Results 1 to 27 of 27
Thread: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
-
2020-06-25, 10:45 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Just doing a bit of a look through some more recent strips and seeing 1131.
Assuming that Durkon had forgotten to hand off Kudzu and made a path for Belkar to stab his undead heart, then would Belkar have went through Kudzu to kill Durkon or would he have taken care to avoid harming the child?
I am not sure - character development would seem to be 'don't kill the child' but he did look pretty angry at the time and he fell (and stabbed) where the child was.Last edited by dancrilis; 2020-06-25 at 01:03 PM.
-
2020-06-25, 10:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Location
- Magrathea
- Gender
Re: Would Belker have killed Kudzu?
An explanation of why MitD being any larger than Huge is implausible.
See my extended signature here! May contain wit, candor, and somewhere from 52 to 8127 walruses.
Purple is humorous descriptions made up on the fly
Green is serious talk about hypothetical
Blue is irony and sarcasm
"I think, therefore I am,
I walk, therefore I stand,
I sleep, therefore I dream;
I joke, therefore I meme."
-Squire Doodad
-
2020-06-25, 10:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: Would Belker have killed Kudzu?
Honestly I'd thought the comic would show Belkar taking Kudzu hostage and forcing Hilgya to resurrect Durkon, but I am somewhat glad it did not go that way.
Personally I think Belkar would've just shoved Kudzu out of the way (and let him fall onto the floor or something).
EDIT: Uh, jinx?Last edited by understatement; 2020-06-25 at 10:51 AM.
-
2020-06-25, 10:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2020
Re: Would Belker have killed Kudzu?
Character-wise, in universe? Maybe. Maybe not. Belkar was - and still is, at this time of the released comics - is on the knife's edge when it comes to development right about now. Between Mr Scruffy and polymorphed Bloodfeast, he's been showing a steadily increasing disdain for attacking / seeing an attack on things that are small and squishy, but he's also not, y'know, a good person. If he saw Kudzu as an acceptable loss to smoke Durkula, then he might very well have.
However, all those questions and theories go out the window when you consider the fact that, meta-narrative wise, as in regarding the fact that all of oots is written by a human being, Rich probably wasn't going to write a scene in which a character we're supposed to empathise with, even just a little bit, straight-up oneshots a baby. I believe somewhere in the annals of the forum there's a quote of him stating that Kudzu doesn't have a statblock, because Rich didn't want to give a literal three month old one, because the main reason creatures have stat blocks is for combat? Therefore, I think it's probably unlikely that if Durkon hadn't moved Kudzu out of harms way, that Belkar would have hurt him.Last edited by deltamire; 2020-06-25 at 10:55 AM.
I draw, and I write sometimes! Drow paladin avatar by me. They/Them
-
2020-06-25, 11:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2015
- Gender
Re: Would Belker have killed Kudzu?
It's not a scene that was ever going to be written. But with that out of the way...
I think he wouldn't have. Much of Belkar's anger stemmed from survivor's guilt and feeling indebted to Durkon in particular. His rage towards Vamp Durkon was due to the perceived affront to Durkon. I think even in his rage Belkar would be able to realize harming Kudzu would have rendered it all meaningless.
It's irrelevant, though. Durkon couldn't make a path to his undead heart without also getting Kudzu out of the way.ungelic is us
-
2020-06-25, 12:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: Would Belker have killed Kudzu?
- Narratively: Killing Kudzu would undermine the critical scene's point of Durkon asserting control over the entire scenario (the same reason he handed Kudzu off in the first place).
- Protagonistically: Belkar is certainly smart enough to extrapolate from a pet/owner relationship to a child/parent relationship; so even if he's far off the mark he isn't likely to harm Kudzu anymore than Durkon is to harm Mr. Scruffy.
- Antagonistically: While there's certainly conceptual space for Hilgya to lose Kudzu for blithely dragging him along on her personal revenge quest, being able to accurately blame the Order rather than herself for the specifics would defeat the purpose of doing so.
- Tactically: Belkar isn't going to risk failing to kill HPoH by trying to aim for his heart through an opaque Kudzu.
- Mechanically: Soft cover provided by creatures only affects ranged attacks; Belkar would have to intentionally try to hit Kudzu instead of Durkon for this to come up.
- Literally: I'm unfamiliar with the hypothetical belker in this scenario.
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2020-06-25, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
-
2020-06-25, 01:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
I think he would kill them. Risque is just too big.
Last edited by Precure; 2020-06-25 at 01:21 PM.
-
2020-06-25, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Valencia, Spain
- Gender
-
2020-06-25, 04:40 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2015
-
2020-06-25, 09:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Belkar may be (or have been) evil-aligned, but even he isn't EVIL enough to stab a baby. End of story.
Also, in before the inevitable lock when the modmins find this.I prepared Explosive Runes before writing this signature.
-
2020-06-25, 11:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
I think there are a number of evil characters who arent evil enough to straight up shank a baby. Though pre character development Belkar mightve been willing to.
Im curious, which evil characters in OOTS do you think would or would not be willing to kill a baby?
-
2020-06-25, 11:44 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Unwilling to (at least personally):
Redcloak is not willing to even kill Azure citizens, barring the whole "unmaking-the-world" thing. He probablyyy won't kill a baby for craps and giggles.
Not sure about Malack -- depends on what kind of "children" he vampirized.
Gannji & Enor -- they're not Evil, just rather amoral. Don't think they'd harm innocents.
Laurin and Miron probably won't, especially if it gives bad rep.
Oona probably won't. She doesn't seem particularly malicious.
The Orcs at Orc Island probably wouldn't either.
-
Willing to (especially personally):
Belkar pre-development is very much willing to kill young children.
Xykon killed Fyron's son, which remains a greater mystery.
Kubota is willing to kill the Katos' unborn child.
Thog killed a young Larry Gardener. Not a baby, but he's definitely a young teenager. Since Nale and Sabine make no objection (and later kidnap a teenager) they fall here as well.
Spoiler: GDGU
Gin-Jun impressively rationalizes himself into killing innocents.
Greg would easily allow Kudzu to die, so yes, he would kill a baby.
Tarquin would do it "for the narrative" or something.
The Mother Black Dragon. Yikes.
Bozzok & Crystal would; if the latter sends elderly into a coma, she'd definitely would be willing to kill the young.
Wow, I haven't realize how many beyond-evil villains there are in the comic.
-
2020-06-25, 11:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
No. The Belkar of OoTS #1 probably would have. Probably the Belkar of OoTS #300 too. But Belkar's moral arc has had a few really major moments, with the hallucination of Shojo, the befriending of Mr. Scruffy, and his epiphany at Durkon's self sacrifice being the big three. He's on the other side of all of those, and all three are in the way of killing a baby. Especially when it's Durkon's baby.
I would really like to see a game made by Obryn, Kurald Galain, and Knaight from these forums.
I'm not joking one bit. I would buy the hell out of that. -- ChubbyRain
Current Design Project: Legacy, a game of masters and apprentices for two players and a GM.
-
2020-06-26, 03:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
The morality of killing the baby is complicated by the situation. If the Order fails, the world gets destroyed, and the dwarves, Kudzu included, all get sent to a bad afterlife. If Belkar's faced with a hypothetical situation where that will happen unless he kills Kudzu, logically the moral thing would be to kill him, because Kudzu dying in battle would be doing Kudzu (and therefore Durkon) a favor. People aren't purely logical, though, and most of us would struggle to do such a thing. Belkar has the stomach to make that sort of hard choice, though, so if the Order needed to kill a baby for altruistic reasons he'd be the one to turn to.
All of that said, Belkar probably wouldn't be thinking through the moral dilemma under the circumstances and would probably act out of emotion. My instinct is that means he wouldn't kill Kudzu, but others might disagree.
-
2020-06-26, 09:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
I generally agree with that assessment. I dont think Kubota killing a pregnant woman counts, but he seems like the type who would be totally willing to get one if this minions to kill a baby of it benefitted him politically, two little princes in the tower style.
The guy from GDGU I think probably would be able to rationalize killing babies from monstrous races if he was highly motivated, though probably wouldnt for the PC races.
As for linear guild, I agree with yes on Thog and since Sabine is literally an incarnation of evil as well, yes there two. Nale was also down to sacrifice people with her so I agree with your assessment they are all pretty much fine with killing tons of innocent people and wouldnt be bothered. Z we dont know enough about, Hilgya its hard to say but I doubt shed be willing to kill a baby. She reserves most of her ire for authority figures she perceives to be stifling her and since babies are helpless and powerless I dont think she has anything against them.
-
2020-06-26, 09:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Hilgya also handed Kudzu to Durkon - something which we have been given no indication was sufficently against her nature to justify a second will save (per Thanh).
To clarify on the topic - I understand Belkar's character development and how much of the recent developments are around Durkon - the question is more on 'in a rage against a hated foe where he is falling while dual wielding weapons would he have the presence of mind to ensure he doesn't harm/kill the child', I would like to think 'yes' but am highly dubious.
Looking at 1131 panel 2 Kudzu seemed fairly dubious about this also.
-
2020-06-26, 11:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Whenever villains go around killing children (this includes babies, fyi) they tend to be both malicious and petty. Hilgya is actively petty, but she doesn't go around setting villages on fire or looting (there is no comic proof to support that she did), so I don't see why she has any reason to kill a baby. Rule of thumb: if the villain in OOTS is an utter asshat, then they definitely would kill children.
I always thought the Dominate scene might've 'worked' because she's handing off the baby to a man(dwarf) she knows -- since subconsciously, she still has some sort of attachment to him? I dunno.
Anyways, I'd like to revise my earlier opinion -- Belkar would also not kill Kudzu because Durkon would be heartbroken and pissed off when he gets Resurrected. Also, Hilgya would kill him. That's two angry dwarven clerics to contend with.
-
2020-06-26, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Location
- Magrathea
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
I do like the sound of "Chaotic Evil doesn't mean Chaotic Stupid, QED."
Belkar's moral fiber and lack thereof wouldn't have stopped him from shoving a baby out of the way for maximum stabbing efficiency or for not having to deal with the fact that he stabbed a baby.Last edited by Squire Doodad; 2020-06-26 at 11:15 AM.
An explanation of why MitD being any larger than Huge is implausible.
See my extended signature here! May contain wit, candor, and somewhere from 52 to 8127 walruses.
Purple is humorous descriptions made up on the fly
Green is serious talk about hypothetical
Blue is irony and sarcasm
"I think, therefore I am,
I walk, therefore I stand,
I sleep, therefore I dream;
I joke, therefore I meme."
-Squire Doodad
-
2020-06-26, 11:16 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Yeah I agree with you, I think Hilgya didnt get another will save handing Kudzu off because Durkon was ostensibly Kudzus father. Its more likely that handing Kudzu fi his father was what didnt go against her true nature. Which is good for Durkon I guess.
-
2020-06-30, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- EU
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Yeah, about that... https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots1114.html
Hilgya has no moral opposition to setting settlements on fire, by her own admission. Here whole revenge scheme here also actively hurts other members of her clan that probably have nothing to do with decision making, some of whom could be very young, and she was willing to contemplate the possibility of just burning them all to death until she thought "nah, the smoke would be bad for my baby".
-
2020-06-30, 11:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
I have no disagreements there, but the fact that she remains at Firmament -- surrounded by much lower-level and even younger dwarves -- probably implies something. I don't think she'll go, "Nah, I'll kill these people for fun because I can," like Xykon or Thog or something.
-
2020-06-30, 11:54 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- EU
- Gender
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Oh, definitely. Hilgya's brand of Evil is the "I'll do anything to get what I want, and I'll be petty about it." She's ok with the idea of killing everyone in her clan/destroying their lives because, in her mind, it's fine to do horrible things if it makes her happy in the moment. But she still has goals she pursues, it's not wanton evil with no logic behind it, even if twisted.
Xykon is the guy who'll toss you in a pool of boiling blood while he strangles your wife because he thinks it's funny to see your horrified face while you drown, and he happened to be bored. Different types of Evil, but still evil.
I think Hilgya would be ok with killing a baby if it meant furthering her goals, and has long as she had no emotional ties with the baby, but she would take no particular pleasure in this.
-
2020-07-03, 12:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Basically, Xykon does evil stuff for the lulz, while for Hilgya it's just a means to an end. If it were easier to reach her goal by being nice, then she'd be nice.
-
2020-07-03, 07:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?
Keeping in mind that Hilgya is petty and impulsive and probably would think of some rationalization for why the option which involves harming the people she dislikes is the better option.
Actually she'd probably cut to the chase and declare that getting revenge on those who slighted her is an important part of her goals, which would mean the nice option is locked out because revenge is generally considered not very nice.
-
2020-07-04, 01:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
-
2020-07-04, 03:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: Would Belkar have killed Kudzu?