Results 61 to 90 of 190
-
2023-02-04, 07:02 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2020
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
That's one of the bonus comics in printed books, right? I haven't read it so I can't comment on it directly. Both under D&D rules and folklore, though, different types of undead are, well, different. To wit: a ghost is the incorporeal spirit of someone who was wronged or died tragically, often retaining much of their personality. A lich is an evil sorcerer who did something horrible to their own self to escape death.
So, Redcloak might not be as right about a ghost, while still applying to Xykon.
-
2023-02-04, 07:17 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
The one thing they both have in common is that they both retain their original mortal souls - with the soul being in charge, no less, unlike with vampires where the body is "controlled by a malign intelligence" which is not the original mortal soul.
While normally liches have to do the lich transformation to themselves, and have to be evil, plenty of D&D novels and splatbooks subvert this, with there being liches who aren't evil, and liches who have had the transformation forced on them somehow.
Redcloak's beliefs about the controllability of undead, may be blinding him to just how much volition and personhood they can have - including Xykon. Xykon is a person - just an incredibly vile person.Last edited by hamishspence; 2023-02-04 at 07:17 AM.
Marut-2 Avatar by Serpentine
New Marut Avatar by Linkele
-
2023-02-04, 09:53 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Bad news: There are two main differences between Ysgard and Acheron, and one of them is that the souls who fall in battle on Acheron don't get back up. The other is that they're press-ganged into pointless battles by pointless generals fighting over worthless ground, while in Ysgard you fight whoever you want for whatever reason you want and then at the end of the day go get drunk with them.
Last edited by RatElemental; 2023-02-04 at 09:55 AM.
-
2023-02-04, 10:38 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2023-02-04, 04:11 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
I don't think Redcloak is entirely wrong in his assessment of most undead in D&D and OotS. Even for the ones that aren't just straight up hijacked by a vile spirit, something happens to them during the reanimation-with-negative-energy process that renders them... twisted. Ghosts being an outlier to that (which they certainly are in most editions, being able to be any alignment etc) doesn't mean he is wrong about the rest.
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2023-02-04, 06:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
The town Roy's Mom exists in has all the carnal pleasures in which she wants to indulge. Eventually she will tire of lost codpieces piling up in the corner and move up to the next town. I'm guessing Eric will have 'grown up' in her eyes, and move on as well. Eventually, she will tire of whatever is going on there and move up to the next town.
This does not seem like such a horrible thing. This seems, to me, like a chance to be and do everything you ever wanted to do in life. Having done it as many times as you like, eventually you grow out of the desire to do it some more.
Example, as a kid I inherited two brothers' worth of Legos. I spent hours building things. It has been thirty years or so since I last played with Legos, and I probably would only do so if a child wants me to do so. I'm otherwise done with them.
Life is like that. You grow out of things and move on. Celestia gives you time to move on from everything you find to be unimportant. You become more and more what you find really important, and the unimportant things just don't interest you anymore.
Contrast that with the Evil afterlives, where you are tormented until you know nothing else. There is no up-side to that.
Xykon is right. Avoiding The Fire Down Below is better than any Evil afterlife. He just didn't figure that out until it was too late to do anything but buy time. Eventually, probably after he's done most of the work himself, he will go exactly where he is avoiding and face exactly what he wants to avoid.
-
2023-02-04, 06:53 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Indeed. Redcloak is deluding himself just as much as Tsukiko was about the controllability of undead. He's just better at rationalizing. That's the thing with having high Wisdom: Doesn't mean you know the right choice, sometimes, it just means you're better at rationalizing the thing you already want.
-
2023-02-05, 04:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
"That's a horrible idea! What time?"
T-Shirt given to me by a good friend.. "in fairness, I was unsupervised at the time".
-
2023-02-05, 09:30 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2014
- Gender
-
2023-02-06, 02:47 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
I'll take this a step further: Good afterlives give you as much time as you want to choose when you're ready to move on - but the kinds of people who end up in Good afterlives will eventually, over a long enough time horizon, willingly choose that sacrifice.
The one thing all the OotS gods have in common is that they need to consume mortal souls to live. Even if mortals don't know that while they're alive, they'll find that out once they cross over; it's not a secret, and even if it was, dead mortals would still notice more and more of their friends/family reaching the summit of Mount Celestia and not coming back down, or entering the heart of forest in Arborea and never re-emerging etc.
Knowing that their gods need the raw materials of their soulstuff to survive, these Good-aligned petitioners also know what will happen if they don't eventually surrender it and merge with the plane - too many of them doing so means that the Good gods will starve. And since the Evil and Neutral gods aren't nearly as permissive when it comes to waiting around for their petitioners to willingly pass on, that means that only the Good gods would die off, putting Good Itself in jeopardy. And that's something truly Good beings would very likely sacrifice themselves to prevent.Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)
-
2023-02-06, 08:12 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2011
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
I don't think it is a sacrifice, in the case of the Good deities.
We see Hel squishing dwarf souls. Maybe some of them are thankful that their torment is over, but the rest are trying to avoid the thumb. With the Good deities we see nothing like that. The souls are simply growing older and older.
Eventually, the old souls pass on. They become the energy of their plane in much the same way that people who die of old age decay and become fertilizer for the next crop.
There is no sacrifice involved. It is just the circle of life extrapolated into the afterlife.
-
2023-02-06, 08:42 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Avatar by linklele. How Teleport Worksa. Malifice (paraphrased):
Rulings are not 'House Rules.' Rulings are a DM doing what DMs are supposed to do.
b. greenstone (paraphrased):
Agency means that they {players} control their character's actions; you control the world's reactions to the character's actions.
Second known member of the Greyview Appreciation Society
-
2023-02-06, 10:22 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
-
2023-02-06, 10:43 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 10:55 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2021
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Resurrecting the Negative LA thread, comments and discussion are very welcome!
Do you want to build monstrous characters with reasonable LA? Join the Monster Mash! Currently, round XII: One-Punch Monster!!! Come judge single-strike entries!
Nice find! Have a cookie!
Searchable spreadsheet of 3.5 monsters by abilities, now with all online monsters
-
2023-02-06, 11:00 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 11:04 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Not even, the gods don't absorb the energy of the planes, they absorb passive worship that the soul emits during its time in the afterlife.
It's more the way plants feed on light through photosynthesis. There's technically some eating going on, but the sun isn't being harmed by it.
-
2023-02-06, 11:25 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
You might want to tell to Thor and Durkon:
Thor: Plants absorb sunlight, animals eat plant, people eat animals, other people defeat them and gain levels. Then the worms eat everyone.
Durkon: An' tha Gods skim tha souls off tha top. Tha more levels, tha better the souls.
Thor: Pretty much. We don't keep making these worlds for fun.
Durkon: Then Redcloak's right. 'E's food fer us an we're food fer ye. Tha world's a big ol' soul farm.
Thor: Ok: see again, that's unnecessarily pejorative.
He then goes on to describe how goblins weren't purposefully put in the position of "food" for PC.
It remains true that the souls don't endure forevermore in the afterlives and that it is the souls being absorbed by them that allows the Planes to sustain the gods. The souls are food for the gods. Or fuel. Or any other metaphor you want.Last edited by Fyraltari; 2023-02-06 at 11:25 AM.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 11:30 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
-
2023-02-06, 11:41 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Assuming this holds true for Hel and her ilk, this is usually not the reason people bring up gods eating souls.
Edit: Also, if the eating metaphor is good enough for the comic, it is good enough for the discussions about the comic.
Besides, I think it's more likely the gods only absorb the energy after the soul's been completely absorbed by the plane and therefore stopped existing as a discrete entity. If true then the gods' nourishment don't bring any harm to the soul in the same way that eating a steak brings no harm to the ox (it's already dead).Last edited by Fyraltari; 2023-02-06 at 11:43 AM.
-
2023-02-06, 11:50 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2023-02-06, 11:51 AM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jun 2018
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Yes, the food metaphor is a good starting point, but it doesn't take into account all the nuance of the system.
-
2023-02-06, 12:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
No, what Thor objected to as unnecessary pejorative is the notion that goblins are lower than the PCs on this particular food web. That's what he argues against in his next sentence. Thor is not adverse to food metaphors, he says they used to explain this system with a pyramid diagram.
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 12:12 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
-
2023-02-06, 12:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 12:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, AL
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
Again, Thor specifically made a distinction between absorbing and eating, never said the gods ate souls, and objected to Durkons statement about humans "eating" goblins.
I don't think it's out of hand to not want to go with the eating analogy when Thor himself doesn't especially if you claim that if it's good enough for the comic it's good enough for the discussion. It's not good enough for the comic. We see that.Cuthalion's art is the prettiest art of all the art. Like my avatar.
Number of times Roland St. Jude has sworn revenge upon me: 2
-
2023-02-06, 12:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2009
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
I think what Thor was objecting to was Durkon calling the world 'a big ol' soul farm' - where Thor called it an ecosystem, he found boiling it down to a 'soul farm' to be pejorative and unnecessary.
As for souls as food - I don't think Thor had any real objection to that, with the understooding that it was a metaphor rather then literal, i.e things break down and are reused even souls (on consideration without the gods souls would presumedly still break down in the planes).
-
2023-02-06, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Location
- France
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
He really doesn't, though "Plants absorb sunlight, animals eat plants, people eat animals" treats "absorb" and "eat" as comparable if not identical.
never said the gods ate souls, and objected to Durkons statement about humans "eating" goblins.
I don't think it's out of hand to not want to go with the eating analogy when Thor himself doesn't especially if you claim that if it's good enough for the comic it's good enough for the discussion. It's not good enough for the comic. We see that.[/QUOTE]
Not only is it good enough for the comic, it is good enough for the author:
Forum Wisdom
Mage avatar by smutmulch & linklele.
-
2023-02-06, 12:52 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Oregon, USA
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
I think of it more like RTGs; souls decay into the general substance of the plane of the afterlives, and that decay produces energy that be can tapped into...regardless of whether gods tap into it or not.
I feel like if the gods had the ability to alter the fundamental nature of souls and the afterlives, they'd have eliminated their own need to eat...or their ability to be mentally influenced by their followers across worlds. Instead, I think it's far more likely their own existences are bound by those laws of...unnature?
I thought Thor was responding to the "world's a soul farm" bit as unnecessarily pejorative (specifically the implication that Thor only cares about his followers for how much he can eat, I imagine), and opened the next sentence with "The point is" to move the topic of conversation to what he wanted to talk about (which, funnily enough, is a less pejorative variant of "You're missing the point" as an opener).FeytouchedBanana eldritch disciple avatar by...me!
The Index of the Giant's Comments VI―Making Dogma from Zapped Bananas
-
2023-02-06, 01:05 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Gender
Re: Question about souls, gods and Roy
"Eventually repurpose into an alignment battery," then, if "consume" is distasteful. My larger point is that souls don't stay as the discrete entities they were as mortals forever, and all the afterlives are designed to do that. The Good ones are only unique in that they give their souls total agency in the matter, rather than being forced into it via eternal torture, violence, monotony, confusion etc. And for me at least, that inherent volition makes all the difference.
EDIT: Thanks for the Giant quote, Fyraltari
...Yes? And what do you suppose would happen if every plant stayed a plant forever with none of them ever returning to the soil? Eventually, the soil they were planted in would fail.Last edited by Psyren; 2023-02-06 at 01:07 PM.
Plague Doctor by Crimmy
Ext. Sig (Handbooks/Creations)