Results 1 to 21 of 21
-
2020-12-01, 03:17 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2020
How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
OK wisebeards; I think GITP is the best forum for old-time 3.5ers like myself, and I want the benefit of your collective wisdom.
I've (painfully) gone through the 3.5 rules and spell-lists winnowing out the ridiculous and creating my homebrew set limiting Tier 1s and buffing Tier 3s. Given that the following is true:
(a) All wands require a Standard (or longer) action to use, regardless of what spell the wand contains.
(b) All scrolls require a Standard (or longer) action to use, regardless of what spell the scroll contains.
I'm considering allowing characters who are not engaged, and have the scroll in hand, to read a scroll of a swift spell as a Move action. Of course, you still can't cast more than one spell in a round. My question is, given the assumptions above, would this trend back to being too unbalanced?
As an aside, I'm in the camp that allows Potions to be consumed as a Move action if a character isn't engaged (but you can't consume more than one a round).
I would appreciate ideas if anyone else has ever done this, or considered it. Thanks!
thom
-
2020-12-01, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2014
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Maybe have people "attune" to one wand or scroll at a time which provides the spell's casting rime, but requires a little ritual or a weeklong attunement period per 50 charges or 3 spells (as One scroll can have multiple spells) that way, players can a have a cool trick, but not all of the cool tricks.
Have you experienced non balance from these items in your game?
-
2020-12-01, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Honestly I don't think you need to make any changes at all to the scroll/wand rules, especially if you're trying to buff T3s and T4s, since they're the ones who benefit most from UMD. Nerfing wands is effectively a big nerf to warlocks and spellthieves, for example. I would use the spell's normal casting time in all cases.
Last edited by Troacctid; 2020-12-01 at 03:38 PM.
-
2020-12-01, 03:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Vacation in Nyalotha
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Care to list the main swift action spells you’re worried about? If they’re few in number or all problematic in their own right why not just address them directly?
Wands and scrolls don’t generally feature in high output T1 cheese. They do feature but spells per turn is not the measurement of the prowess there. Martials with wand chambers benefit proportionally more than T1.Last edited by Xervous; 2020-12-01 at 03:47 PM.
-
2020-12-01, 04:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Sub-Prime Material Plane
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
I mean, if you're that worried about wizards/sorcs abusing their spells-per-day limit, you could limit the usage of magic items by characters who have the Scribe Scroll feat, I suppose.
-
2020-12-01, 07:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2020
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Well, my homebrew doesn't have those classes (as PCs anyway) , but that's good to know.
Hmmm, also good to know that, thanks. I haven't run 3.5 in a while so I missed that aspect of T1 vs T3. My primary concern is not letting any wizard or cleric become able to do everything better than anyone else. I've researched the various "broken spells" threads on GITP and closed down most of those loopholes. I'm concerned about swift spells in general, not any spell specifically.
What I'm getting so far is that my concerns are (probably) overblown, which is what I wanted to know...
-
2020-12-01, 07:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2014
- Location
- Sub-Prime Material Plane
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
For wizards, limit spells known and downtime. If a wizard gets too many spells available, remember that losing their spellbook is a huge ordeal. The tradeoff for getting to know every spell is that your spells known are a physical object that can be stolen or destroyed.
For clerics and druids, there's not much you can really do without gutting their entire archetype. You can't limit their spells known, but you could limit their spells per day, I suppose...
For Clerics, make sure Nightsticks don't exist in the world. For Druids, harshly enforce the rule that they must know about every animal they want to wildshape into (successful knowledge check, or having seen it, or, most harshly, both).
That still won't stop the most abusive characters from over-running everything else, but it's a start.
The best answer though? Talk to your players about the power of their characters and have them adjust as need be. Be honest with them. Arbitrary limits and houserules can rub people the wrong way. On the other hand, an honest approach and discussion about the problem and possible solutions can foster mutual respect.
-
2020-12-01, 09:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Emerald City, Oz
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
I think that for someone using UMD to activate a scroll the standard action would be required, because they don't really know what they are doing. Whereas a wizard (or whatever) casting a spell they know off a scroll would just be using it as a mana source and be able to cast it as normal...
That's my take anyway..."There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter."
~ Ernest Hemingway
2021 2022 2023 2024
Dwarf Magus (Deep Marshal) spell list
-
2020-12-01, 10:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
On the other hand, having UMD ranks probably means you do know what you're doing--you just can't produce magical effects by yourself, only hijack magic someone else has already placed outside themselves (into a magic device).
In general, I don't think the scroll/wand rules are a big problem. They're pretty straightforward gp-for-spell rules, so they won't be any less balanced than spellcasting already is. If you've fixed all the broken spells, scrolls and wands should be fine, too. If you have problems with players using tons and tons of scrolls to trivialize encounters, keep in mind that about 10% of all treasure they gain is expected to be spent on consumables. If they're spending much more than that, it makes sense to reflect that in their WBL.
One thing you might address is the flat DC 20 UMD check for wands and staves. It's a check that becomes quite easy to hit at high levels, even for characters that haven't invested much in UMD or Charisma. You could separate activation into a "proper" activation with a fairly high DC (maybe 20 + 2 * spell level), or a "slow" activation, with a significantly lower DC (maybe 15 + spell level) but also a much longer casting time. Essentially, the first check is accessible only to dedicated UMD-users, and allows you to use scrolls and wands in combat; the second check is for UMD dabblers, and allows them to use utility items out of combat, like using a scroll of break enchantment to un-petrify the cleric.Spoiler: Collectible nice thingsMy incarnate/crusader. A self-healing crowd-control melee build (ECL 8).
My Ruby Knight Vindicator barsader. A party-buffing melee build (ECL 14).
Doctor Despair's and my all-natural approach to necromancy.
-
2020-12-01, 10:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- Tijuana, México.
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Check out which is the Playground's favorite Dragon!
>> My Extended Signature <<
Hey guys, I'm a vestige! And a spell!
Awesome avatar by Cuthalion.
-
2020-12-02, 04:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2020
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
I think it is a bad homerules addition, at least given your stated objective.
As other people said, your modification hits T3 and T4's a LOT more then T1's.
Many Fighter/gish/rogue types rely heavily on UMD, Wand Chambers and "spell consumables" to stay on par with full casting classes. This means that you will nerf these kind of archetypes instead of the ones you are actually trying to.
If you want to really hit them, take away the rule "Spells from scrolls are cast at the CL of the caster, if it is higher then the one of the scroll", limiting heavily the real advantage full casting classes have over other archetypes when using scrolls.
Bad idea. Everything the PCs are not allowed to have should not be permitted to baddies too. BBEG is excluded since he has his separate role, but these classes are not fit for a BBEG anyway
-
2020-12-02, 05:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Scrolls taking the same action to cast as the spell they mimic is standard as of Rules Compendium.
That's how i've always played it and i've never had any trouble. Sure, they can be useful, but that's intended, not broken.
As others have mentioned the people who usually benefit the most from scrolls and wands are UMD users, not full casters. So if anything it improves balance instead of making it worse.
That's not a rule in the first place. Only staffs let you use your CL.Last edited by sleepyphoenixx; 2020-12-02 at 05:45 AM.
-
2020-12-02, 07:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2019
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
The easiest way to do this is not to line-item veto every awesome thing casters might do, but to give non-casters things they can do that are awesome. Nerfing things tends to piss people off, particularly when there's splash damage to something they wanted to do that wouldn't have been problematic (which is pretty common).
Depends what you mean. It's true that a Rogue who periodically UMDs Wands of Grave Strike or Scrolls of Knock is not really any more of a problem than a Wizard who casts those spells. But it's not true that there are no balance problems caused by charged items. The treasure you get from encounters is enough to allow you to keep buying scrolls that are high enough level to win those encounters, which destroys the game. Charged magic items are one of the biggest balance problems in D&D, it's just that people often don't notice because players tend to be extremely irrational about using them.
-
2020-12-03, 01:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
-
2020-12-03, 02:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
-
2020-12-03, 02:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Having nightsticks in and of themselves really isn't abusive it is unlimited nightsticks that is a problem, keeping nightsticks but limiting it to only being able to use one or two nightsticks per day per character actually works just fine. If you really have an issue the culprit is DMM and not the nightsticks themselves...
For Druids changing Nature Spell to a Meta Magic Feat actually does a lot to limit their power and the spell level increase can be adjusted as needed to get their power level where you want it. In general you're probably good at +2 Spell levels. I also require Nature Spell at +2 for anyone who wishes to cast spells while polymorphed or shapechanged into a creature type different from their own.
-
2020-12-03, 04:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Druids would still be T1 just by virtue of their spellcasting alone, but as a player i'd probably hate the nerf enough to not play a druid at all...
I think i'd almost prefer druids being banned tbh.
Edit: in the interest of being constructive, i think it'd be preferable to limit druids to the UA deadly hunter variant and leave wild shape as the domain of rangers via the ACF/MoMF route.
Yes, i realize that it's objectively a worse nerf, but it feels better than being told "you can still do it, but it sucks now compared to its original form". That's just adding insult to injury.
I think that's a factor DM's often disregard when trying to "rebalance" the game with houserules.
After all it doesn't matter how balanced your houserules are if your players aren't having fun because they're feeling unfairly restricted (no matter how accurate those feelings are).Last edited by sleepyphoenixx; 2020-12-03 at 04:14 PM.
-
2020-12-03, 04:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2018
-
2020-12-03, 05:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2020
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?
Hmmm...sometime I must start a thread on whether anyone's actually DMing a 3.5 rules game at present. I didn't want to waste the group's time with my background before asking my question but, in short: I've been DMing D&D on and off since 1975, which almost by definition makes me "old school", to wit:
I have zero problem with the "PCs can't do it, but the baddies can" (see old-school, above), and:
Perhaps, but the advantage of being the only person who's willing to DM a 3.5 game does come in handy. My gaming group is so desperate to play anything that's not 5E (which we loathe) that I could probably make them wear tinfoil hats and chant "the DM is great!" every hour and they'd still want to play! However, where I live may be unusual in that respect...and I'm not that big of a d*ck.
Anyway, thanks for all the advice, especially about the non-T1 classes using wands & scrolls more. Again, that wasn't my experience when I ran my last 3.5 game back in 2005 - 2010. So I'm leaning towards letting the swift casting as a Move action stand.Last edited by thom99; 2020-12-03 at 05:02 PM.
-
2020-12-03, 06:06 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2012
-
2020-12-03, 07:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2018
- Location
- Colorado
- Gender
Re: How unbalanced are my rules for scrolls?