Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: PbP Savage Worlds
-
2016-02-29, 01:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Between dreams
- Gender
PbP Savage Worlds
Sorry if this is the wrong place for this.
Pretty simple question really. I'm new to the Savage Worlds system and I'm wondering how easy it is to run in PbP. Some of the mechanics seem like they might not work in forum based play, such as the card based initiative. So has anyone done it? Does it work well? Do things need to be changed?
-
2016-02-29, 09:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Location
- Between dreams
- Gender
Re: PbP Savage Worlds
So no one can answer this? No one plays savage Worlds?
-
2016-02-29, 09:48 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Gender
Re: PbP Savage Worlds
I have not played Savage Worlds in PBP, but I suspect you'll run into the usual problems as DnD in PBP.
Actions are probably going to be too granular so you get bogged down in combat, everything skill check requires the player's input then the GM's, people flaking can cause initiative to be held up or distorted...It always amazes me how often people on forums would rather accuse you of misreading their posts with malice than re-explain their ideas with clarity.
-
2016-03-02, 08:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- San Antonio, Texas
- Gender
Re: PbP Savage Worlds
I've not done it, but PbR always requires some rebalancing; I think the card-based initiative is fine, but folks might want to submit several actions.
The Cranky Gamer
*It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude; the appearance of truth within the framework of the game.
*Picard management tip: Debate honestly. The goal is to arrive at the truth, not at your preconception.
*Mutant Dawn for Savage Worlds!
*The One Deck Engine: Gaming on a budget
Written by Me on DriveThru RPG
There are almost 400,000 threads on this site. If you need me to address a thread as a moderator, include a link.
-
2016-03-06, 12:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: PbP Savage Worlds
I'm a Savage Worlds player, but haven't ever tried it in PbP. What I have tried, though, is playing through Tabletop Simulator. This game is designed to be a fast-paced game. Actions are short and often time-restricted (depending on the GM). Roleplay is interwoven with combat, and combats are generally over within an hour. When extra time has to be taken to describe actions or fiddle with bad physics, the game becomes boring very, very fast. I imagine a similar sort of effect would occur over PbP. With the exception of card-based initiative, which would be difficult to make sure that everyone involved is dealing from the same deck, the game's mechanics would work over PbP. However, the essence of the game might be lost.
To try to preserve the Fast, Furious, Fun aspects of the game, I would recommend the following changes:
- Switch to a dice-based or a turn-based initiative system. This will help to fix the card-based mechanics issue.
- Remove all concepts of miniatures or gameboards. Every character is either 'near their target', or 'at range with their target', or 'far away from their target.' Spells affect things over PAD (Plot Appropriate Distance.) Discrepancies in this issue are handled by a die roll or by GM call.
- Enforce the Multi-Action Penalty rule. If a player's actions have more than one 'thing' they are doing, then they recieve a penalty for the whole action. This keeps posts short and combats moving.
- Play up on the RP. If something can be handled without rules, don't invoke the game's rules.
Currently RPG group playing: Endworld (D&D 5e. A Homebrewed post-apocalyptic supplement.)
My campaign settings: Azura; 10,000 CE | The Frozen Seas | Bloodstones (Paleolithic Horror) | AEGIS - The School for Superhero Children | Iaphela (5e, Elder Scrolls)