New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Peregrine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Gender
    Male

    Default [House] Physical skills

    Here’s a simple idea for a house rule: bonus skill points for physical skills (those based on Str, Dex and Con) are allocated based on Con rather than Int.

    Pros: It’s more realistic. Where Int lets you learn more effectively in your mental skills, Con lets you train harder in your physical skills. Skill-starved tanks are now less so.
    Cons: Con, so rarely a dump stat, just got better, though not as much as you might think. Skill monkeys (particularly the Dex-reliant rogues) are now liable to have fewer skill points for some key skills, since they traditionally favour Int over Con (but that’s largely because it gave skill points). It doesn’t necessarily suit all physical skills (e.g. Open Lock, Concentration), though it suits the rest far better than Int did.

    Actually, I’ve come up with some questions I need to address for my own house rule now: Do you gain +Int and +Con? This could be a bit much… but then, many people bemoan the lack of skill points, and this would probably free up more points for people to take Knowledge, Craft and Profession skills.

    What, then, if you have a penalty? Having a Con bonus lets you put more skill points into physical skills; would having a Con penalty limit the number of physical skill points you can allocate? Should your class skill points be allocated to physical vs mental skills in a certain ratio, and your Int and Con add to or subtract from this quota? (For instance, say a rogue gets 50:50 physical and mental skill points, that is, 4 physical and 4 mental, plus or minus Con and Int. A certain rogue has Con 9 and Int 13, so only gets 3 physical skill points but 5 mental skill points.)

    Thoughts?
    Last edited by Peregrine; 2007-09-15 at 05:22 PM. Reason: Fixed silly typo
    I support paladins and the alignment system.

    My Homebrew Gaming Stuff (not updated lately) - My Campaign (ended)
    Homebrew licence:
    Spoiler
    Show
    All my homebrew stuff is released under the Open Game License, except where based on non-OGC work or otherwise stated. For Section 15:

    <name of homebrew here> Copyright <year first posted>, T. Pederick

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Spiryt's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [House] Physical skills

    Well, any chance of higher Inteligence being useful to warriors is no more.

    I don't like it.
    Avatar by Kwarkpudding
    The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing;
    Rush in and die, dogs—I was a man before I was a king.

    Whoever makes shoddy beer, shall be thrown into manure - town law from Gdańsk, XIth century.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RTGoodman's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Eastern NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [House] Physical skills

    It's sort of like you're re-inventing the wheel. I mean, the point of ability modifiers to skills is that the physical-type characters (the ones with high Str and Con) are gonna be really good at the physical skills (Jump, Climb, etc.), while those who are smart are gonna be really good at learning a ton of skills.

    I may be the toughest guy ever (Con 18), but if I've got a low Intelligence (6 or so), my toughness isn't going to help me learn new things like a high intelligence would. It'll just make me better at the few things I can do (jumping, swimming, and such).

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Peregrine's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [House] Physical skills

    Quote Originally Posted by Spiryt View Post
    Well, any chance of higher Inteligence being useful to warriors is no more.

    I don't like it.
    I'm not sure why that's inherently objectionable. Also it's not true; an intelligent warrior can take things like the Combat Expertise tree. I'd rather save Int from dump-stat status by introducing more feats of that kind, than by preserving a system that seems a little dumb.

    Quote Originally Posted by rtg0922 View Post
    It's sort of like you're re-inventing the wheel. I mean, the point of ability modifiers to skills is that the physical-type characters (the ones with high Str and Con) are gonna be really good at the physical skills (Jump, Climb, etc.), while those who are smart are gonna be really good at learning a ton of skills.

    I may be the toughest guy ever (Con 18), but if I've got a low Intelligence (6 or so), my toughness isn't going to help me learn new things like a high intelligence would. It'll just make me better at the few things I can do (jumping, swimming, and such).
    I came up with this idea at some point in time when I'd just finished reading another attempt at basing skills more strongly off relevant stats rather than Int. It seems that a number of homebrewers have problems with the idea that being intelligent means you're better able to learn climbing, jumping and tumbling, where a less bright sort would only be able to learn climbing. I agreed, but I thought the execution of this now-forgotten thread was awful. Basing breadth of physical skills on Con seemed to make much more sense: your stamina lets you train harder and longer.

    This doesn't replace or double up on the existing ability modifiers to skills: they make you better at each individual skill. Bonus skill points have always just given you breadth, doing nothing to the rank cap. Con-based skill points are no different to Int-based skill points in this regard.
    I support paladins and the alignment system.

    My Homebrew Gaming Stuff (not updated lately) - My Campaign (ended)
    Homebrew licence:
    Spoiler
    Show
    All my homebrew stuff is released under the Open Game License, except where based on non-OGC work or otherwise stated. For Section 15:

    <name of homebrew here> Copyright <year first posted>, T. Pederick

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    vivi's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    I'm right behind you
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: [House] Physical skills

    I like your idea A LOT, but are their one or two pools of skills?
    Founder of the cult of the bunny

    (\_/)
    (O.o)
    (><)
    /_|_\

    this is bunny.
    copy bunny to signature to help him achieve world domination. Join the dark side (we have cookies!)

    thanks for the avatar, mysticaloctopus

    Spoiler
    Show

    Best:

    Runner up:

    3rd:


  6. - Top - End - #6
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Eighth_Seraph's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Water Tribe, South Pole
    Gender
    Male

    Lightbulb Re: [House] Physical skills

    Right, in order to pull this off, you'd have to separate "physical" skills from "mental" skills. So your Con would give

    Skill Allocations within Pools{table]Constitution|Intelligence
    Balance|Appraise
    Climb|Bluff
    Escape Artist|Craft
    Hide|Decipher Script
    Jump|Diplomacy
    Perform|Disable Device
    Ride|Disguise
    Survival|Forgery
    Swim|Gather Information
    Tumble|Handle Animal
    Move Silently|Heal
    |Intimidate
    |Knowledge (all)
    |Listen
    |Open Lock
    |Perform
    |Profession
    |Search
    |Sense Motive
    |Sleight of Hand
    |Spellcraft
    |Spot
    |Use Magic Device
    |Use Rope[/table]

    You'll notice that Perform is on both sides; that's to reflect that someone could be a dancer or a flute player with different uses of this skill, so individual perform skills need to be taken into account. Is this about right from your view, Badger?
    Last edited by Eighth_Seraph; 2007-09-15 at 07:51 PM.
    Water, Earth, Fire, and Air: Benders of the Avatar world
    Monks and Rangers for a non-magical world
    Quote Originally Posted by KKL View Post
    Edition Wars and Nerd Rage destroyed Rome. Ceasar died because he was a crappy DM.
    Avatar By the amazing Mephibosheth

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Edea's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    In your head.
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: [House] Physical skills

    It's an interesting idea, but it might be a bit easier to simply expand the class skill list and skill point per level totals of melee classes (which we already know to be almost universally, unnecessarily abysmal, IMO anyway).

    Another house rule might be to eliminate the affect of a negative Intelligence modifier on your skill points accrued per level: only a bonus to the stat would affect those totals (so you're still rewarded for a high stat in that area, but also given a bit more breathing room).
    "Come play in the darkness with me."
    Thanks for the avatar, banjo1985!

    Spoiler
    Show

    I guess I'm a Neutral Good Human Wizard (4th Level)
    Ability Scores:
    Strength- 14
    Dexterity- 15
    Constitution- 17
    Intelligence- 20
    Wisdom- 20
    Charisma- 12
    Take the 'What D&D Character am I?" Quiz!


    Somehow I doubt the veracity of this quiz :P
    Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Orc in the Playground
     
    F.H. Zebedee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    Gender
    Male

    Thumbs up Re: [House] Physical skills

    I think you'd need to homebrew this whole thing out, listing the split between physical and mental skills, and some you can put both in.

    There's two main modifications, I'd say, and that'd be first of all, either making STR the Fort Save stat, or making it the stat for picking up skills. As is, it's the second most dumpable stat after CHA, and often, moreso dumpable. Con, on the other hand, though never a first priority, is the least dumped on stat, I'd say. So if we up con, throw STR a bone.

    And then I'd say, ensure that both STR and INT provide skill points, and that class skillpoints (The 2+ in 2+int) can be put into either category. A valid enough fix, and would make fighters more skillful, any way you slice it. And it'd prevent wizards from being capable at outclassing physical classes at physical skills. Anything that helps Monk, Fighter, Barbarian, and Paladin, while slightly dinging up pointy hat is good in my book.
    Click the spoiler tag for a link to my forums!
    Spoiler
    Show

    Please visit my forums! We've got a great community and a lot of excellent free form RPing!

    Thanks to DrKarling for the awesome avatar!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •