Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Question What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I've seen the arguments explaining why without ur-priest/sublime chord, dual caster classes are generally trash. Has anyone tried building a more effective version? Even just taking, say, a mystic theurge, and dropping some of the pre-reqs a little? Is it possible to find a nice balance between nerf-tacular and power overwhelming? I kind of like the flavor of a devout Boccob-worshiping, knowledge seeking, Wizard/Archivist/mysteriousdualcastingprestigeclass x, and wanted to know if I could make one that doesnt entirely blow, and since my DM likes my idea, and recently became aware of how awful MT is normally, I wanted to whip up some sort of reasonable proposal. Help?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Troll in the Playground
     
    GreenSorcererElf

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Allowing people to take more than 10 levels of mystic theurge would be a good start, though that doesn't help until the last levels. Since the problem is lack of the highest possible level of spells, and that is the whole limiting factor of the class, there's not much to be done. If the player knows what they're doing, clever spell combos and ways to cast more spells per turn have a chance to make up for it, but it's like TWF vs THF.

    Notice how all the MT style classes that are based around a specific pair of classes get extra abilities. Find one of those you like, or homebrew one, find a way to overcome your lack of the highest level spells by combining your lower level ones and you can still be a productive party member.

    Edit: also, try to stay away from MAD (Multiple Attribute Dependency). The cerebremancer (psionic/arcane) for example, can go psion/wizard, both of which use intellegence as their primary attribute. This doesn't make you any more powerfull, but it means that you don't have to worry about two different stats, and your save DC's will be the same for both classes. If you are using something like cleric/wizard, one side will most likely have lower save DC's than the other, which can be annoying. The more splatbooks you have, the easier this will be.

    And, though it probably goes without saying, stay away from classes that get spells later (sorcerer, wilder, etc), as that will be even more levels you are behind the others (though I always liked the idea of a shugenja/sorcerer, cha basesd theurge with spontaneous casting on both sides.

    Just remembered, the Ultimate Magus gets progression in two arcane classes, and some great abilities otherwise.
    Last edited by Fizban; 2007-03-24 at 08:18 PM.
    Attention Imgur Users! Imgur apparently doesn't like hosting images anymore and only works in certain places or for people who already have the image cached: No one can see your avatars or images!
    Also Photobucket users? Don't know if it's a bandwidth or region lock or something, but I'm seeing some avatars blurred out with a watermark that looks like the photobucket icon.
    And Tinypic went down a while back, seeing plenty of old avatars showing their downed image.
    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Octopus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fizban View Post
    sheer awesomeness

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Jack_Simth's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    It's tricky.

    On the one hand, if you push the requirements down too much, then there's no downside, and you end up with an overpowered character towards the end.

    On the other hand, as is, you'll usually end up with a mechanically weak character for most the career.

    Hmm... maybe something easy to get into, and runs long, that has spellcasting dead levels?

    So, say, 1st level arcane and 2nd level Divine spells (or vise versa - unlike most PrC's, you can get in with just four levels) the PrC runs 16 levels, but it misses out on advancement at, say, 5th and 10th (while somehow requireing you to take either the PrC itself or one of your two base classes).
    Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Halfling in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Wait, Jack_Mann, are you suggesting some kind of long leveled prestige class that would actually require that in the middle of it, you take more base class levels? That sounds strange, but could work... so early entry to prevent you from sucking too much in the very beginning, but forcing you to add in base class levels later, to stop you from getting too mighty? Or maybe something like Ultimate Magus does, where at certain levels only one of them gets buffed? I'd imagine as he'd ultimatly be a servant of Boccob, his arcane casting would be the more important one. Maybe at a few of the levels, only his arcane casting improves, but the rest both do, so that he'd really just end up being, say, 2 levels behind in arcane casting, and more like 2, then 3, then later 4 behind in arcane? Is any of this starting to sound balanced?

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Library Lovers Contest Winner
     
    GryffonDurime's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I like the idea of looking at other, later takes on the Mystic Theurge, namely the Ultimate Magus. Granted, this is a different beast entirely, but it still offers you access to 9th level Arcane spells if you only dip for your spontaneous class, and then gives you ways to -use- your abundance of spell slots in strange and nifty ways.

    If I had to make any changes, though...that's where it kind of breaks down. Maybe look at the Archmage and Geomancer and get some ideas for smaller, side abilities: throw a divine slot of equal level when you cast an arcane Fireball and you get to count it as Divine rather than Arcane for Spell Failure and the like? Dunno.

    I think you could add a few abilities that draw on your resources to open some interesting options without overpowering the class.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Novi Sad (Serbia)
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Well Ultimate Magus could be a good point to start if you want to build class that is not useless. Though it combines two aspects of arcane spellcasting you could modify it to be arcane/divine PrC. Also Arcane Hierophant is nice class if you lower down requirements to let us say 1st lvl arcane or divine spells that would allow you to access class earlier. I think it is nice class anyway since it gets some abilities which while not that great are better than MT's nothing.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Zincorium's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oak Harbor, WA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Use overpowered base classes for spellcasting, like Ur Priest or Sublime Chord, then use something like Fochlucan lyricist to increase spellcasting to the max. Yes, it's cheese.
    "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."
    - Thomas Jefferson

    Avatar by Meynolds!

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Krellen's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I've always wondered that if high-level spells break the game so badly that they're "necessary" for high-level play, how do these dual-caster classes really break the system? Don't they fix it, by removing the mechanic that breaks it the most?

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Troll in the Playground
     
    GreenSorcererElf

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Well, the way I see it is: sure, the high level spells are overpowered, but when you really need to get past something, that's when you turn to the wizard and ask him to bring out the grilled cheese. If the party is running on lower level spells, they will be easier to challenge, but you have to keep the kid gloves on a bit because they don't have the mega-cheese to fall back on if you go too far.
    Attention Imgur Users! Imgur apparently doesn't like hosting images anymore and only works in certain places or for people who already have the image cached: No one can see your avatars or images!
    Also Photobucket users? Don't know if it's a bandwidth or region lock or something, but I'm seeing some avatars blurred out with a watermark that looks like the photobucket icon.
    And Tinypic went down a while back, seeing plenty of old avatars showing their downed image.
    Quote Originally Posted by Violet Octopus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fizban View Post
    sheer awesomeness

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Jack_Simth's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Krellen View Post
    I've always wondered that if high-level spells break the game so badly that they're "necessary" for high-level play, how do these dual-caster classes really break the system? Don't they fix it, by removing the mechanic that breaks it the most?
    The problem is more that the dual-casting is very, very painful at low levels, and ONE FEAT completely obliviates 90% of the need for the class.

    The Wiz-3/Cleric-3/Mystic Theurge 1 is a 7th level character casting 2nd level spells... while the Wiz-7 and Cleric-7 are casting 4th level spells.

    Meanwhile, the Cleric-7 and Wiz-7 can have Leadership, and have a 5th level Cohort casting 3rd level spells of the opposed type. One feat makes the PrC kinda pointless (except for the possiblity of eventual tricks, like a Contingent Heal or Ressurection in later levels). Most such PrC's (as-is) cap out after 10 levels (a 16th level character casting as a Wiz and Cleric 13) while Leadership at that point can get you a 14th level Cohort... who can still advance as you go up (so between you and your cohort - one feat, mind - you cast as an Wizard/Cleric-16 while your cohort casts as a Cleric/Wizard-14... vs. the Mystic Theurge who's casting as a Wizard/Cleric-13). And with the Leadership option, you can still take PrC's that advance your spellcasting power in other ways (like, say, Loremaster, Incantatrix, Radiant Servant of Pelor, or whatever) which you can't with the Mystic Theurge types.
    Last edited by Jack_Simth; 2007-03-24 at 09:18 PM.
    Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Novi Sad (Serbia)
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    They don't break system because they suck. They only break it if you take PrC that gives you lvl 1-9 spells over 10 lvls of that class (like Ur-priest).

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Leadership is not an ordinary feat, it's an ability granted by DM fiat which just happens to also require a feat slot.
    Last edited by PinkysBrain; 2007-03-24 at 09:22 PM.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AtomicKitKat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    It's all about breaking the speed of progression. Get a class on each side(Ur-Priest for Cleric, Sublime Chord for Arcane 4-9) that acquires spell levels at double the normal rate, and the Theurge(or similar) is now counting as 4 levels(2 of each) of the equivalent PHB class(Cleric, Wizard). Sure, you don't get all the "nifty" class features(like better Turning{who gives a rat's ass? Everyone and his brother uses Divine MetaCheese anyway}, better Familiar{Again...}, and Bonus Feats{every 5 levels? Not really worth it.})

    The main limiting factors to "double-classers" are a lack of actions(You can only cast 1 spell a round, barring swift-action/quickened spells), and MAD(barring some crazy combination of classes that use the same base stat).
    President of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment(SHELA)

    Glowing Kitty from Lilly
    Wren Worgatar by Mephibosheth
    The Living Bullet!
    Unusual Inner Animal Avatar from Quincunx.
    Whenever you mention Pun-pun*SQUELCH!*, Ao kills another Kobold.
    Everytime someone says "Pazuzu" twice, Ao erases them on the next "Pa". Then he undeletes them so he can wipeinfo them from the multiverse.
    Everytime you kill a catgirl, I get more company.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Orc in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I think the best thing would be dual casting as a base class with a limited list of spells from each source - something along the lines of the warmage and beguiler lists (maybe there will be equivalent divine casting classes in Complete Champion). So a god of whomping stuff might still use the standard cleric, while a god of trickery would have the beguiler and divine whatever lists or just a stripped down list of cleric spells.

    You have your standard progression of save DCs and spell power rolls and can specifically exclude things that synergize too well. You can also wrap a few minor abilities around it to give it more style than the Mystic Theurge.

    Another option is creating a dual-casting PrC that allows busting the level caps on lower level spells, increasing caster level, increasing spell DCs and increasing spell power as abilities gained over time (and writing the abilities in a way that they don't become dip-fodder for enterprising optimizers).
    Proud Supporter of Cleric Rights

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Midnight Lurker's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The City, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    It's worth looking at True Necromancer from Libris Mortis. After checking this out, it makes me want to do a complete rewrite of the Mystic Theurge.
    The Evil Midnight Lurker what Lurks at Midnight
    "An object at rest -- CANNOT BE STOPPED!!!!!"

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Seattle, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    For the record, leadership should never be considered when talking about game balance, it is a tool for the DM to fill out a party, not something you use to pimp out your character.

    That said, the only way I see dual casters being useful is if they gain some abiltiy to cast multiple spells per a round. Quicken spell isn't enough as they lack the high level spell slots neccesary to quicken their good spells. Perhaps creating a mystic theurge varient where they gain the ability to twin cast arcane and divine spells. Then they will be able to be a wizard and a cleric at the same time, and they will be able to use all of their dozens of spells per day.
    "Sometimes, were heroes. Sometimes, we shoot other people right in the face for money."

    -Shadowrun 4e, Runner's Companion

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Zincorium's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oak Harbor, WA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by Midnight Lurker View Post
    It's worth looking at True Necromancer from Libris Mortis. After checking this out, it makes me want to do a complete rewrite of the Mystic Theurge.
    Why? True necromancer loses two additional levels of spells from each side over the course of it's progression. It's worse than the mystic theurge for the very reasons people complain about. The special abilities are okay, but if you look at the prerequisites, it's really not worth it. 5 lost caster levels on each side by level 16?
    "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."
    - Thomas Jefferson

    Avatar by Meynolds!

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Jack Mann's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Quote Originally Posted by lordmarcoos View Post
    Wait, Jack_Mann...
    No, he's Jack_Simth. I'm Jack Mann. Cool mustache? Jack Mann. Weird rainbow bubble things? Jack_Simth.

    This has been a special message from JackWatch.
    I am a poor man, some say Im half crazy,
    son of the sword and the knife
    Lady I pledge you my sword and my honor,
    my heart and my pride and my life
    --Bella Doa, by Joe Bethancourt
    Spoiler
    Show


    Alas, poor Draknir. By Mephibosheth

    Owl-atar by KingGolem
    You will be missed, dear 'stache...

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HempRope's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Michigan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    Hmm... I have an entirely different take on this whole issue. I don't think daul-casting PrCs are that much weaker than straight-up, single-class casters. Because we can't look at characters in a vacuum, we have to consider them as part of an entire adventuring party.

    The main limiting factor in D&D, I think we all agree, is the amount of actions a character can take. That's why dual-casters aren't anywhere near doubly effective as single-casters. However, rolling two classes into one character frees up a whole nother slot in the party. So let's imagine that instead of two full casters (a cleric and a sorcerer/wizard, say), you have two dual-casters (Mystic Theurges, for this example).

    Each round, you can still have one character casting arcane spells and another laying on the healing or divine buffs. They are slightly less powerful than what the two full casters can provide, but the casters can truly be in two places at once, anywhere on the battlefield.
    The real advantage, though, is that you can have two arcane casters or two healers at any given moment. Someone fireballs the party? Both casters can heal. Everyone's healthy? Both can fireball the enemy.

    Of course, you do lose an armored frontliner -- you no longer have a heavily-armored, buffed caster (cleric) to mete out punishment with their mace. But I'd argue that the ability to continue casting from either spell list even after one of the two casters is incapacitated almost makes up for this.

    Now, I know you would never really have two dual-casters in a party. But a similar flexibility can be achieved by adjusting some of the other classes. A paladin rather than a fighter is a good choice (a little more healing), and perhaps a ranger rather than a rogue (that other frontliner). And it opens a spot for a true specialist in a standard four-character party.

    As stated above, it's more of a tradeoff than a clear greater than and less than relationship.
    DON'T PANIC
    (Arthur Avatar by the Losar.)

    GO BLUE

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Seattle, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I don't know, you are fighting an uphill battle saying that dual casters are even in the same league as full casters. Being a dual caster stunts your access to higher level spells (especially painful at low levels), gives you a low caster level, gives you MAD(in most cases), and requires you to fulfill two party roles even though you can only perform one in any given round. Also, by taking mystic theurge or what not, you are denying yourself the abilities of better PrCs.

    Think of it like this, Lets compare a 3 wizard/3 cleric/1 mystic theurge to a 7 wizard. The theurge is caster level 4 in both classes, and has access to 2nd level spells in both classes, while the wizard is caster level 7 and has access to 4th level spells. While the theurge is trying to heal his party with cure moderate wounds(which is allready fairly weak by this point) and hinder enemies using web, the wizard is casting solid fog and dimension door. The theurge just can't compeate.

    Sure a lot of these problums get lessened by the time you hit 20th level, but the vast majority of games never reach that level (It seems like most D&D games hit their zenith around 7th-12th level in my experiance), and that you still have to make it to the high levels where you are more useful.
    "Sometimes, were heroes. Sometimes, we shoot other people right in the face for money."

    -Shadowrun 4e, Runner's Companion

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location

    Default Re: What would make a dual-caster useful?

    I'd take 2 specialists over 2 generalists any day. If I really need a heal spell they can provide it 3 levels earlier, if I really need a teleport to get the hell out of dodge they can provide it 3 levels earlier. Finally ... if they really need to lay the smack down with spells, they can do it a whole lot better.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •