Results 1 to 19 of 19
-
2007-01-03, 12:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Am I reading this correctly?
Greater Mighty Wallop located in Races of the Dragon, 3rd lvl Sorc/Wizard transmutation spell. It is a better version of the spell Mighty Wallop (1st lvl Sorc/Wizard Spell), gives you caster lvl /4 to a max of 5 size increases or your effective weapon size is collosal (which ever comes first), spell is touch and its effects are caster level/hour. Thus a wizard can easily cast it on his monk ally (or a ally with a war hammer or other bludgeoning weapon.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
If I understand this correctly
Far from optimized build Just getting my point across
Lvl 12 Human Sorc 3/Monk 2/Enlightened Fist 7
Spells known as a 8th lvl Sorc, Caster Lvl 12
BAB of 8.25
Feats
1 Combat Casting
1 (Human Bonus Feat) Precocious Apprentice
3 Ascetic Mage
6 Practiced Spellcaster
9 Improved Natural Attack
12 Superior Unarmed Strike (From TOB) Gives +4 Monk lvls to determining Unarmed Damage
Monk Bonus Feats
1 Stunning Fists
2 Combat Reflexes
Wealth by lvl at 12 is 88,000 he can easily afford a monk's belt 13,000
Monk's Unarmed Damage 2 (Monk)+ 7 (Enlightened Fist)+5 (Monk's Belt)+4 Superior Unarmed Strike= 18 lvls 2d8 for a Human
3 size increases for Greater Mighty Wallop
1 size increase for Improved Natural Weapon
Total Size Increases 4
8d8 base damage (According to the DMG Table for size increases page 28)
This is before adding things such as strength damage
Finish off the build by finishing Enlightened Fist, and then doing Abjurant Champion
--------------------------------------------------------------------
That is a pretty nice spell
Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 01:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Yep. It's a powerful spell.
-
2007-01-03, 02:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Singapore
- Gender
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Now, if you could just enchant your fists with Clouting(Complete Divine) via Kensai... That would really be a Mighty Wallop. :P
President of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment(SHELA)
Glowing Kitty from Lilly
Wren Worgatar by Mephibosheth
The Living Bullet!
Unusual Inner Animal Avatar from Quincunx.
Whenever you mention Pun-pun*SQUELCH!*, Ao kills another Kobold.
Everytime someone says "Pazuzu" twice, Ao erases them on the next "Pa". Then he undeletes them so he can wipeinfo them from the multiverse.
Everytime you kill a catgirl, I get more company.
-
2007-01-03, 03:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Just making sure, its in the too good to be true type catergory for a spell
Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 03:10 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
It's no Venomfire, but it is pretty good. :P
-
2007-01-03, 03:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Don't have serpent kingdoms so I wouldn't know
Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 04:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- with Carmen Sandiego.
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
So what's the gist of Venomfire?
Member of a fanclub.
-
2007-01-03, 04:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Essentially, it adds a ridiculous amount of bonus damage ([CL]d6, maybe? Something like that) to every natural weapon that has poison. Wildshape into something with a poisonous natural attack, as a druid--or two, or three--and you're doing absolutely ridiculous amounts of damage, especially with caster level boosters.
-
2007-01-03, 05:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Singapore
- Gender
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
President of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment(SHELA)
Glowing Kitty from Lilly
Wren Worgatar by Mephibosheth
The Living Bullet!
Unusual Inner Animal Avatar from Quincunx.
Whenever you mention Pun-pun*SQUELCH!*, Ao kills another Kobold.
Everytime someone says "Pazuzu" twice, Ao erases them on the next "Pa". Then he undeletes them so he can wipeinfo them from the multiverse.
Everytime you kill a catgirl, I get more company.
-
2007-01-03, 09:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
You acknowledge the build isn't optimized, and that's a very good thing.
That build has a lousy BAB, hit points, and caster progression. At low levels it would suck royally. A superior build would be a strait Monk 11/Full BAB Class 9. Then simply ask the full progression arcane caster in your group to cast Greater Mighty Wallop on you. You should even offer to buy it for his spellbook, and to always watch his back in combat (given your movement speed, that shouldn't be a problem).
It's mistake that I've seen over and over again as a DM. Most Gish builds are horrendously under-powered until high levels. (Duskblades are the exception, IMO). Consequently, most players who play a Gish feel pretty useless/bored/stupid casting Grease and unable to survive on the front line of combat when everyone else is 6th level, blowing away at their enemies with Fireballs or killing them in one blow with Leap Attack. And half of my current group is pretty new to D&D, not even owning a PHB.
So I applaud your creative use of a spell. But I would warn anyone against being a Gish just to get access to it.
-
2007-01-03, 11:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Texas
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
-
2007-01-03, 12:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- In the corner, drawing.
- Gender
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Aaaand, here we are:
Precocious Apprentice
I've been considering a sorcerer/monk gestalt, I'll have to take a closer look at this spell...
(D&D doodling has moved to My Tumblr!)
~
~
Runewriters: My new fantasy comic (that doesn't have a fancy banner yet!)
-
2007-01-03, 12:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
I wouldn't call this build a gish, and yes I know its far from optimized. Yes a pure monk with this spell, fighter with a melee weapon with this spell or another focus melee chain, or wizard would be better at the level. Specialized characters are always better at dnd, if you have enough people to play all 4 major rolls. Thing is this build would be effective, regardless of it slowed down monk and sorcerer progressions as soon as you get Greater Mighty Wallop. I was just showing how it is still possible/easy to have both with the same character.
If you have a wizard in the party, it would be foolish for him not to cast this spell on the fighters weapons. If he complains he "wastes a 3rd lvl slot," get the DM to smash him in the head with the DMG. Then buy a cheap 3rd lvl pearl of power, (9,000 gp).
So in sum it would be better to have a wizard cast this on your monk since there is no reason not to. I was just showing how this spell makes a sucky character good, even if he has to get it himself.Last edited by Ramza00; 2007-01-03 at 01:30 PM.
Stupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 01:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
A better monk would be
Monk 6/Shou Disciple 5/Swashbuckler 3/Fighter 4/Psychic Warrior 2
Shou Disciple 5 gives you full bab, advances your flurry so we reach lvl 11 for greater flurry, 2 bonus feats, progresses your monk's damage (which is now at 11 thus a monk's belt and superior unarmed strike will bring it to 20) and allows you to flurry with any martial weapon.
Swashbuckler gives you Int to Damage with all light weapons and weapons you can use weapon finesse with which included unarmed strikes. Take Carmendine Monk for Int to AC instead of Wisdom), weapon finesse and full bab.
Fighter 4 gives you 3 bonus feats, and full bab
Psychic Warrior 2 gives you 2 more bonus feats.
Final BAB 18, 8 lvls with d8 hps 12 lvls with d10, 20 lvls with good Fort, 10 lvls with good Reflex+1 reflex from grace, 6 lvls of good WillStupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 01:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
doesn't Improved Natural Attack require a natural armor bonus?
-
2007-01-03, 01:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Improved Natural Armor does, I am talking Improved Natural Attack
Improved Natural Attack, [General]
Prerequisite
Natural weapon, base attack bonus +4.
Benefit
Choose one of the creature’s natural attack forms. The damage for this natural weapon increases by one step, as if the creature’s size had increased by one category: 1d2, 1d3, 1d4, 1d6, 1d8, 2d6, 3d6, 4d6, 6d6, 8d6, 12d6.
A weapon or attack that deals 1d10 points of damage increases as follows: 1d10, 2d8, 3d8, 4d8, 6d8, 8d8, 12d8.
This feat may be taken multiple times, but each time it applies to a different natural attack.
http://www.d20srd.org/srd/monsterFeats.htm
In sum its a long debate among some peopleStupendous Man drawn by Linklele
-
2007-01-03, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Texas
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
Shazzabaa---
Ooo thanks.
Bah Ramza00 beat me.
-
2007-01-03, 01:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
Re: Am I reading this spell correctly (Greater Mighty Wallop for Monks)
ah my bad. there's a misprint in the forgotten realms list of feats that says
Prerequisite: Natural armor, Con 13Last edited by mooseofshadows; 2007-01-03 at 01:57 PM. Reason: typo
-
2007-01-07, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
- Gender