Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    ShriekingDrake's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Updated Spells Known Table--what do you think

    One of our players has proposed that we change the spells known progression to the following. I like the logic of the table, and it looks like it makes 0-9 spontaneous casters a bit more fun. I am wondering what you all think about this progression. Are there problems with it? Are there pit falls I'm overlooking? I'm inclined to allow this--updating my monsters as well--but want to be sure I'm not falling into a trap.

    SPELLS KNOWN

    01st 5 2
    02th 6 3
    03th 7 3 2
    04th 8 4 3
    05th 9 5 3 2
    06th 9 5 4 3
    07th 9 6 5 3 2
    08th 9 6 5 4 3
    09th 9 6 6 5 3 2
    10th 9 6 6 5 4 3
    11th 9 6 6 6 5 3 2
    12th 9 6 6 6 5 4 3
    13th 9 6 6 6 6 5 3 2
    14th 9 6 6 6 6 5 4 3
    15th 9 6 6 6 6 6 5 3 2
    16th 9 6 6 6 6 6 5 4 3
    17th 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 3 2
    18th 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 4 3
    19th 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 3
    20th 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 4

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    ShriekingDrake's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Default Re: Updated Spells Known Table--what do you think

    I do know that this is not the most exciting subject. But I'd really welcome thoughts. This looks fine to me, but I want to be able to justify my ascent or denial either way.

    Right now, I'm inclined to allow it for all spontaneous casters who go to 9th level spells. But, I am prone to overlooking the obvious and would appreciate the wisdom of the boards.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Banned
     
    Answerer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: Updated Spells Known Table--what do you think

    I think it's fine in any game that allows Tier 1 prepared casters. Those would still be better than this, but this gives the spontaneous casters an actual advantage in some respects, as opposed to being almost-strictly inferior.
    Last edited by Answerer; 2012-09-30 at 12:34 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •