Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
2007-12-27, 01:43 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Gender
Piercing Cold Vs. Protection Spells
So, my party just engaged with a elemental Savant (Cold) with the Piercing Cold feat. They had Protection from Energy (Cold) cast on them. But, as a DM, if this feat normally hurts people INMUNE to cold, i think it should hurt people PROTECTED form cold. Although its also possible that it only works for things naturally protected or inmune, not magically.
I dont really know what to do.
What do you think?
-
2007-12-27, 01:51 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- Sunnydale
Re: Piercing Cold Vs. Protection Spells
It's right in the feat description (Frostburn, page 49). Resist Energy (cold) has no effect against a [Cold] spell with this feat. There's no mention about Protection from Energy (cold), so it behaves normally ("still entitled to whatever other defenses the attack allows"). With the increased damage the feat affords, the protection isn't going to matter much.
Last edited by Curmudgeon; 2007-12-27 at 01:57 PM. Reason: Expanded explanation
-
2007-12-27, 03:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: Piercing Cold Vs. Protection Spells
I think you get half damage, as normal for 'creatures normally immune to cold.' The only source of immunity the feat bothers to call out as working any differently is the Cold subtype, which still isn't affected.