Results 1 to 30 of 66
-
2019-04-05, 09:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Welcome back to the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge E6 Appetizer Edition! I hope everyone had their fill of good classes last round, because we're back into the stuff that's a little bit undertuned. I'm sure you can handle it!
The form of this challenge is to take a particular D&D 3.5 base class (our "secret ingredient," or SI) and turn it into a functional E6 build, which must feature the SI as heavily as possible. (The only hard rule about this is that you must take at least one level in the SI, though judges are encouraged to look favorably on builds that take as many levels as possible in said SI.) Your final build submission should consist of your 6 regular levels and your first 10 epic bonus feats, though providing a snapshot at earlier points through the progression is heartily encouraged. Entries are to be PM'd to the Chair (that would be me!), and they will be posted anonymously; our volunteer judges will then grade each build on a 1-5 point scale in four categories: Originality, Power, Elegance, and Use of the Secret Ingredient. The builds with the highest three scores will be awarded medals, with the Honorable Mention award going to the non-medaling build that the Chair likes best and/or that receives the most votes for HM in this thread. (HM may not always be awarded, particularly if the number of builds is very small.) And then we all have cake!*
*Note: You must provide your own cake.
This is basically like the regular Iron Chef, and let's be brutally honest with ourselves here: this isn't a gargantuan community, and we basically all know what we're talking about at this point. Make the builds, send 'em in, post some scores, and have fun. If you've got questions, lemme know. Still, let's lay out a few rules!
- Cooking Time: Builds must be submitted via PM to the Chair by 4:59 PM GMT - 9 on Thursday, Apr 25, 2019 (1:59 AM GMT on Friday, Apr 26). The reveal shall be on the first evening the Chair has free following the cooking deadline, which is hoped to be that evening or the immediately subsequent one—I'll do my best, anyway. Judging is then encouraged to go as quickly as possible; if multiple judges volunteer, we'll set about a two-week window, but if we only get one judge, we'll try to wrap up as soon as possible after that judge presents scores. (I will admit that the deadline time may not be an exact science, but don't hide from me and we'll probably be cool.)
- Kitchen: Let's break this one down a bit.
Spoiler: Let's talk about sources
- ALLOWED: Almost all D&D 3.5 material published by WotC: Core, Completes, monster books, Races Of books, alternate power source books (Expanded Psionics Handbook, Magic of Incarnum, Tome of Battle, Tome of Magic, etc.), Spell Compendium, Book of Exalted Deeds, Book of Vile Darkness, Eberron material, Forgotten Realms material, and other WotC-published 3.5 material. (This list is NOT exhaustive and there are many other legal books that I did not mention by name!)
- ALLOWED: Material from the 3.5 archives of the Wizards of the Coast website (including, but not limited to, the Mind's Eye articles). If you use it, link it.
- ALLOWED: Official errata from WotC. If you're relying on this in a material fashion, it's a good idea to link it and to discuss it.
- NOT ALLOWED: Unofficial errata, including "class fixes" (regardless of the source, including from the original author if not published in a WotC book) or fan-created content.
- ALLOWED: Unupdated WotC-published 3.0 material (e.g., Sword and Fist, Masters of the Wild, etc.) except for 3.0 psionics. No 3.0 psionics allowed. If you are using 3.0 material, use the general-purpose skill updates (Wilderness Lore becomes Survival, Innuendo becomes Bluff, etc.) and the general-purpose rules updates (spells with a casting time of "1 action" become "1 standard action," etc.) when appropriate.
- NOT ALLOWED: 3.0 material for which a direct 3.5 update exists. Use the updated material instead.
- ALLOWED: Dragon Compendium and its errata.
- NOT ALLOWED: Content from Dragon Magazine and/or Dungeon Magazine unless said content appears in an otherwise allowed source.
- ALLOWED: Oriental Adventures, including the 3.5 update to Oriental Adventures from Dragon Magazine #318. This is a specific exception to the "no Dragon" rule!
- NOT ALLOWED: Pathfinder content, regardless of whether it is "D&D 3.5 OGL" or not. If it didn't come from WotC, we don't want it.
- ALLOWED: From Unearthed Arcana: racial paragon classes, alternate class features/variant classes, spelltouched feats, and variant races. (Traits and flaws are technically legal, but traits warrant a -0.5 point penalty in Elegance, and flaws warrant a -1 penalty in Elegance.)
- NOT ALLOWED: Other Unearthed Arcana content, including (but not limited to) bloodlines, LA buyoff, fractional BAB/saves, alternate casting systems, alternate skill systems, item familiars, prestigious character classes, generic classes, gestalt, etc. When you're wondering if UA content is allowed, err on the side of caution and don't mess around with it.
- NOT ALLOWED: Leadership, regardless of source. Game elements functionally equivalent to Leadership (including, but not limited to, Dragon Cohort, Undead Leadership, and Thrallherd) are similarly banned. (Familiars, Improved Familiar, animal companions, Wild Cohort, psicrystals, elemental envoys, and similar game elements are allowed, and they are not considered to be "Leadership." If the difference isn't obvious, feel free to contact the Chair with specific questions.)
- NOT ALLOWED: Third-party content, homebrew, or other non-WotC content.
- NOT ALLOWED: Epic feats from the Epic Level Handbook. Just because you're "epic" in E6 after 6th level doesn't mean that you're that kind of epic.
- NOT ALLOWED: Any race or template with a level adjustment other than +0. (Or any other source of LA other than a race or template, if any such things exist.)
- NOT ALLOWED: For our judges: penalizing solely based on legal sources used, regardless of whether those sources are plentiful, sparse, common, obscure, or something in between. If the material is legal, then it doesn't matter how many or how few books it came out of.
- ALLOWED: Also for our judges: penalizing for using a source (other than material in Core; don't be vindictive about genuinely obvious stuff) that isn't listed in the build writeup. The chef may choose to present the sources in-line with the text, in a consolidated source list, or somewhere else, but if the source is listed (and is otherwise legal), it counts. If the source is not listed, you may choose to penalize for that.
If you have questions about anything in this section (or hell, in this ruleset), feel free to ask the Chair.
- Character Creation: 32 point buy is assumed. For the purposes of this contest, Level Adjustment greater than +0 is banned. (This may be revised at a later point, but I don't feel that the E6 LA rules are conducive to fun in the context of this contest.) No more than two entries per chef per contest, please; if you submit two builds and somehow are so overcome with inspiration for a third that you can't help yourself, PM me and tell me which two you care about the most.
- Speculation: Please do not post any form of speculation before the reveal. Just don't do it, guys. It's not cool. This means NOT posting any of the following or anything substantially similar: what you think is going to be common, significant elements of your planned build or of other potential builds, or anything else that could directly influence someone else's build choices for good or for ill. (It's acceptable to ask for rules clarifications as appropriate, but try to avoid tipping your hand too much.) Speculation is bad because it can discourage people from posting builds and can also "taint the judging pool" when it comes to Originality, so please just try to be aware of how other people might react to your speculation.
- E6: Here's how E6 works for the purposes of this contest. Build your character normally for the first six levels. After you reach level 6, you stop gaining levels and start gaining bonus feats every time you would gain 5,000 XP. Since we aren't actually tracking XP, you'll basically list your first ten epic bonus feats in the order that you take them, and we think of them as being kind of like levels. We will not use the LA-equals-reduced-point-buy rules, instead preferring to just ban races with LA, at least for now. We will not use the "capstone feats"; all feats that you take must be normal legal 3.5 feats, not homebrew E6 ones. You may not use the Epic feats from the Epic Level Handbook, though if for some reason there are non-Epic feats from the ELH that you qualify for, you may take those. (I don't think there are any, but I'm sure someone will prove me wrong.) It is up to the discretion of each judge whether this is a "hard E6" (magic above 3rd level spells is simply beyond mortal reach, items that have a listed CL above 6th are just plain not available, etc.) or a "soft E6" (if you can somehow get the magic on your character, it's yours, regardless of level), though I honestly don't expect it to come up. Don't go crazy with making assumptions about items and we probably won't have to find out.
- Presentation: Please use the table found below in the spoiler. List your epic bonus feats (in clear order) after the table. If you find a clever way of formatting that that isn't annoying and that doesn't break anything, have fun; if it's portable, I may steal it for the next round. When sending your build or any disputes to the Chair, clearly include your build's name in the subject of the PM, and please present your build exactly as you want the Chair to copy and paste it into the thread.
If you're using a picture, cite the source and follow any relevant citation rules. Because we have had issues with this in the past, when listing your skills, please make it very clear how many ranks you have at each level. There are multiple ways to do this and we do not wish to cramp anyone's individual style by dictating exactly how this must look, but make sure that somewhere in your entry there's an explanation of how many actual skill ranks you have. It's still fine to list total skill bonuses, if that's your style, but don't only list bonuses; make sure that there is a clear listing somewhere of your ranks alone.SpoilerCode for the table:Level Class Base Attack Bonus Fort Save Ref Save Will Save Skills Feats Class Features 1st New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities 2nd New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities 3rd New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities 4th New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities 5th New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities 6th New Class Level +x +x +x +x Skills Feats New Class Abilities Spoiler[table="class: head alt1 alt2"]
[tr]
[th][B]Level[/B][/th]
[th][B]Class[/B][/th]
[th][B]Base Attack Bonus[/B][/th]
[th][B]Fort Save[/B][/th]
[th][B]Ref Save[/B][/th]
[th][B]Will Save[/B][/th]
[th][B]Skills[/B][/th]
[th][B]Feats[/B][/th]
[th][B]Class Features[/B][/th]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]1st[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2nd[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3rd[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4th[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5th[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6th[/td]
[td]New Class Level[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]+x[/td]
[td]Skills[/td]
[td]Feats[/td]
[td]New Class Abilities[/td]
[/tr][/table] - Contest houserules: Nearly the same as the main contest's rules here: all creatures are proficient with natural weapons they have or may acquire, bonus feats that are explicitly granted without meeting prereqs are usable even without those prereqs, and feats that affect which skills are class skills for you and/or how you spend your skill points (Able Learner, Martial Study, Truename Training, Apprentice, etc.) apply immediately at the level at which you take them (even though you normally spend skill points before taking a feat).
- Judging guidelines: The minimum score in a category is 1, and the maximum is 5. Judges are expected to be fair, consistent, and open-minded, and they are expected to make a good-faith effort to engage with any reasonable disputes that arise, especially when RAW is in question. That said, contestants are asked to not dispute more than necessary; let's do everything in good faith and really only dispute when a judge is being inconsistent, being unfair, or is otherwise grossly misinterpreting a build.
Judges may not penalize Originality solely because a build is a tribute or homage to an existing creative work (in or out of D&D canon; note that this is not the same thing as penalizing Originality for using well-known optimization tactics), nor may judges penalize based solely on sources used (whether those sources are plentiful, sparse, common, obscure, or something in between, you should judge the build elements and how they work together rather than what book or what books they came out of, as long as those books are legal for this contest and are cited in the entry).
As with the main contest, we will follow the "One Mistake, One Penalty" guideline, and it is very important that the judges adhere to it. I'm going to directly copy and paste this from the main thread, and hopefully the original author won't mind too much:
SpoilerJudges are only allowed to penalise once for a given mistake. If someone messes up their skills and doesn't qualify for a PrC, ding them as hard as you like. Once. In one category. You don't then get to declare that because they didn't qualify for that PrC, they don't get those levels, and thus don't qualify for anything else. If Ranger is a common ingredient, ding them for Originality. Once. Don't also take off points for Two-Weapon-Fighting being a common ingredient.
Non-exhaustive list of examples:
SkillsAllowed:
- Giving a penalty for miscalculating the number of skill points gained
- Giving a penalty for not having enough ranks to meet a prerequisite
- Increasing the harshness of a skill miscalculation penalty if it affects critical skills including prereqs
Not allowed:
- Giving separate penalties for miscalculating skill points and for non-qualification where the non-qualification is solely caused by the miscalculation
PrereqsAllowed:
- Giving a penalty for not meeting prereqs
- Scaling the penalty depending on how important the item that the build failed to qualify for is
- Giving minimum score in UotSI for not qualifying for the SI
- Not giving credit for (note: not the same as penalising for) tactics using feats or classes other than the SI that were not qualified for (but see below)
Not Allowed:
- "Cascading" failures to qualify - declaring that because a build doesn't qualify for a feat, for example, it also doesn't qualify for anything using that feat as a prereq
- Treating a build as having fewer levels than it does because of FtQ for classes
Other general things that are no longer allowed:
- Penalising because someone has chosen to build a tribute to an existing creative work
- Deciding that a backstory has not met a fluff prerequisite well enough, or because its method of meeting it is "unrealistic". You may penalise if a fluff prereq is not addressed at all, but not for how well it is addressed.
Note that these are protections, not licenses. Deliberately taking a feat that you know you don't qualify for hoping to just suck up the judging penalty for a feat that you couldn't normally take is not okay, and may lead to your build being disqualified. - Other bits and bobs: If there's something major and relevant I haven't mentioned, assume that the way I handle it will probably be the same as the main contest unless stated otherwise or unless doing so would be an obviously absurd result. If you've got questions, I'll give you answers.
This round's secret ingredient:
the DRAGON SHAMAN, from Player's Handbook II!
Allez Optimizer!
The Builds:
Name Alignment/Race Stub Dragon Color Rhomian Firegullet NE Duskling Dragonfire Adept 1 / Cloistered Cleric 1 / Dragon Shaman 4 Red Black Wing NE Sparrow Hengeyokai Dragon Shaman 6 Black Osborn Goodbarrel ("Festerbreath") NG Glimmerskin Halfling Sorcerer 1 / Dragonfire Adept 1 / Dragon Shaman 4 Gold Dagg'on Clawsome NG Dragonborn Duskling Marshal 1 / Incarnate 1 / Dragon Shaman 4 Copper The Blue-Tongued Warbler LN Kenku Rogue 1 / Dragon Shaman 5 Blue Marya Bluescale LE Desert Half-Orc Dragon Shaman 6 Blue
Spoiler: Contest History
Round 4: Knight
Round 5: Ninja
Round 6: Racial Paragon Classes
Round 7: Hexblade
Round 8: Shugenja
Round 9: Swashbuckler
Round 10: Crusader
Round 11: Soulknife
Round 12: Factotum
Round 13: Prestige Classes
Round 14: Mountebank
Round 15: Sorcerer
Spoiler: Way Old Stuff (2012 and earlier; Amechra's run as Chair)Last edited by Zaq; 2019-04-26 at 12:54 AM.
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-05, 09:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Here's a few gentle recommendations that are intended to improve scores and make things easier for the judges. As always, THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS POST ARE NOT RULES. Judges and contestants are free to honor them or ignore them; my intent here is only to help, and NONE of what I'm saying here is required.
Recommendations:
- Double-check ALL of your prereqs. Every. Single. One. Feats, PrCs, whatever. You might even go so far as to spell out when you meet each one, but again, that's not a requirement. But one of the single biggest causes of point loss is failure to meet prereqs.
- Tell the judges what's cool about your build! You spent hours or days on this (y'know, probably) and know it inside and out, but the judges are getting a whole bunch of these dishes all at once and don't know the build history of each one. You're significantly more likely to score well if you spell out exactly what makes you awesome than if you try to just let it stand on its own.
- Make it easy to read! Skill tables are awful, though they're an incredibly necessary evil. Full Monster Manual-style statblocks are occasionally useful but are also insanely dense if not formatted well. Judges are very likely to miss something if you aren't careful with how you present your info. Remember that judging takes a lot of time, energy, and focus, so don't rely on the judge being willing/able to decode something in order to see what makes you interesting!
- Be memorable. Remember that we're all using the same ingredient here. What makes you different?
I totally lovehate the dragon shaman. It's a really confusing class that feels like it comes so close to having a purpose, but no one seems to know what that purpose is. It wasn't so much designed by committee—more like designed by anonymous suggestion box. I find it downright comical how awkwardly designed it is. But now it's up to you to show us all what the real purpose of the dragon shaman truly is!
And hey, at least in E6 they haven't run out of new class features before you run out of levels.
Side note: that opening post is getting really bulky, and I feel like it's impossible for folks to find the necessary information in it. Anyone got any easy suggestions for making it simpler to parse? I don't want to cut out anything that I don't have to, since it's actually pretty important information and it's so top-heavy because I keep needing to add stuff to it, but it's not an elegant presentation in the slightest.In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-06, 02:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- The Old West
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I'm interested. Question, does the breath weapon function in an Alternate Form? Looking at the class and [thing I'm looking at] doesn't specify, so I assume it does, but I want to be sure.
Avatar by linklele
Spoiler: Build Contests
E6 Iron Chef XVI Shared First Place: Black Wing
E6 Iron Chef XXI Shared Second Place: The Shadow's Hand
-
2019-04-06, 05:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
- Location
- A Sauna in Hell
- Gender
-
2019-04-06, 08:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Location
- Michigan
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I'd like to compete, feel like I ought to judge instead, and may not actually have time for either. We'll see.
Iron Chef Medals
SpoilerSir Driscoll Conia - Silver - IC L
Nick Snarespan - Gold - IC LIII
Lucy "Legs" Silvertail - Bronze - IC LXVIII
Bolfarg of Knoss - Gold - IC LXXVII
Ivarr Deathborn - Bronze - IC LXXVII
Ahmtel - Silver - IC LXXVIII
Tocke of Nessus - Gold - IC LXXIX
The Blessed Third - Silver - IC LXXXI
Galahad Galapagos - Gold - IC LXXXIV
Sai-don, Knight of the Tide - Bronze - IC LXXXIV
-
2019-04-06, 01:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Jasnah avatar by Zea Mays
-
2019-04-08, 11:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I’m genuinely curious to see if we get more chromatics or more metallics.
I don’t think it’s speculation for people to simply guess which side is going to be more populous. Let’s stop short of saying why or of predicting specific flavors, of course...In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-09, 01:26 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- The Old West
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Avatar by linklele
Spoiler: Build Contests
E6 Iron Chef XVI Shared First Place: Black Wing
E6 Iron Chef XXI Shared Second Place: The Shadow's Hand
-
2019-04-09, 02:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Antibes
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I'm feeling dicey. I'll bet on a perfect tie!
VC XV, The horsemen are drawing nearer: The Alien and the Omen (part 1 and part 2).
VC XVI, Burn baby burn:Nero
VC XVIII, This is Heresy! Torquemada
VC XX, Elder Evil: Henry Bowyer
And a repository of deliciously absurd sentences produced by maddened optimisers in my extended signature
-
2019-04-13, 02:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I'm in the unusual position of having to many feat slots and nothing to fill them with lol
Originally Posted by Peelee
-
2019-04-13, 05:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Location
- Karrnath
- Gender
-
2019-04-13, 08:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-13, 09:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Location
- Karrnath
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
-
2019-04-14, 08:27 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
i did a rework, and should be done today
041519 - submittedLast edited by jdizzlean; 2019-04-15 at 01:40 PM. Reason: avoiding double post
-
2019-04-16, 08:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I don't have enough builds and I don't have enough time/energy. You've all got another week. Get out there and make me proud.
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-16, 08:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Behind Blue Eyes
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I... missed this. Well I've got a lot going on, but if I find my mind drifting this way with a few hours to spare, I'll cook again.
If you need me for anything, or I forgot about something, PM me and I'll see it.
Undead- er, undying gratitude to linklele for the avatar.
-
2019-04-17, 11:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
-
2019-04-19, 11:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Happy Friday, everyone! As a reminder, the deadline is next week, but you’ve got a weekend to build if you’re still interested!
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-22, 04:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- The Old West
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Thanks for the extension, I should be able to have something in by the new submission date.
Avatar by linklele
Spoiler: Build Contests
E6 Iron Chef XVI Shared First Place: Black Wing
E6 Iron Chef XXI Shared Second Place: The Shadow's Hand
-
2019-04-22, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Approximately 72 hours remain!
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-25, 08:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Deadline’s this evening! I’d really like one or two more entries, though. Who’s still working?
In the Beginning Was the Word, and the Word Was Suck: A Guide to Truenamers
Come join the Iron Chef Optimization Challenge in the Playground E6 Appetizer Edition! We're currently cooking for round 28. Everyone is welcome!
My compiled Iron Chef stuff!
Queer pride isn't limited to one month!
-
2019-04-25, 01:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- The Old West
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Avatar by linklele
Spoiler: Build Contests
E6 Iron Chef XVI Shared First Place: Black Wing
E6 Iron Chef XXI Shared Second Place: The Shadow's Hand
-
2019-04-25, 03:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- MN, USA
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
I managed to whip up a little something. It should be in your inbox, Zaq.
-
2019-04-25, 06:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- The Old West
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
Ok, think I got it done just in time! Can't wait to see everyone's builds!
Avatar by linklele
Spoiler: Build Contests
E6 Iron Chef XVI Shared First Place: Black Wing
E6 Iron Chef XXI Shared Second Place: The Shadow's Hand
-
2019-04-25, 09:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
- Location
- Karrnath
- Gender
-
2019-04-25, 11:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Gender
Re: Iron Chef Optimization Challenge: E6 Appetizer Edition (Round XVI)
i sent mine in right?
if i was dumb, please hold till Sunday morning when i go into work so i can submit!
Originally Posted by Peelee
-
2019-04-26, 12:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Rhomian Firegullet
Red! length
Originally Posted by Rhomian Firegullet
-
2019-04-26, 12:34 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Black Wing
Orange! (Black is the new orange, you see.)
Originally Posted by Black Wing
-
2019-04-26, 12:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Osborn Goodbarrel
Yellow! length
Originally Posted by Festerbreath
-
2019-04-26, 12:37 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Gender
Dagg'on Clawsome
Green! (Well, until you polish off the patina, at least.)
Originally Posted by Dagg'on Clawsome