New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 62
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    molten_dragon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The State of Denial
    Gender
    Male

    Default Modern 'elementals'

    I've been playing around with some ideas for games I might want to run in the future, and I had an interesting idea today.

    I think a modern take on the classical elementals would be interesting. Rather than being manifestations of the 4 classical elements though, they would be manifestations of the 4 fundamental forces (Electromagnetism, Gravity, Strong Nuclear Force, and Weak Nuclear force). Like the elementals, they would be composed of, and could control that force.

    I'm kind of having trouble conceiving of what they'd be like and what they'd do though. Electromagnetism and gravity are easier, since I'm more familiar with them, but even those are giving me some problems.

    So I decided to ask the playground for help. What abilities do you see these fundamental force beings having, and what do you think they would 'look' like (for lack of a better term).

    I'm more concerned with generalities than fitting them into a specific game system.
    If build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.

    If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

    My Homebrew

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    OrcBarbarianGirl

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Why am I here?

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    That is an interesting thought there. Let me think...

    Electromagnetism is real easy. Just have it look like a lightning dude.

    Gravity is harder, because it's hard to illustrate gravity without the mass that causes it. It could look like a shapeless prism, as its gravity bends light into a multicolored blob.

    Where this gets harder is that electromagnetism is governed by photons(If I didn't have a horrible teacher). So technically, the electric elemental has the monopoly on being visible. Worse, electromagnetism is a process that specifically overrides the weak force in all cases. It will take a lot of imagination to makes these forces interact like classical elements.

    One source of inspiration is to ask: what do these forces do for us every day? The strong force is responsible for nuclear energy(again, IIRC), so it would have to have some kind of energetic look to it. The weak force usually comes into play in chemistry, so maybe a weak elemental could look like a fizzing blob of acid, continually exchanging electrons among many elements.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    • Gravity could be a miniature black hole.
    • Electromagnetism...a living aurora borealis, maybe? Or perhaps a mobile electromagnetic disturbance? (Just imagine everything in the house flickering on and your TV suddenly talking to you.)
    • Weak Force could be described as a "stillness", I guess.
    • And Strong Force would be like some sort of chaos elemental. (Edit: Or maybe a snake of light?)


    I'm not a physicist, mind you, but my understanding of those terms leads me to believe those fit the bill.

    Edit2: Ninja'd?
    Last edited by Grinner; 2013-11-19 at 08:01 PM.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    molten_dragon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The State of Denial
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    I should clarify. I don't expect that all of them will be visible to the naked eye. Some of them may not be visible at all, but they should be detectable in some manner.

    For example an Electromagnetic elemental might simply be a shining light that varies through the EM spectrum, from radio waves through hard gamma radiation.

    A gravity elemental might be a gravitational singularity that can't be seen at all, except through gravitational lensing, or with a gravimeter.
    If build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.

    If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

    My Homebrew

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2012

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    The weak nuclear force is responsible for certain subatomic particle interactions, particularly those which are responsible for one subatomic particle turning into a different type of subatomic particle. This is the cause of certain types of radioactive decay. The strong nuclear force on the other hand is responsible for holding quarks together to make subatomic particles, and holding subatomic particles together to make atomic nuclei. I have no idea how to make an elemental that represents either of these.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by molten_dragon View Post
    Weak Nuclear force
    If you can sell a layperson on a "Weak Nuclear Force Elemental", then I tip my hat to you, because that sounds incredibly boring to me.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    GnomeWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Electromagnitism is quite obvious. It is electricity and magnetics.

    Gravity is also quite obvious, if a bit harder to implement. It is gravity, and how large objects are attracted to each other.

    Weak Nuclear Force is apparently also called the weak interaction, and it governs radioactive decay. Probably the easiest way to describe this would be "randomness", as the decay of a radioactive material is the only way we know of to produce true randomness. Other than that, I'm not sure how else you would apply it.

    Strong Nuclear Force is also known as strong interaction. It is the force holding the inside of an atomic nucleus together, and does nothing else. On the one hand, it would be difficult to apply it in most situations. Even if you hit somebody with a "Strong Nuclear Force attack", the range of such at attack would be measured in femtometers; it would literally not even affect a single atom of their body. On the other hand, disrupting the Strong Nuclear Forces that make up an object would literally cause it to fall apart. Such an effect would be equivalent to Disintegrate or, quite possibly, spontaneous nuclear detonation.

    Needless to say, SNF would be the most powerful weapon to use. It would also be the most dangerous, and probably the most difficult to attempt.


    [EDIT]
    Quote Originally Posted by No brains View Post
    Where this gets harder is that electromagnetism is governed by photons(If I didn't have a horrible teacher). So technically, the electric elemental has the monopoly on being visible. Worse, electromagnetism is a process that specifically overrides the weak force in all cases. It will take a lot of imagination to makes these forces interact like classical elements.
    As an aside, light/photons are not a force and so would only relate to forces incidentally. Electromagnetic forces are governed by the movement of electrons, not photons. (Hence, electro-. Also why "electricity" is named what it is.)
    Last edited by erikun; 2013-11-19 at 09:05 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by darthbobcat View Post
    There are no bad ideas, just bad execution.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Thank you to zimmerwald1915 for the Gustave avatar.
    The full set is here.



    Air Raccoon avatar provided by Ceika
    from the Request an OotS Style Avatar thread



    A big thanks to PrinceAquilaDei for the gryphon avatar!
    original image

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    molten_dragon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The State of Denial
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Slipperychicken View Post
    If you can sell a layperson on a "Weak Nuclear Force Elemental", then I tip my hat to you, because that sounds incredibly boring to me.
    The group I play with is mostly science nerds. They'll love it.
    If build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.

    If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.

    My Homebrew

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Protecting my Horde (yes, I mean that kind)

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by erikun View Post
    Strong Nuclear Force is also known as strong interaction. It is the force holding the inside of an atomic nucleus together, and does nothing else. On the one hand, it would be difficult to apply it in most situations. Even if you hit somebody with a "Strong Nuclear Force attack", the range of such at attack would be measured in femtometers; it would literally not even affect a single atom of their body. On the other hand, disrupting the Strong Nuclear Forces that make up an object would literally cause it to fall apart. Such an effect would be equivalent to Disintegrate or, quite possibly, spontaneous nuclear detonation.

    Needless to say, SNF would be the most powerful weapon to use. It would also be the most dangerous, and probably the most difficult to attempt.
    I was going to mention that. The SNF is what basically holds atoms together, so if you can control that you can stop it from working functionally making something collapse into its base subatomic particles. On a large enough scale you'd be looking at the ability to make anything cease to be. By the same token with enough control you could turn anything you want into something else.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by molten_dragon View Post
    The group I play with is mostly science nerds. They'll love it.
    Nice. I figured this kind of thing would make science/physics people happy.

    [Note to Self: Cram in some physics classes before graduation]

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    GnomeWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Beleriphon View Post
    I was going to mention that. The SNF is what basically holds atoms together, so if you can control that you can stop it from working functionally making something collapse into its base subatomic particles. On a large enough scale you'd be looking at the ability to make anything cease to be. By the same token with enough control you could turn anything you want into something else.
    Not... really, no.

    I mean, mucking around with SNF could transmute an element, in a way. Weakening it just enough to let a few protons and neutrons release from each atom would give you a lighter element (along with producing alpha particles). Trying to create a heavier element would be far more difficult, and would require extending the SNF to cover at least two atoms to combine them together. This could work... in theory... but it would much be like using gravity to create a black hole as a method to transmute carbon into lead, or something similar.

    While I can see the idea behind it, it's kind of hard to say how well it would work - and probably far, far more likely that squashing all the electrons from both atoms into that same nucleus will have some rather... unintended consequences.
    Quote Originally Posted by darthbobcat View Post
    There are no bad ideas, just bad execution.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Thank you to zimmerwald1915 for the Gustave avatar.
    The full set is here.



    Air Raccoon avatar provided by Ceika
    from the Request an OotS Style Avatar thread



    A big thanks to PrinceAquilaDei for the gryphon avatar!
    original image

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Lord Raziere's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by molten_dragon View Post
    The group I play with is mostly science nerds. They'll love it.
    In my opinion... try solids, liquids, gasses and plasma instead. they're better analogues to the classical elements and they're broad enough for a lot of creativity. plus you don't have to strain yourself trying to think how the strong and weak nuclear forces work as elementals.

    but...if you insist on the current formation, then unfortunately I have nothing to add.
    I'm also on discord as "raziere".


  13. - Top - End - #13
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Wharrrrrrgarbl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Slipperychicken View Post
    If you can sell a layperson on a "Weak Nuclear Force Elemental", then I tip my hat to you, because that sounds incredibly boring to me.
    It's more exciting if you describe them as (gauge) boson elementals.

    So, Photon Elemental: pretty self-explanatory. Radiation! Fireballs! Lightning bolts! Ads for personal injury lawyers!

    Graviton Elemental: Also, as people have noted, pretty easy. Squish.

    Gluon Elemental: I'm thinking a sort of stable Glueball, so you have dozens of different interpretations available. If you're fighting it, it has some seriously bad news disintegrating touch/slam attacks, as well as stomping around in a deadly miasma of radioactive and antimatter particles.

    W Boson Elemental: Difficult to detect; you have to track it by the trail of neutrinos and charged particles it spews out. Also has a tendency to start nuclear reactions (of whatever size the DM pleases ). Always accompanied by a Higgs Elemental, or some other strong fluctuation in the Higgs field.

    Z Boson Elemental: Even harder to detect; is most easily spotted (if you could possibly call it easy) by its shadow in streams of neutrinos. Also accompanied by a Higgs Elemental.

    Higgs Elemental: Very mysterious, but has no associated directionality. Accompanied by an area of increased vacuum energy, where (in the absence of sufficient gravity) space begins to expand and tear itself apart.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kane0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Waterdeep
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Can we compromise and have a Nuclear elemental?

    Cause you know, the Tarrasque and Astral Dreadnaught need an elemental counterpart...
    Roll for it
    5e Houserules and Homebrew
    Old Extended Signature
    Awesome avatar by Ceika

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Kane0 View Post
    Can we compromise and have a Nuclear elemental?
    If we have nuclear elementals, I vote that the Elder version should have Death Throes (Ex) with a radius listed in miles, with smaller elementals having (relatively) smaller death-explosions.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Wharrrrrrgarbl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    You may be interested in the Nuclear Toxyderm.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kane0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Waterdeep
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Slipperychicken View Post
    If we have nuclear elementals, I vote that the Elder version should have Death Throes (Ex) with a radius listed in miles, with smaller elementals having (relatively) smaller death-explosions.
    ... I am ok with this.

    Edit: Now I will forever see a small nuclear elemental bouncing around inside each Battlemech engine. Way to cross game systems.
    Last edited by Kane0; 2013-11-19 at 11:15 PM.
    Roll for it
    5e Houserules and Homebrew
    Old Extended Signature
    Awesome avatar by Ceika

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Eldritch Horror in the Playground Moderator
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    I dunno, an Elder Strong Nuclear Force Elemental having an attack line of 'Slam +26 melee: 2d8+6 plus spontaneous nuclear detonation' would be pretty cool to see in a MM.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by The Glyphstone View Post
    I dunno, an Elder Strong Nuclear Force Elemental having an attack line of 'Slam +26 melee: 2d8+6 plus spontaneous nuclear detonation' would be pretty cool to see in a MM.
    If those words appear in a dnd game, one knows that something has just gone horribly wrong gloriously right.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Wharrrrrrgarbl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Slipperychicken View Post
    If those words appear in a dnd game, one knows that something has just gone horribly wrong gloriously right.
    Ahem. From the d20 Modern SRD:

    Chain Reaction (Su): If the nuclear toxyderm is reduced to 0 or fewer hit points, it explodes in a blinding flash of light that deals 400 points of damage to everything (creatures and objects alike) within 400 feet and 100 points of damage to everything within a mile; a successful Reflex save halves the damage (DC 10 + 1/2 toxyderm’s Hit Dice + toxyderm’s Dexterity modifier). This explosion generally results in a milehigh mushroom cloud and a highly radioactive crater a quarter-mile across.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Troll in the Playground
     
    Imp

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Kane0 View Post
    Can we compromise and have a Nuclear elemental?

    Cause you know, the Tarrasque and Astral Dreadnaught need an elemental counterpart...
    A miniature neutron star?
    Black text is for sarcasm, also sincerity. You'll just have to read between the lines and infer from context like an animal

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Nov 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Wharrrrrrgarbl View Post
    Ahem. From the d20 Modern SRD:
    I already read that. I just thought it was homebrew because of the site's layout.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mastikator View Post
    A miniature neutron star?
    There was a homebrew Neutronium Golem a while back. It might as well have been a Big Numbers Elemental, since that's more or less what it boiled down to.

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Wharrrrrrgarbl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Mastikator View Post
    A miniature neutron star?
    But that would be a Hadron Elemental!

    Re: Toxyderms, if you prefer a less... Geocities source, check http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=d20/article/msrd under Arcana Creatures, or if you can find a print copy of Urban Arcana.
    Last edited by Wharrrrrrgarbl; 2013-11-19 at 11:37 PM.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Titan in the Playground
     
    nedz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    London, EU
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by The Glyphstone View Post
    I dunno, an Elder Strong Nuclear Force Elemental having an attack line of 'Slam +26 melee: 2d8+6 plus spontaneous nuclear detonation' would be pretty cool to see in a MM.
    Disintegrate touch attack

    A Weak Nuclear Force Elemental would do a random polymorph perhaps ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Raziere View Post
    In my opinion... try solids, liquids, gasses and plasma instead. they're better analogues to the classical elements and they're broad enough for a lot of creativity. plus you don't have to strain yourself trying to think how the strong and weak nuclear forces work as elementals.
    Also Bose-Einstein Condensate Elementals and Supercritical Fluid Elementals.
    π = 4
    Consider a 5' radius blast: this affects 4 squares which have a circumference of 40' — Actually it's worse than that.


    Completely Dysfunctional Handbook
    Warped Druid Handbook

    Avatar by Caravaggio

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    BlueWizardGirl

    Join Date
    Feb 2012

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Yay! I always thought bringing our science knowledge to RPG makes things more interesting.


    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Raziere View Post
    In my opinion... try solids, liquids, gasses and plasma instead. they're better analogues to the classical elements and they're broad enough for a lot of creativity. plus you don't have to strain yourself trying to think how the strong and weak nuclear forces work as elementals.
    I also like to think the classic elementals are analogies to states of matter.
    About the "forces" elementals... really, is hard to think a materialization for them, especially because it will probably tend to atoms and subparticles. Perhaps doing like the Giant, bringing elementals out of the periodic table, is refreshing and more easy.
    "I am somewhat preoccupied telling the Laws of Physics to shut up and sit down."


  26. - Top - End - #26
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Planetar

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    One thing I would point out is that the classical elements aren't TOTALLY unjustifiable by science; each represents a STATE of matter, so you've got Earth (Solid), Water (Liquid), Air (Gas), Fire (Plasma). Each of them is a relatively easily available form of the state of matter. I suppose if you want to get a Bose-Einstein Condensate we're getting into more... interesting... elementals.
    Spoiler
    Show

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGirl

    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    More conceptually, the weak and strong force elementals could affect the connections between and within things respectively. The weak force could "disconnect" things (denying teamwork/flanking bonuses?) while a strong force golem could "dissolve" things into constituent parts.
    Non est salvatori salvator,
    neque defensori dominus,
    nec pater nec mater,
    nihil supernum.

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    I think this thread is a wonderful idea, and I fully support the creation of elementals corresponding to the 4 forces.

    Except one problem: forces aren't elements, so we can't call them elementals.

    Does anyone have a good idea for an alternate name? Forcementals? Forcals?

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Necroticplague's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Just my 2 cents on two possibilities for gravity elementals:

    1:Invisible, mostly. Since the forvr of gravity is only directly visible in the way light bends through it, the elemental would not be visible in a normal way. Light bending through it would mean the most you see is an outline of it at the point where it ceases to be bent.Figuring where it is should be easy, but it would benefit from permanent concealment.

    2:Starkly noticeable. The gravity of a gravity elemental is so great, light does not escape at all, instead of merely being bent. It appears as less of a figure and more of a hole in the world.Basically, a vaguely humanoid-shaped black hole. Of course, it's hawking radiation means infrared cameras can see this thing from miles off.

    Although, when I saw the thread title, i did expect to be reading about Hydrogen Elementals all the way up to ununoctium elementals.
    Avatar by TinyMushroom.

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    OrcBarbarianGirl

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Why am I here?

    Default Re: Modern 'elementals'

    Quote Originally Posted by Necroticplague View Post
    ...The gravity of a gravity elemental is so great, light does not escape at all, instead of merely being bent...
    Oh, what if that light got out when it died? It's not a nuke, but a flash bomb could make an inconvenient low level death throes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •