Results 601 to 630 of 1018
-
2021-06-22, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q239: Does Shadow Blade work with Booming Blade or Green Flame Blade since by RAW both BB and GFB have component requirements of "(a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)" and the blade created by Shadow Blade has no listed price?
-
2021-06-22, 01:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2011
- Location
- Why am I here?
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A239 It is unfortunately unclear. In a very permissive reading, yes.
Theoretically, a 2nd level spells have a cost of at least 10gp according to the end of the equipment section of the PHB. Thus, a Shadow Blade is a simple melee weapon that cost 10gp to make.
I feel there's technically support for the permissive reading, but I don't know of any official support for spell effects as material components.
-
2021-06-22, 05:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
R:239 RAW, the blade that Shadow Blade creates doesn't have any innate monetary value, so Booming Blade and Green-Flame Blade can't be used with it.
That being said, Crawford has ruled that he'd allow it.
Not necessarily - the price is ultimately up to the DM, and I will note that section is technically for the services of the spellcaster, not the price of the spell itself.Last edited by Ortho; 2021-06-22 at 05:33 PM.
The Everyman's Guide to Taking Up Arms - A Guide to Fighters
Practical Magical Gadgetry - A Guide to Artificers
Avatar courtesy of the webcomic Aurora, drawn by Red
-
2021-06-23, 06:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Re 239:
Then again, all prices of anything are ultimately up to the DM. And 10 GP is the only price that that is specified in the books for a Shadow Blade.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-06-25, 08:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 240: How does an attack made with the Clockwork Amulet interact with advantage and disadvantage? Do you always just take the 10 and never roll any dice, or does its automatic 10 just replace one of the two d20s you would otherwise be expected to roll?
Last edited by Gurgeh; 2021-06-25 at 08:28 AM.
-
2021-06-25, 08:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 240:
Advantage or disadvantage only apply when you would make a roll. You forgo the roll when you use Clockwork Amulet, so advantage/disadvantage doesn't apply.
-
2021-06-26, 07:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 241
If a PC is possessed by a ghost and attacks another PC who is under the effect of PROTECTION from G&E is the attack normal or at disadv?
(Who is attacking - the ghost or the PC being controlled)
-
2021-06-26, 09:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 241
Possession says:
it retains its alignment, Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma, and immunity to being charmed and frightened. It otherwise uses the possessed target's statistics
-
2021-06-30, 09:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
-
2021-07-01, 02:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
The Everyman's Guide to Taking Up Arms - A Guide to Fighters
Practical Magical Gadgetry - A Guide to Artificers
Avatar courtesy of the webcomic Aurora, drawn by Red
-
2021-07-01, 03:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
The question to which I was replying was this:-
"Q 240: How does an attack made with the Clockwork Amulet interact with advantage and disadvantage?"
The answer is part of the basic 5e mechanics, even if this particular mechanic isn't used that often. It's on p175 of the PHB under the title Passive Checks.
"If the character has advantage on the check, add 5. For disadvantage, subtract 5."
-
2021-07-01, 03:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
-
2021-07-02, 05:33 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
-
2021-07-02, 07:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
-
2021-07-03, 07:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2019
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 242
If a creature is INCAPACITATED (An incapacitated creature can't take actions or reactions) then there is nothing prohibiting it from moving (as counter-intuitive as that is, it's RAW), but can a creature use legendary actions to move? (AKA - is a legendary action an action always / sometimes / never)
Can an INCAPACITATED creature take legendary actions? (AKA - is a legendary action an action)
Can an INCAPACITATED creature take bonus actions? (AKA - is a bonus action an action)
It seems obvious to me that legendary actions and bonus actions are actions, but it also seems obvious to me that reactions are actions and moving is an action so who knows what RAW is?Last edited by da newt; 2021-07-03 at 07:55 AM.
-
2021-07-03, 09:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A242 No, an incapacitated creature can't do any of that.
Legendary actions are introduced page 11 of the MM, where it is stated that a creature "can't use them while incapacitated or otherwise unable to take actions".
Similarly, page 189 of the PHB says that "anything that deprives you of your ability to take actions also prevents you from taking a bonus action".
-
2021-07-04, 08:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 243
Can an Echo Knight's echo be used as cover?
Interested in both RAW and RAI on this.
e: If so, moon druid could make an interesting multiclassLast edited by Hairfish; 2021-07-04 at 09:03 PM.
-
2021-07-04, 10:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2018
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q244
As a 1st level Artificer with an INT score of 16, how many spells can I prepare each day? The general formula is INT mod + half class level (rounded down). Does that mean at level 1 I should round my level's contribution down to zero and only have 3 spells prepped based on my INT mod?
-
2021-07-04, 10:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2018
-
2021-07-07, 03:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
- Location
- Hopping across the planes
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q245
Can you plane shift a friend's body? It's well known that a corpse isn't a willing creature, that it is actually an object, but the spell doesn't say anything about objects too. You surely don't planeshift naked though...
-
2021-07-09, 09:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2016
-
2021-07-10, 01:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q246
Does Blindsense, like that of a Rogue, remove the disadvantage of attacking an invisible creature, assuming that creature is within Blindsense range, or does it merely allow you to pinpoint them?Last edited by Sniper; 2021-07-10 at 01:38 AM. Reason: Can't count lol
-
2021-07-10, 06:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 246:
A rogue's blindsense only allows pinpointing creatures. To fully replace vision, you need the blindsight ability instead.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-07-18, 01:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Night Vale
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q.247 Does the sorcerer's metamagic Quickened Spell allow you to cast multiple (two) non-cantrip spells in a round?
Potentially relevant details: I'm joining a campaign as a 4th level Wild-Magic Sorcerer. Could I Quicken a Chromatic Orb with sorc. points and then also cast Color Spray on the same turn? Or would I have to cast a cantrip as a normal action after using my bonus action for the quickened Chromatic Orb?Avatar by TheGiant
Long-form Sig
-
2021-07-18, 04:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 247:
If you cast a spell using a bonus action, the only other spell you can cast that turn is a cantrip. This is true regardless of whether the bonus action spell is a bonus action by default (such as Misty Step or Hex), or if it's a bonus action as a result of the Quicken metamagic.
Note that you can still take any non-spellcasting action, as well. For instance, some spells let you modify them, or repeat their effect, by taking an action during their duration. This is still allowed with a bonus-action spell.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-07-26, 12:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2021
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 248
This seems like a matter of some controversy, but can Booming Blade be used with a reach weapon at 10ft provided you have the Spell Sniper feat?
The range on BB as of Tasha's is "Self (5-ft radius)," AND the spell description mentions a target within 5 feet on top of that. Spell Sniper says "When you cast a spell that requires you to make an attack roll, that spell's range is doubled." As far as I can tell, it predates any use of the "Self (5-ft radius)" language, if that helps matters. Only clear guidance I can find on the subject is from before Tasha's; the pre-errata range was simply "5 ft". (And then a 21-page thread on another forum of people arguing about it with a tone far more certain than their arguments merited :P)
Apologies if this is a re-ask but I couldn't find it in this thread if so.
-
2021-07-26, 06:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 248
Silly as is may seem, RAW Spell Sniper still does nothing to booming blade. The spell's range is still self - the (5 foot radius) descriptor describes the area effected. See the other three notable Self (30 foot radius) spells from the PHB: aura of life, aura of purity and aura of vitality.
Crawford himself has mentioned that counterspell's effective range doesn't change with Distant Spell metamagic (which I also find stupid, but alas), and it hasthe samea simiilar specified range in the spell description that booming blade shares.Last edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2021-07-27 at 09:06 AM.
-
2021-07-29, 08:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2016
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q249. 5e doesn't have flight maneuverability like previous editions, does it? For example, could any flying creature, regardless of flight speed, just hover in one spot indefinitely if they wanted? (Until they suffer from exhaustion, anyways...)
-
2021-07-30, 07:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 252:
Some flying creatures have the ability to hover, while others don't. But the only consequence I can find is that if a non-hovering creature has its speed reduced to 0, it falls. I can find no rule in the PHB, DMG, or MM that sets minimum movement amounts. In other words, a non-hover flyer must have movement available, but does not necessarily need to use it.Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-07-31, 12:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019