Results 451 to 480 of 1515
-
2022-06-14, 09:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q206 Are the physical remains of a non-creature plant such as a tree considered a corpse? More generally, is the term " corpse" meaningfully defined as a discrete rules term anywhere?
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-14, 11:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 206
Probably not; and: Probably not.
As far as I can tell, the word "corpse" is never defined anywhere in the D&D rulebooks. However, in most places where the word "corpse" appears, the phrase "dead creature" also appears. For example, the descriptions of the spells Animate Dead, Gentle Repose, Raise Dead, and Reincarnate all include the phrase "dead creature," and we can assume that the spells whose descriptions refer back to these spells, such as Resurrection and True Resurrection, also affect only dead creaures.
The concept of a dead creature is much better defined in the rulebooks than the concept of a corpse. Since a creature is definitely not the same thing as an object, a dead creature is also definitely not the same thing as a dead object (such as "the physical remains of a non-creature plant"). However, the physical remains of a Plant creature, such as a treant, do qualify as a dead creature.
I know of no spell or extraordinary or magical power that affects a formerly living object as if it was a dead creature.Last edited by Duke of Urrel; 2022-06-14 at 11:24 AM.
-
2022-06-14, 04:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 204 contention
Wrong. All of the Spell Focus (alignment) feats include the same line: "This bonus does not stack with any other bonus from Spell Focus feats."
Bonus from the same sources don't stack, even if untyped. All of the Spell Focus feats are considered the same source.
Only the bonus from Greater Spell Focus do stack with Spell Focus.Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2022-06-14, 04:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2012
- Location
- Saint Paul, MN
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 204 Further Commentary
The Spell Focus feat does not apply to spells with a particular descriptor, such as Evil. It applies only to "the school of magic you select." Descriptors do not denote schools of magic.
There's also this passage.
You can gain this feat multiple times. Its effects do not stack. Each time you take the feat, it applies to a new school of magic.
-
2022-06-14, 05:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 204 further info Spell focus (alignment) does exist, and applies to spells with that descriptor. You are right, though, it too explicitly says it doesn't stack with other spell foci:
Originally Posted by complete divine p22I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-15, 07:15 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2020
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 207 the dmg gives rules for spell research, that being that a new spell takes 1000 GP and one week per spell level, addition to a DC 10 + spell level spellcraft check. How long/how expensive is it to research a cantrip? The DC for a spellcraft check would be 10 likely but can you create a cantrip as a standard action with a DC 10 spellcraft check? Rai it would likely be spell level 1/2 in which case it would take 3.5 (heh) days and 500 GP but I don’t know if there are rules for this.
Last edited by Jervis; 2022-06-15 at 07:17 PM.
-
2022-06-15, 07:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 207 Your assessment of the situation is accurate. Generally speaking, when using formulae that have a spot for spell slot like creating wands, a cantrip/orison is treated as 1/2 a 1st. While there isn't a rule explicitly stating this in this instance, it's a reasonable extrapolation in actual play.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-15, 08:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2020
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q208
The binder needs to draw a summoning circle, a process that takes 1 minute to complete, and then must then activate it as a full round action within a minute of the circles completion.
Does the drawing of a summoning circle need to be continuous, or can I break it up into smaller pieces. Say, I'm preparing for the morning, and im halfway through making a circle, can I pause and help an ally put on armour, then return to continue the drawing of the circle?
If so, is it possible to say, carry preprepared scrolls which unfold into near complete circles, each requiring only a single round of drawing to complete, to be able to summon and bind a vestige hastily when needed?
-
2022-06-15, 09:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
- Location
- California
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Rhymes with "Protracted."
Handbooks: The Warlockopedia | The Warmagepedia (WIP) | Tier List (2019 Update)
Spreadsheets: Spellcasting classes | Deities | Useful items
Homebrew: Gestalt Theurge | Fighter and Monk fixes | Warlock stuff | Houserules and quick fixes
Original Fiction: The Wizard's Familiar
-
2022-06-16, 10:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 209
Probably a "specific trumps general" question, but anyway...
Originally Posted by EruditeOriginally Posted by Psychic ChirurgerySpoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2022-06-16, 12:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 59
Yeah, that's an oldie and I don't even know if the OP is still around, but I've found a different answer than the one I'd given at the time, so it's mostly for the record:
The WotC Website had several articles for expanded classes, including ACF for psions. Among them:
Originally Posted by WotC WebsiteSpoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2022-06-16, 05:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2020
Native Sha'ir enthusiast. NO GENIE WARLOCK DOESNT COUNT!
Rate my homebrew: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsing...&postcount=323
-
2022-06-16, 10:36 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
I've noticed an interesting tidbit in the descriptions of clerics, druids, and paladins.
Originally Posted by Ex-ClericsOriginally Posted by Ex-DruidsOriginally Posted by Ex-Paladins
Do clerics and druids regain the lost abilities from their previous levels after atoning?"Technically correct" is the best kind of correct.
-
2022-06-16, 11:03 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 210 Yes. ten characters
Originally Posted by AtonementI've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-17, 06:14 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 211
Assuming that the psionic-magic transparency rule is in effect, can a ring of spell storing also store a manifested psionic power of the appropriate level directed at it?Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature
-
2022-06-18, 07:19 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 212
Can a swarm use Personal psionic powers, or does it count as being "a fixed number of targets"?Resurrecting the Negative LA thread, comments and discussion are very welcome!
Do you want to build monstrous characters with reasonable LA? Join the Monster Mash! Currently, round XII: One-Punch Monster!!! Come judge single-strike entries!
Nice find! Have a cookie!
Searchable spreadsheet of 3.5 monsters by abilities, now with all online monsters
-
2022-06-18, 11:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 213
Can an ethereal creature use a targeted dispel magic against an abjuration effect created on the Material Plane?
Background: per ethereal jaunt, "abjurations affect an ethereal creature normally. Their effects extend onto the Ethereal Plane from the Material Plane, but not vice versa." So a Material abjuration's effect is in the Ethereal but its point of origin is not. That means an Ethereal caster couldn't area-dispel a Material abjuration, which affects "each ongoing area or effect spell whose point of origin is within the area of the dispel magic spell ..." But for targeted dispelling, I don't see the text leaning in one direction or the other.
For ease of reference, ethereal jaunt and dispel magic.
-
2022-06-19, 01:39 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2020
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 214 Can you choose to suppress always on SU abilities that don’t say anything on the subject? I know elves can turn off their immunity to sleep to allow sleep spells to effect them but I don’t know how it works in general.
Say for example if you’re a Knight of the Thorn 3 with aura of terror can you turn off the dark letters spelling out “MENACING” floating behind your head?Native Sha'ir enthusiast. NO GENIE WARLOCK DOESNT COUNT!
Rate my homebrew: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsing...&postcount=323
-
2022-06-19, 05:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2022
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q215: For the 3.0 prestige class Weapon Master from Sword and Fist, the text of the Ki Damage ability states that it is always in effect when applicable, but the table gives a number of uses per day. Is this a case of text trumps table, or is perhaps the table information being additional clarification, not direct conflict?
-
2022-06-19, 10:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 214 No. This is a perennial issue for characters with auras, stench, and the like. In terms of practically solving this problem, the typical way of resolving this is when you and your party wake up for the day after preparing spells, just get them in close so they make the save vs your aura of terror and are then immune for the rest of the day.
A 215 Text always trumps table. This is just a specific occurrence of primary source always being dominant. Since the text is always the primary source, when there is a conflict, it's the only thing that actually matters.I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-20, 03:36 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Jerusalem
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 215 contention?
I don't think there is a conflict here, though. The text doesn't say "whenever you score a hit", and clearly references "using" the ability. The text simply describes the function of the ability, and makes no claim as to how often it can be used. That info is supplied by the table. This isn't rainbow servant. The books are filled with such cases. I'd say that the lack of explicit claim as to how often the ability can be used by the text means that the table stands.
This is of course, the RAW answer for the RAW thread. The absolute majority of tables wouldn't even delve into this discussion, and simpluy accept the clear RAI - the ability can be used once per level per day.Screaming defiance with the last breath
It would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.
My judgments and medals!
The Iron Chef Optimization spreadsheet!
Song, Sword, and Sorcery: my 5E homebrew half-caster bard (Version 2.0!)
-
2022-06-20, 07:09 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
- Location
- Bear mountains! (Alps)
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q216
Does a morale bonus to all saves, like that granted by the spell conviction, stack with a morale bonus to (subset of saves), such as inspire courage morale bonus against fear?
Or more in general, do (same type) bonuses to (different things) that (both apply to the same roll) stack? I always assumed no because of the same type, but now I got a doubt.
another example : cobalt power grants an insight bonus to damage rolls when making power attack, knowledge devotion is an insight bonus to damage rolls, period. the doubt here is "cobalt power increases power attack"
-
2022-06-20, 09:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 216 No. What matters is what is immediately after the "to". A "morale bonus to all saves" is a "morale bonus to Will", a "morale bonus to Fortitude" and a "morale bonus to Reflex". They don't stack with a "morale bonus to Will saves against fear" since they apply to the same thing, the Will save. On the other hand, a morale bonus to Strength (Rage spell) stacks with a morale bonus to attack rolls, since they don't apply to the same thing, even though the end result is to increase the attack roll.
Resurrecting the Negative LA thread, comments and discussion are very welcome!
Do you want to build monstrous characters with reasonable LA? Join the Monster Mash! Currently, round XII: One-Punch Monster!!! Come judge single-strike entries!
Nice find! Have a cookie!
Searchable spreadsheet of 3.5 monsters by abilities, now with all online monsters
-
2022-06-20, 11:15 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
- Location
- Bear mountains! (Alps)
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q217 does dread stack with bane?
Q218Can a 6th level or higher kensai add epic weapon qualities to his signature weapon?
-
2022-06-20, 11:31 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 217 (clarification) From the context, I assume "dread" is also a spell. What book is it in?
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-20, 11:40 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2019
- Location
- Bear mountains! (Alps)
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q217 clarification : does the dread epic weapon property stack with the normal weapon property bane?
https://www.d20srd.org/srd/epic/magicItems/weapons.htmLast edited by ciopo; 2022-06-20 at 11:40 AM.
-
2022-06-20, 11:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 217 Both bonuses are untyped and from different sources, so there's no reason they wouldn't.
I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.
Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!
Iron Chef Medals!
Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition
-
2022-06-20, 02:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2020
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 218 The Knight of the Thorn PrC uses this wording for the Aura of Terror feature
Originally Posted by Aura of TerrorLast edited by Jervis; 2022-06-20 at 02:13 PM.
-
2022-06-20, 02:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2020
- Location
- Jerusalem
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
A 218
Unless otherwise noted or clearly inferred, "level" in class features references class level.
As for duration - I'd assume it's as long as the enemy is within the aura, but I'm unsure. No concrete answer from me on that.Screaming defiance with the last breath
It would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.
My judgments and medals!
The Iron Chef Optimization spreadsheet!
Song, Sword, and Sorcery: my 5E homebrew half-caster bard (Version 2.0!)
-
2022-06-21, 04:18 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2010
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Simple RAW Thread for 3.5 #37: 3d12+1
Q 219
Damn, I hate when I have to do that, but both my memory and my Google-fu are completely failing me:
I know there is playable race, looking like bald humans but in fact aberrations (NOT Elan) and with three consciousness giving them psionic powers. I just can't find the name nor the book they come from. Please help.Spoiler
DM: At the end of the meal, the innkeeper is bringing you the cheese plate. Roll for initiative.
PC: Excuse me, what?
DM: I said, roll for initiative. They like their cheese really ripe in these parts. They have the ooze type.
"Excuse me, but... is it a GOOD or a BAD thing when the DM can't help bursting into laughter every time he hears the phrase 'level-appropriate encounter'? No, just curious..."
Extended signature