Support the GITP forums on Patreon
Help support GITP's forums (and ongoing server maintenance) via Patreon
Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Keledrath's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    GMT -5
    Gender
    Male

    Default Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Okay, I've been having this dispute lately. Magic and psionics: Two different things, and no easy compromise. Some people (non-DnD players) say only "True" psionics are exempt from transarency. "True" psionics encompass telepathy, pyrokinesis, and telekinesis. I support a 50-50 compromise: psionics are weakened by anti-magic, and magic is weakened by anti-psionics. Which is the better compromise?
    I follow a general rule: better to ask and be told no than not to ask at all.

    Shadeblight by KennyPyro

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    uk

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    best compromise is to use the magic-psionics transparency rules as published.
    far less work and it is most balanced too.
    78% of DM's started their first campaign in a tavern. If you're one of the 22% that didn't, copy and paste this into your signature.
    if this thread is a 4e thread then play 3.5
    if this thread is a 3.5 thread then play 4e

    devils advocacy by signature

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Somewhere. Close.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    It all depends (if you look at this from a rule/balance point of view) on how much psionics your DM is willing to compensate for. Its all in the EPH; there's Psi-Mag transparency, partial transparency, and they're completely different. I personally like playing with psionics is different, but if your DM has little to no understanding of psionics things can get a bit messy... that's my favorite though.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Keledrath's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    GMT -5
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Not a DM, just a debate with some other forumites. And it's basicly between these two.
    I follow a general rule: better to ask and be told no than not to ask at all.

    Shadeblight by KennyPyro

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Somewhere. Close.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Well, in that case, my vote is cast with 'They are Different'. Magic uses manipulation of arcane might, or divine intervention, while psionics draw their power from the manifesters mind. That's different if you ask me.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    How do you tell the difference between coming 'from the psion's mind' and 'coming from the sorcerer's talent'? Other than by the mechanical variations.

    I'm all for 100% transparency. Arcane magic, divine magic, and nearly every natural supernatural capability interact 'normally'. I see no reason for psionics to be something completely different.

    What are you proposing for 'weakened' spells/powers? Treat as some level of spell/psi resistance?

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    BlueKnightGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Somewhere. Close.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    I think for the weakened part you can use the partial transparency rules from EPH. Like spell resistance = psi resistance but less of it... and such

    I see your point. I guess that since divine magic and arcane magic interact normally, it WOULD make sense, rule-wise, for pionics to follow suit. It would be interesting to see a 'Divine is different' variant set up somewhere... ok, I can feel your seething hatred at the idea, so I'll drop that. I just like psi is diff because it adds a new type of character: combat-type, spellcaster-type, and psionic-type. Otherwise, psionics is just another [more balanced] type of magic-user with a bit of completely irrelevant fluff associated to it. But to each his own, and it is very influenced by the campaign in question too, so its hard to generalize.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Well, actually, if you made divine different...or even just made psionics different, but made the setting match the idea that there are two completely different 'magic-like' systems, by rolling out a reasonable number of psi-related creatures and features to match the swarm of magic-related ones...you could well do something interesting with it. I don't really see why 'psionic type' is interesting as a new type though. It's exactly the same 'just another magic user' as with full transparency except when they interact.

    I see they did provide complete suggestions for partial separation of psi and magic. That's nice.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Surgebinder in the Playground Moderator
     
    Douglas's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Mountain View, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Here's how I view this sort of thing:
    Arcane magic: You manipulate the energy of the world around you using various rituals (spells) that cause this energy to react in particular ways. You discovered the rituals either through careful study (wizard) or instinctive knowledge (sorcerer)

    Divine magic: You pray to your god and he gives you the means to manipulate the energy of the world around you. Doing so requires particular rituals similar to arcane magic simply because its easier that way. A god could give his clerics the ability to do magic without going through the motions of spellcasting, but that would require a lot more effort on his part.

    Psionics: You have an internal reservoir of energy that you use to create magical effects. The source of the energy makes it possible to manipulate it with pure force of will (no gestures or other components), but it's still energy and it still interacts with other energy in exactly the same way that any other energy would.

    Magical energy comes from external sources, psionic is internal; they are both energy in the final analysis, however, and they interact just fine.
    Like 4X (aka Civilization-like) gaming? Know programming? Interested in game development? Take a look.

    Avatar by Ceika.

    Archives:
    Spoiler
    Show
    Saberhagen's Twelve Swords, some homebrew artifacts for 3.5 (please comment)
    Isstinen Tonche for ECL 74 playtesting.
    Team Solars: Powergaming beyond your wildest imagining, without infinite loops or epic. Yes, the DM asked for it.
    Arcane Swordsage: Making it actually work (homebrew)

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2006

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    in dungeons and dragons transparency is done because that's what the rules support (and really, require). In other systems it's not needed so it's purely a matter of the settings rules.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AtomicKitKat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    The way I see it, part of the reason to encourage transparency is also because there's already too few skill points to spread around.
    President of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment(SHELA)

    Glowing Kitty from Lilly
    Wren Worgatar by Mephibosheth
    The Living Bullet!
    Unusual Inner Animal Avatar from Quincunx.
    Whenever you mention Pun-pun*SQUELCH!*, Ao kills another Kobold.
    Everytime someone says "Pazuzu" twice, Ao erases them on the next "Pa". Then he undeletes them so he can wipeinfo them from the multiverse.
    Everytime you kill a catgirl, I get more company.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Titan in the Playground
     
    lord_khaine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    transperency rules has nothing to do with skill points, its mainly for avoiding annoying combinations where fx the cleric hides the psion in a antimagic field, whereupon he then starts to nuke everything that didnt bring psionic protection to the clash.
    thnx to Starwoof for the fine avatar

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Quote Originally Posted by lord_khaine View Post
    transperency rules has nothing to do with skill points, its mainly for avoiding annoying combinations where fx the cleric hides the psion in a antimagic field, whereupon he then starts to nuke everything that didnt bring psionic protection to the clash.
    If you push for total transparency, I think the implication is, you can subsume Psicraft and Knowledge (psionics) under Spellcraft and Knowledge (arcana). (Althought (arcana) and (religion) are already distinct, so maybe just the *craft skills.)

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Nero24200's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Personally, I've never liked Psionic's. If I wanted to shape reality with the power of my mind, theres already classes for that, the best example being a wizard.

    Though having read the posts I would say that there shouldn't be any transparacy. Psionics and magic are regarded as two different things in terms of mechanics. You wouldn't have an antimagic feild weaken physical prowess would you?

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Xuincherguixe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Non Sequitoria
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    I've thought about it, psionics aren't that different from magic. One could easily rule that the same forces power all, but different classes work with them differently.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Rizban: You could be all, "Today's Destruction is brought to you by the color green.... I HATE GREEN!" then fly off mumbling to yourself "Seven... seven bats... mwa ha ha ha..."

    Quote Originally Posted by Flickerdart View Post
    Everyone knows you can just parse XML with regex.
    Don't mind me. I'm just going to have some post traumatic flashbacks in the corner here and sob uncontrollably.


    Millenium Earl by Shmee

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Matthew's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Quote Originally Posted by douglas View Post
    Here's how I view this sort of thing:
    Arcane magic: You manipulate the energy of the world around you using various rituals (spells) that cause this energy to react in particular ways. You discovered the rituals either through careful study (wizard) or instinctive knowledge (sorcerer)

    Divine magic: You pray to your god and he gives you the means to manipulate the energy of the world around you. Doing so requires particular rituals similar to arcane magic simply because its easier that way. A god could give his clerics the ability to do magic without going through the motions of spellcasting, but that would require a lot more effort on his part.

    Psionics: You have an internal reservoir of energy that you use to create magical effects. The source of the energy makes it possible to manipulate it with pure force of will (no gestures or other components), but it's still energy and it still interacts with other energy in exactly the same way that any other energy would.

    Magical energy comes from external sources, psionic is internal; they are both energy in the final analysis, however, and they interact just fine.
    This is, I think, the most common way of looking at it and the one supported in the Complete Mage. It's not the way I look at it, though. I think it takes internal power to manipulate external energy.
    It is a joyful thing indeed to hold intimate converse with a man after one’s own heart, chatting without reserve about things of interest or the fleeting topics of the world; but such, alas, are few and far between.

    – Yoshida Kenko (1283-1350), Tsurezure-Gusa (1340)

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    psychoticbarber's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Windsor ON, Canada
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    I use the "Magic and Psionics are Different" variant, but I allow for magic to create defenses that are specifically tuned to work against Psionics and vice versa (or versa vice ).
    *Evil grin* "Snip snip."
    Kayru, City of Ancients (OOC)

    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbitrarity View Post
    The wizard sleeps the fighter, and/or greases him for sneak attack, and/or uses color spray. And/or makes him too weak to use his armour. And does the laundry.

    Avatar by Starwoof! Thank you kind sir!

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Starbuck_II's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Quote Originally Posted by kamikasei View Post
    If you push for total transparency, I think the implication is, you can subsume Psicraft and Knowledge (psionics) under Spellcraft and Knowledge (arcana). (Althought (arcana) and (religion) are already distinct, so maybe just the *craft skills.)
    You imply/infer wrong.

    Full transparency keeps them seperate skills.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Banned
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    reality... except not

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    well the way i look at it psionic/magic is the same just makes sense

    divine magic, no chance of failure from wearing full plate and swinging something heavy, you get at least 1 type of spell to spontaneously cast, and you generally get other abilities as well

    arcane magic: very powerful, especially battlefield controll and offensive stuff, also lots of utility, chance of failure if you wear armor, if you get full casting of this you probably dont get much else

    psionic magic: you dont have so many limits on your spells, cant wear heavy armor (or have hair, has anyone else noticed this? anyone with mental powers is undergoing chemotherapy and wigs disentigrate on contact with them in all fantasy worlds!) its good for blowing the crap out of a couple encounters a day, like arcane magic you cant do it in armor(all metals must be made of hair! and your skin is jealous that the leather used to have hair) its also not vancian casting (different, unless you use mana points variant from unearthed arcana) and if you have full casting of this, you probably dont get much else

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Firbolg in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Quote Originally Posted by Starbuck_II View Post
    You imply/infer wrong.

    Full transparency keeps them seperate skills.
    Yes, I'm aware of that. I was attempting to interpret AtomicKitKat's comment about having few enough skill points to spread around.

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Dhavaer's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Quote Originally Posted by tannish2 View Post
    psionic magic: you dont have so many limits on your spells, cant wear heavy armor (or have hair, has anyone else noticed this? anyone with mental powers is undergoing chemotherapy and wigs disentigrate on contact with them in all fantasy worlds!) its good for blowing the crap out of a couple encounters a day, like arcane magic you cant do it in armor(all metals must be made of hair! and your skin is jealous that the leather used to have hair) its also not vancian casting (different, unless you use mana points variant from unearthed arcana) and if you have full casting of this, you probably dont get much else
    That's not actually anything stopping you from using psionics in armour; Psions just don't get proficiency.
    Thanks to Veera for the avatar.

    I keep my stories in a blog. You should read them.

    5E Sorcerous Origin: Arcanist

    5E Class: Spellsword

    5E Spells: Alternate Damage Cantrips

    Spoiler
    Show
    Quote Originally Posted by ClericofPhwarrr View Post
    Dhavaer, your ideas are like candy from the sky, sprinkled lightly with cinnamon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gwyn chan 'r Gwyll View Post
    Wow. Badass without being flashy and showy, attractive while remaining classy. Bravo Dhavaer.
    Quote Originally Posted by Psyren View Post
    ...Why do I imagine you licking your lips and rubbing your hands together?

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Keledrath's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    GMT -5
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    And I for one don'r want to waste my 1, 1(if human), 3, and 6(if not human) on armor when I've only got a d4 anyways.
    I follow a general rule: better to ask and be told no than not to ask at all.

    Shadeblight by KennyPyro

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Banned
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    reality... except not

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    still, i look at psionics as basically a different type of magic, nothing else. it being seperate makes no more sense than arcane and divine magic being seperate (for dispell/spellcraft purposes)
    Last edited by tannish2; 2007-08-25 at 03:08 PM.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AtomicKitKat's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Yeah. Disregard earlier comment about Spellcraft/Psicraft confluence. It does affect the value of things like Spell/Psi resistance. Dragon with 50 SR is useless against Psions, Elder Brain with 50 PR is useless against casters, etc.
    President of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment(SHELA)

    Glowing Kitty from Lilly
    Wren Worgatar by Mephibosheth
    The Living Bullet!
    Unusual Inner Animal Avatar from Quincunx.
    Whenever you mention Pun-pun*SQUELCH!*, Ao kills another Kobold.
    Everytime someone says "Pazuzu" twice, Ao erases them on the next "Pa". Then he undeletes them so he can wipeinfo them from the multiverse.
    Everytime you kill a catgirl, I get more company.

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Singapore

    Default Re: Magic psionic transperency<compromise>

    Psionics/magic transparency is a kludge. The books are extremely straightforward about it being a kludge. It exists to save both Wizards and DMs the work of balancing every creature and encounter against both magic and psionics. It serves absolutely no other purpose, and has absolutely no other logic behind it. It's an important kludge, but that's really all there is to say about it... if you have a DM willing to put in the work to treat psionics differently, naturally you'd treat it differently. Otherwise you don't. Usually you won't, since it's an awful lot of work.
    Last edited by Aquillion; 2007-08-26 at 01:07 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •