Results 181 to 210 of 1477
-
2020-12-29, 04:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
This is a case of specific vs. general vs. exception. The text in the spell is actually a reminder of a general rule for the Search skill. When a class other than rogue grants itself trapfinding (or when a rogue ACF trades away trapfinding), it creates an exception to this general rule, and exceptions always take priority over general rules. Some DMs consider this particular interaction to be an example of a dysfunctional rule, claiming that according to the specific text of the spell, the trapfinding ability is irrelevant, and it cares specifically about the rogue class; I personally disagree with that, because regardless of what the spell's text says, the trapfinding ability still provides an exception to it, and exceptions take precedence over specific rules as well as general ones.
Find traps has a different wording than trapfinding: it allows you to find traps "just as a rogue can." So it works just fine as well.
In case you need more clarity, Rules Compendium updated the general rule in question, and it now references the trapfinding ability rather than the rogue class.Last edited by Troacctid; 2020-12-29 at 04:54 PM.
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2020-12-29, 04:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- UK
- Gender
-
2020-12-30, 08:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q94: If you use shapeshifting magic (wild shape + Aberration Shape or one of the effects based on polymorph/metamorphosis) and take both Assume Supernatural Ability (Quickness) for the MMI's choker and ASA (Alternate Form) for phasm (also MMI) and you turn into a phasm, followed by using its alternate form to turn into a choker, do you count as a choker for ASA (Quickness)?
I...think you do, but I'm not 100% sure.
Q95: Do you still count as a phasm for Alternate Form?
Q96: And what are your stats like in the second form?
It might be a good way to turn into lots of critters using a single wild shape or polymorph/metamorphosis!Last edited by MaxiDuRaritry; 2020-12-30 at 08:16 PM.
⚣ Tanuki in the Playground. ⚣
-
2020-12-31, 10:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q97
Is a Spellscale's 'Blood-Quickening' ritual Ex, Sp or Su? Or none of the above?
Question behind the question: Would the Shapechange spell allow me to perform such a ritual?
-
2020-12-31, 12:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- UK
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A97 Since the race description does not specify the techical answer is "none of the above" though most of the abilities that are granted equate to feats and those abilities will usually be "Ex" (see feat descriptions for specific details).
As written shapechange would not grant the abilities.Last edited by Khedrac; 2020-12-31 at 12:06 PM.
-
2020-12-31, 12:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2015
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Last edited by MaxiDuRaritry; 2020-12-31 at 12:18 PM.
⚣ Tanuki in the Playground. ⚣
-
2021-01-03, 05:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Kaeda
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 98
Is there a default rule for if a creature has a Fly speed without a listed maneuverability?Kaedanis Pyran, tai faernae.
The LA Assignment Threads: Attempting to Make Monsters Playable Since 2016
My Homebrewer's Extended Signature
-
2021-01-03, 06:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 99:
Do Warlocks count as a spellcaster for the purposes of using Craft (Alchemy)? If so, where is that written?
-
2021-01-03, 07:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A 099
Interesting question.
Originally Posted by SRD
So by strictest RAW, no, they wouldn't qualify to craft alchemical items through Warlock levels alone.
Most DMs, however, would probably let this slide if you asked them, IMHO.My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2021-01-03, 08:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
-
2021-01-04, 07:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 100 a
The War Hulk PrC has the No Time to Think feature, which means you are treated as having 0 ranks in all Int, Wis and Cha based skills (except Intimidate). Am I correct in assuming this means you may not use any of those skills if they are trained only, even if you have ranks in them?
Q 100 b
How does No Time to Think interact with the Jack of All Trades feat, which gives a virtual 1/2 rank in all skills?Last edited by Thurbane; 2021-01-04 at 07:22 PM.
My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2021-01-06, 02:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Italy
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q101: if you have multiple castings of nondetections, possibly by several different people, and/or several pieces of equipment with the masking property, does it mean that to scry you a spellcaster has to beat all the various nondetections? or only one does apply?
Last edited by King of Nowhere; 2021-01-06 at 02:01 PM.
In memory of Evisceratus: he dreamed of a better world, but he lacked the class levels to make the dream come true.
Ridiculous monsters you won't take seriously even as they disembowel you
my take on the highly skilled professional: the specialized expert
-
2021-01-06, 06:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
This is a case of the same spell multiple times in different strengths. Only the most powerful one applies. http://www.d20srd.org/srd/magicOverv...tackingEffects
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2021-01-07, 03:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 102
The Sickening Strike and Terrifying Strike ambush feats (Drow of the Underdark) can induce conditions that involve a saving throw penalty (sickened and shaken, respectively) for 1 round.
If the sneak attack causing the effects of the ambush feat(s) is an unarmed strike that also carries another special effect requiring a saving throw (like a Stunning Fist attack or a touch spell whose caster was holding the charge), does said saving throw suffer from the penalties of the conditions? Or would it only count for the next attack?
In other words, in which order are the ambush feats and special attack applied?
Q 103
The wracking touch spell (Complete Adventurer & Spell Compendium) is a touch spell with the following effect:
Originally Posted by Spell Compendium
B) If the caster holds the charge, and then makes an unarmed strike in the correct conditions to cause sneak attack damage on a creature not immune, does he inflict sneak attack damage twice? (Once for the unarmed strike itself, and once from the wracking touch spell going off?)
C) Same question as B) if a wracking touch spell is cast on a spell-storing weapon, and released in a situation where the weapon also inflicts sneak attack damage.
D) And by the way, still in the case of a spell-storing weapon with a wracking touch spell, is the sneak attack damage dependent on the caster's ability, or on the wielder's (if they aren't the same person)?Last edited by St Fan; 2021-01-07 at 04:18 AM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2021-01-07, 09:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Terra Australis
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 104
If I am full-attacking with a melee weapon, and also deliver a Snap Kick using that feat as part of the attack, can I designate the kick as a Stunning Fist attack, if I also have that feat?My winning competition entries: Kinvig Arrumskor | The Great Pumpkinhead | Wynfrith d'Acker
Torn-City - Massively multiplayer online browser based crime RPG
-
2021-01-08, 09:08 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A 104
Yes. As described, "This attack is an unarmed attack that deals damage", so you can use it in conjunction with any special attack fitting alongside such an unarmed attack (Stunning Fist, non-lethal damage, sneak attack [+Ambush feats], discharging a touch spell you were holding the charge, etc.)
What you can't use as a snap kick are special attacks that don't inflict damage (disarm, trip, etc.)Last edited by St Fan; 2021-01-08 at 09:10 AM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2021-01-09, 04:24 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A103:A) Sneak attack dmg is never part of a spell's direct effect, it can only be triggered by it. (Usually ray attacks)
So the Fort SV only half the spells dmg not the SA dmg.
B) I would say yes. Each successful attack that is viable for SA (weapon hits, ranged attacks, or spells like rays...) count.
So if you had flurry of blows each hit counts. If the spell by itself can cause SA and you just hold it, it would still cause SA on release, as long as the condition hasn't changed.
C) Same logic as before: If it counts on its own it should still count later (storing(holding) as long as the situation and target are viable for SA.
D) Since the spell doesn't GIVE you sneak attack dmg or the ability itself, but only the trigger to use it, I would argue that the wielder of the weapon/attack has to be able to do SA DMG otherwise it doesnt do anything at all. The caster only gives you the spell, spell dmg/effect and the trigger option.
Edit: A different ruling below.Last edited by Bobur; 2021-01-09 at 05:10 AM.
-
2021-01-09, 04:28 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q105:
You need concealment to make a hide check. How does this work in magical darkness? (20%miss chance)
Can I just walk into the magical zone and make a hide check right in front of an enemy? or basically in plain sight as long as within the darkness?
B) Can I move at 1/2 speed after hiding within to get to an enemy in the darkness and use SA?Last edited by Bobur; 2021-01-09 at 04:31 AM.
-
2021-01-09, 04:35 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- UK
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A 103 B Contention
I admit I cannot remember the location of the rule, but one can only trigger sneak attack (or similar) once per attack roll. Thus if you use one attack roll to deliver two effects (here unarmed strike and held charge spell) only one instance of sneak attack damage can result.
-
2021-01-09, 04:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A. In order to hide, you need cover or concealment, and you cannot be observed. Magical darkness fulfills the first criterion, but not the second. So, in this scenario, unless you had the Hide in Plain Sight ability to allow you to hide even while observed, you would need to first distract any observers with Bluff.
B. Yes, provided you succeed on an additional Hide check made at a -5 penalty for each 5 feet of open space between you and the target (RC 92), but also, in this situation, no, because if they're in the darkness too, they have concealment, and you can't sneak attack a target that has concealment against you.Last edited by Troacctid; 2021-01-09 at 04:43 AM.
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2021-01-09, 05:13 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Last edited by Bobur; 2021-01-09 at 05:17 AM.
-
2021-01-09, 09:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 106
Okay, this is a follow-up to my previous question, because it really needs to be cleared up.
A) First of all, where can you find more extensive/complete rules about holding the charge of a touch spell beyond the SRD? I know there are fuller rules for weaponlike spells on the Complete Arcane, but it doesn't cover holding the charge in detail.
B) The SRD specifies that making a touch attack while holding the charge of a damaging spell might cause a critical hit and/or sneak attack damage, following the full aforementioned rules for weaponlike spells, right?
C) The same SRD had that you can also make a normal unarmed strike or natural attack while holding the charge, and "If the attack hits, you deal normal damage for your unarmed attack or natural weapon and the spell discharges. If the attack misses, you are still holding the charge."
In this case, if the unarmed strike/natural attack is a critical hit and/or sneak attack, the extra damage (and damage type) are normal for this attack, but what about the discharged spell? It seems to be implied that you can't have twice a critical hit and/or sneak attack on the same attack, and so the discharged spell don't count anymore as a weaponlike spell at all...Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2021-01-09, 12:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- UK
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Interesting. In response to this I re-checked my PHB and then turned to the Rules Compendium, a book I don't know that well and normally forget I have access to.
Reading the PHB there is no suggestion that you can use an unarmed strike to deliver a held charge touch spell - but then there is also nothing to say that you cannot. However:
Originally Posted by Rules Compendium page 132
There may be some other rules tucked in odd places, but they are not going to be easy to find.
So: A106
A Rules Compendium
B Correct
C See above, and correct, the spell cannot critical in this case.Last edited by Khedrac; 2021-01-09 at 12:26 PM.
-
2021-01-09, 05:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Very comprehensive response, thank you Khedrac.
Q 107
Still around the same theme... the chill touch spell seems to work like most touch-attacks weaponlike spells, but it has the particularity of not lasting for just one touch, but 1 touch attack by level. So...
A) Its duration is stated as "instantaneous", which is a bit ambiguous. My guess is that it concerns only the effects of one touch, i.e. the negative damage and strength damage can't be dispelled, but healed normally, correct? Otherwise, there's no way you can make 1 attack/level if the spell immediately ends.
B) Although the delivery mechanism is very likely to be similar to a spell you're holding the charge, it isn't spelled outright. So, unlike with a spell you're holding the charge, can you cast another spell without disrupting the remaining chill touch attacks you have?
C) If the answer to B) is yes, does that mean this spell can last indefinitely (in theory) until you've expended all attacks (unless hit with dispel magic)?
D) I thought of that one as obvious so I wasn't about to ask, but I can't find it clearly spelled out either... if you have more than one attack per round, you can make multiple touch attacks with chill touch during a full-attack action, right? Nothing restrict you to it once a round...Last edited by St Fan; 2021-01-10 at 03:09 PM.
Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2021-01-12, 09:07 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2019
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q108
A large (or larger) creature stands partially in and partially out of an Antimagic Field. Can it use (Su) abilities?Last edited by YellowJohn; 2021-01-12 at 09:07 AM.
-
2021-01-12, 08:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Canadia
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A108
"Should a creature be larger than the area enclosed by the barrier, any part of it that lies outside the barrier is unaffected by the field."
I imagine this line suggests that the barrier created by antimagic field is, in fact, a barrier, and creatures and projectiles entering the field are specifically allowed to by an earlier line of the spell. That's based on a reading that emphasizes this line, however. For a normal reading of the spell, though, I think this just means "if you're large enough to be both inside and outside, part of you is affected (and it's the part inside)".
The rest is up to DM adjudication, as ever.The future is bright.
-
2021-01-14, 12:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 109
Do you threaten squares while prone?
-
2021-01-14, 01:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Kaeda
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
A 109 Yes.
Kaedanis Pyran, tai faernae.
The LA Assignment Threads: Attempting to Make Monsters Playable Since 2016
My Homebrewer's Extended Signature
-
2021-01-14, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2019
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Q 110
RHD base attack bonus doesn't have the same limit as BAB from class levels. Does the same apply to base save bonus from RHD?Join the 3.5e Discord server: https://discord.gg/ehGFz6M3nJ
-
2021-01-14, 06:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #36: The Triple Dozen
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar