Results 1 to 30 of 86
-
2007-10-11, 04:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Flee in terror, for the uncapped has been unleashed. Someone, somewhere, actually, in This thread, has decided to start an argument over Pun-Pun vs The Mortiverse. The Mortiverse, incidentally, is the result of using the 3rd party "Immortal's Handbook".
Now, while the "logical" debate is fought with set theory, and some rather fuzzy rules, what sort of opinions do we have here?
-
2007-10-11, 04:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Pokemon friend code : 3067-5701-8746
Trade list can be found on my Giant League wiki page, all pokemon are kept in stock with 5 IVs, most with egg moves, some bred for Hidden Powers. Currently at 55 in stock and counting.
Padherders for my phone and my tablet!
-
2007-10-11, 04:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Canada, eh?
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
I'd say it'd start off as an epic, universe destroying battle, but eventually turn into a Slap Slap Kiss.
You've read it! You can't unread it!
-
2007-10-11, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Owww... it burns!
My eyes want to unread something...
Incidentally
Always Maximize Roll
Greater deities (rank 16-20) automatically get the best result possible on any check, saving throw, attack roll, or damage roll. Calculate success, failure, or other effects accordingly. When a greater deity makes a check, attack, or save assume a 20 was rolled and calculate success or failure from there. A d20 should still be rolled and used to check for a threat of a critical hit. This quality means that greater deities never need the Maximize Spell feat, because their spells have maximum effect already.
They have MORE than 16-20, and they therefore aren't greater deities, so they can't use that....
-
2007-10-11, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- The Land of Angles
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Juggernaut crashing into the Blob, and the Blob goes flying, along with a large chunk of the ground he was standing on. If this is the more powerful Blob, Juggernaut pushes him back and the ground moves with him.
-
2007-10-11, 04:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Everyone loses
I am a fan of in that order
-
2007-10-11, 05:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Manila, PH
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
X-men: isn't it odd that the UNSTOPPABLE JUGGERNAUT has been stopped, and the IMMOVABLE BLOB has been moved? Juggernaut's ability involves being "unstoppable" if he gains any forward momentum, while Blob creates a gravitational field preventing him from being moved from his location. They were both defeated by tangent forces, the ground destroyed underneath Jugs, Blob was exposed to a heavier body. Since the active Juggernaut can create a tangent force where as the passive blob cannot, I would say that Irresistable wins.
My mother says: those on fire should roll.
-
2007-10-11, 05:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Canada, eh?
- Gender
-
2007-10-11, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Just wondering, does anyone have a link to the level 1 Pun-Pun? I can't seem to find it...
-
2007-10-11, 05:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Dat Shoggoth
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
I have to say that Pun-Pun, saviour of the DnD rules, wins this one. The Mortiverse is just ZOMG NUMBORZ!!1!, whereas Khan, Stormwind, Ghola and others have created an entity that needs its own theory of time to truly comprehend.
-
2007-10-11, 05:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- A mound of Rainbowflesh
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
I really can't say, seeing as I haven't seen the most powerful version of pun-pun yet. That thread is too big to sift through, however I think it is pretty pointless. You're pitting a legitimate WoTC-only monstrosity(Pun-Pun) against a 3rd party... thing...(Mortiverse) which is essentially a mass of numbers shoved together until it equals infinity.
Also, Pun-Pun has a cooler name.
-
2007-10-11, 05:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Actually, if anyone but those who carefully perused the IH knew what that long list of abilities did, it might seem to even the score. There's something about duplication of observed powers, knowing everything (Special: The DM hands you the adventure he is currently running), and a bunch of other crazy stuff like that.
Level 1 pun-pun is somewhere late in the pun-pun thread, not entirely sure where.
-
2007-10-11, 05:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- Darlington, Co. Durham
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
I would like to point out that you couldn't have an unstoppable force meeting an immovable object.
Consider this: In order for the unstoppable force to continue being so after colliding with the immovable object, it would need to be deflected. In doing so, it's forward momentum would reach zero at one point as it acquires momentum in another direction, thus meaning it isn't unstoppable.
Likewise, for an immovable object to be immovable, it would have to prevent it's own motion after the collision with the unstoppable force. In doing so, it eliminates the possibility of the unstoppable force being unstoppable.
Therefore, as h_v stated, they can't exist in the same universe, if at all.
GMT Timezone
-
2007-10-11, 05:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
I know that Opus 100 FTW.
They're inherently contradictory terms.
On the other hand, it is remarkably similar to the grappling of two infinities. Example, what happens if two creatures with literally infinite stats are forced to make opposed checks (infinite damage loop in conjunction with the Shambling Mound's electricity to CON, followed by Void Release and Bellflower tatoo, followed by use of manipulate form)
-
2007-10-11, 05:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Gender
-
2007-10-11, 06:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Atlantic Ocean
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Well, Pun-Pun is only Wizards stuff, but the Mortiverse is 3rd party. They can't work together, unless Pun-Pun has access to those things as well. Then, Pun-Pun has everthing the Mortiverse has, plus all his other stuff.
Pun-Pun wins.SpoilerAvvies by Z-Axis, now bearer of 3 divine rank.
So you may have heard of Lord Herman. Well, he's pretty awesome.
Chief Arial Commander of HALO
Through hostilties, Leader of AMEN
Annoyingly Androgynous ElfLarger Avvies:Shas aia Toriia (under constuction)Spoiler
-
2007-10-11, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
That is, indeed, a mentioned argument. But that thread makes my brain hurt, if only because they keep throwing around travestries of set theory.
This, however, is a great quote.
I don't frequent these boards. I don't care to debate the minutia of which nigh-omnipotent being is more nigh-omnipotent. I don't even play D&D all that much. But this colossal display of idiocy:
Originally Posted by Buugipopuu
You don't have 0 whole apples, because that's a meaningless concept.
If B ⊂ A then (B ∩ C) ⊂ (A ∩ C).
P.S. If you try to argue that "whole apples" is not a subset of "apples", I shall reach through the Internet and punch you in the face with a fury that only an irked geek can unleash.
P.P.S. YOU ARE BAD AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD.
-
2007-10-11, 06:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Seattle, WA
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Concerning what happens if an Unstoppable Force meets an Immovable Object, first take into account relativity, where concepts like "motion" and "rest" are only relative to a particular frame of reference. If object #1 is unstoppable, and object #2 is immovable, note that from a reference frame attached to object #1, the situation is reversed, where it's the Immovable Object and object #2 is the Unstoppable Force.
And with a reference frame half way between the two objects, we have the situation of two Unstoppable Forces meeting. In other words, Unstoppable Force meeting Immovable Object is equivalent to two Unstoppable Forces meeting.
The other consideration is that matter is mostly empty space and energy. Hence if two Unstoppable Forces meet, they'll go through each other and continue on their way. (This is similar to how two galaxies can "collide" and pass through each other mostly unaffected, where the odds of any stars colliding are low since the stars are so far apart from each other.) The Unstoppable Force will go through the Immovable Object and pass out the other side. That answer avoids violating either's condition.
-
2007-10-11, 07:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Earth
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Pun-Pun wins by virtue of being able to create abilities for himself that don't ever appear in any rule book and give them to himself as Ex abilities.
"I Win"
Pun-Pun win's every fight, challenge, contest, or anything else Pun-Pun wants to win.
EX
It's perfectly legal per RAW as well.
-
2007-10-11, 07:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Pun pun with 0 ranks in UMD and infinite charisma score uses a scroll of disintigrate with an infinite DC...there was trouble with the mortiverse link so i couldn't see it(nor do i know all its abilities) however, i doubt he has infinite fort save...(though i can predict that he has infinite con too...)if so, how about infinite will save?something like that comes to mind...if you can't move it...you don't need to...just go around it...
-
2007-10-11, 07:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- A mound of Rainbowflesh
- Gender
-
2007-10-11, 07:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Oddly, that's been mentioned as well
Mortiverse has a "replicate" ability, which allows it to duplicate any ability of any creature it has encountered, so the argument goes as follows...
Oh ho. I've been deliberately avoiding doing this because I'm such a nice guy, and was keeping the moral high ground and not using the loose wording of Manipulate Form to have abilities that aren't published, which is underhanded and lame. But if you insist on interpreting the rules that way, you may note that in order for the Mortiverse to mimic an ability with Replicate, it merely has to have encountered it. It doesn't say it has to have encountered it in combat, or even encountered it being used by a creature that actually exists, or even encountered it during the course of actual events which happen, that the ability in question must be published, or any limitations on what must be done to "encounter" the ability. Thus, using its aleph-aleph-0 actions, the Mortiverse runs its own D&D game with a creature which has the ability:
Omniability
You have every ability contained within the set of abilities which it is beneficial to possess.
By playing a game in which this ability is on a creature, it encounters the ability, and thus replicates it with Replicate. What's really neat is that abilities copied with Replicate may be used "at any time". Not "at any time after encountering the ability", or even "at any time after taking Replicate", meaning the Mortiverse has every beneficial ability contained within the set of all abilities from the beginning of time, without taking any actions at all.
True, but that is cancelled by something with the same ability. Therefore, pun-pun can have "virtual" infinity, as well as a real infinity, through the mentioned infinite damage loop/Shambling mound/Bellflower tattoo/void release/manipulate form.Last edited by Arbitrarity; 2007-10-11 at 07:37 PM.
-
2007-10-11, 07:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Manila, PH
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
My mother says: those on fire should roll.
-
2007-10-11, 07:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Stockholm, Sweden
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
My Heavy Metal band;
http://myspace.com/eternalexilesthlm
Check it out if you like kick ass heavy metal! :D
-
2007-10-11, 07:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- United States
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
You bet its idiotic.
I haven't wanted to bring this up on the actual topic yet, but Bigxxxx claims Morti can replicate "the entire universe, perfectly, in its head, as a 'DnD Game' ".
But...if it would take an infinite amount "memory" to run a perfect simulation (Aleph-null?), but that simulation includes an infinitely complex creature/idea (Mortiverse, which in itself would take Aleph-null? memory to "run"), wouldn't the "actual memory" required be Aleph-1? Maybe Morti could do this if he had Aleph-null "memory", but if his simulation includes himself (which it would have to, since he's using it to "encounter" an ability), wouldn't have to account for...uh...Universe(Aleph-null), +Morti(Aleph-1), Morti's simulation inside himself(Aleph-2?), [recursion to Aleph-(Aleph-null))? Does that work? Would it even stop ther?], since every iteration has to contain a perfect "copy" of Morti, which is each infinitely complicated, simulation an infinitely complex existence and an infinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being who is simulating an infinitely complex existence and an inifinitely complex being [repeatrepeatrepeat].
Even Morti can't process an infinitely-recursive simulation which adds another infinitely complex layer of complexity with each recursion, can he? (Incidentally, Pun-Pun can. He uses:
Infinite computation: Pun-Pun (and only Pun-Pun) can process/imagine/simulate anything, no matter how complex.)
Am I right? Or do I still not get the concepts of Alephs well enough? (I think that's what the argument Bigxxxx is presenting boils down to, and I can't say I fully understand Alephs yet, but I think I understand enough to follow the argument...)
-
2007-10-11, 08:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Having not actually began work on calculus or higher maths, I am unable to respond in a properly informed manner. All I can do is peruse wikipedia
-
2007-10-11, 08:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- United States
- Gender
-
2007-10-11, 09:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
According to Exalted 1'st edition, the Immovable Object always wins.
-
2007-10-11, 10:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Even Morti can't process an infinitely-recursive simulation which adds another infinitely complex layer of complexity with each recursion, can he?
-
2007-10-11, 10:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Earth
Re: An Irresistable Force vs. an Immovable Object....
Actually Pun-Pun can create an ability that says none of his abilities can be copied by Mort and thus wins.
"I Win" is a valid, RAW legal, Pun-Pun ability. Anything you can imagine Pun-Pun can have as an ability. And with his infinite knowledge checks he can imagine everything.