Results 661 to 690 of 1018
-
2021-09-10, 07:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2021
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q267I've got a question about the Tasha's spell books and multiclassing. The way I read it, if I'm a druid with a 2-level wizard dip, I can attune to the Astromancy Archive and have Foresight as a spell known that I can prepare as soon as I get a 9th level slot at wizard 2/druid 15. Is that correct?
Last edited by carkl3000; 2021-09-10 at 08:12 AM.
-
2021-09-10, 08:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2019
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A267 (please make sure to include a question number in the future)
As per the spellcasting rules for multiclass characters, you prepare spells individually for each of your classes. The Astromancy Archive states that its spells are wizard spells for the one attuned to it, and as such you'd be preparing them as a wizard. However, since you're a wizard 2, you're unable to prepare foresight or any other spell over 1st-level, because a wizard 2 can't prepare spells of a level higher than 1st.
-
2021-09-10, 08:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2021
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Sorry about that!
As per the spellcasting rules for multiclass characters, you prepare spells individually for each of your classes. The Astromancy Archive states that its spells are wizard spells for the one attuned to it, and as such you'd be preparing them as a wizard. However, since you're a wizard 2, you're unable to prepare foresight or any other spell over 1st-level, because a wizard 2 can't prepare spells of a level higher than 1st.
If there were separate druid and wizard spells slots, I would agree 100%, but 1) The spell is in my spell book, and 2) I have a 9th level slot. That seems to take care of both conditions, no?
Edit:
Additionally, I don't see anything in the multiclassing rules that contradicts this. A multiclassed 2nd level wizard can't add spells to their book that are higher than 1st level, but Foresight is already in the book. The way I read it, if I'm attuned to the book I know the spell. I just can't prepare it or cast it until I have a 9th level slot which I would get at wizard 2/druid 15.Last edited by carkl3000; 2021-09-10 at 09:22 AM.
-
2021-09-10, 09:29 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 267 Clarification
Chaos Jackal is correct. From the PHB section on multiclassed spellcaters:Spells Known and Prepared. You determine what spells you know and can prepare for each class individually, as if you were a single-classed member of that class. If you are a ranger 4/wizard 3, for example, you know three 1st-level ranger spells based on your levels in the ranger class. As 3rd-level wizard, you know three wizard cantrips, and your spellbook contains ten wizard spells, two of which (the two you gained when you reached 3rd level as a wizard) can be 2nd-level spells. If your Intelligence is 16, you can prepare six wizard spells from your spellbook.
Each spell you know and prepare is associated with one of your classes, and you use the spellcasting ability of that class when you cast the spell. Similarly, a spellcasting focus, such as a holy symbol, can be used only for the spells from the class associated with that focus.This brass disc of articulated, concentric rings unfolds into an armillary Sphere. As a Bonus Action, you can unfold it into the Sphere or back into a disc. When found, it contains the following Spells, which are Wizard Spells for you while you are attuned to it: Augury, Divination, Find the Path, Foresight, Locate Creature, and Locate Object. It functions as a Spellbook for you, with Spells encoded on the rings.
When you're a multiclass character, these rules take precedence over the default casting rules in the Class's Spellcasting feature.Last edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2021-09-10 at 09:29 AM.
-
2021-09-10, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q268
The text for Find Familiar reads, in part:
Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.
It would seem that the answer is "Based on the familiar's stats rather than on yours."
-
2021-09-10, 05:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 268
It's your spell save DC. You're the one casting the spell, not your familiar. The first sentence shows the intent: "Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell."
You're casting the spell, the familiar is just delivering it.Last edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2021-09-10 at 05:29 PM.
-
2021-09-10, 08:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Charlottesville
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 269
Does movement on a Broom of Flying require the use of a hand? Likewise, does being hit while riding require any kind of save to stay on?Last edited by Sholos; 2021-09-10 at 08:07 PM.
Tali avatar by the talented Thormag.
-
2021-09-10, 10:34 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q270
Did the debate as to whether the "permanent" version of True Polymorph was dispellable ever get settled? If so, what was the resolution?
I note that in my resources, True Polymorph and Mighty Fortress have casting conditions that make their effects "permanent", while Major Image has its effect if upcast described as "until dispelled".
-
2021-09-11, 01:59 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 269
RAW, there's no restriction whatsoever to what you can do on a Broom of Flying. Of course, a DM asking for Dexterity (Acrobatics) checks or Strength Saving Throws not to fall of it in the appropriate situation would be totally reasonable. Likewise, a DM ruling that you can only use one hand (and therefore one-handed weapon, no shield etc...) whilst on the Broom would be using an (eminently reasonable) house rule.
A270changed in recent printings, see below.
True Polymorph has a duration of one hour. After one hour, the SPELL isn't active, so there is nothing to DISPEL. (I'm uncertain as to whether an Antimagic Field would have any effect : I'm inclined to say no, with the new shape being, for game purposes, the "true" shape of the polymorphed creature, but AMF does affect magical items, unlike Dispel Magic).Last edited by Osuniev; 2021-09-11 at 06:30 AM.
-
2021-09-11, 06:03 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Paris, France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
R270
In later printings, the line...
"If you concentrate on this spell for the full duration, the transformation becomes permanent."
... has been replaced with...
"If you concentrate on this spell for the full duration, the transformation lasts until it is dispelled."
... which annoyingly was not reported in the errata document.
-
2021-09-11, 08:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q271 (continuing the subject(s) raised in 270)
The Xanathar's spell Mighty Fortress creates a stone structure. The spell description contains the text
A staff of one hundred invisible servants obeys anycommand given to them by creatures you designate when you cast the spell. Each servant functions as if created by the unseen servant spell.
The walls, turrets, and keep are all made of stone that can be damaged. Each 10—foot by 10-foot section of stone has AC 15 and 30 hit points per inch of thickness. It is immune to poison and psychic damage. Reducing a section of stone to 0 hit points destroys it and might cause connected sections to buckle and collapse at the DM’s discretion.
Casting this spell on the same spot once every 7 days for a year makes the fortress permanent.
-
2021-09-12, 02:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q272
If a team Polymorphs a Tarrasque into a chicken or True Polymorphs it into a quill pen, and then promptly Disintegrates it, is the result:
A. An even more annoyed Tarrasque?
B. A small pile of feathery ash?
Also, in these scenarios, would the chicken get a save against the Disintegrate? Would the quill pen?
-
2021-09-12, 08:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 272
Your first guess is the correct one... mostly. While the spell does readsA creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6+40 force damage. If this damage reduces the target to 0 Hit Points, it is disintegrated.
Originally Posted by PHB Errata
As for whether or not it receives a saving throw is a more interesting question. The Chicken-Tarrasque absolutely does, using the chicken's awful Constitution modifier (and +2 Proficiency bonus).
The quill via true polymorph is the questionable bit. It all hinges on if your DM counts the Quill-Tarrasque as a nonmagical object or a magical object.
If it's the former, the Tarrasque RAW turns into a pile of ash, as the spell automatically disintegrates nonmagical objects. It does not reduce them to 0 hit points, it does not collect 200$ and it does not pass GO, it straight up explicitly annihilates it (Though even this is debateable, as true polymorph ends if the target dies. But can an object die? Ask your DM).
If they do consider it a magical object (which is a fair interpretation; if exposed to an AMF, it's right back to Tarrasque time), it's outright immune to disintegration.Last edited by Kuulvheysoon; 2021-09-12 at 08:39 AM.
-
2021-09-13, 03:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q273: The Javelin of Lightning lets you hurl it at a target within 120 feet, do lightning damage to everything in a ling between you and the target, and then... "The lightning bolt turns back into a javelin when it reaches the target. Make a ranged weapon attack against the target. On a hit, the target takes damage from the javelin plus 4d6 lightning damage."
120 feet is the long range for a javelin. Does this directive to make a ranged weapon attack override the long range penalty (allowing you to make the attack roll without disadvantage) if you threw it the maximum distance? Or are you still governed by the javelin's rules and thus making that attack roll at disadvantage?
-
2021-09-13, 04:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 273 It says, "Make a ranged weapon attack." General rules for a ranged weapon attack impose disadvantage when you attack at long range. Nothing in the item description imposes specific rules to the contrary, so I'd say you attack at disadvantage.
Last edited by NecessaryWeevil; 2021-09-13 at 04:32 PM.
Proclaiming something "objectively" true or false does not excuse you from proving it so.
-
2021-09-13, 11:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q274
A. If a Tarrasque is temporarily reduced in size by polymorph magic and transported to the product of a Demiplane spell, could it make its own way out after the spell effect wears off, if this still happens during the time that there's a door large enough for a Medium-sized creature to use?
B. What if the polymorphing spell doesn't end until after the stated time in the Demiplane casting for there to be a door out?
-
2021-09-13, 11:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q275
A. Do Dominate Person/Dominate Monster let you force the target to be "willing" or not "unwilling" to be affected by another spell (presumably one cast by one of your allies)?
B. Same question, but for the Charm X spells.
C. Same question, but for Suggestion.
-
2021-09-18, 04:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 276
Does the Githyanki psionics feature count as a spell with regards to the rule that says you can only cast a cantrip if you use a bonus action spell during your turn? (i.e. - can I cast fireball then use the githyanki misty step)
-
2021-09-18, 04:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- The Great White North
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A 275
A-C: Ask your DM. Charmed as a condition isn't particularly well-defined.
I could see a DM allowing it for the second portion of dominate person/monster, where you take utter control of them, but nothing in the RAW gives a definitive answer, I'm afraid.
A 276
Despite how the title of the feature is named, a closer reading of it reveals that they use the verb "cast", meaning that it is indeed subject to the same rules as normal spellcasting in regards to the Bonus Spell Rule.
-
2021-09-18, 05:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q277
Can you use the Telekinesis spell to move yourself? The Creature section reads:
You can try to move a Huge or smaller creature. Make an ability check with your spellcasting ability contested by the creature’s Strength check. If you win the contest, you move the creature up to 30 feet in any direction, including upward but not beyond the range of this spell. Until the end of your next turn, the creature is restrained in your telekinetic grip. A creature lifted upward is suspended in mid-air.
On subsequent rounds, you can use your action to attempt to maintain your telekinetic grip on the creature by repeating the contest.
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/spell:telekinesisLast edited by Corey; 2021-09-18 at 05:06 PM.
-
2021-09-19, 10:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 278:
A spellcaster is concentrating on a spell. They then choose to cast a different concentration spell, which would ordinarily end the first one. But the new spell is countered. Does the first spell still end?Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-09-19, 05:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
279
Suppose:
- You correctly believe that Avshar the Atrocious is somewhere within 100 feet of you.
- He's not behind cover.
- You can't actually perceive him, due to Invisibility.
Can you target him with a spell (e.g. Dispel Magic) that does not require you to be able to see its target?
To be clear, this is NOT a question about targeting the magical effect of invisibility. It's a question about targeting a person, who is at an undisclosed location within the range of the spell.Last edited by Corey; 2021-09-19 at 05:55 PM.
-
2021-09-19, 06:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Location
- Corvallis, OR
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Dawn of Hope: a 5e setting. http://wiki.admiralbenbo.org
Rogue Equivalent Damage calculator, now prettier and more configurable!
5e Monster Data Sheet--vital statistics for all 693 MM, Volo's, and now MToF monsters: Updated!
NIH system 5e fork, very much WIP. Base github repo.
NIH System PDF Up to date main-branch build version.
-
2021-09-19, 06:32 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
-
2021-09-19, 07:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
- Location
- Corvallis, OR
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Dawn of Hope: a 5e setting. http://wiki.admiralbenbo.org
Rogue Equivalent Damage calculator, now prettier and more configurable!
5e Monster Data Sheet--vital statistics for all 693 MM, Volo's, and now MToF monsters: Updated!
NIH system 5e fork, very much WIP. Base github repo.
NIH System PDF Up to date main-branch build version.
-
2021-09-21, 05:58 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2017
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 281 My Wild Magic Sorcerer has the bend Luck ability :
Spoiler: Bend LuckStarting at 6th level, you have the ability to twist fate using your wild magic. When another creature you can see makes an attack roll, an ability check, or a saving throw, you can use your reaction and spend 2 sorcery points to roll 1d4 and apply the number rolled as a bonus or penalty (your choice) to the creature's roll. You can do so after the creature rolls but before any effects of the roll occur.
When an enemy rolls (example : Wisdom save against her spell, the Hobgoblin devastatator rolls a natural 13 for a modified 14 ):
a. - should she know 1. the result of the dice (13) or 2. the modified roll (14) or 3. whether the enmy will succed or not ?
b. Can she use Bend Luck to turn a natural 20 or a natural 1 into something else ?
-
2021-09-21, 07:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A281b: Bend Luck does not affect the number rolled on the die itself, it simply applies a bonus or penalty to the final result (similar to Bardic Inspiration, Bless, some Battle Master manoeuvres, etc.). It has no effect on attack rolls always missing on a natural 1 or getting critical hits on a natural 20.
-
2021-09-21, 08:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
A279
I believe the invisible creature can be targeted as long as the spell doesn't require sight.
The important distinction, though, is whether the creature is hidden. If the creature is not hidden, just invisible, then I think there's no question he can be targeted. The problem comes if the creature is hiding and makes a successful stealth check against the caster's perception. In that case, I believe the rules are unclear on whether the hiding creature can be targeted by a spell.
Powers &8^]
-
2021-09-22, 07:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- The Land of Cleves
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q 282:
When a caster casts Time Stop, do they know at the start how many rounds they rolled?Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
—As You Like It, III:ii:328
Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics
-
2021-09-25, 09:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
- Location
- Space Australia
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW for 5e V: The Disadvantage Strikes Back
Q283
Harengon's Rabbit Hop vs Sentinel Feat
Sentinel
"Creatures provoke opportunity attacks from you even if they take the Disengage action before leaving your reach."
Rabbit Hop
"As a bonus action, you can jump a number of feet equal to five times your proficiency bonus, without provoking opportunity attacks."
Rabbit Hop is not a disengage, so it ignores the specific exceptions of Sentinel and thus still does not provoke opportunity attacks?