Results 271 to 300 of 309
Thread: Why ban ToB?
-
2020-07-08, 10:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
-
2020-07-09, 02:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: Why ban ToB?
Sorry, but equating "best combat options" with "all combat options" is your own faulty reasoning. Slot-constrained magic users like wizards actually DO have to consider all of their options, not just their best. That is the key for an efficient use of limited ressources.
-
2020-07-09, 04:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Why ban ToB?
Certainly in D&D fiction, magic missiles are a staple of even the most powerful wizards. The Simbul often fires off multiple magic missile spells at once (using Spell Sequencer spells grants access to that sort of thing).
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2020-07-09, 05:20 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
Re: Why ban ToB?
on the issue of magic missile, I honestly see it as a wasted spell slot. especially in pathfinder, where the only time i could see my wizard character wanting to cast magic missile is with a zombie or such at first level and oh look i can cast disrupt undead all day.and when I get up higher in levels I have more universally effective save or suck that can pin down such monsters so that i can either run away or let the fighters kill em after that. sleep and grease can rest easy knowing that i will not be replacing them with magic missile.
the first half of the meaning of life is that there isn't one.
-
2020-07-09, 07:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
Re: Why ban ToB?
No, they don't. The time cost from considering and eliminating Magic Missile each combat round is higher than the benefit from actually casting it. It's not like the 13th level Wizard is seriously considering "shoot it with my crossbow" either.
The correspondence between "D&D fiction" and "D&D rules", let alone "behavior of intelligent D&D players" is almost nonexistent. Also, much of the fiction draws on earlier editions, where Magic Missile actually did enough damage to be semi-useful.
-
2020-07-09, 12:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
On the minimax forum I found a guide for making a character who only used magic missile
Get your physics out of my D&D!
Proudly Chaotic
Optimism is delusion pessimism will save the world
-
2020-07-09, 05:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
Re: Why ban ToB?
Orth Plays: Currently Baldur's Gate II
-
2020-07-09, 06:19 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
Re: Why ban ToB?
Well, non-idiot crusaders do pick a number of options from a pool at random, and once those options are expended they can't be used again. That sounds a lot like MTG's system of a deck and a hand of cards, on a very abstract level. You even build your deck by picking your maneuvers.
-
2020-07-09, 08:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Malsheem, Nessus
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
This is probably the best way to make that idea workable. I'm reminded of one old attempt to take all the fighter powers in the 4e PHB and condense them down to 2 pages because most of them weren't anything special. If all of your basic "Make N melee attacks, deal +Xd6 damage" maneuvers were usable all the time, I wouldn't have as many objections to restricting all the more interesting maneuvers by stance.
Of course not, not any more than a 13th-level swordsage is seriously evaluating Blistering Flourish as a combat option...but he might still care about expeditious retreat against a fast opponent or protection from evil against a possessing demon, the same way the swordsage might still care about Burning Blade against a cold-subtyped monster or Sudden Leap against a flying one.
The point is not that all spells and maneuvers of all levels are equally valuable in a given combat, but that the problem of "here are a bunch of different usable abilities of varying relevance and power to which you currently have access, how do you organize them for easy reference during play?" is already a thing for all spellcasting classes, and if casters can handle 30+ spells at some point (whether that's by memorizing them or making spell cards or just ignoring everything below their top two levels or whatever) then there's no need to worry about initiators handling the same number of maneuvers.
Granted, some players do have trouble keeping track of more than a handful of abilities even with mnemonic aids, and that's fine...but that's not a reason to limit initiators overall (since that's just reinforcing the "smart and experienced players play spellcasters, dumb n00bs play martial types" stereotype), it's a reason to provide both simple and complex classes for both the casting and martial playstyles.
-
2020-07-09, 11:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
actually with the right metamagic feats magic missle can remain a viable combat at high level
Get your physics out of my D&D!
Proudly Chaotic
Optimism is delusion pessimism will save the world
-
2020-07-09, 11:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
-
2020-07-10, 08:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
-
2020-07-16, 08:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
Re: Why ban ToB?
I know it certainly doesn’t fix the disconnect, but it seems relevant to point out that readying only requires five minutes. This means that an initiator with a bit of scouting can prepare what would appear most appropriate for an upcoming fight. Again, it’s not perfect, as any level of surprise will leave you unable to use a choice maneuver.
Would you consider these adjustments, or at least do you feel they would address your concerns with the readied mechanic? The first is to increase the number of readied maneuvers, particularly at lower levels. Don’t make a warblade have to choose at all until 9th level or so when they have 7 maneuvers readied at a time. Crusaders would probably want at least the option to refresh at their normal rate.
The other option is to allow you to use unreadied maneuvers, but at a penalty. Maybe you take some small amount of damage as you force your body to make crazy motions without properly stretching first?
-
2020-07-16, 08:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2019
-
2020-07-16, 08:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Central Kentucky
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
Again, the readying doesn't mean you can't do the maneuver if it's unreadied, imo. It means you can't usefully do it in a stressful situation against a resisting opponent. Outside of combat, in circumstances where it's legal to take 10 on skills, I'd let initiators do all their maneuvers, readied or not, every other round. Though the healing ones wouldn't heal.
-
2020-07-16, 08:57 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- EU
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
I think the flavor issue here is that a large part of being a master swordsman is exactly being able to react quickly to your opponent, drawing instinctually from your repertoire of techniques.
Like, Olympic fencers aren't restricted to fight using only the small portion of techniques they can practice in five minutes the morning of the match. They use everything they know, because they spend years mastering their discipline and that means reacting in a stressful situation without missing a beat, otherwise you lose.Last edited by Silly Name; 2020-07-16 at 12:40 PM.
-
2020-07-16, 12:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Jerusalem
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
I apologize for not responding, I stopped paying attention to the thread somewhere in the magic missile conversation. However, the people who don't speak for me spoke for me very well, so I don't have much to add. I don't think that really adresses the flavor issue.
-
2020-07-16, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
Well really I think the people who argued against ToB were just making excuses because they didn't want to say it was a flavor issue
Get your physics out of my D&D!
Proudly Chaotic
Optimism is delusion pessimism will save the world
-
2020-07-16, 12:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Vacation in Nyalotha
Re: Why ban ToB?
clearly ToB is like mtg in that they’re both pay to win. How did you get ToB back in the day? That’s right, you bought it!
If all rules are suggestions what happens when I pass the save?
-
2020-07-16, 12:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- EU
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
I mean, flavor issues are valid issues, IMHO. I also think some truly find the mechanics not to their liking, which is understandable.
I myself have no strong feelings on ToB: if one of my players wants to use stuff from there I'll allow it, maybe refluff as demanded by the setting. What matters to me is keeping intra-party balance, so if that players risks overshadowing other non-ToB martials I'll try my best to help them a bit (a magic item here or there, sprinkle in some situations where their build shines...). I do agree the readied maneuvers system is wonky flavor-wise, though.
-
2020-07-16, 01:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Jerusalem
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
I feel it is important to distinct between issues with the flavour of the book(Too anime, I don't like martials using fire, etc) and issues with the flavour emerging from the mechanics of the book, which is what I was talking about. You can refluff anything, you can change fire damage to bludgeoning damage, no problem. You can't refluff the system. In that sense, if you have a real issue with the flavour evoked by the mechanics, you're done. If it doesn't bother other people that's great for them, but there are no easy fixes which would allow you to incorporate it in your games.
-
2020-07-16, 06:13 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- In your head.
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
The main and best reason would be not having access to the book.
The next reason would be that core martials are allowed in the game and/or martial adepts being perceived as overpowered. I probably wouldn't allow PC fighter/PC monk to exist in the same game as the warblade/swordsage, they'd just get replaced; as for initiators being OP, that's the clarion call of someone who needs to get CoDzilla'd.
The last reason would be weeb factor, which is dumb since a wizard/fighter or sorcerer/paladin gish is just as weeb as a martial adept, except one of those is functional without spending hours combing through obscure splatbooks. If you think it's this one, ask him about using the Arcane Swordsage variant"Come play in the darkness with me."
Thanks for the avatar, banjo1985!
Spoiler
I guess I'm a Neutral Good Human Wizard (4th Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 14
Dexterity- 15
Constitution- 17
Intelligence- 20
Wisdom- 20
Charisma- 12
Take the 'What D&D Character am I?" Quiz!
Somehow I doubt the veracity of this quiz :P
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
-
2020-07-16, 08:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2014
Re: Why ban ToB?
to be honest, if the reason given for disallowing ToB was they thought it was too powerful, I would ask compared to what? if they say any of the spellcasters I would then show them how broken spellcasters could be just using core spells. as a level 1 wizard, i am not using true strike to kill the goblins, i am spamming daze or casting sleep and then watching the fighter or barbarian do clean up. especially spamming daze in pathfinder where 0 level spells are at will. my two other 0 level spells in pathfinder at level 1 would be disrupt undead and detect magic.
the first half of the meaning of life is that there isn't one.
-
2020-07-16, 08:47 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
-
2020-07-16, 09:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
Well really they're powerful, but not to powerful. For me that's just the right level.
Get your physics out of my D&D!
Proudly Chaotic
Optimism is delusion pessimism will save the world
-
2020-07-17, 01:56 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- Seattle, WA
Re: Why ban ToB?
RE readied maneuvers and flavor, there's always the Adaptive Style feat, which lets you change all your readied maneuvers as a full-round action. That seems perfectly reasonable from a real-world perspective of briefly withdrawing to change your stance and plan your next few moves. Plus, it's a legitimately fantastic feat for Swordsages even just mechanically, being a far more efficient way of recovering their expended maneuvers.
Originally Posted by Darths & DroidsOptimization Trophies
Looking for a finished webcomic to read, or want to recommend one to others? Check out my Completed Webcomics You'd Recommend II thread!
Or perhaps you want something Halloweeny for the season? Halloween Webcomics II
-
2020-07-17, 02:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
As has been mentioned in the thread a couple of times already, just because this forum considers something to be perfectly balanced doesn't mean that they are for every table. At tables where high level wizards and fighters can play together without any balance issues the high optimization floor of the martial initiators will make them seem OP.
Now, I'm not in favor of banning ToB, but I do realize that if you have a bunch of players with little to no interest in optimization and system's mastery*, introducing ToB without taking some steps to ensure everyone is at the floor level of ToB will cause some issues, and that for someone that plays constantly with a group like that, it just might not be worth the headache.
*it could be argued that for a group like that, you might be better off switching to 5e, or another simpler system like FATE, but if everyone has decided they want to play DnD 3.5, it just means you'll need to 'balance content available to the table', as a certain poster here on this forum whose account is named for their eponymous wizard character would say.Jasnah avatar by Zea Mays
-
2020-07-17, 03:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
- In your head.
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
"Come play in the darkness with me."
Thanks for the avatar, banjo1985!
Spoiler
I guess I'm a Neutral Good Human Wizard (4th Level)
Ability Scores:
Strength- 14
Dexterity- 15
Constitution- 17
Intelligence- 20
Wisdom- 20
Charisma- 12
Take the 'What D&D Character am I?" Quiz!
Somehow I doubt the veracity of this quiz :P
Which Final Fantasy Character Are You?
-
2020-07-17, 03:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
The first table I ever played at had a monk, rogue, druid and ranger, and went to about level 12-ish? There where no meaningful balance issues between any of us as far as I remember, but we where all new to the game, so we where all at the optimization floor. I can definitely imagine some people never bothering to get enough system's mastery to ever grow beyond that, as I've played with people in other systems that even during session 10 still needed to be told how to make an attack roll (granted, that was Shadowrun, which is slightly more complicated than 3.5, but still).
Last edited by DeTess; 2020-07-17 at 03:40 AM.
Jasnah avatar by Zea Mays
-
2020-07-17, 04:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2016
- Gender
Re: Why ban ToB?
Best I see, ToB just give tools to martials, like the skills in RPGs or MMOs or MOBAs or however you want to call it.
They even have cooldowns!!!Last edited by TheCount; 2020-07-17 at 04:39 AM.