Careless Village WW

[Matthias2207]

So do the deaths of Network Member and Important Civilian affect the game in any way? What happens when all Importants are killed, for example? Is that even possible? How many are there? Should I lure raccoons with peanut butter, or rather artificially flavoured powdered bone slime? So many questions!
And what's this with the mayor? Did I miss something? (I didn't read the rules very carefully, so that's a likely explanation.)

[Gray Mage]

Superdark33, do you have something you want to share with us?

[Count Dingdong]

@Matthias: those NPCs that are none of you may or may not do somthing. The Mayor died first day, so some Candidates came into play. For whatever reason, blue = Mayor vote? (reference to nother game, I assume)

Current votes:
super dark33 - 2
usourselves&we - 1

need minimum of 5 to avoid executioner deciding. about 24 hours left. get to voting...

also, masons no longer protected, unless new ones came, that is. and everyone in game except Tom the Mime can be voted for for lynch.

[TBFProgrammer]

I'd like to know why people protected Forum Explorer, especially since he was up against the masons.

[planswalker]

Agreed. Forum Explorer still has my suspicions.

[Devmaar]

That's a good point, Forum Explorer

[Ramsus]

Sure, Forum Explorer it is. Remember, vote Ramsus for mayor. The opposing side is not giving you cookies no matter what they say.

[super dark33]

Superdark33, do you have something you want to share with us?

Yeah, i was the first to vote.
someone had to.
i have no idea who is who yet so i just threw a blind vote.
carry on.

[gunnar11]

So why are we voting on ForumExplorer Again?

If you want to keep the discussion going maybe you should accuse someone else, not FE.

[Forum Explorer]

whoa whoa whoa! Nobody including me knew I was up against a mason. And if I'm understanding the mason rules correctly only one other mason knew planswalker was a mason. In the end I voted for planswalker because I didn't want to get lynched myself and he had the second most votes.

TBFProgrammer for never explaining the weird logic of yesterday even when I asked politely.

[planswalker]

And that doesn't help explain why it is that you thought not getting the start of voting patterns yesterday was a good idea. You actions to me smell of someone who doesn't want an informed town.

Since TBF argued against lynching the mason yesterday, I think it's safe to say he wasn't acting wolf-like.

I'll grant that the evidence against you isn't absolutely condemning, but can you provide us a better target?

[gunnar11]

Since TBF argued against lynching the mason yesterday, I think it's safe to say he wasn't acting wolf-like.

I'll grant that the evidence against you isn't absolutely condemning, but can you provide us a better target?

The moment people knew you were a Mason, no one voted for you to be linched. If you're talking about before that, what does it matter that TBF argued against it? It was a random guess!

Second: Why, if he doesn't have a better target, does he have to die? That just seems like a weird rule. I myself don't have any clear target, so do I have to die?

[planswalker]

There is evidence that doesn't smell right to me, and SOMEONE is going to die today, whether we vote someone or leave it in the hands of a single person.

i'll grant that I'm not 100% sure he's a wolf, but he's more suspicious than anyone else.

[gunnar11]

Doesn't sound right, but hey, you're a Mason, so everything will turn out right, I hope. I'll trust you for this one:

Changing my votes:

Ramsus for mayor.
and I'm sorry, Forum Explorer but maybe this will stir up some more info.

by the way, maybe a bit of a dumb question, but: do we get to know the roles of the people we lynch?

[planswalker]

If I'm wrong about forum explorer, I will personally apologize to him via pm, but I think he sounds more wolfy than anyone else atm.

[Count Dingdong]

by the way, maybe a bit of a dumb question, but: do we get to know the roles of the people we lynch?

Yes. Role names are revealed on lynch but not on Night Kill. Bystander/Village/Wolf is not revealed (but may be obvious). Role descriptions are not revealed.

Alignment and powers were already revealed for Original players, but newcomers aren't same. So you may know role name, but not alignment. Hope that makes things clear.

------------------------------

Current votes:
Forum Explorer - 5
TBFProgrammer - 1
super dark33 - 1
usourselves&we - 1

need minimum 5 votes to lynch -> if nothing changes, Forum Explorer is lynched. You have about 18 hours left?

[Forum Explorer]

where did my post go? I had this all written up once already.


Anyways I really don't want to claim so I'll see if I can argue you out of killing me first.


Yesterday I wasn't so much arguing that that everyone shouldn't vote but trying to justify why my non vote was harmless. By my logic if everyone was voting randomly then it was better to let the executioner choose because that was at least a slightly better chance of hitting a wolf. As is that didn't happen at all and we've ended up establishing a pretty good voting pattern anyways.

As for apologies that seems silly. After all this is only a game and I'll likely return as a Clueless Villager anyways.

[planswalker]

yeah, I hope I don't seem too bloodthirsty or anything. I think it's 50/50 of you being a wolf, honestly. I'd be less eager to throw pitchforks at you if this shut you out of the game permanently.

I just figure a 50/50 is more likely to be a wolf than the blind random throw of no guess.

[Lex-Kat]

Of course we're not giving out cookies. Everyone knows pixies make the best cake.

Vote for me, and I will give you a nice strawberry and chocolate cake, with vanilla frosting.

Oh, and Ramsus is evil. Don't vote for Ramsus. Vote Lex-Kat for mayor.

[Penguinator]

Forum Explorer, yes. Afraid I haven't much to say, yet.

[Forum Explorer]

Right I don't think I have time to convince you all otherwise so....


I am the Seer and I've done a piss-poor job of it.

[planswalker]

and any wolf could claim that.

do you have any claims we could test to help us verify this?

[Forum Explorer]

and any wolf could claim that.

do you have any claims we could test to help us verify this?

Afraid not. The only scan I've done was Ramsus and it was interfered/failed for whatever reason.


So yeah piss-poor job, particularly since I've apparently missed the Night 0 scan.

[planswalker]

that's... awfully convenient for a wolf to say.

of course, a true see wouldn't try to lie to save their own skin.

Like I said, a 50/50 chance of wolfhood is my bet.

[Ramsus]

Wow a Seer claim with no scries. Yeah. Not wolfish at all. Cherry on top is the interference claim on someone believable for interference to happen on. I'm pretty sure I've done that exact move before as a wolf.

For me that's like 70/30 wolf.

[Forum Explorer]

I tried using reason and that wasn't getting me anywhere so I revealed my role. Due to bad decisions+bad luck I've pretty much entirely failed to do anything of value.

Not much more to say. Believe me or don't.

[Count Dingdong]

12 hours left, 8 people yet to vote. Reminder that 3 days without voting is autolynch. Vote for No Lynch counts as vote.

Current Votes:
Forum Explorer - 6
Ramsus - 1
TBFProgrammer - 1
super dark33 - 1
usourselves&we - 1

[usourselves&we]

It actually sounds like a probable story, for the most part. A good amount of people would target Ramsus rather soon with seer powers. It's more likely that a new-ish player who is a wolf backed into a corner would claim seer with scries then claim fool when those are wrong.

But it's not like we have information Super Dark for the hell of it and still voting Lex-kat for new fake mayor vote, that might possibly become a real thing.

[Zar Peter]

I'll believe the explorer for the moment, too. And Lex Kat seems to think that Ramsus is evil, I wonder why.

I'm wondering what's this mayor thing is all are talking about lately... maybe I should read the old newspapers.

[Ramsus]

Wow, yeah, I don't want to be a lynch candidate because my opposition in this election (that I started) declared me evil. If she was a seer or a proxy that would have been an outright claim. As is, it's just misleading.