman I'm convinced it will be awesome.
-
2011-05-10, 04:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ēast Seaxna rīc
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
So? While I've probably heard a flintloch firing at one point or another I don't keep an idea of what it sounds like in my head and the one I heard firing may not have been an accurate recreation and it still sounded obviously wrong.
Hey, the Colin Baker years had the protagonists acting like jerks for no reason. That at least qualifies as drama.
I found Paradise Towers to be one of the scariest episodes ever. Probably helped by it being so forgetable I only remember the one slightly scary bit.
Is the captain in Pirate Planet even the villain? I can't remember. I mainly only remember seeing the costume was in a museum.
I don't count "not being engaged by a story" as a case of having high standards. Thats about the lowest standards can go the way I see things."that nighted, penguin-fringed abyss" - At The Mountains of Madness, H.P. Lovecraft
When a man decides another's future behind his back, it is a conspiracy. When a god does it, it's destiny.
-
2011-05-10, 07:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- England
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
All Comicshorse's posts come with the advisor : This is just my opinion any difficulties arising from implementing my ideas are your own problem
-
2011-05-10, 09:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Neurotypicalville, WA
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Keep in mind that actual gun feedback is REALLY loud. That's why you never hear an actual 5.56 NATO blast from a SCAR-H in Modern Warfare 2, or a .22 from a revolver in Law & Order. It can destroy mics, blow out bass speakers, etc. I'm glad they went with a simple Flintlock sound forging, because my TV is brand new.
Steam username is Triscuitable.
I got VAC banned in COD: Ghosts for using an FOV changer.
I try not to think of how sad that is.
-
2011-05-10, 09:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Gender
-
2011-05-10, 09:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Neurotypicalville, WA
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Ita go "pew-pew". Just like everything else in my head.
Steam username is Triscuitable.
I got VAC banned in COD: Ghosts for using an FOV changer.
I try not to think of how sad that is.
-
2011-05-10, 09:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I remember when I was a little younger I was taken to a sort of re-enactmenty place where they fired flint-lock rifles and cannons and such. The cannonw as awesome, I 'felt' it fire and we were stood a little way away, that was cool, but I am being distracted...
They fired a few different muskety-rifley things and to my ears each one sounded different to the others, maybe I am just strange..... It has been suggested before... But yeah guns are loud, and sound cool, in a loudy-cool way.
But anyways, I liked the episode, maybe it was not the best but I enjoyed it a lot. I guess I am just easy to please.Last edited by Raddish; 2011-05-10 at 09:48 PM.
-
2011-05-11, 08:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ēast Seaxna rīc
- Gender
-
2011-05-12, 10:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Well I liked that episode. It was silly and lacking in substance, but it was fun and ended with space pirates. So I'm happy.
Also, I thought that the black spots turning out to bewas brilliant.Spoilerskin samples
And I have no bloody idea what a flintlock sounds like, and wasn't distracted by it at all. (Though I was wondering about the missing pirate...)
-
2011-05-13, 07:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Neurotypicalville, WA
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Speaking of which, I just cut myself... Waiting... Holding mirror... Dang.
Steam username is Triscuitable.
I got VAC banned in COD: Ghosts for using an FOV changer.
I try not to think of how sad that is.
-
2011-05-13, 09:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
-
2011-05-13, 09:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
What I don't get is why the nurse became incredibly evil looking around infections. I mean seriously, whoever programmed that clearly didn't have a good bedside manner in mind.
Also, isn't it implied that this isn't the only sighting of a siren? How often does this sort of craziness happen? The odds of it happening once seem low enough. Multiple times? That's kind of crazy.Avatar by Serpentine.
"Love takes up where knowledge leaves off."
- St. Thomas Aquinas
-
2011-05-14, 10:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
She became pissy when someone tried to interfere with her taking care of the wounded, like when Amy went to Rory on the ship.
And it's implied in those particular waters during calm seas the siren was seen. Which makes sense, 'cause those boats would basically also be sitting on the large space craft like the current boat is.
That said...so excited about tonights episode. <3 Might use it to introduce some friends to the Whoverse.Show me how pretty the world is
'Cause I envy the way that you move
Show me how pretty the world is
'Cause I want something a little bit louder
Show me how pretty the world is
'Cause you're brilliant when you try
Show me how pretty the whole world is tonight
-Matt Nathanson "Pretty the World"
Various Syka-Foxes done by the wonderful Ceika
-
2011-05-14, 01:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Derby, UK
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
First impression:
SpoilerThis episode is going to inspire soooo much fanfiction and slightly squicky fanart...Last edited by Aotrs Commander; 2011-05-14 at 01:18 PM.
-
2011-05-14, 01:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Belfast, NI
- Gender
-
2011-05-14, 01:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Spoiler
Good episode.
In fact, fantastic episode.
Very intriguing idea. Loved the Doctor/Tardis interaction so much. The plot overall was pretty good as well, rather than just being an attempt to set up the "Tardis in a living body" situation.
I thought the "Amy/Rory in the Tardis running around" bit was weaker, with the ill defined illusions and abilities but it was still better than anything from last week. I was getting a few Portal vibes...
The Villain was an interesting premise but I don't think it had much character beyond that.
Avatar by Simius
-
2011-05-14, 01:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Derby, UK
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Last edited by Aotrs Commander; 2011-05-14 at 01:44 PM.
-
2011-05-14, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Belfast, NI
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
SpoilerPersonally I found those bits pretty disturbing. Especially when you think about exactly how House set up those illusions. Namely, that they were real. House is using paradoxes to create certain scenarios and then tear them down.
And Since Rory is made of plastic and technically doesn't eat, drink, sleep or age; how long do you think he'd have to be there on his own to look like that.
-
2011-05-14, 01:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Germany
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Well, took me a while but I finally got to have another look at PP just before the new episode. Okay, I guess it wasn't that bad but the pirate planet story still is a bit... well... it wouldn't work. Never. Guess that's what stuck to me. No, I couldn't find any real plot holes, I'll admit. Except maybe for the telepaths stupid behavior sometimes.
-
2011-05-14, 02:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Ēast Seaxna rīc
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
"that nighted, penguin-fringed abyss" - At The Mountains of Madness, H.P. Lovecraft
When a man decides another's future behind his back, it is a conspiracy. When a god does it, it's destiny.
-
2011-05-14, 02:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Derby, UK
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
SpoilerAlso, not-actually-killing Rory is becoming this series' running gag. And it's actually starting to get funnier... (Anybody also note Rory sort of got to Do Stuff (-ish) this week?)
-
2011-05-14, 02:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Norwich, UK
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
SpoilerHoly Mother of Jimbob, Time Lords can change gender. A lot of fanboys/girls are going to have a field day with that one.
Great episode though. Really enjoyed the Doctor/TARDIS interaction. Great writing and acting. Also loved the line about bunk beds. It's about time somebody said it.
-
2011-05-14, 02:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- In a box of dice
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
What's so unworkable about a hollow planet that jumps through hyperspace to engulf worlds and strip them of all their mineral resources? And the stuff with the time dams, their ever increasing energy requirements and the Captain's revenge plan was the sort of brilliant simplicity that only the very best writers can come up with.
And yes, the telepaths were lame. But in their defense, they were meant to be. They didn't have any more of a clue than the rest of the population of the planet, they just had mind powers.
As for tonight's episode, I have to say that the last three are a perfect illustration of the difference between competent, good and great writers. There was an energy and sense of not knowing where things were going combined with thinking you could see it all perfectly that I haven't felt on Who since season 4.
Now I want to see if the script Stephen Fry wrote will ever get made. And if they can afford to get Gaiman to come back next year for an episode.
-
2011-05-14, 02:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- England
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
Piratebold-Bard by Elder Tsofu | Backer #121 of the Giantitp Kickstarter | My homebrew
-
2011-05-14, 02:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
- Scotland/Glasgow
- Gender
Re: Doctor Who (again) [SPOILERS]
I thought it was the exact opposite of last week's. The episode was incredible, but the preview of next week seemed a bit odd/lacklustre