New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    RogueGirl

    Join Date
    Jan 2018

    Default More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advantage?

    Just a general question:

    What would you say is more satisfying? Rolling two natural 20s when you have disadvantage or rolling a 1 followed by a natural 20 when you have advantage?

    And have you ever experienced one of them in-game?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Imp

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Rolling that double 20 with disadvantage is 100% awespme. Can confirm!
    I apologise if I come across daft. I'm a bit like that. I also like a good argument, so please don't take offence if I'm somewhat...forthright.

    Please be aware; when it comes to 5ed D&D, I own Core (1st printing) and SCAG only. All my opinions and rulings are based solely on those, unless otherwise stated. I reserve the right of ignorance of errata or any other source.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Titan in the Playground
     
    J-H's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    It depends: Did you roll that on your Knowledge: Nature check to identify a CR 3 creature? Or did you roll it for your attack roll when you're dueling a Death Knight on a bridge above a river of volcanic lava, with everyone in the battle in single digit HPs?

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    RogueGuy

    Join Date
    Oct 2019

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Rolling that double 20 with disadvantage 9 times out of 10.

    But as J-H pointed out, context can make all the difference in the world, so whichever one that yields 'how do you wanna do this?' wins.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Pex's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Double 20 on disadvantage because 1) Rolling with disadvantage makes it harder to succeed, but it's easy to forget it's only harder not impossible. Succeeding on disadvantage is already a cool thing. 2) When people roll Advantage/Disadvantage they usually roll both d20s at the same time so double 20 is immediate gratification where as while rolling a 1 and a 20 on advantage is nice, there was no physically rolling the 1 first to elate getting the 20 on the following roll.
    Quote Originally Posted by OvisCaedo View Post
    Rules existing are a dire threat to the divine power of the DM.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Greece
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Rolling a crit with disadvantage is a 0.25% chance. When it happens, it's a cause for celebration. It's sweeter when it's a double 20.
    Last edited by Gtdead; 2021-11-26 at 09:19 AM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    stoutstien's Avatar

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Maine
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Imo passing or making a check/save/challenge by one is the best feeling. Something about that near miss that is oh so satisfying.
    what is the point of living if you can't deadlift?

    All credit to the amazing avatar goes to thoroughlyS

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    DruidGirl

    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    USA, Wisconsin

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Being a halfling and rolling a nat 20 and a nat 1 with disadvantage, then re-rolling the 1 and turning it into a 20.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Land of Cleves
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Rolling a 20 and a 1 with advantage is "Oh, gee, I'm glad I had advantage, there.". But really, when you're rolling with advantage, you already expect that you're probably going to succeed, and even have a decent chance for a critical success, so the outcome isn't surprising. The fact that the other die is a 1 is perhaps a bit interesting, but it doesn't actually matter.

    Rolling a double-20 with disadvantage is "That. Was. Awesome." You're doing something that has an extremely small chance of success (typically, the lowest nonzero chance of success possible in the game), and succeeding on it anyway. Succeeding on something hard is made all the sweeter, the harder the success is (even if it's just based on dumb luck).

    Then there's the advantage-with-two-20s, or the disadvantage-with-two-ones. Those are the situations where you say "Wow, I guess the dice gods really wanted me to succeed/fail on that one".
    Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
    As You Like It, III:ii:328

    Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
    Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Pex's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2013

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Quote Originally Posted by Chronos View Post
    Rolling a 20 and a 1 with advantage is "Oh, gee, I'm glad I had advantage, there.". But really, when you're rolling with advantage, you already expect that you're probably going to succeed, and even have a decent chance for a critical success, so the outcome isn't surprising. The fact that the other die is a 1 is perhaps a bit interesting, but it doesn't actually matter.

    Rolling a double-20 with disadvantage is "That. Was. Awesome." You're doing something that has an extremely small chance of success (typically, the lowest nonzero chance of success possible in the game), and succeeding on it anyway. Succeeding on something hard is made all the sweeter, the harder the success is (even if it's just based on dumb luck).

    Then there's the advantage-with-two-20s, or the disadvantage-with-two-ones. Those are the situations where you say "Wow, I guess the dice gods really wanted me to succeed/fail on that one".
    The absolute worse - rolling with Advantage and getting two 1s.
    Quote Originally Posted by OvisCaedo View Post
    Rules existing are a dire threat to the divine power of the DM.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Flumph

    Join Date
    Dec 2014

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    2 20s with disadvantage.

    It's going to happen so rarely and it is awesome when it does.

    It is 1/400 and how many times are players rolling with disadvantage?

    It happened in our current game a few sessions ago. The archer fired through a blizzard and allies (no SS in our game) at a creature wearing full plate and a shield.

    That's 22 AC total with a +9 to hit so a 16% chance to hit.

    In our game the extra crit damage (weapon dice only) is maximized. He rolled 20+20, rolled high on his damage roll, and took the creature down. It was an amazing moment.
    If you are trying to abuse the game; Don't. And you're probably wrong anyway.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Barbarian in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Burbank CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    I think I would have to say the rolling of two natural 20s when you have disadvantage would be the greater thrill and thus more satisfying for me.

    But no, I have not had such a wonderful outcome as me and dice have a... rocky... relationship at the best of times.
    *It isn't realism, it's verisimilitude... seeming to be true within the context of the game world.

    "D&D does not have SECRET rules that can only be revealed by meticulous deconstruction of words and grammar. There is only the unclear rules prose that makes people think there are secret rules to be revealed."

    Consistency between games and tables is but the dream of a madman - Mastikator

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    NinjaGirl

    Join Date
    May 2018

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Two 20s by far would be more satisfying, but I have to add the closest to that I've had to date, a 1 and 20 with disadvantage and lucky available.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Orc in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2015

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Being a Halfling, trying something with disadvantage, rolling two 1's, then re-rolling them both into a pair of 20's. :)
    Awaken an animal and you make them smart for the rest of their life; Teach your Awakened animal to be a druid and they will create a new race and take over the world.

  15. - Top - End - #15
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Planetar

    Join Date
    May 2018

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    I will go against the general sentiment here:
    A 1 followed by a 20 is the textbook definition of satisfying as in "you made a choice [that lead you to get an advantage] and you are satisfied to be confirmed in your belief that it was the good choice".

    The double 20 with disadvantage is awesome, amazing, a miracle, etc. It's generally "better". But it isn't "fulfilling" as there will always be a part of me that says that "it isn't the expected result".

    And I will particularly feel that if you repeat it:
    If I make 10 checks with advantage in a row, and each time obtain a "low then high", I will be very satisfied.
    If I make 10 checks with disadvantage in a row, and each time obtain a "double high", then I be both very happy and feeling bad for whoever is opposed to me.

  16. - Top - End - #16
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    NinjaGirl

    Join Date
    May 2018

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Quote Originally Posted by MoiMagnus View Post
    I will go against the general sentiment here:
    A 1 followed by a 20 is the textbook definition of satisfying as in "you made a choice [that lead you to get an advantage] and you are satisfied to be confirmed in your belief that it was the good choice".

    The double 20 with disadvantage is awesome, amazing, a miracle, etc. It's generally "better". But it isn't "fulfilling" as there will always be a part of me that says that "it isn't the expected result".
    Those are precisely the reasons why I feel the second is more satisfying. You make a choice to attack even though you have disadvantage and get a result that isn't expected.

  17. - Top - End - #17
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Imp

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Quote Originally Posted by Lunali View Post
    Those are precisely the reasons why I feel the second is more satisfying. You make a choice to attack even though you have disadvantage and get a result that isn't expected.
    Indeed. Beating the odds is always more exciting than getting the expected outcome. To make an extreme analogy, I doubt anyone celebrates or feels satisfaction at losing the lottery, even though they expect to. Hedging your bets to improve your odds often takes away some of the excitement of winning and it's often the case that generating advantage and still failing is worse still than chancing your arm and getting the same failure.

    Succeed with Advantage: Expected. Satisfying
    Succeed without Advantage: Exciting.
    Succeed with Disadvantage: Beat the odds. Very Exciting

    Fail with Disadvantage: Expected. Not disappointing.
    Fail without Advantage: A little disappointing.
    Fail with Advantage. Feel cheated. Frustrating.
    I apologise if I come across daft. I'm a bit like that. I also like a good argument, so please don't take offence if I'm somewhat...forthright.

    Please be aware; when it comes to 5ed D&D, I own Core (1st printing) and SCAG only. All my opinions and rulings are based solely on those, unless otherwise stated. I reserve the right of ignorance of errata or any other source.

  18. - Top - End - #18
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    RedWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    House rule on my table 2 nat 20 on advantage, EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING HAPPENS. Your target dies, no matter how many hp it has, you will accomplish what you are trying to do, no matter how out there it is. Everything.
    A double 1 on disadvantage is a disaster. It never happened though.
    But 3 PCs and a Vilain met their fates because of a double 20

  19. - Top - End - #19
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Leon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Newcastle, Australia
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Rolling well with Disadvantage
    Thankyou to NEOPhyte for the Techpriest Engiseer
    Spoiler
    Show

    Current PC's
    Ravia Del'Karro (Magos Biologis Errant)
    Katarina (Ordo Malleus Interrogator)
    Emberly (Fire Elemental former Chef)

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike_G View Post
    Just play the character you want to play. Don't feel the need to squeeze every point out of the build.
    Quote Originally Posted by Max_Killjoy View Post
    take this virtual +1.
    Peril Planet

  20. - Top - End - #20
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Land of Cleves
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    A double 1 on disadvantage is a disaster. It never happened though.
    I remember at least once in my group. We were fighting some sort of boss monster, and had cast some sort of spell that required a saving throw. The DM rolled and said "Now remember, this thing has spell resistance", and then lifted up the DM screen to reveal a pair of d20s both showing 1s.
    Time travels in divers paces with divers persons.
    As You Like It, III:ii:328

    Chronos's Unalliterative Skillmonkey Guide
    Current Homebrew: 5th edition psionics

  21. - Top - End - #21
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Kane0's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Waterdeep
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: More satisfying? Two nat 20s with disadvantage or a 1 followed by 20 with advanta

    Quote Originally Posted by Wasp View Post
    Just a general question:

    What would you say is more satisfying? Rolling two natural 20s when you have disadvantage or rolling a 1 followed by a natural 20 when you have advantage?

    And have you ever experienced one of them in-game?
    The former, and i've seen it happen only twice with real dice.
    Roll for it
    5e Houserules and Homebrew
    Old Extended Signature
    Awesome avatar by Ceika

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •