Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
2014-01-21, 04:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
Stupid alignment clarification question...
Ok, so I have a group of new players, and while deciding on classes and alignments I looked up some stuff online to clarify to them what the alignments were like. (Playing 3.5)
I ended up confusing myself, because one of my favorite fictional characters (batman) was listed under like 3 different websites as being lawful good. I have always thought of batman as chaotic good, or neutral good, seeing as he is a vigilante who often has the police chasing HIM.
Am I totally off base here or what? Anyone able to clarify this, since now I'm confused.
-
2014-01-21, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
The Giant had some interesting things to say on how Lawfulness can, sometimes, be compatible with vigilantism:
And WoTC's guide to Law & Chaos is also helpful:
Save My Game: Lawful and Chaotic
As a lawful person, you recognize that most laws have valid purposes that promote social order, but you are not necessarily bound to obey them to the letter. In particular, if you are both good and lawful, you have no respect for a law (that) is unfair or capricious.
...
The law of the land in any given place is most likely designed to promote social order, so in general terms, lawful characters are more likely to respect it than chaotic characters are. However, the content of the law matters much more than its mere existence.
...
Any character might fear the consequences of breaking a local law, especially when the authorities rule with an iron hand. Very few characters, however, should make important decisions based solely on the legality of the choices. For a lawful good character such as a paladin, achieving goals in the right way -- that is, in a way that promotes the general welfare and doesn't unnecessarily imperil others -- is the most important consideration.Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2014-01-21, 05:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
-
2014-01-21, 05:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Batman is a terrible example for alignments. Mostly because he's been written by so many authors with so many interpretations of the Batman.
Spoiler
One way I like to explain alignment to new players is to break the alignment down into two categories and go from there. This may help you as well. The first half has more to do with ethics and honor, while the second half has more to do with morality… specifically, your compunctions towards committing murder.
According to PHB, pg. 104:
Lawful characters tell the truth, keep their word, respect authority, honor tradition, and judge those who fall short of their duties. Chaotic characters follow their consciences, resent being told what to do, favor new ideas over tradition, and do what they promise if they feel like it.
- Lawful: Poster child for the DMV. Wouldn't speed if his mother's life depended on it.
- Neutral: Drives defensively and responsibly. Sometimes speeds when he's running late or when the rest of traffic is speeding, just to keep with the flow of traffic, cause… you know. It's safer.
- Chaotic: Believes stop signs are suggestions on a good day, yield signs on a bad day. Never goes less than 10 miles an hour over on freeways. Gets kind of a thrill out of not getting caught.
The moral side of the spectrum has mostly to do with your feelings toward protecting or destroying innocent life… so murder.
PHB, pg. 104, again.
Good characters and creatures protect innocent life. Evil characters and creatures debase or destroy innocent life, whether for fun or profit.
People who are neutral with respect to good and evil have compunctions against killing the innocent but lack the commit- ment to make sacrifices to protect or help others. Neutral people are committed to others by personal relationships.PbP Junk and Stuff:
My Characters:
I am currently not a player in a game, and would be mostly interested in joining 5E games.My Campaigns:
For the Republic of Ishtar! A 5E Campaign
My PbP color is dark red.
My Player Registry
My DM Registry
Jormengand's Advice on Character Development
-
2014-01-21, 06:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Guys like Batman and Rorschach expose the weaknesses in the dnd alignment system's ability to categorize people and behavior.
Last edited by Slipperychicken; 2014-01-21 at 06:03 PM.
-
2014-01-21, 06:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Batman under which author? Frank Miller's Batman is very very different from Grant Morrison's Batman. Hell even ASBAR Batman is different from the Dark Knight Returns and those are both Miller. The character varies too much in different portrayals to be nailed down easily.
My Avatar is Glimtwizzle, a Gnomish Fighter/Illusionist by Cuthalion.
-
2014-01-21, 06:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Last edited by hamishspence; 2014-01-21 at 06:06 PM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2014-01-21, 11:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
My Avatar is Glimtwizzle, a Gnomish Fighter/Illusionist by Cuthalion.
-
2014-01-23, 12:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Those are my favorite Batman stories too, but the stories about the "deputized ally of the Gotham PD, with membership in the international peacekeeping organization known as the Justice League, and who happens to wear a costume" are a lot more common than the "hunted vigilante" stories.
A game is a fictional construct created for the sake of the players, not the other way around. If you have a question "How do I keep X from happening at my table," and you feel that the out-of-game answer "Talk the the other people at your table" won't help, then the in-game answers "Remove mechanics A, B, and/or C, impose mechanics L, M, and/or N" will not help either.
Tragak's Planar Reconstruction Archive (current active project: Acheron)
Avatar Credit goes to: Chd. Thank you!
-
2014-01-23, 01:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
-
2014-01-23, 01:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- St. Louis, MO
- Gender
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
I've always thought of Batman as more of a Lawful Neutral entity myself. I'm not as familiar as most of the rest of you are, but I've always felt, at least based on my experience with him, that he respects the legitimate authority of the Gotham PD, and doesn't work with them, just does part of their job for them. He's not judge jury and executioner, so he's not going to kill (again, my experience), so he's definitely not evil. He's willing to die to protect what he believe in, so I would put him as good except for a few sticking points I have with him being good. Using fear and intimidation to beat his opponents, and having detailed plans on how to defeat ALL of his allies. That for me has him solidly put into LN, a very close to LG, but still a solid LN.
Granted, my views based on my limited knowledge of batman, being mostly movies and the cartoons.
-
2014-01-23, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Ohio
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
He's a Lawful Good greyguard-type. While he breaks the law, it's because the law has failed to establish order. He fights for the greater law and order of Gotham City, stamping out the corruption and putting the fear of law and justice into the criminals who otherwise scoff at the inept and corrupt GCPD.
There is absolutely nothing Evil or Non-Good about using Fear and Intimidation to prevent Evil. And having plans to kill/defeat all his allies is a caution in case his allies go rogue.
He's Lawful Good in the sense that he takes the Good approach to creating a just and fair order.
-
2014-01-23, 02:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Dromund Kaas
- Gender
-
2014-01-23, 03:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Gender
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
Don't try to understand D&D alignment by looking at any non-D&D sources. D&D alignment is not consistent with any established moral/ethical philosophy in the history of the world. Like the combat system, it's a grossly simplistic system, unrealistic in may ways, designed to simplify play.
-
2014-01-23, 04:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Stupid alignment clarification question...
I agree.
Sometimes it's fun to look at characters in other media and say "Typical Lawful Neutral", or whatever. But in most cases it'll be a pretty dubious fit.
I'd also like to draw your attention to the option of just dropping alignment completely. The game works perfectly well without it - Gary Gygax himself took to running it that way, in his later years. Think about it."None of us likes to be hated, none of us likes to be shunned. A natural result of these conditions is, that we consciously or unconsciously pay more attention to tuning our opinions to our neighbor’s pitch and preserving his approval than we do to examining the opinions searchingly and seeing to it that they are right and sound." - Mark Twain