Results 271 to 300 of 862
-
2021-09-18, 08:44 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
No argument there: she's attacking the heroes right now, after all.
My guess is that it would interact weirdly or be redundant due to her trollblood fusion situation. Trolls are canonically the source for many regeneration items in D&D (i.e. this ring has the ichor of a troll encased inside it, etc.) so I wouldn't be surprised if her troll half resisted conventional regeneration magic.
-
2021-09-18, 08:52 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Considering they gave V a splice with Familicide when V's immediate threat was a black dragon related close enough to the Draketooths, it might not have been a primary objective but it may very well have been a "just in case" thing.
Of course it's also possible that they just got super lucky.
Still hope that this entire fiasco with the Gates gives the IFCC a kick in the pants tbh; enough so that they're not any better than they were before if not outright causing them to break up or be destroyed.Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-09-18, 09:32 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I feel like their shock at V using familicide, followed by their interaction with Tiamat, suggest the IFCC didn't expect familicide. They weren't in the presence of any outside agent that'd necessitate misdirection, so I doubt they will they were pretending to be surprised. I doubt that spell was the only epic necromancy spell Haerta knew either (though I can't recall what the limit is for wizards epic spells known) and anticipating V using a spell that unwittingly strips a Gate of most meaningful protection due to the target *just so happening* to be related to a Gates Protector is a bit of a stretch, especially how it got them in trouble with Tiamat. Also if familicide was a chess move by the IFCC it takes some of Vs culpability for using it away.
I prefer the idea that the IFCC, like everyone in the comic, is doing their best job based on the information they have and that information isn't omniscient. No one has the full overview of the world other than Rich. I agree that the IFCC shouldn't break-even on their plan, and I doubt they will (if nothing else, if their plans fail, their lower-downs will pull funding and protection from disgruntled Dragon deities).
-
2021-09-18, 09:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2016
- Location
- Seoul
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.
Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
We also have a TvTropes page!
Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal)Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.
Extended sig here.
-
2021-09-18, 10:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
One member of that team utterly curbstomped her earlier. And not only is he even stronger now, he has allies with him that are nearly as strong. Unless she has something truly massive up her sleeve, this train of thought is beyond delusional. And the longer she takes to spring her super-gambit (whatever it is), the stronger the evil team gets, thanks to her own defenses.
Again, she is actively making Team Evil stronger, and thus prolonging the time it will take for this changing of the guard she believes is inevitable to occur. At some point, the math of long-term crushing oppression vs. an instant reset and reshuffle of the world's souls does shift.
Disease immunity is a lot more common than you think at high levels; Periapt of Health is right there in core for instance. I don't think she was incompetent either, but it was something she could have better planned for. She's high enough level that enemies can do recon on her from afar.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2021-09-18, 01:35 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Their goal -explicitly stated- was to cause more conflict. This is directly counter to Serini's goal, which is to avoid direct conflict between Xykon and the Order. The exact course of events might not have been predictable, but it was exactly the sort of thing that they were hoping for. They proceeded to use Nale and his team as pawns for the same purpose, and then deliberately stepped in to prevent V from preventing the gate's destruction.
The important point here is that the defenses around Girard's gate were annihilated, that they were annihilated as a result of the deliberate actions of a party that was actively working toward that outcome, that said party is still acting toward an outcome that is at least as bad as destroying the world and has the power and resources to pull off similar plans to the ones that destroyed Girard's defenses, and that the Order's role in destroying the defenses (although not the gate itself) had nothing to do with their pursuit of the gate.
In other words, Serini is completely misattributing the real threat to the Order, when it was the IFCC which mostly directly manipulated events to ensure the gate's destruction.
-
2021-09-18, 02:55 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
(Ranks in Knowledge (Arcana),(Nature), or (Religion)) / 10 IIRC.
EDIT: Nope, that's Epic spell slots/day. As far as the SRD says, it looks like you can have as many as you have the time/money/XP to research."Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman
-
2021-09-18, 03:22 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
People are making good points, especially with the corrections for timelines.
I have one point that I won’t let go: the argument that since the defenses for the gates were not perfect, that the people who made those defenses (i.e. each member of the order of the Scribble) are responsible for their failure. Not a moron like Elan, a psycho like Miko, or a “good intentioned but completely wrong” Roy, all of whom chose to destroy the gates.
Everything that has ever been created can undone. If someone deliberately destroys something, they are the ones who bear responsibility for its destruction.
One related point: none of those characters was being controlled by IIFC or any other force. All of them had agency, and they chose to destroy the gates. That makes them less than ideal guardians for the last gate.
I also want to acknowledge the point that someone made earlier: if Serini had not intervened, the OOTS would have attacked Team Evil, which was a high risk move. If the OOTS lost (which was definitely possible), then Team Evil would know about the portal, and would have a path to the last gate.
-
2021-09-18, 05:56 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
This is, at the very least, an exageration. The Order attacking Xykon gives him none of those things. If they attacked by leaping out from behind the illusion screen then it might (depending on how they did it) have indicated to Team Evil that there was a portal or an illusion or something similar at play. If that happened Xykon would still have to figure out the illusion and find a way around it, then deal with any other defences the Gates might have. Of course, the Order might have attacked in a different way which didn't really even given that clue.
-
2021-09-18, 06:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I'm probably late to the party on this. But I just realized there's a parallel between Serini not wanting to answer The Order's Sending and Roy not wanting Durkon to enter discussions with Redcloak. Both thinking the element of surprise is superior to trying to negotiate a better solution.
Probably right in Roy's case and wrong in Serini's, but both cutting off options based on incomplete information.I don't actually play D&D. I do play:
Magic: the Gathering Online (with FREE tournaments at Gatherling)
DC Universe, my surprisingly good CoH replacement
Planetside 2, MMO-meets-FPS (and the first shooter I've liked in ages).
Simunomics - a massive multiplayer Business Simulation Game. Browser-based, free to play.
-
2021-09-18, 07:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
-
2021-09-18, 07:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Location
- Magrathea
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
An explanation of why MitD being any larger than Huge is implausible.
See my extended signature here! May contain wit, candor, and somewhere from 52 to 8127 walruses.
Purple is humorous descriptions made up on the fly
Green is serious talk about hypothetical
Blue is irony and sarcasm
"I think, therefore I am,
I walk, therefore I stand,
I sleep, therefore I dream;
I joke, therefore I meme."
-Squire Doodad
-
2021-09-18, 08:01 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
The entire point of putting defenses around something is to prevent someone who is evil, irresponsible, or otherwise acting contrary to your interests from messing with it. If your defenses don't work against a random moron wandering in and blowing up the gate then they're not defenses, they're a "Please don't touch" sign. If you're taking responsibility for one of the linchpins preventing your entire world from being destroyed then, yes, you do have a moral responsibility to make sure that it takes more than one psycho-fighter-without-bonus-feats to destroy it.
Also, your focus on who is responsible for the failure is fundamentally wrong-headed. The important part is that they failed, four times out of five, and trusting last gate's defenses to indefinitely protect it from Xykon is foolhardy. The fact that the gates defenses are not perfect means that- wait for it- they're not perfect. They have flaws that can be exploited and can eventually be overcome, especially by an epic-level lich with massive amounts of time on his hands. If the world gets blown up because Serini trusted her gate's defenses to stop Xykon, even after seeing them fail at every other gate, and actively prevented others from stopping him first, then she is absolutely responsible for that outcome.
-
2021-09-18, 08:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
-
2021-09-18, 08:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Part of the problem here is that the people who are work far too hard to place blame on the Order are ignoring two key facts:
1) The party idiot would never have been anywhere near the self-destruct if Xykon hadn't killed Dorukan, taken over his dungeon, and set up shop in the gate room.
2) The party idiot would never have been anywhere near the self-destruct if Xykon hadn't intentionally lured the heroes there because he needed someone of pure heart to touch the gate and deactivate its final defense.
Dorukan's self-destruct system wasn't that easy to activate. It was behind multiple layers of high-level defenses and guarded by an epic-level wizard. It was Xykon who defeated all of those defenses, killed Dorukan, and left the door wide open so that the party idiot could wander in and touch things.
-
2021-09-18, 08:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Hey, I'm just saying that your self-destruct rune destroying one of the pillars holding up the fabric of reality should, just maybe, have more safeguards on it than writing "don't ever touch this"! Just seems like a basic safety protocol thing, Dorukan had a lot of employees working for him, OSHA's gonna own his ass if he ever escape's Xykon's soul prison thingy! :D
-
2021-09-18, 08:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- massachusetts
- Gender
-
2021-09-18, 08:28 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
If? Are you intentionally ignoring what the Order's actual plan is in order to call Serini stupid?
-
2021-09-18, 08:48 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
-
2021-09-18, 08:57 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
That's honestly one reason why I think she should've responded to the Sendings, so that she could have more control over where the Order of the Stick went and prepare an Ambush that way. Their assault on the place has already led to Team Evil finding out that some doors with X's on them are still fully populated with monsters, and whether that's because of MITD's sabotage or Serini's design of the place, it's still damaged the security of this place because she kept quiet and let them bumble around outside.
-
2021-09-18, 09:02 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Washington D.C.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2021-09-18, 09:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Amount that does to prevent the Order from getting involved anyway and needing to be dealt with: Nada.
She had two choices when the Sendings were peppering her: Not getting involved and risk them disrupting things on her doorstep as they sought to battle Team Evil, or get involved to steer things to a point where she can safely neutralize them without damaging her fortifications.
She did the former, and guess what, Team Evil learned something important about Kraagor's Gate that they otherwise wouldn't have found out for a long while, and thus she needs to deal with them before they can do further damage, like revealing the teleportation trap...Last edited by Wraithfighter; 2021-09-18 at 09:33 PM.
-
2021-09-18, 09:50 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Washington D.C.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
It's almost as if she wanted to retain the element of surprise. I wonder if she would use that for some sort of ambush on the Order themselves...
Oh, right, that's exactly what she's doing.
You want Serini to do something that Serini does not want to do. This does not make Serini wrong. This simply makes Serini not you.Last edited by Peelee; 2021-09-18 at 09:51 PM.
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2021-09-18, 09:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
-
2021-09-18, 10:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Well, yeah, that's why I said "I think" at the start of my first comment. I think that, knowing what we know about her aims and motives, she made the wrong decision in her reaction to the Sendings. Just my own personal read on the situation.
The gap in logic there might be just a difference in strategy, which I think is interesting grounds for discussion, or a sign that there's more to this than what we currently know about Serini's aims and motives (which I think is more likely). I do think she's been displaying much of the same arrogance in their abilities and beliefs that the rest of the Scribbles have done in the past, and like with them (to considerably varying degrees) its contributed to making the Gate less safe. Sure, it's some of that "well earned arrogance" you can see with high-level characters, but it does tend to blind one to other options that aren't all about how powerful or right you are.
Because it sure doesn't seem like Serini's asked the golden question here: "What if I'm wrong?"
She's acting like she knows best, her ways is superior, her actions are right, everyone else is just too dumb or stubborn to see anything else, to the point that she doesn't even bother trying to convince anyone else that her way is the right one. No point getting input from the captive Paladins, no communicating with do-gooders on their way to reinforce, no one's counsel but her own. Even if she were 100% right everywhere else, not interrogating that possibility is a mistake, especially with the stakes as high as they are.
-
2021-09-18, 10:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Washington D.C.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2021-09-18, 10:26 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
Nah, we're running on a hard double-standard here. Serini's failures are completely understandable and due to things outside of her control (like ambushing the Order inside of her own dungeon) while the Order's failures are due to them being incompetent bunglers who were silly not to foresee the future with their powers of divination. I mean, those idiots didn't even think to try a Sending spell!
-
2021-09-18, 10:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Washington D.C.
- Gender
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
We are, but not the way you think. Serini is not allowed to do anything except the most optimal actions for the Order and if anything turns out in any way other than exactly as she planned then she was objectively wrong. Meanwhile, the Order's failures of destorying two Gates intentionally and solely to prevent Xykon from having them means they have the absolute right to have the guardian of the last Gate talk to them and give them every possible benefit of every possible doubt.
There is definitely a double standard here, I agree.Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2021-09-18, 11:59 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2016
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
I used the word 'if' to acknowledge it was possible they might have carried out their plan. Or they might not have. Given developments, I think they wont.
If they had carried out that plan it's not clear whether they would have ambushed Xykon by leaping out from behind the illusion as he passed (which would probably give away the illusion), or ambushed him by exiting the illusion after he passed and then leapt upon him after he left the dungeon (which might give a clue, but not necessarily the defence).
As to Serini - I don't think I have ever called her stupid. And anyway, as far as we are aware, Serini did not know what the Order's plans were, so those plans cannot have had any bearing on her cleverness or stupidity.
Amount of control Serini has over whether or how the Order does an ambush: none
Amount of influence she could have gained by talking to them: perhaps some
What element of surprise do you think she used in the attack which she would have lost by engaging with the Order's sending. Hayley knew it was "an obvious deathtrap" before following anyway. What extra precautions might they have taken knowing that a Serini (who they think will be an ally, or maybe neutral if she tells them to piss off in a sending) was there?
That's demonstrably not true.
I challenge you to ask a single person who has been arguing that Serini's actions are not optimal if they think it was the optimal choice for Elan to destroy the first gate. Everyone is willing to admit that the Order sometimes (perhaps often) made poor decisions. It's just that when people point out that Serini has made poor decisions here, it raises hackles.Last edited by Liquor Box; 2021-09-19 at 12:11 AM.
-
2021-09-19, 12:46 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
Re: OOTS #1244 - The Discussion Thread
This is ridiculous strawman. Nobody is talking about what the Order has a "right" to, we're talking about how Serini not engaging with them is backfiring on her. The only thing that has actually gone her way so far is that she successfully ambushed the Paladins. Other than that, everything is going wrong for her. Team Evil has been potentially clued in regarding funny business with the doors, she lost the fight she just started, and she's lost any leverage or credibility she might have had as the guardian of the gate that could have been used to convince anyone to do things her way.
And the cherry on top her is that she is objectively wrong. We know for a fact that her plans are based on false assumptions. There is zero chance that the narrative is going wind up validating her strategy because we've already been told that things can't go that way. Where, exactly, are you planning on taking this argument when the comic doesn't end with the Order leaving followed by a page of text that says "And eventually Xykon got bored and also left, and thus the world was saved!"? I'm serious here: what parts of Serini's plan could possibly be about to succeed?
You're backing yourself into an increasingly extreme position and characterization of events. That is not a sign that you are convincing anyone, especially yourself, that your arguments are valid.