New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default How Mundane is enough?

    I've been thinking about people who whine and complain "WAAAH! My fighter must be utterly mundane!", and people who just say it. And I have to ask, how mundane is enough? Obviously videogame style blasts of fire from my sword ala ToB is too non-mundane. But what's an acceptable measure of not-realistic-but-not-going-to-make-me-whine-about-too-high-fantasy? Is it okay to cleave a stone in half with your sword? What about to fall a large distance like a Dragoon from FF? Hitting multiple enemies with a thrown weapon?
    Avoiding an explosion like a fireball in a bland area with no cover, and not moving to do so? Spell resistance?

    Much like my Low-Magic thread (which is floating around somewhere) this is mostly for my amusement/knowledge.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Viscount Einstrauss's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: How Mundane is enough?

    I prefer to limit "mundane" characters to NPC's, myself, unless everyone's going to be that way. I mean, they're just going to be unimpressive next to the guy that can think you dead, the guy that can raise the dead with a prayer, and the guy who turns into giant magical beasts. Being able to use a sword sort of nifty just doesn't match that, neither according to mechanics nor sensibly.

    I'm fine with ToB. If the wizard is thinking people dead, the option to create fire with your sword makes you sound at least a little formidable in his presense.
    Do not meddle in the affairs of adventurers, for you are expendable and full of EXP.


    Overblown fantasy action/adventure/comedy/drama/spoof. Updates M/W/F

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Troll in the Playground
     
    ElfMonkGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: How Mundane is enough?

    Well, the way I see it:

    If you do something anyone can do, but just so much _amazingly_ better that the _consequences_ of your action is ridiculous, that's mundane.

    If you can do something other people _can't_ do, even a less impressive version of, making it an entire different kind of action, that's not mundane.

    Thus, making an attack for 100 damage is mundane; the damage comes from the same sources as a normal attack, there's just more of it. Using a maneuver to deal 100 damage is not mundane; you're using secret-squirrel-magic-jutsu to do something a commoner can not do on any scale, not even for 1 point of damage. They have to use their mundane option.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Dullyanna's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Over the Rainbow.
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: How Mundane is enough?

    Considering that, eventually, PCs will be going up against gigantic regenerating turtles and "Those damn crabs", it helps alot when you can do more than poke them with a sharp stick. But that's not the case in a low magic setting, of course.
    Generic Expendable Grunt of the Society for Hobgoblin Equality in Level Adjustment (SHELA)

    Credit where it's due:Avatar helpfully improved by Baboon Army... Thanks again .

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Sheriff in the Playground Administrator
     
    Roland St. Jude's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: How Mundane is enough?

    Sheriff of Moddingham: Somewhere in there is a fair question, but it's presented in an incredibly trolling manner that flames a decent portion of the board's posters. Thread locked and don't restart it without permission.
    Forum Rules

    Sheriff Roland by Chris the Pontifex

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •