Results 331 to 360 of 1018
-
2020-09-28, 12:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A129
We have Sage Advice to the contrary
"@JeremyECrawford Second question: can the knock back granted by open hands flurry of blows be used to push the target vertically?"
Pushing someone away requires the whole move to be away from you. A diagonal push works. Vertical doesn't. #DnD
-
2020-10-02, 01:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q130
I'm puzzled by a part of description of Scrying spell.
Part of it says:
Knowledge - Save Modifier
Secondhand (you have heard of the target) - +5
Firsthand (you have met the target) +0
Familiar (you know the target well) - -5
Connection - Save Modifier
Likeness or picture - -2
Possession or garment - -4
Body part, lock of hair, bit of nail, or the like - -10
What are these modyfiers about? Do they affect the main DC? I mean it's the target that is making the save ... why would Familiarity with the target REDUCE the DC for the target? (Should it not INCREASE it, if you know it well - should that not make it harder for the target to avoid you?) What is this part of spell description describing? I'm confused. Thanks :)
-
2020-10-02, 02:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A130
They do exactly what it says - they modify the result of the target's saving throw. So a -5 turns a save that would have been a 16 to an 11. Your DC remains the same in all cases.
-
2020-10-02, 02:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
So, let's say intial DC is 17. As a Caster I'm Familiar with the target (-5), I have Likeness and picture (-2), target's garment (-4) and even target's body part (-10). So target, that is targeted, needs to meet or exceed DC -4 in order to resist my Scrying? I'll never be able to scry it, given every save will be auto-success.
-
2020-10-02, 06:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2018
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A130
Nope, the DC is still 17, but since you're familiar with the target and you have a body part, the target gets -15 to their save. In order to beat your DC of 17, they'd have to roll a natural 20 and have an innate +12 at least to their save.
I don't know if this is RAW but I suspect the different types of modifiers aren't meant to stack. You don't get extra bonuses for having a picture and a garment on top of the body part, just whichever bonus is highest.
-
2020-10-02, 08:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Castle Sparrowcellar
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q131: DMG 251 table Creature Size and Space specifies that 4 tiny creatures can occupy 1 square. PHB 191 says: "Whether a creature is a friend or an enemy, you can’t willingly end your move in its space". Does DMG override PHB here? Can they occupy the space but not attack properly while in the same square as others?
-
2020-10-02, 09:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A131
The DMG overrides here. The specific case beats the general case. It's also worth noting that the PHB is meant to be, well, player-facing. So a lot of it's information assumes you're the size of a PC: Small or Medium.
Other cases where a specific rule on sharing a space override the general include riding a mount.
-
2020-10-03, 07:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 131:
There is no conflict here. Tiny creatures can't share their space with other tiny creatures, either. But a tiny creature's space is smaller than a medium creature's, so four tiny-creature-spaces can fit in a single 5' square.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2020-10-03, 08:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Castle Sparrowcellar
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Sorry, this has me asking a Q132:
If this is the case, do tiny creatures have a smaller OA area? I'm going to include a picture to demonstrate.
Spoiler: Grid
If tiny creatures space is smaller than a medium creature's would Medium Creature '1' provoke an OA from Tiny Creature 'A' by moving one square south? Likewise, would Medium Creature '2' provoke an OA only from Tiny Creature 'B' moving one square east?
Do they still threaten the same area as a medium creature, with 1's south movement provoking nothing, and 2's east movement provoking an OA from each of the tiny's?
-
2020-10-03, 10:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A132:
Opportunity attacks occur when a creature leaves the reach of another creature. So it depends on what the tiny creature's reach is. In previous editions, some tiny, diminutive, and fine creatures had attacks with reach less than 5', but I don't think that's the case in 5th edition. So assuming the tiny creature A has a reach of 5', then the answer to the question quoted above is "Yes".
Powers &8^]
-
2020-10-04, 02:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q132
Are there any races, or other player options, that could decrease a starting character's ability scores in a manner similar to how many of 3.5's races would have a -2 to certain abilities?
I rolled four 1s on my d6s. Part of me wants to see if I can do justice to my father's 1e legacy of a super low-health Fighter with my own low-stat character.
"Ash the glass-jawed" they called him.
-
2020-10-04, 04:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A132 Playable kobolds and orcs, as initially published in Volo's Guide to Monsters, came with a -2, respectively to Strength and Intelligence. This has now been errata'd away, as this game design proved extremely unpopular.
-
2020-10-04, 05:01 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q133 bear spirit totem's temp HP....how long do they last?
-
2020-10-04, 05:21 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A133 "Unless a feature that grants you temporary hit points has a duration, they last until they're depleted or you finish a long rest." (PHB p198)
-
2020-10-04, 06:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2014
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A133 So THP last 1min?
-
2020-10-04, 06:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Re 133:
I'm not sure how you're getting "a minute" from Millstone85's answer?Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2020-10-04, 07:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
I think Dmdork's reasoning is that:
- The spirit is the feature that grants the THP.
- The spirit persists for 1 minute.
- By the rule I quoted, so would the THP.
Now, me, I first read the SAC, which says "Unless a feature says otherwise, temporary hit points last until you finish a long rest (PH, 198)". Then I went to the referenced page and quoted it, without realising that it didn't quite say the same thing.
So, well, I don't know anymore.
-
2020-10-04, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Can a character be under the effects of the same spell twice? Example/specific case I'm curious about: We know that you can attack the same creature twice with Booming Blade, but is "don't move or suffer damage" effect also doubled, or can it occur only once?
SpoilerCurrent characters:
Dharrus the Archivist in Alkazaar's Appendix
Vrardurz in Cyre Blue
Previous (beloved) characters:
Xaxhan in The Eyes of The Lich Queen
Reclin the Rash in Lord of the Iron Fortress
-
2020-10-04, 04:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Location
- Space Australia
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
-
2020-10-04, 04:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
That's what I suspected. Cheers, thanks.
SpoilerCurrent characters:
Dharrus the Archivist in Alkazaar's Appendix
Vrardurz in Cyre Blue
Previous (beloved) characters:
Xaxhan in The Eyes of The Lich Queen
Reclin the Rash in Lord of the Iron Fortress
-
2020-10-04, 05:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- In your head.
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 134: Does the friends cantrip affect a Charisma-based caster's ability checks made for counterspell or dispel magic against the chosen target's spells?
I would say it doesn't, but I'm not sure how to word my reasoning properly. Basically friends is for Charisma checks 'involving the target', while the counterspell check is directed at the target's spell, not the target themselves?"Come play in the darkness with me."
Thanks for the avatar, banjo1985!
Spoiler
I guess I'm a Neutral Good Human Wizard (4th Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 14
Dexterity- 15
Constitution- 17
Intelligence- 20
Wisdom- 20
Charisma- 12
Take the 'What D&D Character am I?" Quiz!
Somehow I doubt the veracity of this quiz :P
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
-
2020-10-04, 07:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 134:
I'd say the wording of Friends is sufficiently ambiguous that RAW there is no reason why it wouldn't give advantage on Dispel Magic and Counterspell. However, it must be cast on a creature that isn't already hostile toward you, in which case I might wonder why you're trying to undo its magic. I'd say the only time this is likely to apply is if you're trying to dispel a harmful effect on a friendly creature.
-
2020-10-04, 09:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
R134:
The most recent Sage Advice clarified that Counterspell targets the enemy spellcaster, not the spell itself. Under that ruling, a cleverly-placed Friends would indeed grant Charisma casters advantage on Counterspell.The Everyman's Guide to Taking Up Arms - A Guide to Fighters
Practical Magical Gadgetry - A Guide to Artificers
Avatar courtesy of the webcomic Aurora, drawn by Red
-
2020-10-08, 09:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Gobbotopia
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q135: Having trouble with carrying capacity. according to roll 20
Originally Posted by Roll20Originally Posted by Also roll20
So from what I'm reading here, if I'm CARRYING objects off the ground, then my speed gradually goes down the more i carry.
But for Pushing and Dragging, I'm moving at full speed up until i reach 1lb beyond my carry capacity, at which point I immediately drop down to 5ft?
that doesn't sound right...Last edited by Draconi Redfir; 2020-10-08 at 09:30 AM.
Avy by Thormag
Spoiler
-
2020-10-08, 01:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A135: Those are two different rules. The first is the simplified method: You can carry normally anything up to 15x STR; anything in excess up to 30x STR requires you to push or pull, reducing your speed to 5ft. The second is the Encumbrance variant rule: You can carry normally anything up to 5x STR, with increasing speed penalties beyond that.
Powers &8^]
-
2020-10-09, 02:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2020
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q136: Is there any reason to assume that Entangle provides a degree of cover (assuming Medium creatures), or any RAW/Sage Advice that settles this?
Q137: When a familiar (assume an owl) uses the Help action, is it for a specific creature or just the next character to attack? Is there any way to assure that one's own familiar is used to help their attack, short of just getting similar initiatives? Readying an action doesn't solve the issue of it getting squashed because it can't use flyby/movement to get to safety.
Thanks!Last edited by Menji; 2020-10-09 at 02:31 AM.
-
2020-10-09, 05:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A136 I do not see any reason to assume that entangle would provide cover, nor do I know of a SA on the subject.
A137 I understand the text as speaking of a specific ally. No need to worry about initiative.
-
2020-10-10, 11:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2020
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
R137: Bear in mind that "a character can only provide help if the task is one that he or she could attempt alone" (PHB p.175). "A familiar can't attack" (PHB p.240), so it cannot Help another creature Attack.
-
2020-10-10, 12:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
R137: The first quotation is from the "Using ability scores" chapter. The "Help" combat action is separate (cf. "In combat, this requires the Help action (see chapter 9, 'Combat')"). Chapter 9 imposes no restrictions on needing to be able to attack oneself in order to use the Help action in combat.
Powers &8^]
-
2020-10-10, 05:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back