Results 211 to 240 of 605
-
2020-09-03, 01:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2020-09-03, 01:41 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Redcloak doesn’t consider his own survival a priority. He’d like to be able to get rid of Xykon, but if they get the ritual off and then Xykon kills him, he considers it a win.
-
2020-09-03, 01:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Regarding people saying that Durkon's offer isn't good/ Durkon can't actually offer stuff: Rich is taking huge shortcuts to fit something that could in reality require millions of words into a stick figure comic.
If Redcloak agreed with Durkons offer, what he'd really mean is "I agree to this deal, pending approvals of the Dark One, the majority of each of the three other pantheons, their heads, Hinjo, the majority of Azurite nobility, all nations bordering Gobtopia, and the elves.
Since we (presumably) don't want to see 200 strips of Durkon talking to Thor, talking to Odin, talking to Marduk, arguing the case to the pantheon, and godsmoot, gods talking to clerics, clerics talking to congregations; we just have to imagine that Durkon is actually empowered to speak for the rest of the world.
I don't think even Homestuck would be willing to go that far.
My guess is behind a panel in a wall in the dungeon, that looks like every other wall. That way somebody with lots of lower level minions can't exhaustively search it (Also, I'd imagine the bugbears have a pretty good idea of the area around the dungeon, having been hunting and gathering there for years), but still being possible for one strong party to miss.
-
2020-09-03, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Backing Critical's statement here. Xykon dead? Awesome. Redcloak dead? Doesn't matter, still won.
I just read all the spoilers. Heh.
As stated before (I believe) I concede that under normal circumstances Redcloak would have reason to accept the offer of continued negotiations, but he can't really afford that kind of thing right now. Xykon being a big obstacle, but also the fact that he'd want the Plan as backup in case the negotiations don't work out and the longer he delays the more chance the other side sabotages the Plan in a terminal manner.
That he wants to keep the Plan available is irrational in itself but within the mindset of the Plan being important it's rational to not want to give the opposition the time/opportunity to wreck it.
As usual, I need other people to phrase things I can't put into words myself. Redcloaks overall goal of the Plan is irrational as hell but he can make rational decisions in pursuit of that goal.
Redcloak's demands are more expansive than just wanting the Azurites to leave Gobbotopia alone. Also Durkon at best tells him that he stands a good chance of convincing Hinjo, the leader of the Azurites, to acknowledge Gobbotopia. As someone else has already pointed out, even if that succeeds that doesn't mean Gobbotopia is safe.
Just because the other side is willing to give you one thing you want doesn't mean you should throw everything else aside.
If Rich wanted to tell us that Durkon is effectively speaking for the rest of the world he could have put it a little bit more bluntly. Durkon himself doesn't even believe he's speaking for the rest of the world: even if you were correct OOC-wise Durkon's behaviour wouldn't convey that to Redcloak, so Redcloak's decision would still make sense based on the assumption that Durkon has little to no executive power.Last edited by Worldsong; 2020-09-03 at 02:06 PM.
-
2020-09-03, 02:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Raleigh NC
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
"Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later, that debt is paid."
-Valery Legasov in Chernobyl
-
2020-09-03, 02:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
-
2020-09-03, 02:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
-
2020-09-03, 02:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
I wouldn't be surprised if Redcloak was willing to deal with something like the Empire of Blood making trouble for Gobbotopia. What seems to really rankle him is that, in addition to expansionistic empires, Gobbotopia would be in danger of attacks by otherwise peaceful nations who are motivated by the belief that the goblinoid nation must be destroyed because goblinoids are bad.
-
2020-09-03, 02:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Look, at the end it doesn't matter. I mean, yes, Durkon's offer was too little and poorly put out and everything you said, but even if all the gods of the three pantheons did appear and pinkie-promised to give Redcloak anything he wanted, he would have refused it, probably persuading himself that it was a trick, or that it was not enough, or some other rationalization.
Because if he get what he want without the Plan then everything he did, everything that happened to him, would have been for nothing.Last edited by Sebastian; 2020-09-03 at 02:26 PM.
I don't make the crazy rules, I just twist them to my purpose
"...the Perilious Path of Crushing Doom"
" Please, tell me it is actually filled with cute, fuzzy bunnies and they just named it that to be ironic."
Note to Self:
If you ever happen to doubt the Giant again remember the "Ghost-martyrs of the Sapphire guard
-
2020-09-03, 02:58 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
You don't think Tarquin has the resources for corpse-ships?
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2020-09-03, 03:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
-
2020-09-03, 03:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2020-09-03, 03:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
He has the resources for eight squadrons of hippogriffs - which seems to be more then Azure city had and they had ships for a transoceanic withdrawal, if he thought it was worth it he might try - but he still has to rest of the western continent to absorb.
-
2020-09-03, 03:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Eh, tomato, tomato. Really, nobody on the Western Continent has resources to spare. If they did, they'd either conquer the neighbors or try and conquer the Elven Kingdom.
-
2020-09-03, 03:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2019
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Arrrgh, here be me extended sig!
-
2020-09-03, 03:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2020-09-03, 03:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Rich has stated that he wanted to bring another female character into the party to balance things out a bit better.
I don't believe that he's going to bring in another female character, then kill her to make things more "real". "Fridging" female characters is bad storytelling.
-
2020-09-03, 03:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Also, the new character was added to help show the difference between the old characters in Book 1 and in Book 7. Minrah can't do that if she's dead.
-
2020-09-03, 03:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Agreed. If Rich brought in Minrah just to kill her as motivation for Durkon or whatever I'd lose a lot of respect for him.
Durkon already knows what is at stake. He's painfully aware of the cost of failure. The fact that his first attempt at persuading Redcloak failed so miserably should already be enough for him to realize that he needs to step up his game.
-
2020-09-03, 04:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
We, the Readers, would not.
Durkon's key mistake is assuming the genuine best interests of the goblins of Goblotopia would be a strong enough motivational factor to keep Redcloak willing to talk, until talking was clearly useless. His mistake is imagining that concessions to Goblotopia would at least keep Redcloak onboard for more talking. And while he surely understood that the case he laid out was less than perfectly and was missing a few key facets, Durkon could not imagine how Redcloak was already quite comfortable with the idea of throwing away so many goblin lives for a theoretical benefit to the abstract future of goblinkind. That is Durkon being Durkon.
Ultimately, Redcloak was only going to hesitate if he understood the Plan as likely to turn out lose-lose for goblinkind, rather than brilliantly win-win like he has been telling himself for years. But that would require him to believe some pretty fantastical information from a dwarf cleric he hardly knows. Even if he believes Durkon is not purposefully lying, it is not likely that he would accept that Thor can be trusted, especially when it is information that TDO is (too) conveniently incapable of confirming or denying.
The point of this scene is not how clever and persuasive Durkon is -- he played his hand better than I expected. The point of this scene is to give Redcloak one last chance to be tested: Are you willing to fight for a whole nation of living breathing goblins? Or are all those goblin lives just pawns for your high stakes gamble, a gamble you cannot honestly say you fully understand?I owe Peelee 5 Quatloos. But I am going double or nothing that Durkon will be casting 8th level spells at the big finale.
I bet Goblin_Priest 5 quatloos that Xykon does not know RC has the phylactery at this point in the tale (#1139).
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of Belkar...so close!
Using my Bardic skills I see the fate of goblinkind!
-
2020-09-03, 04:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Yes it does. Once the Rifts are sealed the Snarl can’t get out until new Rifts form in thousands if not millions of years and Redcloak’s Ritua is pointless. A sealed Rift is not a threat to anyone.
There are no right thing he could have done. Redcloak is not in this because he made a lucid assessment of the situation and calculated the odds of the goblins coming on top. He is in this because of a bundle of trauma, guilt and rationalization. Durkon just doesn’t have the emotional connection with Redcloak to nudge him off his course. He will see it through until he reach is goal or is forced to abandon it.
Because he thought Durkon was there to negotiate a surrender from the gods. He thought the Plan had succeeded. And then the dwarf talk to him about doing something different.
Pretty sure the order didn’t need a Cleric back when Durkon was camped in addition to Hilgya who raised him she’s there because being a newcomer brings a change in dynamic to the party. Someone who isn’t familiar with their oddities, someone who only knows the new and improved Belkar, someone to give recaps to.
we need to find some way to remove her from the party.
I suppose it's possible they will both escape alive , and I won't feel sorry if they do. I want to see more Minrah! But I can't believe the clerics can take such an awful risk and not pay SOME consequence. A few damage marks which will be easily healed when they rest and regain their spells just doesn't seem like enough of a consequence.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2020-09-03, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
-
2020-09-03, 05:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
I believe that's exactly what I said: Durkon was good at building bridges, bad at the rest. (Particularly planning for failure at first.)
That's the heart of the issue, but I don't think it's a slam dunk that Redcloak would automatically turn such an offer down if it somehow happened. To me, it would come down to two things.
1) What does Redcloak think the Plan is for? We know he's never spoken to the Dark One. We know from Word of God that the Dark One sees control of the Gate as more of a deterent than a weapon; the very fact Redcloak listened to the parley suggests Redcloak understands that as well. But at the end of the day, does the Dark One want the Snarl as an ace in the hole to ensure negotiations tilt in his favor, or is intended as the very means to those negotiations (and could thus be traded away freely when the time came)?
If Redcloak thinks the Snarl is an ace, even honest negotiations wouldn't be enough to dissuade him; the offer would have to be so good there would be nothing left to negotiate for, otherwise he's running the risk of short-selling the Dark One. But if Redcloak thinks the point of the Plan is to get a bargaining chip, he might be willing to give up the Plan in exchange for everything he could think to ask for. Not that it would be easy to do so, because...
2) Is Redcloak only getting this offer from the gods because his plan is on the cusp of success? This, to me, is the key. If Redcloak thinks all his actions ultimately led to the deal, I think he could end the Plan and sell himself on a job well done. But if he can't convince himself of that, either because he thinks the Dark One would settle for nothing less than the power of the Snarl or because the gods insist that this could have been done at any time and has nothing to do with the chaos Redcloak has caused, then I think Redcloak would almost certainly reject their offer and stick to the Plan for the reasons everyone has long ago pointed out.
Interestingly, even though Durkon doesn't really know Redcloak's background, he almost wound up confirming the significance of Redcloak's efforts by accident. Sadly, he couldn't recognize the opportunity, so he backtracked and the moment was played mostly for comedy. But it would not surprise me if that ends up getting revisited at a later date.
-H
-
2020-09-03, 05:08 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
? The Plan involves handing over Snarl power to the Dark One, which has nothing to do with the rifts on the Material Plane. Redcloak's Plan was still in use even when the other rifts had been sealed.
There are no right thing he could have done. Redcloak is not in this because he made a lucid assessment of the situation and calculated the odds of the goblins coming on top. He is in this because of a bundle of trauma, guilt and rationalization. Durkon just doesn’t have the emotional connection with Redcloak to nudge him off his course. He will see it through until he reach is goal or is forced to abandon it.
Because he thought Durkon was there to negotiate a surrender from the gods. He thought the Plan had succeeded. And then the dwarf talk to him about doing something different.
-
2020-09-03, 05:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2018
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
The Dark One can't exactly get to the Snarl if the rifts to the Snarl's prison are sealed.
He figured that the reason Durkon came to talk to him was because the gods were willing to listen to his demands in exchange for him not using the ritual that would grant the Dark One the ability to unleash the Snarl on them.
From the beginning the Plan has been to use the Snarl to strongarm the gods into giving goblinoids better lives. As Hatu pointed out, if Redcloak considers the Snarl the means rather than the objective having the gods themselves show up to negotiate would mean that the Plan is working.Last edited by Worldsong; 2020-09-03 at 05:13 PM.
-
2020-09-03, 05:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
What? No! The plan is to give the Dark One the ability to move a Rift to any Palne of his chosing so that he can threatne the gods with unleashing the beast on their turf.
The Plan is to scare the gods into compliance. The discussion began with redcloak reveling in the belief that the Gods were afraid of his actions.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2020-09-03, 05:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Crap, OK, I just rechecked SOD - you're right; it's about shifting the rift itself. (which begs the questionn - does sealing one rift mean sealing all the others, or would Redcloak have to do Thor's ritual four times?)
(I imagined you were enacting Wahlberg from The Happening, FYI).
The Plan is to scare the gods into compliance. The discussion began with redcloak reveling in the belief that the Gods were afraid of his actions.
-
2020-09-03, 05:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2019
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Then why do the empires of blood, sweat, and tears need to keep making up justifications?
People like Tarquin are exactly who Redcloak fears; people who abuse the causes of plight of the Azurites or the safety of the remaining southern demi-humans to clothe their naked desire for conquest.
The conqueror doesn't need to convince everyone of their lies, just cause enough doubt to cause good people to hesitate to stop them.
Or even just the idea that the conqueror believes what they say helps. "oh, we only want to conquer Azure city because it's held by those evil goblins, we would never attack other humans".
There's also a small but important minority of people like Gin-jun and Miko who care very much about law and very little about general humanoid life.
I'd say they should do five nations next, as the three they have are conspicuously large already.
Good thing Rich has been stingy with the resurrections and rewards in the hereafter, otherwise there would be no major consequences!Last edited by Quizatzhaderac; 2020-09-03 at 05:36 PM.
-
2020-09-03, 05:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Five. That wasn't clarified, but I would guess all of them at once. Gods be gods.
Oh my goooooooooood.Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2020-09-03, 05:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: OOTS #1213 - The Discussion Thread
Huh....The whole post read to me like you were expecting Durkon to do a better job of "building bridges", before knowing what he could build that would serve as a bridge; the knowledge of which seems like the most realistic thing Durkon could expect to take away here.
Of course, using a negotiation as a fact-finding mission is questionable at best; but if Thor hasn't answered communes before, I can't really fault Durkon for not going through the motions of pre-meeting divinations. To say nothing of Durkon's assessment of his own diplomatic abilities being more accurate than Thor's, though I could see how beings capable of manipulating reality might have difficulty recognizing wishful thinking.FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas