Results 421 to 450 of 519
-
2013-11-01, 09:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Thank you for trying, Socratov, as well as for letting us know when you found it necessary to throw in the towel. This was a tough round to judge (so are most rounds, come to that).
-
2013-11-01, 10:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- Below sea level
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Well, I'll be back some other time when it's *ahem* more convenient *ahem*. Anyway, I did have fun for as long as it lasted
Warlock Poetry?
Or ways to use me in game?
Better grab a drink...
Currently ruining Strahd's day - Avatar by the Outstanding Smuchsmuch
First Ordained Jr. Tormlet by LoyalPaladin
-
2013-11-01, 10:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
split hairs - hardly but maybe you should wear the dunce cap for a bit
Braxton adjusted was 16.5 and then stated that Braxton - disputes answered - score stands
seems clear as day to me.
Braxton 16.5
-
2013-11-01, 10:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
- Richland, WA
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
I am what lurks under your bridge, I am the troll...
Not sure about what I said, go back highlight it with your mouse and wham it's magically blue for sarcasm, so like everything on the internet take it with a grain of salt.
-
2013-11-01, 10:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Necro-equestrian Pugilism
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Last edited by Deadline; 2013-11-01 at 10:09 AM.
-
2013-11-01, 10:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
-
2013-11-01, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Socratov I can totally understand, sometimes I try to sneak judge for practice but eventually everything is too much for me too handle, that is why I really respect the people that take time to judge (and I feel a bad taste in my mouth anytime we press any judge)
EDIT: Chairman did you see my last pm?Last edited by thethird; 2013-11-01 at 12:10 PM.
Thanks a lot Gengy for the awesome... just a sec... avatar. :)
-
2013-11-01, 11:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Judging is a harder job than competing. Thanks for giving it the effort - I know that we all appreciate it.
Guys, can we please keep this civil? There's only (about) 3 more days to this competition, and then the slate gets wiped clean. I don't think that I need to mention any names, do I?
Dispute:
Originally Posted by EillyassaLast edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2013-11-01 at 11:32 AM.
-
2013-11-01, 12:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Thank you for clarifying that you have adjusted Braxton's score to 16.5. My main question is where that adjustment should be added, as I keep a spreadsheet that tracks scores for each category every round. While it may seem clear as day to you, others including myself may not know what caused that final +0.25 adjustment. Looking back over the thread, here are the comments and scores I see from you about Braxton:
Now, I see how the score went from 16 to 16.25 because of the removal of the "basic build" penalty under Elegance. However, I'm still struggling to see where the additional +.25 comes from to render a total score of 16.5. Can you please let me know where it should go?
-
2013-11-01, 12:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Unnamed.. no, I'm Braxton. However, I will admit I took serious references from Conan (Check the quote right above my background, straight conan reference), and thought.. (What if Conan turned corrupt?) I tried to bring this out, and I like to feel that I did pretty well.
On the warblade, warblade 6 would've gotten me less than barbarian 2 did, I felt. The character was built originally as full barbarian, and kept slowly changing the more I thought about it. Iron Heart Surge is just too strong. However, I only use it to get rid of nauseated and sickened, as well as fatigued after a rage. I went with the extra two levels of ragemage to grab a final rage per day (4/day). I felt that was stronger than trying to glue in JPM, which I did consider but thought it not fitting the theme I was going with. (Felt it would be a blatant power grab I'd get penalized in Elegance for) Con over Str was to grab extra corruption, so that I would be able to cast more spells. Also, my damage is pretty considerable even without more Str, so I went to up my HP as well. Felt it was the better choice.
Yes, I don't mention my taint, I read over the heroes of horror and saw the different parts about how where if you fight evil, you gain taint. I used that as my basis, doing odd jobs, fighting any evil I could fight, slowly becoming more like the evil I fought without knowing.
On casting while raging- I can also use maneuvers at the same time, as I checked- none of the maneuvers I grabbed require concentration, so I can use any of them I want.
Finally, I noticed no one really commented on the Instantaneous rage, which I am the only person to have picked up. It is really quite powerful, having the ability to completely demoralize my opponents during their turn using the rest of my abilities.
Thank all of the judges for judging this round, may the best Chef win.
I see what you mean about entering the SI late, but its required to keep the Steal Spell progession, dropping out of Spellthief earlier would have delayed Steal Spell(5th) and possibly Steal Spell(6th). Also, since Spellthief is 3/4 BAB she only qualifies for the SI at 8, but the extra die of SA and advanced Steal Spell is what makes her push entry into the PRC back so far.
-
2013-11-01, 12:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
-
2013-11-01, 01:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Just my two cents as a sometime-IC chef contestant, but I personally am not impressed with retdalyn's judging. It looks sloppily done, plus the reasons that I saw for dropping marks seem rather harsh. Dropping marks for not having the right number of sentences in a paragraph? Or for having too long a backstory?
Please note that GITP is lagging horribly for me, so there will be spelling mistakes.
-
2013-11-01, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
GreenSerpent - I welcome your comment
I will address this
It looks sloppily done - tabled format is quite neat and uniform.
Fluff
- as is subjective to each judge- has no bearing on the right number of sentences.
-I have seen several past contests where long fluff was penalized ; and frankly I do not care to read a short story - just what the character is doing and how they got what they got.- this can be done in around 2 paragraphs.
- the deductions had absolutely nothing to do with the correct number of sentences in a paragraph.
GreenSerpent - have a wonderful day.
RE: Ponies-
sorry on the miscommunication and confusion RE: Braxton
rules interpretation = 0 that is where the score was adjusted.
score is 16.5Last edited by relytdan; 2013-11-01 at 02:45 PM.
-
2013-11-01, 03:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Tallies Somewhere During Disputes But Who Can Really Keep Track Any More All I Know is that We've Had Three Judges 2: Electric Boogaloo
{table=head]Entry|Medal|Total|Average
Rand Turimbar|Gold|48.75|4.0625
Sir Driscoll Conia|Silver|44.75|3.72916666666667
Brooswayn Scourgesoul|Bronze|43.75| 3.64583333333333
The Lost Crab|Bronze|43.75| 3.64583333333333
Angelique A'lanale|Fifth|43|3.583333333
Designation MDCCCLXXXVI|Fifth|43|3.583333333
Eillyassa Miltal|Seventh|42.75|3.5625
Braxton|Eighth|42.25|3.5208333333
Magralyx|Eighth|41.75|3.479166667
Leilani|Tenth|41.25|3.4375
The Damned of the Crab|Eleventh|40.25|3.354166667
Shane MacLaughlan|Twelfth|39.5|3.291666667
Bug|Thirteenth|38.25|3.1875
Giorgio|Fourteenth|36|3
Smeagol|Fifteenth|34.5|2.875
Pantaleon Dalence|Sixteenth|33|2.75[/table]
The above table includes Korahir's +0.25 to Braxton's Power score from the most recent dispute.
@relytdan
Thank you for clarifying. Adjustments have been made in the table above. The following questions of arithmetic are still open:
I saw your first response, as follows:
I then responded with additional questions and fear that post might have gotten missed due to volume. I've reposted it below:
Can you please provide clarification on their scores, whether there were additional deductions not listed in your tables or whether a correction to their total scores is in order?
@Korahir
I don't know if the below also got lost in the shuffle. Would you please be able to address?
-
2013-11-01, 03:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Here i thought english would be the problem, turns out my math is flawed ;P
Braxton: UoSI score: 2,75 Total: 11,5 (unchanged)
Eillyassa: total of 12.25
Angelique: Power score: 3.75. Total: 14.
Bug: Elegance score: 4. Total: 11.25.
Sorry for making such obvious mistakes. Thanks ponies for pointing them out.
-
2013-11-01, 04:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Caen, France
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
I'm sorry to say that I'm in way over my head.
I'm only halfway through, so no judgings from me this round. My apologies.
Overall, I'm impressed by Angelique A'lanale and Designation MDCCCLXXXVI, and Angelique gets my vote for Honorable Mention.
I did finish rating Originality for all entries. Here are my thoughts, for those who wish to read them.
Spoiler: Originality
Spoiler: Criteria
This is the most subjective category, so there will probably be disagreements. A similarity between two entries is not penalized.
Everyone starts with a score of 3. Points are added or substracted for the following reasons :
+ Use of a race / class / ACF I did not expect, or a race / class / ACF that rarely sees play in IC competitions, to my experience.
+ The build's combat and out-of-combat roles are unexpected.
+ Original and / or compelling backstory and / or presentation. Bonus if it makes me laugh or if, after reading, I genuinely care about the character. I like being entertained.
- Use of a very popular race / subrace / dip / ACF / template. No deductions are made for popular classes if you take them for more than 2 levels.
- The build fills an expected role or uses expected strategies / tricks.
- I didn't find the backstory or the character interesting.
Smeagol, the Furious Avenger
Spoiler
+ Your backstory made me smile. I'm not an expert on Lord of the Rings, so can you (or someone else) explain the references to the hooded white robes and the two snakes facing each other in front of the sun ? (+0.5)
- I expected Half-Orcs. In addition, Desert Half-Orc is the most popular Half-Orc subrace, though it is rare to see Half-Orcs in IC. (+0)
- I did expect Barbarian, and it is used fairly often as a dip. (-0.5)
- Lion Totem, on top of that. Well, here goes. (-0.25)
- Because of the similarities between Sworn Foe and Favored Enemy, I expected Ranger ; however, it doesn't see much play in IC from my experience. (+0)
-Wait, I did not expect that Ranger ACF ! Actually, I have never heard of it before, so you get cookie points. (+0.25)
+ I expected both Avenging Executioner and Half-Orc Paragon. However, as explained in my criteria, I do not penalize classes unless they are dips, and although Avenging Executioner is sometimes used, Half-Orc Paragon is not. (+0.25)
- I very much expected an Intimidate-focused melee build, and since you didn't explicitly write down Smeagol's tactics, I can only assume that he focuses on this. (-1)
- Out-of-combat, you seem to focus on... err... climbing and jumping ? No obvious focus, so in order to stay on an equal foot with those who do have one, I must give you the standard penalty. (-0.25)
Score = 2
An Intimidate + Charge build was what I pictured when I first saw the SI. Maybe you should have Vizzini'd harder.
Sir Driscoll Conia, the Diamond Knight
Spoiler
+ I like the backstory, and I like the character. (+0.5)
- Lesser Aasimar. Who doesn't know the Lesser Planetouched at this point ? (-0.25)
- Corrupt Avenger has an explicit synergy with Paladin, so it was expected. (+0)
+ Swordsage, however, was the one martial adept I didn't expect, mostly because of the medium BAB. Quite present in IC contests though. (+0.5)
- I thought about Bone Knight quite a bit, and it is very popular. (-0.5)
- I expected an Intimidate-focused melee build. (-1)
- No obvious out-of-combat role, so you get a minor deduction in order to stay on par with those who have one. (-0.25)
Score = 2
Your run-of-the-mill fallen Paladin. Swordsage is a nice touch, though.
The Lost Crab
Spoiler
+ The backstory didn't do anything for me, but the haikus are a nice touch, and it is impressive that you succeeded in finding a picture so appropriate. (+0.5)
- Human. 'Nuff said. (-0.5)
+ I didn't expect Human Paragon, but it has seen a fair amount of use in past IC competitions. (+0.25)
+ In retrospect, I should have expected Maho-bujin, but since I didn't before I saw your build, for the sake of integrity, you get points. (+0.5)
- Intimidation focus, again. (-1)
- A scouting focus was also expected. (-0.25)
Score = 2.5
I really should have seen Maho-bujin coming, but hey, I didn't.
Designation MDCCCLXXXVI
Spoiler
+ Brrr. Delicious chills. You are close to maximal backstory score. (+0.75)
+ I didn't expect Warforged, though it is used often. (+0.25)
- I expected Ranger ; however, it doesn't see much play in IC from my experience. (+0)
+ Didn't see that ACF coming though, mostly because I didn't know about it. (+0.25)
+ Incarnate ? Well well, now you're talking ! (+0.5)
- Crusader was expected, but you took three levels, so it's not a dip as I defined them. No penalty. (+0)
+ Soulcaster was definitely not expected. No big bonus for only two levels of it, though. (+0.25)
- Intimidate Focus was exp... wait, no Intimidate Focus ? How am I supposed to take points away from you now ? (+0)
- Maneuver-fueled Melee combatant was expected because of the full BAB. (-0.5)
- I was expecting a scouting focus as the main out-of-combat role, so you get a penalty here. (-0.25)
Score = 4.25
Your roles were expected, but the way you went about it was most definitely not.
Magralyx the Kinslayer
Spoiler
+ Did I just see a succubus ? (+0.25)
+ Yep. Seems I did. (+0.25)
+ Really, that's... wow. (+0.25)
+ And it counts as both a race and a class, so... (+0.25)
+ LA +6 ? 6 hit dice ? (+0.25)
+ Did I mention succubus ? (+0.25)
Okay, so more seriously.
+ Nice backstory. (+0.25)
+ Succubus, as a race. Did not see that coming, no I didn't. And it's uncommon in IC too. (+0.75)
+ Succubus, as a class : idem. More levels in it equals more points.(+0.75)
+ I did not expect Battle Dancer, and I rarely see it used. (+0.5)
You aren't focused on any specific combat role, so I'll split :
- A little bit of ranged combat at low levels. Neither surprising nor expected. (+0)
- A little bit of melee. That was expected. (-0.25)
- A little bit of intimidation. No real emphasis, but it's there, and expected. (-0.25)
- Party face and scout were two expected out-of-combat roles. (-0.25)
Score : 4.5
You're a succubus. You might be a typical one (except for the LG thing), but even the most bland succubus will have an original feel, so there you go.
Braxton the Destroyer, Sworn Enemy of Evil, Unstoppable Force of Destruction, The Rock Against Which all Evil is Crushed, Slayer of Those Who Deserve Slaying, Warrior of the Unyielding Sword
Spoiler
+ Okay backstory, though I don't understand why you put those references there. Conan ? A Knight's Tale ? What does it have to do with Braxton ? (+0)
- Humans, humans everywhere ! (-0.5)
- Warblade was expected, and sees regular play. (+0)
- Barbarian, however, is an expected and often seen dip. (-0.5)
- Lion Totem ACF. (-0.25)
+Wait, Rage Mage ? Now that's unexpected, and not something we see in every contest. (+0.5)
- Melee combatant with Intimidate focus. The obvious route, same penalty as everyone.(-1)
- No focus out of combat, which should be at least as penalized as an expected focus. (-0.25)
Score : 1
Standard race, standard classes, standard everything. Even Rage Mage can't save you. That's a shame, I like Rage Mage.
Eillyassa Miltal
Spoiler
+ Okay backstory. (+0.25)
+ Strongheart halflings see a lot of play, but not Lightfoot halflings, so you get a bonus. (+0.25)
+ Spellthief I did not expect at all. (+0.75)
+ Melee combatant was expected, but not two-weaponers or sneak-attack focused builds. (+0)
- I see no particular focus out of combat. Maybe party face with Bluff. Either way, that's the same penalty. (-0.25)
Score : 4
Nothing exceptional, but a collection of both uncommon and unexpected choices.
Giorgio, the Lich's Bane
Spoiler
+ I enjoyed the backstory. (+0.5)
- Humans, both expected and oft-used. Standard penalty. (-0.5)
+ Spellthief was unexpected, so you get a small bonus for that dip. (+0.25)
+ Rogue was unexpected as well. (+0.25)
+ Sorcerer was unexpected, and while it regularly features in IC, its Battle variant does not. (+0.5)
+ It's hard to determine what your role is supposed to be, so I'll assume half sneak attacker, half BC / debuffer caster. Anyway, those are two unexpected roles, so you get (+0.5).
- Out-of-combat, you've only got Spot going for you. The closest role you can borrow is that of the scout, so that's a (-0.25).
Score : 4.25
An odd collection of classes, and an unusual combat focus for a Corrupt Avenger. No entry in there looks like yours.
Brooswayn « Knight From the Dark » Scourgesoul
Spoiler
+ I laughed. Hard. The picture, the caption, the name, everything. Of course, that was before I read the last paragraph. And, good sir or madam, you get maximal backstory points.(+1)
+ Hellbred was unexpected, but it regularly appears in IC. (+0.25)
- Warblade was expected and a common occurrence. (+0)
+ I expected someone to grab Mettle, and so Hellreaver was on my list of expected classes. I don't think Hellreaver is seen often in Iron Chef, though. (+0.25)
- Intimidatefocusmeleecharacter and no play makes Keynub a dull boy. (-1)
- No obvious out-of-combat role. (-0.25)
Score : 3.25
Your character is pretty much run-of-the-mill, and that's where the backstory (among other things) separates him from the others.
Angelique A'lanale
Spoiler
+ Superb backstory, masterfully written. As I read the final paragraph, I found myself cheering. (+1)
- Azurin often appears in IC, and is nearly on the same level as Human in terms of expectation. (-0.25)
- Duskblade was expected and is common. (+0)
+ Soulborn. I didn't think I would be surprised by a full BAB base class this round. Well done. (+0.5)
+ Hellreaver was expected for this round, though rare in IC. (+0.25)
- Frontline fighter was an expected role, but no Intimidate focus, so good on you. In-combat healing is rare, and I especially didn't expect it for this SI. (+0)
+ Out of combat, you are focused on healing, which was highly unexpected. (+0.25)
Score : 4.75
Nonstandard combat role, unique way of achieving it, a way with words, but the beauty of the entry lies in the fact that Angelique is not only a build, but a great character.
Shane McLaughlan
Spoiler
+ The origin story doesn't do anything for me, but I have to give you some points for your presentation, particularly the use of different colors for the spells of your different classes, and the use of bold for new skills / skill tricks, as it greatly facilitated my work. (+0.25)
- Human, again. (-0.5)
+ Spellthief was unexpected, so you get a small bonus for that dip.(+0.25)
- Duskblade is popular and was expected. (+0)
+ I did not see Unseen Seer coming (see what I did there ? Oh look, I did it again), but it's a popular PrC. (+0.25)
+ Mage of the Arcane Order is another popular PrC that I didn't expect for this contest. (+0.25)
+ Melee was expected, sneak attack was not. In addition, you are able to fulfill an arbitrary number of roles to a limited extent thanks to your brand new trick. (+0.25)
+ Scouting was expected, but trapfinding was most definitely not. These two cancel each other out. (+0)
Score : 3.75
Your class combination is surprising, although the individual ingredients are not unheard of in IC.
Bug, a.k.a. Twinkling Guide, a.k.a. Mr. T
Spoiler
+ I laughed. Good job. (+0.5)
+ I don't think I have ever seen a Diopsid before in IC. And I've read the Dervish builds. If it isn't in there, I don't know where it could be.(+0.5)
- Barbarian was expected, and is popular. Not a dip, so no penalty. (+0)
- Lion Spirit Totem is only second to Imperious Command on the list of things I never want to see again. It's good, but too much of a good thing... (-0.25)
- Skilled City-Dweller is another popular ACF, because Tumble. (-0.25)
+ Now, I didn't see Trapkiller coming. (+0.25)
+ Hellreaver was expected for this round, though rare in IC. (+0.25)
- Intimidate focus, charger build, nothing to see here, move along.(-1)
+ Out of combat, your main activity is trapfinding, which was unexpected. (+0.25)
Score : 3.25
The unusual choices you make more than outweigh the Intimidate focus. But still, Intimidate focus was the obvious route.
The Damned of the Crab
Spoiler
+ Nice backstory. (+0.25)
- Azurin gets a small penalty. Popular for the same reason as Human, but a whole lot less common. (-0.25)
- Paladin was expected. Not a dip, so no penalty. (+0)
+ I didn't expect Totemist, but it is a popular class in IC. (+0)
+ Everyone knows about Telflammar Shadowlord, but I didn't see it coming here. (+0.25)
+ Melee was expected, sneak attack was not. Shadowpouncers were unforeseen, but this doesn't affect your score because you cannot use it before level 20, that is 5 % of a non-epic campaign, assuming it even attains this level.(+0)
- Out-of combat, you are focused on scouting, at least I presume so. (-0.25)
Score : 3
Telflammar Shadowlord was the key here. It's a shame you get it so late.
Rand Turimbar
Spoiler
+ Backstory is okay. (+0.25)
+ Due to the Constitution penalty, and the reliance of Corruption mechanics on Constitution, I didn't expect any Elf subrace this round. (+0.25)
- Crusader was expected and is popular. (+0)
+ Jade Phoenix Mage wasn't expected. (+0.25)
- Maneuver-fueled Melee attacker was expected. (-0.5)
- Out of combat, for most of your career, Intimidate and Hide do the job ; that's either scout or party face, and both were expected. You do make some use of your Knowledges, though. (+0)
Score : 3.25
Not the obvious choice, not a mind-blowing one either.
Pantaleon Dalence, the Blurred Visage
Spoiler
- No backstory. You provided a build where I (and I assume I'm not the only one) would have liked a character.(-0.5)
- Illumian is a very common sight in IC. (-0.25)
- Fighter was expected this round, and has been known to appear in IC. (+0)
- Ranger, though expected, isn't very popular in IC, according to my experience. (+0)
+ Now that's something ! I didn't even know about Soldier of Light. Only a dip won't grant you much, though. (+0.25)
+ Will you believe that I didn't even think about Swiftblade ? It's popular, though. For 9 levels, you still gain some points. (+0.5)
- You're a melee combatant first and foremost. This was expected. (-0.5)
- Tracking focus out of combat was expected. (-0.25)
Score : 2.25
Swiftblade was a nice touch, but your other choices were standard. What I most regret is the absence of a backstory, but you know that already.
Leilani
Spoiler
+ You cover the bases in your backstory, but it's very little. (+0)
+ Akutsuwhatnow ? I don't think I've ever heard of this. But it's a template, and according to my criteria, templates don't give bonuses, only penalties. (+0)
- Human again. (-0.5)
+ Spellthief was very unexpected, as stated before. (+0.5)
- Swordsage might have been unexpected, but its popularity offsets the bonus. (+0)
+ Maho-Tsukai, on the other hand, wasn't expected. (+0.25)
+ You're a melee sneak attacker. I don't include your primary spellcaster abilities in your Originality rating, since you can do this only at level 20. (+0)
+ Out-of-combat, you've got a nice little portfolio. Appraise, all the Knowledge skills, Sense Motive were unexpected ; you've got some social and some scouting, but all in all, it is mostly surprising. (+0.25)
Score : 3.5
I'll admit, overall, it's far from the build I imagined upon seeing the SI. On the other hand, human.
So that's that. Sorry again, and congratulations to everyone.Last edited by Keynub; 2013-11-01 at 04:12 PM.
-
2013-11-01, 05:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
-
2013-11-01, 09:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Thanks Socratov and Keynub for letting us know, it is appreciated.
In regards to System Mastery, I became hooked on [redacted] after seeing how to properly utilise it in a build that achieved the same thing I had tried to lever in, but done much more cleanly. There can always be some application of it somewhere im a build.
-
2013-11-01, 10:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Thank you for updating.
Sorry to drag this out, but just to confirm: even though the individual Power deductions only list -1.5 in deductions for a total score of 13.75, you're holding to -2 in Power deductions for a total score of 13.25, thus penalizing the build for no other reason than an addition error on the part of the judge?
-
2013-11-02, 12:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Sorry, Ponies, but there's no rest for the wicked. Another dispute -
Originally Posted by GiorgioOriginally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVIOriginally Posted by AngeliqueLast edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2013-11-02 at 12:27 AM.
-
2013-11-02, 12:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
My honorable mention goes to Magralyx.
Entering a +6 LA race is a fairly bold decision, and I quite enjoyed the back-story.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2013-11-02, 12:49 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
wow. Judging is serious business. My hat off to you all.
-
2013-11-02, 06:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
MDCCCLXXXVI
Korahir:
I wouldn’t consider Level 10 to be “very” late for entry into the SI, but it was as soon as he could with the Incarnate levels granting poor BAB advancement.
Further, I thought my explanation for not completing the SI would negate any penalties for not completing the SI.
In comparison Magralyx who enters the SI even later (at ECL 14) was complimented for not completing the SI, noting how the eighth level of the SI is a dead level for class abilities. MDCCCLXXXVI was able to pick up the ninth level and the last unique class ability.
Also while he does have few skill points to play with, MDCCCLXXXVI is more interested in tracking and finding them (Survival and Spot). Skill ranks at Level 20 for him are 13 each and +8 bonus helps in this regard. True Bluff, Listen, and Sense Motive are not as highly invested skillwise but then again he is not interested in using subtlety when he finds his human foes. The idea here was the bonus was offsetting the non-maxed out skills.
Looking over your judging I realized i didn't award your use of tainted fury and therefor use of taint. Scoring adjustement: +0,5 UotSi
About the incarnum spellcasting—here was what I had interpreted. Incarnum Spellshaping is the feat needed in order to even cast spells with the Incarnum descriptor as described on p 98 of Magic of Incarnum. The feat further describes that the spells are cast “as appropriate for your class’ spellcasting ability,” in this case the Corrupt Avenger, as MDCCCLXXXVI has no other spellcasting capability. The Corrupt Avenger prepares spells as a wizard does with a spellbook. The SI in the spellcasting section notes that MDCCCLXXXVI can learn spells from wizards or wu jen as long as those spells are on my class list. Thanks to Incarnum Spellshaping, these incarnum spells are on my class list and are legal for me to learn. The incarnum spells are not normally on a wizard’s spell list either—unless he has the Incarnum Spellshaping feat.
And those are “typical” spells prepared, not absolutes, so even if the judges disagree with my interpretation, MDCCCLXXXVI still has the ability to cast from the “standard” spell list including being able to pump essentia to increase the spell level.
Angelique
Affirmative. My lack of oversight. The build is capable of meeting the SI requirement if we acquire moderate taint at level 8. I fully intended to, as it plays a role in her story of becoming barren and internalizing the taint.
This is the only real dispute I have. While a character is more prone to violent acts and registers as evil under a detect evil spell, any actual alignment change is up to the DM. The book says "a rule of thumb characters with moderate taint are Neutral at best." There is no real hard/fast rule for alignment change due to taint.
However, should a DM rule this way, the character still maintains most of her effectiveness. I took strong heart vest with a feat just in case this might come up, so no loss there. Merely paralysis and disease immunity are lost.Last edited by Korahir; 2013-11-02 at 06:16 AM.
-
2013-11-02, 07:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Originally Posted by Giorgio
Originally Posted by CAdv, pg 16
Originally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVI
Originally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVI
Originally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVI
Originally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVI
Originally Posted by MDCCCLXXXVI
Originally Posted by Angelique
Originally Posted by Angelique
Originally Posted by Angelique
Originally Posted by Angelique
Tallies, Wherever we Are!
{table=head]Entry|Medal|Total|Average
Rand Turimbar|Gold|48.75|4.0625
Sir Driscoll Conia|Silver|44.75|3.72916666666667
Designation MDCCCLXXXVI|Bronze|44|3.66666666666666667
Brooswayn Scourgesoul|Fourth|43.75|3.64583333333333
The Lost Crab|Fourth|43.75|3.64583333333333
Angelique A'lanale|Sixth|43|3.583333333
Eillyassa Miltal|Seventh|42.75|3.5625
Braxton|Eighth|42.25|3.5208333333
Magralyx|Eighth|41.75|3.479166667
Leilani|Tenth|41.25|3.4375
The Damned of the Crab|Eleventh|40.25|3.354166667
Shane MacLaughlan|Twelfth|39.5|3.291666667
Bug|Thirteenth|38.25|3.1875
Giorgio|Fourteenth|36|3
Smeagol|Fifteenth|34.5|2.875
Pantaleon Dalence|Sixteenth|33.25|2.77083333333333333[/table]
And just like that, we have a medal upset! Also, lest I forget: my Honorable Mention vote goes to Magralyx. She came out of left field with the "go big or go home" selection of Succubus, and I appreciate her various CHA synergies and awesome background.
-
2013-11-02, 09:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
I believe these disputes were never answered. Sorry if it seems overly pushy relytdan, I would have dropped it if not for the fact that it could have an impact on the medals, given the latest disputes.
Last edited by yougi; 2013-11-02 at 09:19 AM. Reason: I can't spell
Spoiler: ICitP Participations
Blackguard Avatar from Cealocanth
-
2013-11-02, 11:05 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
-
2013-11-02, 11:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
-
2013-11-02, 12:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
50% of this were not addressed not even acknowledged, specially considering there is a comment from the chairman I think they should.
My HM also goes to a succubusLast edited by thethird; 2013-11-02 at 12:02 PM.
Thanks a lot Gengy for the awesome... just a sec... avatar. :)
-
2013-11-02, 02:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
It appears that I forgot to change the 12 to 13...
Score 13.75
total penalties: 6.25
Originality -2
Power -1.5
Elegance -1
UsotSI -1.75
-
2013-11-02, 08:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground L
Korahir:
I wouldn’t consider Level 10 to be “very” late for entry into the SI, but it was as soon as he could with the Incarnate levels granting poor BAB advancement.
Further, I thought my explanation for not completing the SI would negate any penalties for not completing the SI.
If it was only short by 1 or 2 levels, the penalty would be light, but it would still be there.Last edited by Thurbane; 2013-11-02 at 08:41 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG