New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Page 7 of 24 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 210 of 694
  1. - Top - End - #181
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    The MunchKING's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Liquor Box View Post

    * nine - The Order + minrah + the two paladins
    ** four - Xykon, Redcloak, MitD and Oona. Greyview isn't a separate character, he is Oona's class feature in the same way that Blood feast is Belkar's - so either count neither or both.
    If we counted both, that would be 3 more on the Order's side, Bloodfeast, Blackwing, and Razor.

    Well and "arbitrarily large number" on both sides, if you count all the summon spells they could go through.
    "Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman

  2. - Top - End - #182
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    The MunchKING's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2009

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Snails View Post
    I get your drift, but you are exaggerating more than a little. Serini had allies that were not insignificant to fight those 6 on ground of her choosing. And lost.
    An Ally that wasn't insignificant, Sunny. The other 4 were barely good for surprise. They gave up as soon as Belkar poked them.


    Quote Originally Posted by Snails View Post
    The primary combat advantage of a solo high level Rogue is that you should be able to avoid combats where you do not like the odds. That she got ambushed by a higher level spellcaster is pretty unfortunate, but not indicative of what a team of 6 or 8 or 10 powerful people gunning for Xykon could do. Especially with her help.
    On the contrary, a bigger team with less stealth would be MORE vulnerable to scry-and-die.

    Quote Originally Posted by Snails View Post
    And while Team Evil is spelunking around these many tunnels, there is definitely an opportunity to set up an ambush with the Order and a few Paladins and a few monster friends. They may not be able to pick the exact day of the fight, but the opportunity to be ready in one of the tunnels that will get hit within a week is available.
    the problem is we saw how well her ambush worked. She had a non-killer ally, and so she only managed to take out half the order. given that it's the half that died to Xykon and fled Redcloak acting with just Oona (before Xykon showed up)(EDIT: And Elan. He wasn't in either of those categories), her ambush skills wouldn't be what elevated them to Team Evil stomping.

    Quote Originally Posted by Snails View Post
    Serini has reasons for thinking the way she does, but she is being swayed by emotions. That is understandable and human(oid). But Haley is tactically and strategically head and shoulder beyond Serini right now. Roy even more so.
    Which is why she doesn't see them beating her as they can beat Xykon, let alone Team Evil.
    "Besides, you know the saying: Kill one, and you are a murderer. Kill millions, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Fishman

  3. - Top - End - #183
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    NecromancerGuy

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Czech Republic
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    I really like that while O'Chul never has any intention of being snarky, he still manages to deliver

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post
    Also, Serini is offering Belkar money, people. I get that idioms don't always translate, but lord, some of the suggestions in this thread... I wish I could find that quote about Rich saying no matter how hard he tries not to sexualize his women characters, the readership will do it for him anyway.
    To be fair, in at least one language I know, a literal translation of "getting one's beak* wet'' does, idiomatically, mean ''having a sexual intercourse''.

    * well, diminutive of beak, but that is beside the point.
    There must be some sense of order - personal, political or dramatic - and if no one else is going to bring it to this world, I will.

    Silent member of Zz'dtri's #698 Scrying Sensor Explanation Club.

  4. - Top - End - #184
    Colossus in the Playground
     
    hamishspence's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2007

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post
    I wish I could find that quote about Rich saying no matter how hard he tries not to sexualize his women characters, the readership will do it for him anyway.
    This is probably what you're thinking of:

    Quote Originally Posted by The Giant View Post
    Laurin is a female character probably in her late 50's who is covered from head to toe and has never discussed anything sexual at all. I made a deliberate effort to not sexualize her, even, since I realized a while ago that I was subconsciously "sexing up" almost all of the female characters. The fact that she still rates these kind of comments is very disappointing.
    Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
    New Marut Avatar by Linkele

  5. - Top - End - #185
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Ruck's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Havran View Post
    I really like that while O'Chul never has any intention of being snarky, he still manages to deliver

    To be fair, in at least one language I know, a literal translation of "getting one's beak* wet'' does, idiomatically, mean ''having a sexual intercourse''.

    * well, diminutive of beak, but that is beside the point.
    I suspect that, in English, any such diminutive might change the meaning, but my unfamiliarity with other languages means I don't want to belabor the point in any case.

    But even putting aside idioms and all, let's look at the logic behind the conclusion: Even if Serini, who has repeatedly described herself as an old woman and is half-troll now, was the type to offer sex for betrayal, would she make that offer to someone who just compared her to his grandmother?

    Quote Originally Posted by hamishspence View Post
    This is probably what you're thinking of:
    That was what I was thinking of, and I even found that post, but somehow I just failed to process that the paragraph I was looking for was in that post.

  6. - Top - End - #186
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    hroşila's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post
    1)The gods have expressed their confidence (or, some of them, anyway) that they can undo the world and save the souls before the Snarl gets them even if the last gate is blown.
    That "some of them" is actually just Loki, isn't it? I'm not sure if Thor discussed it on panel, so a refresher would be appreciated. Hel seemed to imply the Snarl getting the souls before it can be imprisoned was the usual outcome, which even allowing for angry hyperbole is not super reassuring, and if it was completely safe there's no reason why gods like Heimdall would vote to demolish the world now (although an argument could be made that Heimdall's reasoning still applies if the chances are very small, but not zero).
    ungelic is us

  7. - Top - End - #187
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Ruck's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by hroşila View Post
    That "some of them" is actually just Loki, isn't it? I'm not sure if Thor discussed it on panel, so a refresher would be appreciated. Hel seemed to imply the Snarl getting the souls before it can be imprisoned was the usual outcome, which even allowing for angry hyperbole is not super reassuring, and if it was completely safe there's no reason why gods like Heimdall would vote to demolish the world now (although an argument could be made that Heimdall's reasoning still applies if the chances are very small, but not zero).
    I think Loki is the only one who expressly says it, yes. Thor says sometimes they succeeded at cashing out the souls and sometimes they didn't. Beyond that, I'm extrapolating from a)the number of "yes" votes, given the importance of souls, seeming to suggest confidence in the possibility, and b)the fact that they've done this millions (billions?) of times before. I infer they've gotten better at it as they've gone along, although I don't have hard evidence for that.

  8. - Top - End - #188
    Titan in the Playground
     
    danielxcutter's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Seoul
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by hroşila View Post
    That "some of them" is actually just Loki, isn't it? I'm not sure if Thor discussed it on panel, so a refresher would be appreciated. Hel seemed to imply the Snarl getting the souls before it can be imprisoned was the usual outcome, which even allowing for angry hyperbole is not super reassuring, and if it was completely safe there's no reason why gods like Heimdall would vote to demolish the world now (although an argument could be made that Heimdall's reasoning still applies if the chances are very small, but not zero).
    I imagine that outburst was partly on the lines of "if we don't pull the plug ourselves it's going to break out" rather than usually or even often losing all the souls. And it feels like his argument was more "it's better to unmake the world now, instead of risking the mortals' souls being lost" rather than outright "if we don't pull it right now the Snarl will be guaranteed to eat them all". Hel's gloating also implies that he would have changed his vote in a heartbeat once her plans were revealed, which implies that he considers waiting to see if the Order can take out Xykon more acceptable than the guaranteed damning of an entire race(and bloating Hel's power with their souls).
    Cool elan Illithid Slayer by linkele.

    Editor/co-writer of Magicae Est Potestas, a crossover between Artemis Fowl and Undertale. Ao3 FanFiction.net DeviantArt
    We also have a TvTropes page!

    Currently playing: Red Hand of Doom(campaign journal) Campaign still going on, but journal discontinued until further notice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Squire Doodad View Post
    I could write a lengthy explanation, but honestly just what danielxcutter said.
    Extended sig here.

  9. - Top - End - #189
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Planetar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Raleigh NC
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post
    I suspect that, in English, any such diminutive might change the meaning, but my unfamiliarity with other languages means I don't want to belabor the point in any case.

    But even putting aside idioms and all, let's look at the logic behind the conclusion: Even if Serini, who has repeatedly described herself as an old woman and is half-troll now, was the type to offer sex for betrayal, would she make that offer to someone who just compared her to his grandmother?



    That was what I was thinking of, and I even found that post, but somehow I just failed to process that the paragraph I was looking for was in that post.
    Yeah. The phrase is an offering of money, corruption. From organized crime. As seen in The Free Dictionary . But we don't need a dictionary to know what's being offered. Look at Belkar's reactions. A person receiving a sexual proposition can react in any number of ways. Especially someone like Belkar, who has demonstrated his willingness to engage with bards in Haley's hometown and hookers everywhere. They can be intrigued, or embarrassed, or become extremely angry, or disgusted. Belkar's doing none of those things. He's just brushing it off. That doesn't fit with Belkar's character at all. Ergo, it's not a sexual proposition he's receiving.

    Not to mention, a person who's in an advanced age category with so much physical damage, including half-troll features, has to be sporting a whopping negative charisma modifier on any diplomacy or bribery check to a human character. And why exactly would Belkar betray his team for something that he's had no problems finding on the trip? I don't know what the going rate is for a night's entertainment in D&D world, but it must be trivial for a character at Belkar's wealth-by-level.

    Respectfully ,

    Brian P.
    "Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later, that debt is paid."

    -Valery Legasov in Chernobyl

  10. - Top - End - #190
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    BardGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    Israel
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Remember Nanny Ogg? Old age CAN come together with sexuality.

    Belkar compares Serini to grandmother, but she doesn't treat him as grandchild.

    And how she winks to Belkar... no, I wouldn't think of money, if I didn't see this on forum.

  11. - Top - End - #191
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    WolfInSheepsClothing

    Join Date
    Aug 2016

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    High stakes negotiations amongst thieves can get really weird.

  12. - Top - End - #192
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    HalflingRogueGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Liquor Box View Post

    Yes they outnumber him, by more than 2-1 if you count consistently.

    Based on what Serini knows, the Order outnumbers them 9* to 4*.

    If we are going to count V out based on what Serini doesn't know, then we should also count MitD out. So it becomes 8 to 3.

    * nine - The Order + minrah + the two paladins
    ** four - Xykon, Redcloak, MitD and Oona. Greyview isn't a separate character, he is Oona's class feature in the same way that Blood feast is Belkar's - so either count neither or both.
    Eeeerm... The Order was going to attack Serini being 7, and was that exact moment when Serini started her ambush.
    So Serini knows that the Order think they could beat Xykon without the paladins and anyone else to help... And I doubt hard they could

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post


    1)The gods have expressed their confidence (or, some of them, anyway) that they can undo the world and save the souls before the Snarl gets them even if the last gate is blown.
    Just Loki, and as an argument to don't blow the world cause they have that thing with the purple color and that. I don't trust that to be a truth, maybe they could save some souls, but most of them would be erased. Thor said they "saved" some of the worlds destroying them.and saving the souls, but others don't, so is hardly implied that if the Snarl is free they can't save all the souls.
    Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2022-01-09 at 11:05 AM.

  13. - Top - End - #193
    Banned
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    A Shallow Grave

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The MunchKING View Post
    An Ally that wasn't insignificant, Sunny. The other 4 were barely good for surprise. They gave up as soon as Belkar poked them.
    That we have seen. She has some monsters that make Team Evil need to go take a nap after beating them. I've been assuming she doesn't have direct control of all of the creatures in the dungeon or she would have just opened every door and buried team evil under monster, but there's really no telling what she has at her disposal. To me her fatal flaw is that she has misjudged the relative strength of both the Order, and Team Evil.

  14. - Top - End - #194
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    PontificatusRex's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    State of Uncertainty
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Fun synchronicity: I was just listening to a podcast about Frank Sinatra and the Rat Pack, and the phrase "Get your beak wet" was used to refer to mobsters' practice of skimming profits off the top of the casinos before any official accounting, and how Sinatra learned from them how to do the same on his tours.

    Now I'm totally imagining Serini listening to Dean Martin when she's relaxing.
    Some people think that Chaotic Neutral is the alignment of the insane, but the enlightened know that Chaotic Neutral is the only alignment without illusions of sanity.

  15. - Top - End - #195
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    RatElemental's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Gender
    Male2Female

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ruck View Post
    Rich has said he doesn't read the forum discussions or predictions anymore, but I also suspect that it would not be hard for him to assume that some people would be speculating that.



    I'll ask again if anyone can think of a reason it benefits the story for Belkar and Serini to be related.

    Also, Serini is offering Belkar money, people. I get that idioms don't always translate, but lord, some of the suggestions in this thread... I wish I could find that quote about Rich saying no matter how hard he tries not to sexualize his women characters, the readership will do it for him anyway.
    Personally I thought "jingle jangle" was a euphemism for liquor and the beak wettening would have been literal that way.

    As for the Serini-Belkar connection, I think it'd make for a few interesting jokes if it turns out Serini knew of Granny Bitterleaf as an acquaintance and hated her guts.
    Last edited by RatElemental; 2022-01-09 at 03:30 PM.

  16. - Top - End - #196
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    Metastachydium's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jul 2020

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The MunchKING View Post
    An ally that wasn't insignificant, Sunny. The other 4 were barely good for surprise. They gave up as soon as Belkar poked them.
    Yup. It's not like Mimi blocked the path of a retreat that would have effortlessly negated Serini's entire strategy for the ambush. It's also not like Franklin broke the grapple on her and the lurker absolutely didn't buy her enough time to safely withdraw into her den.

    Seriously, the only monster she deployed that wasn't incredibly efficient for its CR was the trapper. That said, yes, they weren't the key factor. Home terrain and the element of surprise were and Team Evil would have had pretty much the opposite of that. Also, don't get me wrong: I was among the first posters that called the "ambush Team Evil at the entrance" idea a questionable move, but let's not misrepresent the numbers/factors involved.

    Quote Originally Posted by RatElemental View Post
    and the beak wettening would have been literal that way.
    So… You also think Belkar might be a birdy?

  17. - Top - End - #197
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Dewin Dwl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Land of the Red Dragon

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
    As a math guy I must object, you used the word “literally” but she is only one-quarter troll, according to Xykon’s observation “I made a theee-eighthsling!”.
    Who are you gonna trust on their maths, a random stranger on the internet, or an evil sorcerer who isn't counting the number of dungeon doors he's crossed off?

  18. - Top - End - #198
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Dewin Dwl's Avatar

    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Land of the Red Dragon

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ekim One-Eye View Post
    Wow...I'd forgotted about those til you said that!
    I'd been slow to think of the sharks in acid, but then immediately thought of the lava-breathing sharks Xykon was contemplating. (Did they actually give those a go?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Shining Wrath View Post
    I agree that people sexualize female characters far too much, but at least some people who weren't native English speakers didn't recognize the idiom "Dip your beak".
    It reminded me of the phrase "dip your bread", which I have heard used with sexual connotations on occasion, but I didn't think that would fit the context given here.
    Last edited by Dewin Dwl; 2022-01-09 at 04:29 PM.

  19. - Top - End - #199
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Lord Vukodlak's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Serini: "Belker... I am your Grandma."

    Belkar: "No your not."

    Serini: "Eh I knew it was a long shot."

    Belkar: "Do I look stupid to you?"

    Everyone Else: "Yes"
    Nale is no more, he has ceased to be, his hit points have dropped to negative ten, all he was is now dust in the wind, he is not Daniel Jackson dead, he is not Kenny dead, he is final dead, he will not pass through death's revolving door, his fate will not be undone because the executives renewed his show for another season. His time had run out, his string of fate has been cut, the blood on the knife has been wiped. He is an Ex-Nale! Now can we please resume watching the Order save the world.

  20. - Top - End - #200
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    ClericGuy

    Join Date
    Aug 2013

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Peelee View Post
    Devils advocate: Serini would have no way of knowing that.
    But they can explain to her that
    1: the Gods absolutely will be killing this world if Xykon gets close to getting the Gate
    2: The OotS has no intention of destroying the last Gate
    so
    3: If she doesn't want teh world destroyed, she needs to team up

  21. - Top - End - #201
    Firbolg in the Playground
     
    SamuraiGuy

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Fyraltari View Post
    Nah, Belkar is Mr. Scruffy's.
    Dogs have family; cats have staff.

    A thought: Serini's monster allies, while not useless, would not give Team Evil scars and Xykon XP as seen here. Therefore, whatever the process is/was for stocking the dungeons, she either can't do it any longer, or can't control monsters of that level on her own. The monsters in the dungeons are not her servants.

    If Serini could somehow bring all the monsters from two or three dungeons out to attack Team Evil at once, that would be enough to overwhelm them. Therefore, she can't, that would be severely anticlimactic. In fact, she probably can't travel into her own dungeons any longer.
    This ... is my signature finishing move!

    "It's never good when you make a fiend cringe" - MadGrady

    According to some online quiz, I'm a 6th level TN Wizard. They didn't give me full XP for all the monsters I've defeated while daydreaming.
    http://easydamus.com/character.html

    I am a Ranger Archetype: Gleaming Warden (thx to Ninja Prawn)

  22. - Top - End - #202
    Dragon in the Playground Moderator
     
    Peelee's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Shining Wrath View Post
    Dogs have family; cats have staff.
    Ah, the siren song of a non-cat person. As if dog owners don't pick up their poop.
    Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.

    Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2

  23. - Top - End - #203
    Troll in the Playground
     
    DaOldeWolf's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Mexico
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Peelee View Post
    Ah, the siren song of a non-cat person. As if dog owners don't pick up their poop.
    As someone with both. I will say there is both great perks and annoying traits to deal with regardless of species. Also both can have bad temper or can end up hurting the owner. They also can be rather cuddly when they want to.
    Thanks to linklele for the amazing avvy.
    Quote Originally Posted by jidasfire View Post
    On a long enough scale, every OOTS forum discussion turns into a debate about alignment, Miko, or Familicide.
    or Star Wars.
    Spoiler: Easydamus result
    Show

    Neutral Good Human Paladin/Cleric (3rd/2nd Level)
    Ability Scores:
    Strength-15 Dexterity-13 Constitution-14
    Intelligence-16 Wisdom-17 Charisma-14
    Alignment: Neutral Good

  24. - Top - End - #204
    Pixie in the Playground
     
    Zombie

    Join Date
    Jan 2022

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Dat **** punt doe.

  25. - Top - End - #205
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    NihhusHuotAliro's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2013

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    You know, instead of a dog or a cat, you could have a picture of a dog or a cat.

  26. - Top - End - #206
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    DrowGirl

    Join Date
    Mar 2016

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Vikenlugaid View Post
    Eeeerm... The Order was going to attack Serini being 7, and was that exact moment when Serini started her ambush.
    The conversation was all in the present tense, so comparing the relative numbers at this point.

    But if we compare the numbers at the point before Serini attacked the Order, then the Order outnumbered Team Evil 7 to 4 (or 6 to 3 if you remove MitD and V).

    So Serini knows that the Order think they could beat Xykon without the paladins and anyone else to help... And I doubt hard they could
    Yes, like they have done before.

  27. - Top - End - #207
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    HalflingRogueGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2008

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by GregTD View Post
    But they can explain to her that
    1: the Gods absolutely will be killing this world if Xykon gets close to getting the Gate
    2: The OotS has no intention of destroying the last Gate
    so
    3: If she doesn't want teh world destroyed, she needs to team up
    Nah I don't think those are the right points, why should she believe them? She will think is a lie since the paladins didn't even mention that.

    I think Durkon telling her about the thing with Redcloak, the monster races and that should be a bettee shot with Serini.

    Quote Originally Posted by Liquor Box View Post


    Yes, like they have done before.
    When? That time when Xykon only casted magic missil, and Redcloak did nothing at all, cause the comic wasn't intended to have a complex plot?
    Do you think that, in tge final battle, Xykon will just cast magic missil again and Redcloak will stay just watching?
    Last edited by Vikenlugaid; 2022-01-10 at 08:49 AM.

  28. - Top - End - #208
    Dwarf in the Playground
     
    Imp

    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    USA
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    New strip. Wicked.

    I liked the joke of Serini acting similar to Grandma Bitterleaf, but I genuinely hope she and Belkar not related because the last thing I think this story needs is that sort of twist.

    (The tragic backstory: Serini became misanthropic because her family ditched her at the nursing home.)
    Last edited by Robots; 2022-01-10 at 08:49 AM.
    Shh! I'm hiding.

  29. - Top - End - #209
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    elros's Avatar

    Join Date
    Mar 2012

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by PontificatusRex View Post
    Fun synchronicity: I was just listening to a podcast about Frank Sinatra and the Rat Pack, and the phrase "Get your beak wet" was used to refer to mobsters' practice of skimming profits off the top of the casinos before any official accounting, and how Sinatra learned from them how to do the same on his tours.

    Now I'm totally imagining Serini listening to Dean Martin when she's relaxing.
    Seirni it supposed to sound like an older character, so it makes sense that the Giant would use a phrase that was common in the 1950s, and also not surprising that most of the readers are not familiar with it.

  30. - Top - End - #210
    Troll in the Playground
     
    HalflingPirate

    Join Date
    Nov 2011

    Default Re: OOTS #1251 - The Discussion Thread

    I completely missed any hint of sexual inuendo. Jingle jingle was obviously a reference to a pouch full of coins and wet your beak was obviously a bribe.

    I can see how the present generation would miss the coin reference because plastic credit cards don't jingle. And of course, anything on the internet that you don't understand is sexual innuendo.

    So I suppose I should have instantly assumed that Granny Bitterleaf was soliciting Belkar with sexual favors. It's so obvious now that I think of it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •