Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 161
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2014

    Default June Survey is out. What do you think?

    http://sgiz.mobi/s3/D-D-5e-Elements-Survey-5

    What do you think? I like that they are awesome for asking us, how much do you this could actualy effect anything? What did you pick? What option are you the least interested in/want the least? What option do you want the most?

    ps. Anyone have the list of classes they said? I forgot.
    Last edited by Rfkannen; 2015-06-30 at 03:50 PM.
    If you want to see some art here is my instagram https://www.instagram.com/rfkannen/

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    depends what you mean by "can we effect anything".

    this is useful marketing information for them. if 500 people take the survey and 400 people tell them they want to see bullywug PCs, and 5 people tell them they want kobold PCs, they're going to introduce bullywugs and largely ignore kobolds.

    you on an individual basis are unlikely to be the tipping point; they're unlikely to treat it much differently if there were only 399 votes for bullywug, or 6 votes for kobolds. collectively, however, the D&D community definitely has the ability to make them strongly consider making a change. if they think birthright is not a popular setting (which is probably true), but 75% of the people surveyed are excited about birthright... then they're definitely going to push birthright farther up on their priority list.

    now, you may look at that and think that your vote doesn't matter at all. that is to some extent true. having said that, there is a lot of difference between 0% and 20% (one of those things is basically "avoid at all costs" and the other is "niche market that should not be a primary focus but is worth considering in some form after the most profitable stuff is done" i would guess, possibly even licensing them out to third parties), and if you just don't vote for the things you like because you assume they aren't the most popular, well, you're pushing the stuff you like closer to 0% which is not a place you want them to be if you also want WotC to ever look at them.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Regardless of how much say people have individually this is still a system in which our desires are directly communicated to the makers of products we want, which can only be a good thing. Personally I voted for spelljammer because I would only really try to bother with a campaign setting if it was really special. I didn't vote for any races because I don't much care for exotic or bizzare character races. I don't even like dragonborn or teiflings.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Nov 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    I think they have a Psionics book in the works. Note that Elans, Maenads, Xeph are not on the Races list, and Psions, Soulknives, Wilders, etc are not on the classes list. Basically, other than Dark Sun as a campaign setting, Psionic based options aren't on here at all. Which either means they have no intention of doing it and no interest in whether or not we're interested, or, far more likely in my opinion, don't see the need for polling data regarding it because it's already in the works.

    So I'll take it as great news!

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by GiantOctopodes View Post
    I think they have a Psionics book in the works. Note that Elans, Maenads, Xeph are not on the Races list, and Psions, Soulknives, Wilders, etc are not on the classes list. Basically, other than Dark Sun as a campaign setting, Psionic based options aren't on here at all. Which either means they have no intention of doing it and no interest in whether or not we're interested, or, far more likely in my opinion, don't see the need for polling data regarding it because it's already in the works.

    So I'll take it as great news!
    I didn't see Acrobats on there. I wish I could be as hopeful.
    Breaking BM: Revised - an updated look at the beast-mounted halfling ranger based on the Revised Ranger: Beast Conclave.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rfkannen View Post
    ps. Anyone have the list of classes they said? I forgot.
    • Alchemist
    • Artificer
    • Cavalier
    • Hexblade
    • Martial Adept (warblade, swordsage, crusader)
    • Runepriest
    • Samurai
    • Scout
    • Seeker
    • Shaman
    • Warden
    • Warmage
    • None of the above


    Personally I'd be psyched if they brought back None of the Above. I played a Human None of the Above 10/Fighter 2 in my very first campaign, and it would be super-nostalgic if I could bring that character over to 5e.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Sep 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    Personally I'd be psyched if they brought back None of the Above. I played a Human None of the Above 10/Fighter 2 in my very first campaign, and it would be super-nostalgic if I could bring that character over to 5e.
    I know that feel.
    Breaking BM: Revised - an updated look at the beast-mounted halfling ranger based on the Revised Ranger: Beast Conclave.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    pwykersotz's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Western Washington
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    Personally I'd be psyched if they brought back None of the Above. I played a Human None of the Above 10/Fighter 2 in my very first campaign, and it would be super-nostalgic if I could bring that character over to 5e.
    *Sensible chuckle*
    Attacking the darkness since 2009.

    List of Unearthed Arcana, Sage Advice, etc.
    Spoiler: Quotes I like
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by icefractal regarding What would a Cat Lord want? View Post
    She wants the renegade Red Dot brought to her court in chains.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimers regarding a description of Stygia View Post
    Yes, I believe you have won GitP for the day.
    Quote Originally Posted by pwykersotz regarding randomly rolling edgelord backstories View Post
    Huh...Apparently I'm Agony Blood Blood, Half-orc Shadow Sorcerer. I killed a Dragons. I'm Chaotic Good, probably racist.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Goblin

    Join Date
    May 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    Personally I'd be psyched if they brought back None of the Above. I played a Human None of the Above 10/Fighter 2 in my very first campaign, and it would be super-nostalgic if I could bring that character over to 5e.
    Why the Fighter dip?
    Last edited by Flashy; 2015-06-30 at 11:45 PM.
    My homebrew: A list of 5e homebrew magitech augments found here, a homebrew race of devil-toads here, and the Professional, an all mundane support class. Criticism is much appreciated!

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Kobold

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Euphonistan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Flashy View Post
    Why the Fighter dip?
    Bonus feats of course why else would anybody take only two levels of fighter in 3e (AD&D combos do not usually use that nomenclature)?

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Flashy View Post
    Why the Fighter dip?
    Because the coward guacamole smelled kinda old.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Seattle, USA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    I'd love to see the some of the races and classes they mentioned. The classes they mentioned are boring, save the martial adepts, who I'd love to see come back.
    "Sometimes, we’re heroes. Sometimes, we shoot other people right in the face for money."

    -Shadowrun 4e, Runner's Companion

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Curious: Cavalier (AD&D 1e Unearthed Arcana) is in, Hexblade (3.5/4Essentials) and even the Martial Adepts (3.5) are in, but no Marshal/Warlord (3.5/4e)? Apparently they're insisting that the Battlemaster is *the* replacement for it, since it wasn't even considered... Heck, even the Artificer, of all classes, is being considered, even if it already had a (nefarious, IMO) treatment in Unearthed Arcana.

    Question: in which edition was the Alchemist a class concept? 2e? Otherwise: are we seeing WotC showing a wink at Paizo? (IMO, a WotC-version of the Alchemist, if 3.5 rules still existed, would have been pretty close to the Artificer; if the Artificer is turned into its own class, with Infusions working different from typical magic as Warlock's Pact Magic does (in principle, not in practice), the Alchemist (Savant!) could be a subclass of the Artificer. Still; kinda mystified, since it's not a 1e class...or maybe it is, and I forgot? Gonna lean with the latter; mind's playing tricks on me, since I can swear I saw it once (alongside the Oriental Adventures classes of Courtier, Ninja, Samurai, Shukenja and Yakuza).
    Retooler of D&D 3.5 (and 5e/Next) content. See here for more.
    Now with a comprehensive guide for 3.5 Paladin players porting to Pathfinder. Also available for 5th Edition
    On Lawful Good:
    Quote Originally Posted by firebrandtoluc View Post
    My friend is currently playing a paladin. It's way outside his normal zone. I told him to try to channel Santa Claus, Mr. Rogers, and Kermit the Frog. Until someone refuses to try to get off the naughty list. Then become Optimus Prime.
    T.G. Oskar profile by Specter.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DwarfBarbarianGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Italy
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Sad that Dragon Shaman and Beguiler didn't make it in the list.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    DwarfFighterGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2011

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    The arcane trickster kind of covers the beguiler (and spell thief).
    Quote Originally Posted by Elderand View Post
    You and your common sense again ! :P

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    DwarfClericGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Yeah, but Evoker Wizard covers Warmage, so there's really no point to that either.

    I agree with OOB. I voted just for the Martial Classes and no races. Do we really need official PC variants for races? Extrapolating out of the MM is easy enough - and monstrous races are nearly 100% of the time used for power options rather than RP ones - from my experience.

    Why be a halfling, when you can be a goblin with 10 (now 5) extra move and darkvision? If there were social reasons to not be one, I can see that - but most tables have some level of no-PvP, forced cooperation regardless of class/race/alignment makeup.

    There's too many races as is, in my opinion. I'd of been much happier with a generic Human, Elf, Dwarf, and Halfling, with defined racial traits and open attribute allotment (+2 to 1 stat, +1 to 2 stats, player's choice.

    Then, maybe a smidge of Pathfinderesque Advanced Race Guide to further customize your subrace. Humans would get Aasimar, Tiefling, Dragonborn and Halforc. Elves get Half, Drow, High, Wood. Dwarves get Mountain, Hill, Rock & Deep Gnome. Halflings get Stout, Lightfoot, and Forest Gnome.
    Trollbait extraordinaire

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Steampunkette's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun... Ravenloft.

    Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun... Planescape.

    Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun Dark Sun... Spelljammer.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    KorvinStarmast's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by CantigThimble View Post
    I didn't vote for any races because I don't much care for exotic or bizzare character races. I don't even like dragonborn or teiflings.
    Seconded.
    I'd like to see Cavalier, Runepriest, and Shaman.
    (The discussion on Psionics is elsewhere on this forum.)

    Another comment from above ...
    There's too many races as is, in my opinion
    Agreed, but it appears that wider diversity in character origin is something the game's fans as whole prefer.
    Last edited by KorvinStarmast; 2015-07-01 at 07:22 AM.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Person_Man's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    If anyone feels like doing me a favor, please vote for Spelljammer. I love that setting, ad would love to see it updated to 5E.

    On the flip side, I didn't vote for any of the classes. I'm fine with new setting specific races and backgrounds and Feats (for campaign specific things like Dragonmarks). But 3.5/PF soured me on class bloat. Each new class is inevitably more slightly powerful then the classes that came before it, which inevitably leads to the core non-full-caster classes being rendered obsolete. Similarly, I hope that they only publish new spells when they're required for the setting, as they tend to be the largest source of game breaking material. Not just high fantasy plot powers. Just strait up more powerful raw numbers that ruin any semblance of balance for non-full casters).

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BarbarianGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Yeah, I'm a little timid on additional classes at this point, too. As I said in the comment field in the survey, new classes should be heavily playtested (preferably public), as they have the biggest potential to alter the fundamental feel of the game, for good or bad.

    Regarding how they'll use this info, I wouldn't worry about 400 people asking for bullywugs. I produce and analyze surveys like this all the time for my job. If WotC acts like most companies, they just use this information to reinforce ideas they already have. So it's not like they say "oh, BUILD ALL THE BULLYWUGS!" It's more like some of the devs have mused over the idea of adding bullywugs and they're using the survey to see if it's a good idea or not.

    Think of the survey as asking "we are thinking about some of these ideas, what do you think?" Not so much "we'll do whatever you vote for."

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    KorvinStarmast's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Person_Man View Post
    If anyone feels like doing me a favor, please vote for Spelljammer. I love that setting, ad would love to see it updated to 5E.

    On the flip side, I didn't vote for any of the classes. .
    What, you don't want to play
    Junior birdman? (Aarakocra)
    Steroid fed barbarians? (Goliaths).
    Half elemental brewers? (genasi cream ale)
    Extraneous gnomes? (Svirfnoselongs).

    I don't either.

    At the risk of offending some of our friends here, I could do without Tieflings at all. But it isn't about me.

    Flavor is good, but the concern you present I share: each "new and exotic class" tends to be a bit too cool, a bit extra powerful, and leaves the standard archetypes stranded on the Group W bench.

    Kind of like what happens to some well balanced champions in LoL when hew champions (Gnar! for example) come out.

    For those not sure about brewing and cream ale, this is the reference.
    Last edited by KorvinStarmast; 2015-07-01 at 08:51 AM.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by KorvinStarmast View Post
    What, you don't want to play
    Junior birdman? (Aarakocra)
    Steroid fed barbarians? (Goliaths).
    Half elemental brewers? (genasi cream ale)
    Extraneous gnomes? (Svirfnoselongs).

    I don't either.

    At the risk of offending some of our friends here, I could do without Tieflings at all. But it isn't about me.

    Flavor is good, but the concern you present I share: each "new and exotic class" tends to be a bit too cool, a bit extra powerful, and leaves the standard archetypes stranded on the Group W bench.

    Kind of like what happens to some well balanced champions in LoL when hew champions (Gnar! for example) come out.

    For those not sure about brewing and cream ale, this is the reference.
    Eh. Having the options is nice and they have to make it so it goes beyond being a ribbon since if the race has no effect then a lot of people will see no point to it (other tabletops probably don't have this problem. I suspect GURPS doesn't, but I've only read about it. D&D on the other hand has had this engrained since second edition (since 1st had them as classes) so to change it would be changing core for D&D. Whether the core should be changed is a different discussion all together).

    Plus some people don't even take abilities into account. I once played with someone who forgot the advantage to saves against magic that gnomes had. He just liked gnomes.

    It really falls down to, "don't like, don't play" mentality. Though if someone is playing a race or class you don't like, it's best to take into account their enjoyment as well as your own. It's a group game after all, communication both ways can go a long way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Forum Explorer View Post
    "Just because the DM lets you break the game, doesn't mean the game is broken."
    Quote Originally Posted by Steampunkette View Post
    "My Patron is Steven Spielberg"
    Quote Originally Posted by CNagy View Post
    For some reason this feels really fitting; I got a mental image of a bunch of psions setting up a LAN party.

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    • Alchemist
    • Artificer
    • Cavalier
    • Hexblade
    • Martial Adept (warblade, swordsage, crusader)
    • Runepriest
    • Samurai
    • Scout
    • Seeker
    • Shaman
    • Warden
    • Warmage
    • None of the above
    Ah cool thanks! Gosh I want a runepriest, I think I forgot to check that one, but in hindsight some rune magic would be awesome. Also in hindsight I am not sure why I voted for the scout, seems like it would just basically be a spell-less ranger

    actually here is my annalist.

    Alchemist- already exists as a wizard school, but it does deserve it's own non-caster class
    artificer- same, maybe same class as alchemist
    cavalier- really just a fighter path would suffice
    hexblade- isn't that what blade-locks are?
    martial adepts- God I want these, but it also seems like it might step on battle-masters toes, but I waaaant it!
    runepriest- ah hell yeah new magic systems for the win. I really really want this now.
    samurai- not really necessary but could make a cool path for some class I suppose. Would rather just have kensei
    scout- why was this ever needed?
    seeker- I guess a ranger path with more spell casting powers might be cool, not a new class though
    shaman- a 4e style one would be awesome, and absolutely nothing like a druid.
    warder- isnt that what ancient paladins are?
    warmage- isn't this literally just a evocation wizard with a level of fighter? Like seriously is there anything about this class that isn't covered by that?
    none of the above- of course this is the best class, the one we need most. I think it should be a full in based caster.


    oh also PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIXIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! gosh I want pixies.
    Last edited by Rfkannen; 2015-07-01 at 09:27 AM.
    If you want to see some art here is my instagram https://www.instagram.com/rfkannen/

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BarbarianGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralanr View Post
    It really falls down to, "don't like, don't play" mentality.
    There's something to be said for cognitive load and perceived penalties, though. Too much splat and the game loses any sense of shape. It starts to look... well... splat-shaped. I hope WotC learned the lessons of 3/3.5e.

    Any artist, writer, musician, or the like will tell you that restrictions encourage creativity. Too many options devalues each of those options.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    mephnick's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2012

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by Person_Man View Post
    On the flip side, I didn't vote for any of the classes. I'm fine with new setting specific races and backgrounds and Feats (for campaign specific things like Dragonmarks). But 3.5/PF soured me on class bloat. Each new class is inevitably more slightly powerful then the classes that came before it
    You can already see this in the articles they've been putting out for 5e, like swashbuckler and favoured soul. I have no doubt a book of new classes would be an overpowered mess.

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    DwarfClericGuy

    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Nijkerk, the Netherlands
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Darksun?

    Yeah, that's just the thing I want for 5e.

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Person_Man's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Also, its a shame we couldn't down-vote ideas. I'd like another opportunity to express how much I hate Kender.

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Inevitability's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Planes of Law

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    I like how there are a lot of 4th edition-inspired options in the survey. It seemed like they had been mostly marketing to 3.5 fans, it's good to see 4e hasn't been forgotten.
    Have you had enough of unreasonably high LA's and unplayable monsters in 3.5? Then check out the LA-assignment thread! Don't hesitate to give feedback!

    Extended signature!

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisBasken View Post
    There's something to be said for cognitive load and perceived penalties, though. Too much splat and the game loses any sense of shape. It starts to look... well... splat-shaped. I hope WotC learned the lessons of 3/3.5e.

    Any artist, writer, musician, or the like will tell you that restrictions encourage creativity. Too many options devalues each of those options.
    I agree on that opinion, it's one of the positives of not playing a caster (in my opinion. The amount of options I get with spells and my, "save until needed" mentality often slows down my creative process when playing casters. Instead of being versatile, I become bound to my limits that I can clearly see since my effectiveness dwindles immensely when I'm out of slots).

    With races though? I think it's the lack of customization within a race that makes it so my creativity isn't dwindled.

    Idk. I'm just a fan of dragonborn, though I know races can be broken. My friend's homebrew slime race was a prime example. Making potions with bubbles (alchemist) and kept hiding in cracks in the floor.
    Quote Originally Posted by Forum Explorer View Post
    "Just because the DM lets you break the game, doesn't mean the game is broken."
    Quote Originally Posted by Steampunkette View Post
    "My Patron is Steven Spielberg"
    Quote Originally Posted by CNagy View Post
    For some reason this feels really fitting; I got a mental image of a bunch of psions setting up a LAN party.

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2014

    Default Re: June Survey is out. What do you think?

    you know, if the things that you wanted to see were not on that list, or there was something you really wanted to not see, i'm pretty sure that's what the text box at the bottom was for. want to see dragon shaman and it isn't on the list? well guess what, you can just write that in the box at the bottom.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •