New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 86
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Flee in terror, for the uncapped has been unleashed. Someone, somewhere, actually, in This thread, has decided to start an argument over Pun-Pun vs The Mortiverse. The Mortiverse, incidentally, is the result of using the 3rd party "Immortal's Handbook".

    Now, while the "logical" debate is fought with set theory, and some rather fuzzy rules, what sort of opinions do we have here?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    MonkGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbitrarity View Post
    Flee in terror, for the uncapped has been unleashed. Someone, somewhere, actually, in This thread, has decided to start an argument over Pun-Pun vs The Mortiverse. The Mortiverse, incidentally, is the result of using the 3rd party "Immortal's Handbook".

    Now, while the "logical" debate is fought with set theory, and some rather fuzzy rules, what sort of opinions do we have here?
    Easy enough; Roll opposed d20's, add infinity to both. Higher roller wins.
    Pokemon friend code : 3067-5701-8746

    Trade list can be found on my Giant League wiki page, all pokemon are kept in stock with 5 IVs, most with egg moves, some bred for Hidden Powers. Currently at 55 in stock and counting.

    Padherders for my phone and my tablet!

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    I'd say it'd start off as an epic, universe destroying battle, but eventually turn into a Slap Slap Kiss.

    You've read it! You can't unread it!

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Owww... it burns!

    My eyes want to unread something...

    Incidentally
    Always Maximize Roll
    Greater deities (rank 16-20) automatically get the best result possible on any check, saving throw, attack roll, or damage roll. Calculate success, failure, or other effects accordingly. When a greater deity makes a check, attack, or save assume a 20 was rolled and calculate success or failure from there. A d20 should still be rolled and used to check for a threat of a critical hit. This quality means that greater deities never need the Maximize Spell feat, because their spells have maximum effect already.
    Wait... that doesn't apply 0.o

    They have MORE than 16-20, and they therefore aren't greater deities, so they can't use that....

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Yuki Akuma's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The Land of Angles

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Juggernaut crashing into the Blob, and the Blob goes flying, along with a large chunk of the ground he was standing on. If this is the more powerful Blob, Juggernaut pushes him back and the ground moves with him.

    There's no wrong way to play. - S. John Ross

    Quote Originally Posted by archaeo View Post
    Man, this is just one of those things you see and realize, "I live in a weird and banal future."

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    SwashbucklerGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Everyone loses
    I am a fan of in that order

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    X-men: isn't it odd that the UNSTOPPABLE JUGGERNAUT has been stopped, and the IMMOVABLE BLOB has been moved? Juggernaut's ability involves being "unstoppable" if he gains any forward momentum, while Blob creates a gravitational field preventing him from being moved from his location. They were both defeated by tangent forces, the ground destroyed underneath Jugs, Blob was exposed to a heavier body. Since the active Juggernaut can create a tangent force where as the passive blob cannot, I would say that Irresistable wins.
    My mother says: those on fire should roll.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Ettin in the Playground
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Canada, eh?
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by cupkeyk View Post
    X-men: isn't it odd that the UNSTOPPABLE JUGGERNAUT has been stopped, and the IMMOVABLE BLOB has been moved? Juggernaut's ability involves being "unstoppable" if he gains any forward momentum, while Blob creates a gravitational field preventing him from being moved from his location. They were both defeated by tangent forces, the ground destroyed underneath Jugs, Blob was exposed to a heavier body. Since the active Juggernaut can create a tangent force where as the passive blob cannot, I would say that Irresistable wins.
    Technically speaking, you can't have an irresistible force and an immovable object in the same universe at the same time, as the existence of one would preclude the existence of the other.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Just wondering, does anyone have a link to the level 1 Pun-Pun? I can't seem to find it...

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Illiterate Scribe's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Dat Shoggoth

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    I have to say that Pun-Pun, saviour of the DnD rules, wins this one. The Mortiverse is just ZOMG NUMBORZ!!1!, whereas Khan, Stormwind, Ghola and others have created an entity that needs its own theory of time to truly comprehend.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Alleine's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A mound of Rainbowflesh
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    I really can't say, seeing as I haven't seen the most powerful version of pun-pun yet. That thread is too big to sift through, however I think it is pretty pointless. You're pitting a legitimate WoTC-only monstrosity(Pun-Pun) against a 3rd party... thing...(Mortiverse) which is essentially a mass of numbers shoved together until it equals infinity.

    Also, Pun-Pun has a cooler name.
    Super-amazing avatar by Ceika!
    << It's a mound of rainbowflesh, do NOT forget that.

    Quote Originally Posted by xNadia View Post
    See the rainbowflesh, EAT the rainbowflesh, BELIEVE THE RAINBOWFLESH!

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Illiterate Scribe View Post
    I have to say that Pun-Pun, saviour of the DnD rules, wins this one. The Mortiverse is just ZOMG NUMBORZ!!1!, whereas Khan, Stormwind, Ghola and others have created an entity that needs its own theory of time to truly comprehend.
    Actually, if anyone but those who carefully perused the IH knew what that long list of abilities did, it might seem to even the score. There's something about duplication of observed powers, knowing everything (Special: The DM hands you the adventure he is currently running), and a bunch of other crazy stuff like that.

    Level 1 pun-pun is somewhere late in the pun-pun thread, not entirely sure where.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Lyinginbedmon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Darlington, Co. Durham
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    I would like to point out that you couldn't have an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object.

    Consider this: In order for the unstoppable force to continue being so after colliding with the immovable object, it would need to be deflected. In doing so, it's forward momentum would reach zero at one point as it acquires momentum in another direction, thus meaning it isn't unstoppable.

    Likewise, for an immovable object to be immovable, it would have to prevent it's own motion after the collision with the unstoppable force. In doing so, it eliminates the possibility of the unstoppable force being unstoppable.

    Therefore, as h_v stated, they can't exist in the same universe, if at all.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    I know that Opus 100 FTW.
    They're inherently contradictory terms.

    On the other hand, it is remarkably similar to the grappling of two infinities. Example, what happens if two creatures with literally infinite stats are forced to make opposed checks (infinite damage loop in conjunction with the Shambling Mound's electricity to CON, followed by Void Release and Bellflower tatoo, followed by use of manipulate form)

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Mewtarthio's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyinginbedmon View Post
    I would like to point out that you couldn't have an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object.

    Consider this: In order for the unstoppable force to continue being so after colliding with the immovable object, it would need to be deflected. In doing so, it's forward momentum would reach zero at one point as it acquires momentum in another direction, thus meaning it isn't unstoppable.

    Likewise, for an immovable object to be immovable, it would have to prevent it's own motion after the collision with the unstoppable force. In doing so, it eliminates the possibility of the unstoppable force being unstoppable.

    Therefore, as h_v stated, they can't exist in the same universe, if at all.
    I say it shatters the multiverse into an infinite number of timelines, each with a different outcome.
    Quote Originally Posted by Winterwind View Post
    Mewtarthio, you have scared my brain into hiding, a trembling, broken shadow of a thing, cowering somewhere in the soothing darkness and singing nursery rhymes in the hope of obscuring the Lovecraftian facts you so boldly brought into daylight.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Shas aia Toriia's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Atlantic Ocean

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Well, Pun-Pun is only Wizards stuff, but the Mortiverse is 3rd party. They can't work together, unless Pun-Pun has access to those things as well. Then, Pun-Pun has everthing the Mortiverse has, plus all his other stuff.

    Pun-Pun wins.
    Spoiler
    Show
    Avvies by Z-Axis, now bearer of 3 divine rank.
    So you may have heard of Lord Herman. Well, he's pretty awesome.
    Chief Arial Commander of HALO
    Through hostilties, Leader of AMEN
    Annoyingly Androgynous Elf
    Larger Avvies:
    Shas aia Toriia (under constuction)
    Spoiler
    Show

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Shas'aia Toriia View Post
    Well, Pun-Pun is only Wizards stuff, but the Mortiverse is 3rd party. They can't work together, unless Pun-Pun has access to those things as well. Then, Pun-Pun has everthing the Mortiverse has, plus all his other stuff.

    Pun-Pun wins.
    That is, indeed, a mentioned argument. But that thread makes my brain hurt, if only because they keep throwing around travestries of set theory.

    This, however, is a great quote.

    I don't frequent these boards. I don't care to debate the minutia of which nigh-omnipotent being is more nigh-omnipotent. I don't even play D&D all that much. But this colossal display of idiocy:

    Originally Posted by Buugipopuu
    You don't have 0 whole apples, because that's a meaningless concept.
    has forced me to respond in the name of all that is good and logical in the universe.

    If B ⊂ A then (B ∩ C) ⊂ (A ∩ C).

    P.S. If you try to argue that "whole apples" is not a subset of "apples", I shall reach through the Internet and punch you in the face with a fury that only an irked geek can unleash.
    P.P.S. YOU ARE BAD AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    RedSorcererGirl

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA

    Lightbulb Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Concerning what happens if an Unstoppable Force meets an Immovable Object, first take into account relativity, where concepts like "motion" and "rest" are only relative to a particular frame of reference. If object #1 is unstoppable, and object #2 is immovable, note that from a reference frame attached to object #1, the situation is reversed, where it's the Immovable Object and object #2 is the Unstoppable Force.

    And with a reference frame half way between the two objects, we have the situation of two Unstoppable Forces meeting. In other words, Unstoppable Force meeting Immovable Object is equivalent to two Unstoppable Forces meeting.

    The other consideration is that matter is mostly empty space and energy. Hence if two Unstoppable Forces meet, they'll go through each other and continue on their way. (This is similar to how two galaxies can "collide" and pass through each other mostly unaffected, where the odds of any stars colliding are low since the stars are so far apart from each other.) The Unstoppable Force will go through the Immovable Object and pass out the other side. That answer avoids violating either's condition.

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Emperor Tippy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Earth

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Pun-Pun wins by virtue of being able to create abilities for himself that don't ever appear in any rule book and give them to himself as Ex abilities.

    "I Win"
    Pun-Pun win's every fight, challenge, contest, or anything else Pun-Pun wants to win.
    EX

    It's perfectly legal per RAW as well.
    People who think Tippy equals win.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    Clearly, this is because Tippy equals Win.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunken Valley View Post
    Tippy=Win
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavinfoxx View Post
    Wow... Tippy, you equal win.
    Quote Originally Posted by Immabozo View Post
    Tippy, I knew, in the back of my mind, that you would have the answer. Why? Cause you win. That's why.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
    Alright. I finally surrender. Tippy, you do in fact equal win. You have claimed the position of being my idol.

    Quote Originally Posted by Someone who shall remain anonymous
    This post contains 100% Tippy thought. May contain dangerous amounts of ludicrousness and/or awesomeness.

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    May 2007

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Pun pun with 0 ranks in UMD and infinite charisma score uses a scroll of disintigrate with an infinite DC...there was trouble with the mortiverse link so i couldn't see it(nor do i know all its abilities) however, i doubt he has infinite fort save...(though i can predict that he has infinite con too...)if so, how about infinite will save?something like that comes to mind...if you can't move it...you don't need to...just go around it...

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Alleine's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    A mound of Rainbowflesh
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    IIRC the Mortiverse has +infinity to everything, and not nigh infinity either. REAL infinity.
    Super-amazing avatar by Ceika!
    << It's a mound of rainbowflesh, do NOT forget that.

    Quote Originally Posted by xNadia View Post
    See the rainbowflesh, EAT the rainbowflesh, BELIEVE THE RAINBOWFLESH!

  22. - Top - End - #22
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Emperor Tippy View Post
    Pun-Pun wins by virtue of being able to create abilities for himself that don't ever appear in any rule book and give them to himself as Ex abilities.

    "I Win"
    Pun-Pun win's every fight, challenge, contest, or anything else Pun-Pun wants to win.
    EX

    It's perfectly legal per RAW as well.
    Oddly, that's been mentioned as well

    Mortiverse has a "replicate" ability, which allows it to duplicate any ability of any creature it has encountered, so the argument goes as follows...

    Oh ho. I've been deliberately avoiding doing this because I'm such a nice guy, and was keeping the moral high ground and not using the loose wording of Manipulate Form to have abilities that aren't published, which is underhanded and lame. But if you insist on interpreting the rules that way, you may note that in order for the Mortiverse to mimic an ability with Replicate, it merely has to have encountered it. It doesn't say it has to have encountered it in combat, or even encountered it being used by a creature that actually exists, or even encountered it during the course of actual events which happen, that the ability in question must be published, or any limitations on what must be done to "encounter" the ability. Thus, using its aleph-aleph-0 actions, the Mortiverse runs its own D&D game with a creature which has the ability:

    Omniability
    You have every ability contained within the set of abilities which it is beneficial to possess.

    By playing a game in which this ability is on a creature, it encounters the ability, and thus replicates it with Replicate. What's really neat is that abilities copied with Replicate may be used "at any time". Not "at any time after encountering the ability", or even "at any time after taking Replicate", meaning the Mortiverse has every beneficial ability contained within the set of all abilities from the beginning of time, without taking any actions at all.
    Which, incidentally, is idiotic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alleine View Post
    IIRC the Mortiverse has +infinity to everything, and not nigh infinity either. REAL infinity.
    True, but that is cancelled by something with the same ability. Therefore, pun-pun can have "virtual" infinity, as well as a real infinity, through the mentioned infinite damage loop/Shambling mound/Bellflower tattoo/void release/manipulate form.
    Last edited by Arbitrarity; 2007-10-11 at 07:37 PM.

  23. - Top - End - #23
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    HalflingRangerGuy

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Manila, PH
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by h_v View Post
    Technically speaking, you can't have an irresistible force and an immovable object in the same universe at the same time, as the existence of one would preclude the existence of the other.
    Hence the quotation marks on my reply; Jugs and Blob aren't exactly the sharpest tools in the shed, so we can't blame them if they named themselves with taglines they can't live up to.
    My mother says: those on fire should roll.

  24. - Top - End - #24
    Dwarf in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Mewtarthio View Post
    I say it shatters the multiverse into an infinite number of timelines, each with a different outcome.
    Doesnt that always happen anyway?
    My Heavy Metal band;

    http://myspace.com/eternalexilesthlm

    Check it out if you like kick ass heavy metal! :D

  25. - Top - End - #25
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AlterForm's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbitrarity View Post
    snip
    You bet its idiotic.

    I haven't wanted to bring this up on the actual topic yet, but Bigxxxx claims Morti can replicate "the entire universe, perfectly, in its head, as a 'DnD Game' ".

    But...if it would take an infinite amount "memory" to run a perfect simulation (Aleph-null?), but that simulation includes an infinitely complex creature/idea (Mortiverse, which in itself would take Aleph-null? memory to "run"), wouldn't the "actual memory" required be Aleph-1? Maybe Morti could do this if he had Aleph-null "memory", but if his simulation includes himself (which it would have to, since he's using it to "encounter" an ability), wouldn't have to account for...uh...Universe(Aleph-null), +Morti(Aleph-1), Morti's simulation inside himself(Aleph-2?), [recursion to Aleph-(Aleph-null))? Does that work? Would it even stop ther?], since every iteration has to contain a perfect "copy" of Morti, which is each infinitely complicated, simulation an infinitely complex existence and an infinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being [repeatrepeatrepeat].

    Even Morti can't process an infinitely-recursive simulation which adds another infinitely complex layer of complexity with each recursion, can he? (Incidentally, Pun-Pun can. He uses:

    Infinite computation: Pun-Pun (and only Pun-Pun) can process/imagine/simulate anything, no matter how complex.)

    Am I right? Or do I still not get the concepts of Alephs well enough? (I think that's what the argument Bigxxxx is presenting boils down to, and I can't say I fully understand Alephs yet, but I think I understand enough to follow the argument...)

  26. - Top - End - #26
    Troll in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Having not actually began work on calculus or higher maths, I am unable to respond in a properly informed manner. All I can do is peruse wikipedia

  27. - Top - End - #27
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    AlterForm's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    United States
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Quote Originally Posted by Arbitrarity View Post
    Having not actually began work on calculus or higher maths, I am unable to respond in a properly informed manner. All I can do is peruse wikipedia
    Heh, that's exactly what I did.

    If I understood correctly, Aleph-Null = Layman's Infinity. Aleph-1 = Layman's Infinity^2. And so on? I dunno.

  28. - Top - End - #28
    Troll in the Playground
     
    ElfMonkGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2007

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    According to Exalted 1'st edition, the Immovable Object always wins.

  29. - Top - End - #29
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Bauglir's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Even Morti can't process an infinitely-recursive simulation which adds another infinitely complex layer of complexity with each recursion, can he?
    Y'know, that's what I said. Apparently alephs fix it? I don't really know, all I know is that I'm convinced that in any fight where the rules apply equally to both of them, we have a draw. Because they can both copy each others abilities (Pun-Pun, obviously, copies Morti's, but Morti can grab Manipulate Form as well and gain all of Pun-Pun's).

  30. - Top - End - #30
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Emperor Tippy's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Earth

    Default Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....

    Actually Pun-Pun can create an ability that says none of his abilities can be copied by Mort and thus wins.

    "I Win" is a valid, RAW legal, Pun-Pun ability. Anything you can imagine Pun-Pun can have as an ability. And with his infinite knowledge checks he can imagine everything.
    People who think Tippy equals win.
    Spoiler
    Show

    Quote Originally Posted by Tyndmyr View Post
    Clearly, this is because Tippy equals Win.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunken Valley View Post
    Tippy=Win
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavinfoxx View Post
    Wow... Tippy, you equal win.
    Quote Originally Posted by Immabozo View Post
    Tippy, I knew, in the back of my mind, that you would have the answer. Why? Cause you win. That's why.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mithril Leaf View Post
    Alright. I finally surrender. Tippy, you do in fact equal win. You have claimed the position of being my idol.

    Quote Originally Posted by Someone who shall remain anonymous
    This post contains 100% Tippy thought. May contain dangerous amounts of ludicrousness and/or awesomeness.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •