Results 31 to 35 of 35
Thread: Building a city with Leadership?
-
2020-06-29, 02:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Building a city with Leadership?
Probably because they give a general definition which aligns with a common sense definition, and the alternative given is to violate both the example and common sense definition entirely?
Imagine if I said "a Pizza is usually defined by layering bread, sauce, cheese and meat" and the other person immediately says "a hotdog is a pizza" so they can utilize a tax break on pizza sales because the "usually" can be stretched to mean anything. I could define the stronghold as being the sky and ground and the stronghold space everything between if we want to play that game. Why have an example if it meets nothing?
-
2020-06-29, 03:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Edmonton, Canada
Re: Building a city with Leadership?
Functionally, what's the difference between having followers from Leadership, and having devoted followers from a series of good diplomacy checks? I would have thought that you would have analogous levels of control. Followers aren't thralls, after all - they still have autonomy.
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." Kurt Vonnegut
-
2020-07-01, 05:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Sub-Prime Material Plane
- Gender
Re: Building a city with Leadership?
-
2020-07-01, 08:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2016
Re: Building a city with Leadership?
-
2020-07-02, 11:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
Re: Building a city with Leadership?
Originally Posted by SBG pg 8Originally Posted by SBG pg 8Originally Posted by SBG pg 53
If you had 10001 stronghold spaces, 5001 or more would have a volume of 4000 cubic ft. If 4998 of them have a volume of 1 cubic ft, 1 of them has a volume of 2 cubic ft, and 1 of them has a volume of 19995000 cubic ft, that would technically have "4000 cubic ft" as both the average and the clear majority, but at the same time you're purporting the idea that a 1x1x1 room, a 1x1x2 room, a 20x20x10 room, and a 310x430x150 are all equally valid "stronghold spaces" for the purpose of determining how much it should cost to build a "stronghold space" with this or that effect.
The point of saying "most" or "average" isn't to say that literally any volume is valid, it's more just to say that "stronghold spaces" don't have to be exactly precisely 20x20x10 as long as they're close (21x21x9 has similar total volume, but if SBG said "all stronghold spaces are 20x20x10", there's nitpicky chuckle****s in this community who would insist that such a volume takes up three stronghold spaces.
But more to the point, that kind of reading of the rules is kinda pointless. If you're willing to stretch definitions and "the rules don't say I can't" just to get a cheap stronghold, you could've just as easily gotten the equivalent of infinite money to build whatever kind of stronghold you want with all the bells and whistles you want, rather than tying yourself to a single city-sized courtyard with no additional buildings for the massive discount. Dying on this "you can get 99.9999999% off" hill is harder than dying on a different hill that gets you a 100% discount, so if you're going to be disingenuous anyway, why not go big?
EDIT: Oh and the Forbiddance quote was pulled mostly because, if we're gonna be persnickety and say that "most" doesn't mean all and therefore a space could be anything...the Forbiddance quote lays out that the spell grants [CL] volumes of 216000 cubic ft each, which are shapeable as you desire, but that this 216000 volume should cover 50 stronghold spaces. So even if you wanna be disingenuous, 216000 cubic ft is the maximum volume for a space - since going beyond that means you can't fit another 49 stronghold spaces of any size into that area.Last edited by AvatarVecna; 2020-07-02 at 11:22 AM.
Currently Recruiting WW/Mafia: Logic's Deathloop Mafia and Cazero's Graduates Of Hope's Peak - Danganronpa Mafia
Avatar by AsteriskAmp
My Homebrew