New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Halfling in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Jan 2017

    Default Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Hey there.

    If we dont have dice limite for spell, exemple:

    Caster level 15:
    Fireball = 15d6

    What would be the best spells for this adaptation?

    No saves, no SR, no touch...something like that.

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    Chimera

    Join Date
    Jun 2020

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Dlabuga View Post
    Hey there.

    If we dont have dice limite for spell, exemple:

    Caster level 15:
    Fireball = 15d6

    What would be the best spells for this adaptation?

    No saves, no SR, no touch...something like that.
    I mean Wings of Flurry already doesn’t have a limit. The orb of line are no SR touch attacks that scale directly with CL, normally capped though so removing that is really good.
    Native Sha'ir enthusiast. NO GENIE WARLOCK DOESNT COUNT!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky McDibben View Post
    I am unburdened of my salt, and I rise like a bland-ass potato chip from the ashes of my discontent.
    Rate my homebrew: https://forums.giantitp.com/showsing...&postcount=323

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    There are already a few attack spells which don't have dice limits, such as Maw of Chaos (SpC) and the notoriously broken Venomfire (SK).

    To answer your actual question, Orb of Force (SpC) and Magic Missile seem like good candidates as they're very hard to resist. Also spells which do a lot of damage per caster level, such as Harm and Disintegrate, if you can pump your caster level and save DCs high enough.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Ettin in the Playground
     
    Eurus's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    I'll vote for my favorite unfair spell, Hail of Stone. Add Sculpt Spell for a good area, Rapid Spell to fix the casting time, stack other metamagics to taste, and you've got an almost unavoidable damage source.
    Last edited by Eurus; 2022-01-12 at 06:00 PM.
    Avatar by araveugnitsuga.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Eurus View Post
    I'll vote for my favorite unfair spell, Hail of Stone. Add Sculpt Spell for a good area, Rapid Spell to fix the casting time, stack other metamagics to taste, and you've got an almost unavoidable damage source.
    No save, no attack roll, no SR? Yeah, I'd call that unfair lol. Nice one, wasn't aware of this.

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Venger's Avatar

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Are you asking for spells that already exist and are uncapped, like maw of chaos?

    Are saying that in your game you will remove damage caps from all spells and are asking which spells will gain utility?

    As mentioned, any spell with as few of the following (save, attack roll, sr) is good for this.

    Are you asking how to break caps? Reserves of strength allows you to do this.
    I've got a new fantasy TTRPG about running your own fencing school in a 3 musketeers pastiche setting. Book coming soon.

    Check out my NEW sci-fi TTRPG about first contact. Cool alien races, murderous AIs, and more. New expansion featuring rules for ships! New book here NOW!

    Quote Originally Posted by weckar View Post
    Venger, can you be my full-time memory aid please?
    Iron Chef Medals!
    Amazing Princess Mononoke avatar by Dispozition

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Titan in the Playground
     
    tyckspoon's Avatar

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Biggus View Post
    No save, no attack roll, no SR? Yeah, I'd call that unfair lol. Nice one, wasn't aware of this.
    ..and for all that it's still normally a pretty terrible spell unless you are building your entire optimization stack on it. It just has that one niche application for being capable of damaging just about anything that is at all subject to suffering HP damage.

    Plus side, tho, if you do trick it all the way out? You get to cast Rocks Fall, Everyone Dies.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Wildstag's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Alamogordo
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Biggus View Post
    There are already a few attack spells which don't have dice limits, such as Maw of Chaos (SpC) and the notoriously broken Venomfire (SK).

    To answer your actual question, Orb of Force (SpC) and Magic Missile seem like good candidates as they're very hard to resist. Also spells which do a lot of damage per caster level, such as Harm and Disintegrate, if you can pump your caster level and save DCs high enough.
    Magic Missile does have dice limits though. Also, it's an SR spell.

    For every two caster levels beyond 1st, you gain an additional missile—two at 3rd level, three at 5th, four at 7th, and the maximum of five missiles at 9th level or higher.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    OldWizardGuy

    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Wildstag View Post
    Magic Missile does have dice limits though. Also, it's an SR spell.
    I think you may have misunderstood the OP's question? They said:

    If we dont have dice limite for spell, exemple:

    Caster level 15:
    Fireball = 15d6
    Fireball normally tops out at 10d6, so as far as I can see this means "what if there were no dice limits for spells which normally have them?".

    Also, yes Magic Missile allows SR, but it requires no attack roll, doesn't allow a save, and is a force spell so very few things can resist it if they don't have SR. Spells which don't involve SR, attack rolls or saves are almost nonexistent as far as I know (even Orb of Force requires a RTA); if you know of any other than Hail of Stone, please enlighten me.
    Last edited by Biggus; 2022-01-14 at 12:02 PM. Reason: typo

  10. - Top - End - #10
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    So, to address the original question - I don't think it makes huge amounts of difference, with one small exception - spells which are basically a higher level version of the same spell with a higher damage cap become redundant.

    In 3.5 the ability to push saving throws through the roof makes damage-dealing spells far less relevant than they used to be - why do a monster more damage when you can still take them out of the fight altogether with one spell. Even without caps few damage spells do enough damage to end an opponent in one cast, something not true of control spells.
    Spells that do damage keep their relative usefulness to each other based on element, SR, and number of targets.

    Possibly some buffs and simple crowd-control spells drop in relevance - why boost the party damage over 5 rounds when you can inflict the same amount in 1? - but that's about it.

  11. - Top - End - #11
    Ogre in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Biggus View Post
    I think you may have misunderstood the OP's question? They said:



    Fireball normally tops out at 10d6, so as far as I can see this means "what if there were no dice limits for spells which normally have them?".

    Also, yes Magic Missile allows SR, but it requires no attack roll, doesn't allow a save, and is a force spell so very few things can resist it if they don't have SR. Spells which don't involve SR, attack rolls or SR are almost nonexistent as far as I know (even Orb of Force requires a RTA); if you know of any other than Hail of Stone, please enlighten me.
    Death Throes (planar handbook, spell compendium) deals 1d8/CL damage (untyped, with no cap!) to everyone in a 30-foot-radius, no saving throw, no spell resistance, no nothing.

    The downside is that it triggers when you die, but this is relatively easy to get around if "you" are, say, an Astral Projection. (Killing yourself via Coup de Grace and a voluntarily failed saving throw is a full round action, but there's probably faster methods.)

    Also, the Planar Handbook version has a 1 hour/CL duration but the Spell Compendium one only lasts for 1 round/CL. So that's a bit tricky.
    Last edited by Gemini476; 2022-01-14 at 10:52 AM.

  12. - Top - End - #12
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Aside from Hail of Stone, Hellfire (Close, L4, d8/2 levels) and Hellfire Storm (medium, L7, d8/level) share the SR:No, Save:No, untyped damage property.

  13. - Top - End - #13
    Titan in the Playground
     
    Troacctid's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    California
    Gender
    Female

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Off the top of my head, shocking grasp is probably an underrated choice. Uncapping it would be a big boost to duskblades specifically.

    My actual answer though is Dalamar's lightning lance. Not only are you getting more bolts, you're also doing more damage on each one.

    Quote Originally Posted by Khedrac View Post
    So, to address the original question - I don't think it makes huge amounts of difference, with one small exception - spells which are basically a higher level version of the same spell with a higher damage cap become redundant.

    In 3.5 the ability to push saving throws through the roof makes damage-dealing spells far less relevant than they used to be - why do a monster more damage when you can still take them out of the fight altogether with one spell. Even without caps few damage spells do enough damage to end an opponent in one cast, something not true of control spells.
    Spells that do damage keep their relative usefulness to each other based on element, SR, and number of targets.

    Possibly some buffs and simple crowd-control spells drop in relevance - why boost the party damage over 5 rounds when you can inflict the same amount in 1? - but that's about it.
    Boosting save DCs above par requires more investment than boosting caster level. You're just going to find yourself in the position of having a 40–60% chance of wasting your action and resources because your spell didn't work. Blasting spells, as a category, are more reliable than save-or-lose spells. They can do the thing all the time instead of only some of the time, they're better against large groups, and they stack with themselves and with the damage the rest of the party is dealing.

  14. - Top - End - #14
    Troll in the Playground
     
    PaladinGuy

    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    UK
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Damage Spell without Dice Limite

    Quote Originally Posted by Troacctid View Post
    Boosting save DCs above par requires more investment than boosting caster level. You're just going to find yourself in the position of having a 40–60% chance of wasting your action and resources because your spell didn't work. Blasting spells, as a category, are more reliable than save-or-lose spells. They can do the thing all the time instead of only some of the time, they're better against large groups, and they stack with themselves and with the damage the rest of the party is dealing.
    For an old-scholl AD&D veteran it's still the reversed metric from AD&D. Back then the damage spells were uncapped and after a few levels saves were usually made (the higher level the opponent, the more they needed to roll a natural 1 to fail). Save or lose spells were for the novel writers, blasting and physically blocking spells were the way to go. With 3.X's ability to boost save DCs far faster than poor saves (I agree faster than good saves is hard) save or lose when targetted on a weak save usually ends the fight, but may take 2 catss, blasting is still likely to take 4 or 5.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •