New OOTS products from CafePress
New OOTS t-shirts, ornaments, mugs, bags, and more
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. - Top - End - #1
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Unfriend Zone

    Default Improved Familiar

    Does anyone know a good method for determining at what level various creatures would be appropriate for choices when selecting the Improved Familiar feat? I realize that most arcane characters have "better things to do" than spend a feat on their familiar, but sometimes story and flavor take precedence over optimization.

    In particular, any guesses about the skiurid from Monster Manual IV? Wouldn't they just be lovely for a necromancer or illusion (shadow)-based character (particularly one with the dark creature template from Tome of Magic)?

  2. - Top - End - #2
    Bugbear in the Playground
     
    JackMage666's Avatar

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Central Texas
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    I'd have to say about 7th, the same as a Pseudodragon. Their Darkness ability is what kicks them up so high, but by 7th level that should hardly be a problem to most enemies (and in fact a problem for the party who can no longer see them).

    The reason I compare to a Pseudodragon is because they have Poison, which is a comparable ability (although, they do have to hit...)

    Adding a template to a familiar, while not unheard of, is considerable more iffy. For the Dark template, the caster level would probably have to be more like 11th (in this case).

    These are just estimates and personal opinions, as I have no idea what the formula is.
    Last edited by JackMage666; 2007-12-22 at 03:15 PM.
    If there's a rule, there's someone out there trying to figure out how to get around it just to piss off his DM.

    Spoiler
    Show
    - The Jack-signal. Thanks Jokes!

    Avatar created by Yeril, who made it look awesome.

  3. - Top - End - #3
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Bag_of_Holding's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Acquiring a familiar with Dark template requires Shadow Familiar feat from ToM p138. You must have 3rd level of Shadowcaster, a class which compares unfavourably to a soulknife, to take the feat.

    As for Skiurid, while it only has CR 1/2, no ability to fly or communicate telepathically (as of pseudodragon), it can use Dimension Door 30ft. 3/day, also Chill Darkness ability which deals AoE 1d6 damage and an ability damage. These however, ain't as good as other 7th-level familiars' abilities, as it includes Courre Eladrin, Imp, Quasit and Wyrmling White Dragon. So I'd say 5th level for Skiurid provided that the DM agrees to it.

  4. - Top - End - #4
    Titan in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Fairfield, CA
    Gender
    Male

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Quote Originally Posted by Bag_of_Holding View Post
    ...Shadowcaster, a class which compares unfavourably to a soulknife...
    I'm forced to disagree here. Shadowcasters are perfectly acceptable casters, as long as you accept that they're below the power of all other 9th level casters.

  5. - Top - End - #5
    Titan in the Playground
     
    The_Snark's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2006

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    I'd agree with Fax, with the caveat that at extremely low levels, they're rather terrible. As you start reaching the middle levels and they have a comfortable number of abilities per day, they start getting better, although they're certainly not the equal of a standard caster.

    The skiurid looks less powerful than a pseudodragon, which can fly, communicate telepathically, scout with blindsense, and has a save-or-lose poison. 5th level, most likely.

    It'd probably be balanced to take another feat to add the Dark template; Improved Familiar can net you a celestial or fiendish familiar, after all.
    Avatar by GryffonDurime. Thanks!

  6. - Top - End - #6
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Bag_of_Holding's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Well, I only played Shadowcaster once (starting from 1st level to 4th), so please excuse my ignorance.

    I might as well find another chance to play a mid-level shadowcaster sometime... Hmm



    edit: added the magic word! Power Word Please!
    Last edited by Bag_of_Holding; 2007-12-22 at 08:23 PM.

  7. - Top - End - #7
    Ogre in the Playground
     
    Devil

    Join Date
    Dec 2006

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Yeah, I'd agree with Fax and say 5th, off the top of my head. I'm not to sure about adding templates to the familiar. As for shadow casters, I thought they looked neat, but didn't look like as much fun as a Binder, so I've never really bothered with them.

    Tangent: It brings to mind a certain character I'm toying with. A homebrew goblin variant (slightly modified version of a halfling.) Hexblade with Improved familiar (worg) as a mount. There are some kinks I'm dealing with (mounted combat) but overall, I think he'll be loads of fun.

  8. - Top - End - #8
    Troll in the Playground
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Unfriend Zone

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Quote Originally Posted by JackMage666 View Post
    Adding a template to a familiar, while not unheard of, is considerable more iffy. For the Dark template, the caster level would probably have to be more like 11th (in this case).
    I meant that the caster has the dark creature template. It'd be fairly redundant to add it to the skiurid. Note that a caster with the dark creature template would be immune to the damage from skiurid's Chill Darkness ability (because it doesn't affect undead or creatures native to the Plane of Shadow).
    Last edited by ghost_warlock; 2007-12-23 at 05:17 AM.

  9. - Top - End - #9
    Barbarian in the Playground
     
    Bag_of_Holding's Avatar

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia

    Default Re: Improved Familiar

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost_warlock View Post
    I meant that the caster has the dark creature template. It'd be fairly redundant to add it to the skiurid. Note that a caster with the dark creature template would be immune to the damage from skiurid's Chill Darkness ability (because it doesn't affect undead or creatures native to the Plane of Shadow).
    Well, even if it did (affect creatures native to the Plane of Shadow), in only deals 1d6 cold damage and Dark template gives cold resistance 10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •