New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 62 of 62
  1. - Top - End - #61
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Snowbluff's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2011

    Default Re: Should Swords Bards Just Learn Maneuvers?

    Quote Originally Posted by False God View Post
    One of the big issues with 3.5E was that casters could basically do all the martial stuff better than martials, and often from fairly low levels (depending on your stats and your system mastery, or simply make martials an unnecessary part of the game).
    People often state that casters were just better at martial stuff, which is true, but this took a lot of work. Casters were both harder to build and play, but also more rewarding. The simple fact of the matter is a core fighter would just basically just do the same thing each turn. Later books expanded their options greatly, by bringing in maneuvers and other abilities that could change how you operate your turn.

    5e maneuvers do this, but for only one subclass. A lot of the time, your turn is basically the same, attack action, with very little decision making. The weakness was recognized, but the solution was only applied sparingly, with the other improvement being the spellcasting variants of classes.

    Your mileage may vary, of course, but I'm definitely the kind of player and DM who favors having "more buttons to push" for the players.
    Avatar of Rudisplork Avatar of PC-dom and Slayer of the Internet. Extended sig
    GitP Regulars as: Vestiges Spells Weapons Races Deities Feats Soulmelds/Veils
    Quote Originally Posted by Darrin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Snowbluff View Post
    All gaming systems should be terribly flawed and exploitable if you want everyone to be happy with them. This allows for a wide variety of power levels for games for different levels of players.
    I dub this the Snowbluff Axiom.

  2. - Top - End - #62
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    BlueWizardGirl

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Should Swords Bards Just Learn Maneuvers?

    Having played swords bard, I think there is some argument that the added pieces of swords bard are easy to keep track of, and defensive flourish it somewhat critical for the swords melee combat as written. Also, there is something to be said that the flourishes are all strongly tied to what the swords bard is thematically. Could this be replicated with the PHB maneuvers, eh, Evasive footwork, sweeping attack and pushing attack are close but weaker overall. This also opens the question of using superiority dice or keeping it tied to inspiration, Which is either accepting things as weaker, or adding another resource to track as well as opening maneuver + inspiration which swords bard normally has problems with.
    I do not think anything needs to change.

    On the other points, more classes having access to maneuver/maneuver-like abilities sounds like a reasonable idea to me.
    My sig is something witty.

    78% of DM's started their first campaign in a tavern. If you're one of the 22% that didn't, copy and paste this into your signature.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •