A Monster for Every Season: Summer 2
You can get A Monster for Every Season: Summer 2 now at Gumroad
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Retired Mod in the Playground Retired Moderator
     
    averagejoe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Because, seriously, life should be about more than deciding which people ideally should die. "But averagejoe," I hear you ask, "What besides people dying could possibly be philisophical?" Well, I'll answer, "The properties of things which can't be measured." So, then, we'll embark on a discussion about a subject very near and dear to my heart. Metaphorically speaking, of course, because abstract concepts can't be physically near anything.

    So, then, what's the deal with love, anyways? Is it a biological response built in to ensure sucessful reproduction? A sacred bond of spirits, trancending the world of flesh and matter? The state in which our self is the most fully expanded?

    Let's spare ourselves the witicisms taken from overplayed songs, eh? We already know that love is "A many splendid thing," or, "All you need," thank you very much.


    Sweet Friendship Jayne avatar by Crown of Thorns

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Just a game.

    Sorry!

    Anyway, in my opinion, love is a series of vastly unrelated and coincidentally-aligned chemical processes that together form the emotion state of "love" whilst causing our own minds to percieve it as something great and amazing. Which it certaintly is, once you get over the stomach dropping and the endless angsty thoughts. What else is there to say?
    Last edited by Cyrano; 2007-08-01 at 12:28 PM.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Banned
     
    Lord Iames Osari's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Up in the sky
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Can I say "all of the above"?

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Ranis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Love is the only word in any language that cannot be defined by other words. It transcends rational and irrational thought, and is the one thing that we experience every day yet are unable to correctly define.
    Last edited by Ranis; 2007-08-01 at 05:24 PM.
    Druid-Ninjatar by the sensuous Serpentine.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    SurlySeraph's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Department of Smiting
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Love is someone else's desires to be fulfilled, and wanting all positive things to happen to that person. That's about as close to it as I can explain. Of course, there are multiple types of love. There's familial/ close friend love, there's romantic love, and there's charitable love. There are probably others, too, but those are the first I could think of.
    Quote Originally Posted by Thespianus View Post
    I fail to see how "No, that guy is too fat to be hurt by your fire" would make sense.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Sisqui's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Stone of Farewell
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post

    Is it a biological response built in to ensure sucessful reproduction?
    Yes.
    A sacred bond of spirits, trancending the world of flesh and matter?
    If you consider the mind to be greater than the sum of its parts, yes.
    The state in which our self is the most fully expanded?
    No. A part of that state most certainly. But that state in and of itself? Definitely not. IMHO anyway.
    Last edited by Sisqui; 2007-08-01 at 07:23 PM.
    I will either find a way or make one.

    We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality- Ayn Rand

    Don't you know then, my son, how little wisdom rules the world?
    ___________________________________________
    Thanks to Potatocubed for the potatavatar

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    zeratul's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    behind you with a knife
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ranis View Post
    Love is the only word in any language that cannot be defined by other words. It transcends rational and irrational thought, and is the one thing that we experience every day yet are unable to correctly define.
    Exactly! Well put Ranis.
    Alexi Laiho Avatar by Mr._Saturn
    Spoiler
    Show

    Sephiroth and Arthuai
    [CENTER]Sepiroth avatars by Ink
    Arthuai by Mr_Saturn
    Alexi Laiho by Mr_Saturn


    I have a metal blog thing now, check it out

    Quote Originally Posted by D'anna Biers View Post
    MOTHER NATURE IS LIKE A REAL MOTHER. IN THAT SHE SECRETELY HATES YOU AND NEVER LETS YOU GO OUT WITH YOUR HOODLUM FRIENDS.
    You can't kill the metal, metal will live on! \m/

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Amotis's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Heima
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sisqui View Post
    No. A part of that state most certainly. But that state in and of itself? Definitely not. IMHO anyway.
    And that's what I think too. QFT.

    I think too much emphasis in our societies and cultures is put upon couples, love, and all that jazz. That's fine and dandy and enjoy your happiness for all it's worth, but I certainly don't think it's the end all to be all of self, worth, and expansion. None of this "you haven't lived unless you loved" or "love is the highest form of being" etc stuff. You, as in yourself, is just as if not more important.

    My personal take for love is that it's accented when you're already self-expanded self. Define yourself by who you are, not who you're with. And with those things in mind you can find some wonderful connections because you're connecting on a deeper level. Accents on yourself and then you can fall in love with each other's accents.
    avatar by kuja.girl
    sign by egobuttz


  9. - Top - End - #9
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Death, your friend the Reaper's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Cookiengard, Sixth layer

    Default Death Included.

    *mutters about elitist posters not wishing death to be involved. Just because he didn't know of emotions (in the glands) dosen't mean he wouldn't comment on it...*
    Inner Circle The Cookie Raid

    Spoiler
    Show
    Credits: Avatar; ChrisTP Signature: Sneak, Trog, Ceika and Gengy
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by FdL View Post
    Life is the set up and Death's the punchline line.
    Quote Originally Posted by Archonic Energy View Post
    I give you the Master of sarcasm, (and puns).
    DEATH.
    Quote Originally Posted by Azrael View Post
    Aww, dammit! You know I can't smite you when you're wearing those things!
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Librarian View Post
    Oh, Captain Jack Sparrow, you must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PirateGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dobbstown
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post
    Let's spare ourselves the witicisms taken from overplayed songs, eh? We already know that love is "A many splendid thing," or, "All you need," thank you very much.
    Does this mean I'm not allowed to say "I believe in a thing called love"? Whoops, I just did anyway.

    I think the problem with a meaningful discussion of love is that it's basically a four-letter word that you can define in nearly-infinite ways. Personally, I'd go so far as to argue that all of those definitions are correct. Love is whatever you think love is. And yes, this includes all the definitions that some of us would call "dysfunctional" or "not real love." I agree with Ranis that love is a word that can't be defined using other words, but I wouldn't say it's the only word in any language that can't be pinned down with other words. What is "art"? What is "beauty"? What is "enlightenment"? The definition, ultimately, depends on the person defining it, and will never be accurately summed up in words.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post
    Let's spare ourselves the witicisms taken from overplayed songs, eh? We already know that love is "A many splendid thing," or, "All you need," thank you very much.
    So, are we allowed to quote underplayed, crappy songs that don't relate to love? How about "Rock Lobster"?

    I think love is a series of biochemical reactions in our minds that we maintain a useful fallacy about. That is that it is some deep spiritual bond which transcends human ability to comprehend or define. Also the "Love is all" or "You haven't lived until you've loved" line also serves its purpose, that of propogating the species, but it too is wrong. Love is an effective way to be happy, but it isn't the only way, and it probably isn't the best.

    Take for instance, the mother of a new born child. If, when handed her infant, she was asked if she "loved" it, she would undoubtably say yes. This is logical in the spiritual sense, because she would have had ten months with which to form a deep emotional bond. But, if she were handed another infant and told it was hers, and she couldn't tell the difference, she would say she 'loved" that child as well.

    Another, more pertinent example: if you were to ask the bride and groom on their wedding day if they loved each other, they would both say yes. I don't know the statistics off the top of my head, but I believe the projected divorce rate is something like 50%. So, for half of those loving couples, their deep spiritual bond will be shattered merely by spending a few years together. Hmmm... that doesn't make sense. Or could it be, there was no bond to begin with!

    Thus love is one of the various modi operandi by which our species is carried on, not some mysterious bond which we can never understand, surpass, or define. [/cynical rant]
    Last edited by bugsysservant; 2007-08-01 at 09:29 PM.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGirl

    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    I'm definitely not a fan of the current trend in the US that to be a whole person you have to be in a relationship, be it good, bad, or ugly. It's blatantly untrue and it's why the rate of divorce and bad relationships is so high.

    Sternberg talks about infatuated love, platonic love, and consummate love, as well as some combinations thereof, but even these ideas don't always seem to hit the mark.

    As a student of psychology, I know that emotion is as intangible as the mind. The latest theories say that any biological changes that accompany an emotion happen near simultaneously so that it is impossible to say that one causes the other.

    As for propagating the species, love isn't necessary. Some animals mate for life, others don't. We just happen to be ones that can go either way. Of course, if you think about, we live longer than we naturally should, so it's no wonder mating for life is hard.

    What another problem is is that it shouldn't be expected that all relationships will have the endgoal of marriage and children. There should be alternatives, but there really aren't. Cohabitation is often frowned upon, and this plays a role in its infrequency.

    There's also a sort of psychological cliche that goes: you can't love anyone else until you love yourself.

    I tend to think of love as when you consider someone's wellbeing as important as your own. no one can make you happy, you can only do that yourself.
    The first chapter of The Book of Svarog

    “Everything has its time and everything dies.” ~ The Doctor (Doctor Who)

    “The facts of nature are settled within the field of human argument.” ~ The Golem- What Everyone Should Know about Science by Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    SurlySeraph's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Department of Smiting
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Evrine View Post
    I tend to think of love as when you consider someone's wellbeing as important as your own. no one can make you happy, you can only do that yourself.
    Or more important than your own. And I dispute the idea that no one except yourself can make you happy. When I was in love, which I am not going to discuss in detail right now, I literally would have happily died to protect the girl I was in love with, or even if for some reason she would want me to die. Knowing that she existed - even if I was not involved with her in any way - was enough to make me happy. Of course, I'm (mostly) over her now, and no longer as self-sacrificing, but love lets you be happy in circumstances when you logically should be unhappy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Thespianus View Post
    I fail to see how "No, that guy is too fat to be hurt by your fire" would make sense.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Vuzzmop's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Love is a bunch of chemicals, nice chemicals, but chemicals. There is nothing spiritual about it, just chemicals in your brain. I don't know why everyone seems to get all angsty when I say that, they're perfectly good chemicals.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    MindFlayer

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Vermont
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Evrine View Post
    As for propagating the species, love isn't necessary. Some animals mate for life, others don't. We just happen to be ones that can go either way. Of course, if you think about, we live longer than we naturally should, so it's no wonder mating for life is hard.
    I am no psychology student, but I humbly refute your point. Perhaps I have fallen prey to the ambiguities of the word "love", but I would point out that you do need love at some point to mate (ignoring instances of rape and other, rarer scenarios). Neurochemists distiguish between physical love (akin to brain disease) and the later love, more akin to a platonic relationship. Young couples "love" eachother largely based on lust and other early mating instincts. As they mature, assuming no divorce, that initial love fades after, I believe, 2-3 years. This is replaced byvarious stages of "love", till you reach a venerable age, well past reproductive potential, where the "love" is almost strictly platonic. The type of love changes, but at no point in the mating/partnership cycle was it absent.
    Last edited by bugsysservant; 2007-08-01 at 10:56 PM.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Retired Mod in the Playground Retired Moderator
     
    averagejoe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Discordia View Post
    I think the problem with a meaningful discussion of love is that it's basically a four-letter word that you can define in nearly-infinite ways. Personally, I'd go so far as to argue that all of those definitions are correct. Love is whatever you think love is. And yes, this includes all the definitions that some of us would call "dysfunctional" or "not real love." I agree with Ranis that love is a word that can't be defined using other words, but I wouldn't say it's the only word in any language that can't be pinned down with other words. What is "art"? What is "beauty"? What is "enlightenment"? The definition, ultimately, depends on the person defining it, and will never be accurately summed up in words.
    Of course love can be defined. It's whatever I point to and say, "That's love." So all I need to do is review every relationship ever, and we have an exhaustive definition of love. Brute force, for the win!

    Quote Originally Posted by Death, your friend the Reaper
    *mutters about elitist posters not wishing death to be involved. Just because he didn't know of emotions (in the glands) dosen't mean he wouldn't comment on it...*
    Er, sorry Death. Nothing personal, you understand. I didn't mean that death had to be specifically excluded, just that this one isn't set up for death, as the other threads seem to be. I mean, death doesn't have nothing to do with love.

    Quote Originally Posted by bugsysservant
    So, are we allowed to quote underplayed, crappy songs that don't relate to love? How about "Rock Lobster"?
    Allowed to? Yes. "Rock Lobster?" Expected and encouraged.


    Sweet Friendship Jayne avatar by Crown of Thorns

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    TSGames's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    control+apple+alt+8

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post
    Because, seriously, life should be about more than deciding which people ideally should die. "But averagejoe," I hear you ask, "What besides people dying could possibly be philisophical?" Well, I'll answer, "The properties of things which can't be measured." So, then, we'll embark on a discussion about a subject very near and dear to my heart. Metaphorically speaking, of course, because abstract concepts can't be physically near anything.
    Hmm... I don't think I've read anything about people dying... even Nietzsche talked a lot about how people should live rather than their dying, although he talked about that too.

    So, then, what's the deal with love, anyways? Is it a biological response built in to ensure sucessful reproduction? A sacred bond of spirits, trancending the world of flesh and matter? The state in which our self is the most fully expanded?

    Let's spare ourselves the witicisms taken from overplayed songs, eh? We already know that love is "A many splendid thing," or, "All you need," thank you very much.
    A 'biological response'? That's called hormones. I would agree that love transcends flesh and matter, otherwise it could be quantified and would have a market value. (Buying shares of LOVE at 10˘ each).

    Are we 'most fully expanded' when we are in love? Perhaps you mean merely when we have a type of love? I would say, in a metaphorical sense, not necessarily to the former, and yes to the latter. To be in love with someone is to have love, but there is a type of love that is even greater than the love that one has for their other. There is love for all things, and when a person has that truly they are complete.
    TopSecret's First Ever Two Page Tabletop Contest
    If you have any questions, want to talk about the contest entries, or you just want to hang out with cool people, visit our forums.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Retired Mod in the Playground Retired Moderator
     
    averagejoe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by DnDestruction View Post
    Hmm... I don't think I've read anything about people dying... even Nietzsche talked a lot about how people should live rather than their dying, although he talked about that too.
    I was referring to the recent onset of threads on this board that are titled, "Philisophical Discussion," and have who lives/dies scenarios. I was being very tongue in cheek in that first paragraph.


    Sweet Friendship Jayne avatar by Crown of Thorns

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Banned
     
    Zeful's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by bugsysservant View Post
    Take for instance, the mother of a new born child. If, when handed her infant, she was asked if she "loved" it, she would undoubtably say yes. This is logical in the spiritual sense, because she would have had ten months with which to form a deep emotional bond. But, if she were handed another infant and told it was hers, and she couldn't tell the difference, she would say she 'loved" that child as well.

    Another, more pertinent example: if you were to ask the bride and groom on their wedding day if they loved each other, they would both say yes. I don't know the statistics off the top of my head, but I believe the projected divorce rate is something like 50%. So, for half of those loving couples, their deep spiritual bond will be shattered merely by spending a few years together. Hmmm... that doesn't make sense. Or could it be, there was no bond to begin with!
    Another example is spousal abusors. When questioned they will say they love their spouse. If that was true, then why do they abuse them?

    The emotional bond that is called 'love' is mearly an investment of emotions in another person. This bond is not very strong and can be broken easily under stress. This is what is called cathexis by Bell Hooks. She also portays love as a action, composed of seven things: care, affection, recognition, respect, commitment, trust, honest and open communitcation. Her definition of love is based around spiritual growth more than physical or sexual displays of affection.

    This is my opinion, nothing more.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Cryopyre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The desolate wastes of AZ
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Hmmm...

    I'm no spiritual person, so I'd say, at a basic and purest definition, love is the series of chemical/electrical reactions experienced in your brain that leads to a deep passion in a person. It can be a mothers love for a child, or two people in a romantic relationship, as long as the deep feeling exists.

    Now, that doesn't mean love is nothing, or that it serves no purpose, just because I see it as chemicals doesn't make it worthless. One should seek out this passion, if for no other reason but to enjoy each other's company for a while.

    I also see no problem with divorce rates, while unfortunate for the children (I know, I am one), It is part of human life. Humans are not monogamous. Even women, aren't monogamous, though they stay seasonally with men, that doesn't mean they won't eventually seek anothers company.


    Awesome avatar by Kurnour

    "Is it true that God answers all prayers?"

    "Yes...sometimes the answer is 'no'."

    "Then how do you tell the difference between any answer and the answer no?"

    "..."

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Banned
     
    Koga's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by averagejoe View Post
    So, then, what's the deal with love, anyways? Is it a biological response built in to ensure sucessful reproduction? A sacred bond of spirits, trancending the world of flesh and matter? The state in which our self is the most fully expanded?
    Love is a buisness model. This aggarvates alot of people, but really it makes sense.

    You would not jump right into a major financial plan would you? Ofcourse not. Such a stupid endevure would leave you pennyless. The same holds true with love. Yet people are so readily to jump into a relationship for the sake of "not being alone" or "it feels good" and putting thier physichal and emotional security at risk. Wether they are aware of it or not.

    Therefore, love is a partnership. A decision for two parties to join thier coporations of individualism for greater gains and happyness models. Together they can accomplish more then they could alone, and feel better along the way. Increasing efficietcy and worker morale.

    Marriage is the legal binding contract that you will respect and stay loyal to the buisness partner you've decided to merge with. Failure to uphold your end of the bargain should come with strict punishment. Just as a creep who outsources an overseas bank account and evades his taxes is.

    Life is a buisness transition. The smart and the hardworking succeed, and the incompetant and lazy perish. As it should be.
    Last edited by Koga; 2007-08-02 at 02:44 AM.

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    The Prince of Cats's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Milton Keynes, UK
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga View Post
    Love is a buisness model. This aggarvates alot of people, but really it makes sense.
    Lern too spel!

    Sorry... Just one of those little irritations...

    I would agree on so many levels. Love is an investment of so many factors, something that should be entered into carefully and something which returns its greatest profit when both parties work hard at it. As a metaphor, a business-partnership or an investment would work quite well.

    Love at first sight (something I believe in) is the most dangerous and the most rewarding kind of relationship. I was reading that people who marry shortly after a whirlwind romance actually have a lower incidence of divorce than those who take things slowly. (I would quote my source, but I think it was the UK edition of Cosmopolitan a few years back) That may be to do with social factors (working harder to prove themselves) or to do with the kind of person who would do such a thing. Whatever the reasons, I think spontaneous people will do better in love than timid ones.

    Quote Originally Posted by bugsysservant View Post
    Young couples "love" eachother largely based on lust and other early mating instincts. As they mature, assuming no divorce, that initial love fades after, I believe, 2-3 years.
    Well, my wife and I are on 5 years and counting. Fully-requited eros is a lot of fun, even if it does lead to soreness...

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    horseboy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Endorphins are a hell of a drug.



    Love is best used to defeat the Zentradi, and to mooch.
    Alot is not a word. It's a lot, two words.
    Always use the proper tool. If the proper tool isn't available, try a hammer.


  24. - Top - End - #24
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Jensik's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Cedar Park, Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Over. Rated.

    Biochemically equivalent to eating large quantities of chocolate. Sure sure, it can be one of the most absolutely blissful feeling you can ever experience in a lifetime, but it can be, simultaneously I might add, be one of the most torturous and excruciatingly painful experiences ever encountered. I honestly cannot comprehend why so many people are so desperate and obsessed over finding an abstract concept which the human mind just conjured out of thin air.

    Which is the same reason I don't do drugs, because I get the same effect from standing up too fast.
    It is pitch black, you are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

    GM of Narutod20's Team 7
    Sharn Vankessel, Cleric of Team Cougar

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    horseboy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jensik View Post
    Over. Rated.

    Biochemically equivalent to eating large quantities of chocolate. Sure sure, it can be one of the most absolutely blissful feeling you can ever experience in a lifetime, but it can be, simultaneously I might add, be one of the most torturous and excruciatingly painful experiences ever encountered. I honestly cannot comprehend why so many people are so desperate and obsessed over finding an abstract concept which the human mind just conjured out of thin air.

    Which is the same reason I don't do drugs, because I get the same effect from standing up too fast.
    Not to sound excessively bitter or anything, but did you ever notice that "love" is the one time in your life where you're EXPECTED to hurt yourself over and over? Touch something hot, you learn not to touch. You do it again later on and everybody laughs because you did something stupid. Not so with "love." Interesting that.
    Alot is not a word. It's a lot, two words.
    Always use the proper tool. If the proper tool isn't available, try a hammer.


  26. - Top - End - #26
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Vuzzmop's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Philosophy is a big question, and my answer to it isn't really allowed on these forums, so I'll give you one on love instead. Love is a nice little state of mind akkin to obsessive compulsive disorder. People seem to not know why we fall in love, it's just for the continuity and survival of the species. Now, the species in question may be a horrible earth sucking parasite like us, but love is still a neccessary part of said parasites survival. We fight against and question love, but when it comes down to it, there is no point. It's just life, we're animals, not machines

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Pyro's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Somewhere
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jensik View Post
    Over. Rated.

    Biochemically equivalent to eating large quantities of chocolate.
    That made me laugh. Hooray for chemicals!

    Hmmm...

    I'm no spiritual person, so I'd say, at a basic and purest definition, love is the series of chemical/electrical reactions experienced in your brain that leads to a deep passion in a person. It can be a mothers love for a child, or two people in a romantic relationship, as long as the deep feeling exists.

    Now, that doesn't mean love is nothing, or that it serves no purpose, just because I see it as chemicals doesn't make it worthless.
    You just summed up almost exactly what I think about love in 3 sentences. You win a cookie!

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Cryopyre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The desolate wastes of AZ
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pyro View Post
    You just summed up almost exactly what I think about love in 3 sentences. You win a cookie!

    Yumm, my first forum cookie. I hope it has chocolate so I can experience brief love.


    Awesome avatar by Kurnour

    "Is it true that God answers all prayers?"

    "Yes...sometimes the answer is 'no'."

    "Then how do you tell the difference between any answer and the answer no?"

    "..."

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Siwenna's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    Not to sound excessively bitter or anything, but did you ever notice that "love" is the one time in your life where you're EXPECTED to hurt yourself over and over? Touch something hot, you learn not to touch. You do it again later on and everybody laughs because you did something stupid. Not so with "love." Interesting that.
    And not only that, but often people refuse to let go of the object until after they have been seriously burned.

    I think love is purely a series of chemical reactions that help our species survive. Parents love their offspring because it keeps the family unit together, an ideal situation for raising children. Between adults, it serves to attract, and keep together, appropriate mates that will, hopefully, have stronger offspring. A while ago I read a neat artical about how female seals generally try to mate with males with certain heterozygous traits, probably since that increases the genetic possibilites for the offspring. I imagine love evolved for similar reasons.
    "I was taught that the human brain was the crowning glory of evolution so far, but I think it’s a very poor scheme for survival."
    ~ Kurt Vonnegut

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Cryopyre's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The desolate wastes of AZ
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Philosophy: death not included. Actual quantity of death may vary.

    That reminds me of something I saw in an evolutionary video. It aid that what a women finds as a more attractive bodily scent smells that way to her, because their immune system is different (there-in covering more diseases if they breed.)


    Awesome avatar by Kurnour

    "Is it true that God answers all prayers?"

    "Yes...sometimes the answer is 'no'."

    "Then how do you tell the difference between any answer and the answer no?"

    "..."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •