Results 1 to 30 of 52
Thread: Poll: Least frightening monster?
-
2008-03-15, 12:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Terra Ephemera
Poll: Least frightening monster?
Certain low-CR monsters, vermin, and animals seem to be a bit lacking in intimidation value to most players. Sure, they may be deadly when encountered in large groups, or if they have a bunch of class levels, but alone or just a small handful of them are... lacking. Furthermore, once no longer as fearsome, they tend to become less evil. (Goblins with slave pits? How could they keep slaves when they're only CR 1/3?)
I'd like to hear which MM1 entries you no longer consider to be particular threatening or, if evil, villainous. For that matter, I'd like to hear about any creatures which, due either to simple power or general personality, are seen more as mere irritants or even comic relief. I'm going to hope to reverse that some with my nextbatch of victimsgame.Last edited by Reltzik; 2008-03-15 at 12:10 PM.
I'm not an evil GM! Honest!
-
2008-03-15, 12:09 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Not low level, but certainly not fearsome: Purple worms. Seem REALLY intimidating, but at that level, a suboptimal party will hand it it's ass.
-
2008-03-15, 12:16 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Pretty much all Vermin after level 7 are useless. Goblins/Orcs/Kobolds/ect are pretty much expected to have class levels in my games. Why would only humans have that possibility? Anything with Int is fair game.
If you play an evil campaign and they decide to slaughter a town is everyone going to be a Commoner? Of course not, it's the same principle.
CR 1/3 Goblins are exactly as Common as level 1 Commoners. And Goblin Wizard 7s are just as common as NPC Wizard 7s.
-
2008-03-15, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
-
2008-03-15, 12:20 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The Tarrsque. No joke.
-
2008-03-15, 12:21 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Underpowered - Owlbears, and most SRD animals (with the notable exception of the Polar Bear).
Lacking in scariness - certainly not goblins, I've made a lvl7 party flee in terror from unadjusted goblins simply by using sufficient numbers and good flavourtext. "Bards" are hard to make scary though (unless they go for the Disciple of Metal PrC), and a lot of the smaller fey have the same problem. Even if they're dangerous, you can't take them seriously as lethal threats.Last edited by sonofzeal; 2008-03-15 at 12:21 PM.
-
2008-03-15, 01:23 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Housecats may be impressive warriors, but they hardly make you tremble in fear. so Housecats lack in the fear factor. They make up by kicking ass though.
-
2008-03-15, 02:27 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Atlanta, GA
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
No one has mentioned the Flumph yet? No love
-
2008-03-15, 02:33 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Oak Harbor, WA
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The Digester.
C'mon, how do you ruin an acid spitting dinosaur?!"It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg."
- Thomas Jefferson
Avatar by Meynolds!
-
2008-03-15, 02:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
I entirely forgot, Black Pudding. I mean, DAMN, that thing is friggin' edible...
-
2008-03-15, 02:42 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- KEEE nosh AAAh, Wisconsin
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Owlbears. I mean, we're supposed to be afraid of that?
-
2008-03-15, 03:31 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Beaten to posting the Digester.
That was actually a joke monster of mine in a campaign. Got the party freaked at the tale of a monster loose in the mountains that was dissolving lone sheep into hideous fusions of melted flesh and bone, then when they fight the thing, it turned out to be a gizzard with legs that ejaculated digestive fluid on them.Last edited by Dode; 2008-03-15 at 03:32 PM.
-
2008-03-15, 03:37 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Brazil
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Member of the Hinjo fan club. Go Hinjo!
"In Soviet Russia, the Darkness attacks you."
"Rogues not only have a lot more skill points, but sneak attack is so good it hurts..."
-
2008-03-15, 03:38 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- London, England.
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The Ravid. It's a one-armed flying snake that hits you with its tail and . . . administers a surge of positive energy that gives you a tingling feeling. Not exactly terrifying.
- SaphI'm the author of the Alex Verus series of urban fantasy novels. Fated is the first, and the final book in the series, Risen, is out as of December 2021. For updates, check my blog!
-
2008-03-15, 03:46 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Terra Ephemera
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Thanks for the help, and those are all really interesting (the Tarrasque? Really?), but I was thinking more in terms of things which even level 1 characters wouldn't fear. Any suggestions on that front?
I'm not an evil GM! Honest!
-
2008-03-15, 03:54 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
My Halfling wizard would disagree. He still has the acid burns all over his body despite the fact that he was 4th level back then and he's halfway through 7th level now.
The fact that it was represented by a Fire elemental miniature seems oddly appropriate in hindsight...Thank you, Devil's Advocate for sending me this link so I can finally erase my old signature!
https://forums.giantitp.com/profile....=editsignature
-
2008-03-15, 05:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Dat Shoggoth
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
It's not monster manual one, but I was pretty scared when I saw the Senmurv:
Spoiler
Screams furry gay pride to me.Last edited by Illiterate Scribe; 2008-03-15 at 05:58 PM.
-
2008-03-15, 06:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2007
- Location
- Metro Manila, Philippines
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Gah, the Senmurv! D:
In my case, if we include older editions, it's the Duckbunny.
Eberron Red Hand of Doom Campaign Journal. NOW COMPLETE!
Sakuya Izayoi avatar by Mr. Saturn. Caella sig by Neoseph.
"I dunno, you just gave me the image of a nerd flying slow motion over a coffee table towards another nerd, dual wielding massive books. It was awesome." -- Marriclay
-
2008-03-15, 06:14 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Stillwater
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
A Shrieker (see "Fungus"). It can't actually do anything in a fight. I think maybe it can grapple if someone steps on it, but that's about it.
Other than that would probably be silly-dressed regular races (humans, goblins, halflings, etc).
-
2008-03-15, 06:24 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Indianapolis
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The tarrasque is infamous for suffering this problem, actually.. thing is, it's a CR 20 creature that doesn't fly and has no ranged attack. It goes kinda like..
"The ground shakes underneath your feet as a 50-foot monstrosity approaches. It's the legendary tarrasque, and he looks hungry!"
"We fly up 100 feet and throw rocks at it until we get bored."
-
2008-03-15, 06:25 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Freeland, WA
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Homebrew:The Reaper-The Wild MageAvatar by Zarah
-
2008-03-15, 07:29 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Finland
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
You know, Spoon counts as a piercing weapon, so once you start eating a living Black Pudding, it'll automatically split itself to smaller Puddings. In other words, you have a replicating dinner. You just have to stick your spoon to it often enough to make it split into 10 hp pieces and those you can eat. They should be about the right size too.
And no, I don't think a melee foe with movement speed 20, negative armor class and the ability to self destruct when touched by a spoon is going to frighten even level 1 mooks. Hell, I wonder how those things even survive in caves; you'd think anything they try to grab would sink its nails or teeth into the thing making it split and thusly making the consumption incredibly ineffective. A rat could bite one into death.
Oh yeah, and they're as dumb as bricks. Literally. In other words, you won't even need to fear it trying to just move over you to grapple you, it first needs to hit you with its 'mi tentacles touch you'-attacks before it can try a Grapple-check.
If a Level 1-party can't kill a CR 12 Elder Black Pudding outside extremely constrainted space (as in, "you just ran through one of those doors that always closes immediately once the protagonists pass and stuck your head into a Pudding on your way through"-constrained - btw, sticking your head to a pudding deals bludgeoning damage so it doesn't split :( You need a punk hairdo to headbutt them to death), it's pretty sad.Last edited by Eldariel; 2008-03-15 at 07:38 PM.
-
2008-03-15, 07:45 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2006
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
A couple of tricks for working with Big T:
1) Limited Movement Environment. If you can't get up past the thing's vertical reach, the safe tactic isn't available.
2) Big T is hungry. If there's something he can't do anything about, he goes and eats something. Big T encountered outside is encountered near a soft target he can eat - a town of 5,000 people, maybe.
3) Int-3 means minimally intelligent. He knows how to throw things, even if they are only boulders he ripped out of the ground with his bare claws.
As for the original topic, try the Bat. No attacks at all.Last edited by Jack_Simth; 2008-03-15 at 07:45 PM.
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
-
2008-03-15, 07:49 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
Don't toads also lack an attack?
-
2008-03-15, 08:04 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
-
2008-03-15, 08:10 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
-
2008-03-15, 08:18 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The Black Pudding can be scary, if only for the fact it dissolves weapons and armour. Our party faced one in a tight spot, and none of us had particularly powerful ranged weapons.
If RAW the black pudding splits into two large oozes. You can split it down to 10hp chunks, but by this time anyone without enough AC is a skeleton. Your warrior can slash and cleave, but has to make reflex saves or loses his weapon.I admit full culpability for Phyrnglsnyx
-
2008-03-15, 09:39 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The rust monster. One attack besides rusting-not really dangerous, but potentially hilarious once in a while.
A really nasty trick would be to have annihilators (from FR Underdark) that looked like rust monsters instead.
-
2008-03-15, 10:00 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Gender
-
2008-03-15, 10:07 PM (ISO 8601)
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Gender
Re: Poll: Least frightening monster?
The phantom fungus. First of all, it looks like a pile of tentacled crap on legs, and it's called the phantom fungus. Serious. A phantom fungus? That's a name that induces giggles, not fear. I bet that people being killed by it are too busy laughing at it's name when they should be screaming from the pain. Come on, of all the things that could go into the "phantom" category, a fungus is the last thing I would have thought of. I mean, who the hell wants to fight an invisible mushroom
Avatar by Serpentine.
"Love takes up where knowledge leaves off."
- St. Thomas Aquinas