New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 50 of 50 FirstFirst ... 254041424344454647484950
Results 1,471 to 1,474 of 1474
  1. - Top - End - #1471
    Bugbear in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2016

    Default Re: Got a Real-World Weapon, Armour or Tactics Question? Mk. XXVIII

    Another issue is that while fast loading rifled muskets existed in the ACW, the method of battlefield command hadn’t changed since the Napoleonic era. Yes the telegraph immensely changed long distance communications, but in the battlefield commands were restricted to voice, bugle and flag. The limitations of communication, including the huge amounts of smoke generated by massed blackpowder weapons, meant the leaders had to keep the men in closer formations.

    So even if the rifled muskets were an improvement over Smoothbores (and obviously they were because of their widespread adoption) the ability to command troops hadn’t changed. It really took many continental powers up to WW1 to drop massed columns and lines for open order. The British were an early adopter because of the 2nd Boer War, but the continental powers learned the lesson the hard way in 1914.

  2. - Top - End - #1472
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    WolfInSheepsClothing

    Join Date
    Jul 2011

    Default Re: Got a Real-World Weapon, Armour or Tactics Question? Mk. XXVIII

    DrewID, I don’t think that rings true. The officers of the ACW were mostly amateurs with a leavening of Mexican War veterans and professionals. And they were still using Hardee’s manual (basically, slightly modified napoleonic stuff) as their baseline.

    And just too many attacks get shot to pieces trying to close whether they succeed or fail to think that officer perception was preventing them.

  3. - Top - End - #1473
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    DruidGuy

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Northern Ohio
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Got a Real-World Weapon, Armour or Tactics Question? Mk. XXVIII

    Quote Originally Posted by KineticDiplomat View Post
    DrewID, I don’t think that rings true. The officers of the ACW were mostly amateurs with a leavening of Mexican War veterans and professionals. And they were still using Hardee’s manual (basically, slightly modified napoleonic stuff) as their baseline.

    And just too many attacks get shot to pieces trying to close whether they succeed or fail to think that officer perception was preventing them.
    Point. I forgot how long the U.S. held to its aversion to European-style (or at least perceived as such) standing armies and elite officer corps. And then a not insignificant percentage of their trained officers were from Southern states, decimating the U.S. Army's supply of trained officers. Unless hearsay "doctrine" received from the few veteran trained officers ... but now I'm slipping into circular argument.

    DrewID

  4. - Top - End - #1474
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Brother Oni's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cippa's River Meadow
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Got a Real-World Weapon, Armour or Tactics Question? Mk. XXVIII

    Page 50, new thread is up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •